I am trying to define a ubr+ service class on PVC for an ATM -SPA (4xOC3 ATM SPA ) but I cannot, I can only implement ubr. According to this link I read that ubr+ is only supported on SVCs. URL
The IOS of my 7600 device is 12.2 (33)SRE2. What I would like to know is there is any other IOS that supports ubr+ under PVCs.
what is the use SPA and SIP...in router hardware ? What if we do not have them ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a 7606 running c7600rsp72043-advipservicesk9-mz.122-33.SRD2.bin with SIP-400 card that has suddenly stopped working, on checking the logs i see the following:
%ONLINE-SP-6-TIMER: Module 3, Proc. 0. Failed to bring online because of timer event
%C7600_PWR-SP-4-DISABLED: power to module in slot 3 set off (Module Failed SCP dnld)
I have tried reseating and even moving it to a different slot but no luck.
%ONLINE-SP-6-TIMER: Module 4, Proc. 0. Failed to bring online because of timer event
%C7600_PWR-SP-4-DISABLED: power to module in slot 4 set off (Module Failed SCP dnld)
sh module
Mod Ports Card Type Model Serial No.
--- ----- -------------------------------------- ------------------ -----------
1 20 ESM20G 7600-ES20-GE3C JAE1237UT90
2 4 7600 ES+ 7600-ES+4TG3CXL JAE13157HIW
3 0 4-subslot SPA Interface Processor-400 7600-SIP-400 JAE13219CZH
5 2 Route Switch Processor 720 (Active) RSP720-3C-GE JAE1151819I
6 2 Route Switch Processor 720 (Hot) RSP720-3C-GE JAE11495POH
[code].....
We are looking for buying a 20GE port 7600 ES+ Card. However, there are a few different models, we are not sure which one is the right one. We will be using this card for Metro Ethernet Termination, MPLS VPN, EoMPLS, QoS (Marking, CBWFQ), PPPoE, possibly VPLS.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have a port on 7600 connecting via Single Mode Fibre to my service provider. Service provider has 1000-Full with auto-negotiate. I am seeing following output on my 7600. [code] if this interface is only capable of doing 1000Mb, how come it is showing 100-Full. If I change to nonegotiate option (both my side and provider side), link goes down. My provider has confirmed they have 1000Full their side.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have done new configuration for CPI 1.2. while i tried to start service i got belw error. [code]
View 3 Replies View RelatedCan we use all four E1 (i.e. 8Mbps) connections for IMA on IMA-4E1 card in a CS2811 router. What is the maximum speed supported for IMA service provided?
View 3 Replies View Relatedi have an Outdoor Area covered by Cisco Wireless LAN Solution (WCS,WLC,1550AP root and Mesh lightweight). I need to disable power transmission for some of these APs in the 2..4GHz.I tried two possible way, but both are not working:
1) Set the power of 802.11g/g/n to 0. There is no such option (power can be set manually from 1 to 5 and, as per the documentation, each level is a reduction of 3dB. Therefore, even if i put to the minimum, i cannot guarantee that there is no utilization of the 2.4GHz spectrum).
2) Define an AP group containing these APs and don't add any SSID. Is not possible because at least one SSID must be added on each AP group.
Working solution/setting in AP/WLC/WCS to avoid transmission in 2.4GHZ? Otherwise the only solution is to power them off?
I have a ASA 5500 series firewall and need to define another peer ip for site2sitevpn connection.Actually my aim is, ASA tries first peer ip of site2site tunnel, when ASA can not not reach this ip, try to reach another ip which i defined before.I can configure this scenario on Cisco Router with this commands:
crypto map to hub 1 ip sec-isakmp
We have two Cisco ASA 5510 Firewalls at one site, and two non-Cisco firewalls at another. Both firewall pairs are configured for high availability (Active-Passive), and both have redundant links to the Internet via routers running HSRP. In the event that one of the Internet routers were to fail, we require the VPN to dynamically move from using the old path via the failed router to using the new router with minimal downtime.
I have been looking at using VPN load balancing to achieve this but the only configuration example I can find is for Cisco VPN Client url... Is it possible to define a static crypto map with the VIP of the load balanced group as the peer IP? So in the non-Cisco devices I will define the VIP of the load balanced group?
