I want to remove VPN configuration from the router and put VPN Configuration on Cisco ASA 5505.The scheme would be: ASA5505(vpn site-to-site) -> 887 -> INTERNET this for both sites.My problem is that I do not know what ip put on interface Outside of firewall. For example on Site A delete all VPN configuration from 887 and leave only ATM0.1 point-to-point, on intereface Outside of ASA put ip of loopback(of router 887) and as default route 85.34.2.XXX. Right?
I need to replace an ASA with an IOS firewall router, and am not sure how to migrate the NAT configuration. Specifically, there is an interface "3rdparty" that has onward connectivity to other private addresses, so our internal addressing is hidden. For some reason there are static NAT rules in different directions across the interface, but at present I cannot see why. Thinking in router terms, all that springs to mind is the inside and outside tags for the interfaces, but also that it might need "overlapping" NAT to be configured.
We try to migrate two ASA stateful Active / Passive from version 8.0 to 8.4 but many of acl rules and Nat no longer working. We must go through the version 8.2? The release 8.4 changes everything and seems to me not too stable, it'sl best to stay in 8.2 or 8.3 !!!
On PIX515T(804) in packet-tracert option no Phase 1 - Route-lookup and both static nat works fine. May I disable on ASA phase route-lookup, that it not send packet on wrong interfaces ?
I need to upgrade the compact flash of my ASA 5510 from 256MB to 512MB. A friend's recommendation was to buy a card reader, copy all of the data from the existing card and paste it to the new compact flash. I have a hard time believing that it's that straight forward.
Any safer, more foolproof way of migrating between flash cards?
I am working on a project to migrate a single Checkpoint firewall over to a single ASA 5510, no VPN, just firewall. The checkpoint firewall has 8 physical interface so the ASA 5510 also support physical 8 interfaces so thiw will be a one-to-one swap. At the moment, I don't have an ASA 5510 to test my theory so I am going to throw it out here. The checkpoint firewall is a SPLAT running on an powerfull IBM Server with 8 CPU dual cores with 32GB of RAM and it has 1200 rules with over 120,000 objects with some of the crazy NATs but it works so we will just leave it at that. There are not that much traffics going across the firewall so there are no need to put in an ASA 5585
I use the cisco conversion tool to do the policy conversion from Checkpoint to Cisco, I get about 1.5 million lines in the configuration. A lot of it has to do with Checkpoint having no concept of interface security level while ASA does. I am sure I can optimize it to cut down the number of lines in the configuration; however, that is not my main concern at the moment. The customer goal is that at the time when cutover from Checkpoint to Cisco ASA, they want everything to be perfect, meaning that it will work like magic.
My question is that can the ASA 5510 handle 1.5 million lines of configuration? Are there any limitations on this? I know there are limitations with FWSM but since I don't have an 5510 to test.
I have a Failover pair of ASA5550's running ASDM 6.2(5) and ASA 8.2(2). Originally they were setup with 2 context's and an admin context but one of the contexts has now been removed. I would like to now migrate to single mode before I go about patching them to the latest software.
I am trying to migrate checkpoint configs to ASA 5585 using SCT tool, this tool asking me to feed it *.W file from checkpoint which is suppose to be a rule definition file on CP, but I cant find it
I have a Fail over pair of ASA5550's running ASDM 6.2(5) and ASA 8.2(2). Originally they were setup with 2 context's and an admin context but one of the contexts has now been removed. I would like to now migrate to single mode before I go about patching them to the latest software.
I have a pair of ASA 5520s in active/standby failover mode, single context. I'll be migrating to multiple context mode later this week. Do I need to break failover first? Or if I don't need to, should I? Or can I do this while maintaining failover? Can either of these scenarios will work (or fail). I'll be remote, doing my work via SSH, but have somebody local who can console in if needed.
Migration option #1 Log into active/primary ASA Configure Multiple Context mode Reboot both devices Login to active/primary ASA
We have backup data center where I am now planning to provide backup internet service ( in the case where there is internet down or power outage at main server room) . I have a pair of Cisco ASA's 5540, one of which I need to move to backup data center ( BDC), Presently I have ADSL router at disaster serve room with static public IP from ISP.
Currently, I am publishing all my internal resources through ASA. Now my questions, if I move Standby ASA to Disaster Server Room. How I can publish the same internal resources through standby ASA and make it standby as active during the down time of main server room
I would like to use an ASA5505 as a simple LAN-to-LAN ethernet router. My plan is to configure two interfaces with the same security level and then use the command that allows interfaces with the same security level to communicate with each other. I can get this to work without having to setup and ACLs or NAT stuff.
I am a beginner to ASA. I am trying to connect the ASA 5505 behind the netgear ADSL router which is getting dynamic IP address from the ISP. How to configure the ASA5505 outside interface for SSL VPN connectivity?
Doing a migration. During comparison of "show bgp nei x.x.x.x advertised-routes" between existing C7600 vs new ASR9K. Found that there were some r>i (RIB-Failure) route in C7600 doesn't flagged w/ r>i in ASR9K. Is it normal behaviour in ASR9K? How can I perserve r>i on ASR9K? Due to my IGP (e.g. AD etc) issue or ASR9K IOS-XR hidden config / default config issue?
I have a normal setup of ASA5505 (without security license) connected behind an internet router. From the ASA5505 console I can ping the Internet. However, users behind the Firewall on the internal LAN, cannot ping the Internet even though NATing is configured. The users can ping the Inside interface of the Firewall so there is no internal reachability problem. In addition, I noticed that the NAT inside access list is not having any hit counts at all when users are trying to reach the internet.
When i replace the ASA5505 with a router with NAT overload configuration on it, the setup works normally and users are able to browse the internet.
The ASA5505 configuration is shown below.
hostname Firewall
interface Ethernet0/0 description Connected To Internet Router switchport access vlan 10
i have asa 5505 with the asdm v5.2 (4), and the asa v7.2(4). This platform has a base license. if i upgrade adsm and asa on v6.2(1) and v8.2(2) if I lose my license and that you need to activate them? i configured site to site vpn (this firewall and the another) that i lose my configuration if i upgrade my firewall.
I've recently upgraded my old firewall from a PIX to an ASA5505 and have been trying to match up the configuration settings to no avail. I have is that I can't ping the new firewall on it's inside interface, despite having "icmp permit any inside" in the running config. Secondly, the server I have on there ("Sar") can't connect out to the internet.I've included the ASA's running config incase anybody can see if something stands out. I have a feeling it's either not letting anything onto the inside interface, or there is no nat going on. Lastly (and possibly relevant), the firewall is actually going at the end of a vlan, which is different to the firewall's inside vlan number. I don't know if this is actually the problem because the server can't connect out even if connected directly into the firewall.
Internet ISP -> Juniper SRX 210 Ge-0/0/0 Juniper fe0/0/2 -> Cisco ASA 5505 Cisco ASA 5505 - >Inernal LAN switch.
1. Internet is connected to Juniper Ge0/0/0 via /30 IP.
2. Juniper fe0/0/2 port is configured as inet port and configured the Internal public LAN pool provided by the ISP. And this port is directly connected to Cisco ASA 5505 E0/0. Its a /28 pool IP address. This interface is configured as outside and security level set to 0.
From Juniper SRX, am able to ping public Internet IPs (8.8.8.8).
Issue:
1. From ASA am unable to ping public ip configured on Juniper G0/0/0 port.(/30) 2. From ASA no other Public internet IP is pinging.
Troubleshooting Done so far.
1, Configured icmp inspection on ASA. 2. Used the packet tracer in ASA, it shows the packet is flowing outside without a drop. 3. Allowed all services in untrust zone in bound traffic in Juniper SRX. 4. Viewed the logs when I was trying the ping 8.8.8.8 in ASA. It says "Tear down ICMP connection for faddrr **** gaddr **
The original goal was to block "Mumble/Murmur" (a voip app) traffic, which runs on TCP/UDP 64738, both inbound and outbound, except to a certain host (63.223.117.170).
However, when nothing I tried seemed to make a difference, just to troubleshoot, I decided to try blocking all inbound traffic. I first disconnected ethernet port 0/0 to ensure that it was cabled correctly and the outside interface went down when I did. That worked as expected, so I confirmed I had the right interface and it was cabled correctly.
I then applied a "any any deny ip" rule as the first element in the outside interface access_list, as you can see below. However, it appears to have had no real effect and the hit count is very low (it should be astronomical).
show ver Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance Software Version 9.0(2) Device Manager Version 7.1(2) Compiled on Thu 21-Feb-13 13:10 by builders System image file is "disk0:/asa902-k8.bin"
Any "best practices" or recommendations on how to migrate from a fixed router (3745) to vlan routing on Catalyst 4507 switches in order to minimize the disruption to the network.
Is it possible to use IP "aliases" on an ASA5505 to use as static NAT public IPs to private IPs? For example, I have int e0/0 connected to my ISP using a /30 subnet and I have my private LAN connected to e0/1 with a /24 subnet. At the moment I can use the one usable IP from the /30 to NAT to the private LAN. The ISP is also routing a /28 subnet to the one public IP of the ASA. I would like to use some of the /28 IPs for NAT also. Can it be as easy as just adding the NAT commands? I figure I would have to add that subnet to the ASA somehow, no? In other devices (including the SA520) they use a concept called IP aliases whereby you define what additional IPs the device can use in its NAT config. Does the ASA support aliases? Maybe I have to do something with VLANs?
I have 1 network that I'm trying to make secure, and it needs to access 2 seperate networks. I tried using an ASA5505 that I had on the shelf to accomplish this but discovered that I had the basic license and that was prohibiting me from getting my connection to my 3rd network. I scrapped that idea and grabbed an old pix 501 off the shelf to bring my connectivity to my 3rd network online since the 3rd network is only passing ip traffic to a small group of servers on the outside I figure the 501 should be just fine.