ASA 5520 running 8.0.4
ASDM v.6.1
Need assistance understanding how in ASDM/Configuration/Site-to-Site VPN/Connection Profiles/ "Any Entry" I can specify that I only want to offer an IKE Proposal of pre-share-aes-256-sha?
The IKE Proposal field has a number of possible options including: pre-share-aes-256-md5, pre-share-3des-md5, pre-share-aes-256-sha, pre-share-aes-192-sha, pre-share-3des-md5, pre-share-aes-sha and pre-share-3des-sha.
I am able to pick a specific IPSec Proposal w/o issue but when I attempt to do the same for the IKE Proposal, and click OK the choice does not "stick" but rather returns to the entire list as defined above.
When I create a service object or group and add the object to a new rule it never works.I mean the traffic match not the rule. I see not hits.I placed the rule on top of my access list to check if I do somethink wrong but it is not working. When I place only a service for example tcp/23 it is working.
my ip service object
object-group service g-as400 description access client 2 as400 machine service-object tcp-udp destination eq 397 service-object tcp destination eq 137 service-object tcp destination eq 2001 service-object tcp destination eq 3000 service-object tcp destination eq 445 service-object tcp destination range 446 447 service-object tcp destination eq 449 service-object tcp destination eq 5010 service-object tcp destination eq 5544 service-object tcp destination eq 5555 service-object tcp destination range 8470 8476 service-object tcp destination eq 8480 service-object tcp destination eq
[code]...
We have a situation where services are stopped on the real servers. The probes fail and we confirm the services are not running on the server. We cannot access the ports from the ACE directly. We can still however acces the VIP on the TCP port (L4 VIP class-map). So we can still telnet to the VIP on the port from thr Client side of the network.This is on ACE 20 Modules deployed in Routed mode. The version of software is A2(3.3).
Tried removing multi-match and loadbalance policies as well as class-map and re-applying then re-appyling the service policy to interface. Same behavior,This is a problem at another level as some services are being monitored by GSS via TCP keep-Alive and this obviuosly causes a problem as the service then never goes off-line.
I have a fresh installation of LMS 4.0 on windows server 2003, when i click to open topology i get error message : ANIServer service may be down or Host name isn't DNS resolvable
i tried pdshow -brief ANIServer ===> service UP
DNS is working using host file in driversetc i restarted the server
restared the crmdmgtd
unistall / install java plugin
pdterm ANIServer
pdexec ANIServer
NO change ..
i have a query ,we are planning to upgrade the Sup Engine from WS-SUP720-3B 2 ports Supervisor Engine 720 to
RSP720-3CXL-GE=
Cisco 7600 Route Switch Processor 720Gbps fabric,PFC3CXL, GE
Can we use the same old IOS from Sup720 to the New RSP720 without purchasing it ?
Show Version-- Cisco Router 7609
Cisco IOS Software, c7600s72033_rp Software (c7600s72033_rp-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.2(33)SRB3, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.2(17r)S4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
System returned to ROM by power cycle at 08:36:39 PDT Fri Mar 30 2007 (SP by power on)
System restarted at 10:04:20 GMT Fri Nov 25 2011
System image file is "bootdisk:c7600s72033-advipservicesk9-mz.122-33.SRB3.bin"
Last reload type: Normal Reload
[code]....
what is use of haiving SPA and SIP in router hardware ? what if we dont have them in router ?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI need to know if upgrading Cisco IOS on 7600 series router is possible. From 12.2(18)SXF --> 12.2(33)SRC, i need this because SRC supports Lawfull Intercept.
specification of router is 7606
slot 1 - WS-X6708-10GE
slot 1/0 - WS-F6700-DFC3C
slot 4 - WS-X6408A-GBIC
slot 6 - WS-SUP720-3B
slot 6/0 - WS-F6K-PFC3B
slot 6/1 - WS-SUP720
The 7600 platform support x.25 and XOT features. In ios versión S764AEK9-15103SCisco 7600-RSP720 IOS ADVANCED ENTERPRISE SERVICES SSH The feature navigator display that support this features, but i'dont see these on the other newer ios version. If posible use 7600 for x.25 / xot or maybe will used de 3900 platform?