So, here's the problem I am running into:My internal network is 10.10.16.0/16, I have a new domain controller with DHCP on it handing out addresses in the 10.10.16.0/24 range.External Network 1 is 192.168.16.0/24. The services I need from that network are primarily in 192.168.0.0 range, however there is a comcast router 75.123.123.123 (Changed of course) that provides high speed internet I need for my www traffic.External Network 2 is 10.1.1.0/16 I have about 4 servers I need to access on this network and that's it. This network has it's own domain and DHCP controller and I've been given a range of ip's to use on this network of 10.1.3.180-10.1.3.189 My switch is just a plane jane 3com switch with minimal management so I am attempting to use my ASA5505 to handle my layer 3 routing.
So here's my issue:ASA5505 (IN:10.10.16.1, OUT: 192.168.16.6): Passes traffic to External Network 1 and to the comcast router, no problem. All my computers on my 10.10.16.0/16 network have access to everything on 192.168.0.0/24 as well as getting full name resolution and www traffic across the comcast router. Can NOT access 10.1.1.0/16 no matter what. From inside the ASA or from on the inside LAN ports. It CAN ping the PIX 501 PIX 501 (IN:10.10.16.3, OUT: 10.1.3.180) Can ping EVERYTHING. Can ping 192.168.0.0/24, can ping 10.10.16.0/16 and can ping 10.1.1.0/16. Set to globally assign the other IP's in my range as addresses for outgoing traffic.Workstations (IN: 10.10.16.XXX DHCP, using 10.10.16.1 as gateway) Can only access everything on External Network 1. ZERO access to External Network 2. ATM I have both INSIDE and OUTSIDE ACL's wide open for both firewalls just to get connectivity going. I will be tightening it up after it is operational.Attached find a log file (Sensetive data removed of course) that contains the sh run and sh ver for both the ASA5505 and the PIX 501.
I just got an ASA 5505 with Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance Software Version 8.0(4) alredy loaded on it. Should I update/upgrade it to the newest IOS release, or is the 8.0(4) good and stable?
I've been trying to get my WRVS4400N connected to my ASA5505 on the internet through a Cox connection, but it isn't working. I cannot get the ASA to be the DHCP server for the wireless router. I've configured the wireless router as a gateway and pointed the DHCP server to the ASA but no addresses are being passed through to the wireless router. I've included a copy of my config.
We are trying to utilize a 5 ip block of addresses provided by our ISP. What we have assigned from them is like this: 10.10.10.46 - 10.10.10.50 is our ip range. 10.10.10.45 is the gateway. Subnet is 255.255.255.248. If we assign 10.10.10.46 to the outside interface how do we accept inbound traffic from the other addresses?
I have Vlan 100 (inside) and Vlan 65 (Outside)I'm trying to configure RDP and ping traffic from Vlan 100 to Vlan 65 One way.If I connect 2 PCs on E0/0 and E0/1 they can happily ping the their own VLAN ip add 192.168.100.3 and 172.16.65.1I've copied my config,
I have a asa 5505 Sec plus with 3vlan, inside, outside and dmz.
On the outside i have 5 ip's for my use, and in the dmz i have a webserver that need to communicate with one sql server on the inside.
The "sql" also needs to be accessible from outside and thus has a static nat with a dynamic nat so it replies from same ip as on nat ie 72.72.72.5 webserver is natted with 72.72.72.6
sql inside ip is 192.168.1.2, gw 192.168.1.1 webserver ip is 192.168.2.100 gw 192.168.2.1 sec lvl on inside is 100 and on dmz 50
with a dynamic policy running inside-net/24 to dmz-network/24 translagt to dmz 192.168.2.2 i can get it to ping 1 way from inside to dmz, but not the other way around...
All i need is to open 1 port ie 6677 both ways for this communication to work.
I'm not very familiar with the CLI and do most stuf in GUI (know i should learn CLI, but time doesnt let me)...
on access rules i have just added everything from any to any using , ip, icmp, tcp and udp just to be sure... :-)
I want to make it so if a user tries to use a different DNS server the request will be redirected to the one they should be using.I thought this might work but the ASA doesn't do PB routing
ip access-list extended transparent_dns permit udp any any eq 53 route-map redirect_dns permit 10 match ip address transparent_dns set ip next-hop ip.of.your.server route-map redirect_dns permit 20
[code]....
The DNS server is windows 2003?Would policy based NAT or WCCP work for this? If so how would I go about it?
for the purpose of a redundency, incase the primary ISP goes down the backup kicks in.Can this be done with the basic license (max 3 vlans) or you need to have the security plus license. (20 vlans) Currently not using the 3rd vlan (dmz)
setting up ASA to allow passive FTP connection! I can get the FTP client to connect but it does not pull the directories. I have opened 21 and range of 55536-55566. I had some trouble gettting the range opened and saved. Normally with other small business routers (GUI) I make sure those ports are forwarded and ftp works.
Is the ftp inspection killing connection or is it my config?