View 1 Replies View RelatedIf I have SIP-200 and I need to configure a feature , for eg - PPP on SIP-200 , is it something possible ? If Yes how I can do that in IOS ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedToday i want to ask is cisco 7600 support ip next-hop recusrive x.x.x.x (PBR feature).
View 1 Replies View RelatedWhy below simple PBR is not implemented in H/W knowing the Copp is not configured
NPE-1#sh ver | i image
System image file is "bootdisk:c7600rsp72043-advipservices-mz.122-33.SRE0a"
NPE-1#sh run int GigabitEthernet1/1
interface GigabitEthernet1/1
ip address 11.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
ip pim sparse-mode
[code]...
I am trying to establish a BGP session between a Cisco 7600 and Juniper MX960, but this always stucks in OpenConfirm state.
access-4#show ip bgp v v VRF1 neighbors 166.63.168.197BGP neighbor is 166.63.168.197, vrf VRF1, remote AS 5555, local AS 65533, external link BGP version 4, remote router ID 195.2.1.21 BGP state = OpenConfirm Last read 00:02:27, last write 00:02:27, hold time is 180, keepalive interval is 60 seconds Message statistics: InQ depth is 0 OutQ depth is 0 Sent Rcvd Opens: 4 4 Notifications: 2 1 Updates: 0 0 Keepalives: 4
May 12 13:58:07.531 bst: TCP src=54912, dst=179, seq=1766275951, ack=1681278050, win=17520 ACK PSHMay 12 13:58:07.535 bst: IP: tableid=2, s=166.63.168.198 (local), d=166.63.168.197 (Vlan20), routed via FIBMay 12 13:58:53.883 bst: IP: tableid=2, s=166.63.168.198 (local), d=166.63.168.197 (Vlan20), routed via FIBMay 12 13:58:59.359 bst: IP: s=166.63.168.197 (Vlan20), d=166.63.168.198, len 61, rcvd 2May 12 13:58:59.359 bst: TCP src=54912, dst=179, seq=1766276010, ack=1681278050, win=17520 ACK PSH FINMay 12 13:58:59.359 bst: IP: tableid=2, s=166.63.168.198 (local), d=166.63.168.197 (Vlan20), routed via FIBMay 12 13:58:59.359 bst: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: received from neighbor 166.63.168.197 4/0 (hold time expired) 0 bytes
ICMP works fine. It is same on JUniper end. Sending keepalives but cannot receive
###interface configinterface Vlan20 ip vrf forwarding VRF1 ip address 166.63.168.198 255.255.255.252 no ip redirects no ip proxy-arp load-interval 30end
###bgp config
neighbor 166.63.168.197 remote-as 5555 neighbor 166.63.168.197 local-as 65533 neighbor 166.63.168.197 ebgp-multihop 5 neighbor 166.63.168.197 update-source Vlan20 neighbor 166.63.168.197 activate neighbor 166.63.168.197 soft-reconfiguration inbound
I am pretty far out of my comfort zone here but these VS-S720-10G-3C cards were purchased to upgrade our 7609/7606 routers, the spec sheet says they are compatable but I can't find an IOS that "likes" them. I had no problem finding an IOS and using the vss cards in our 6506...
[URL]
I have a strange QoS problem with one Cisco7600 (sup7203BXL, IOS 12.2(33)SRE6).
This is layer 2 traffic,and all ports are L2 dot1q trunks:
1) Packet comes with DSCP 46 on Gigabit port (WS6728-SFP) with "mls qos trust dscp" configured. It goes out the port of the same card/slot with DSCP 0.
2) packet comes with DSCP 46 on different Gigabit port on the same card/slot with "mls qos trust dscp" and also "mls qos vlan-based" configured. It qoes out out the port with DSCP 46.
Why the switch behave differently if "mls qos vlan-based" is configured on port (or to say it works correct since it doesn't override DSCP)?
I have global command "mls qos rewrite ip dscp" since this 7600 is also MPLS PE router and I found in documentation that "mls qos rewite ip dscp" is mandatory for QoS on MPLS (EXP bits). So I can't turn off "rewrite ip dscp". Again the problem that I presents is L2 problem not MPLS (MPLS is used for different traffic).
Also mls qos mappings are ok COS to DSCp are 5 to 46 and vice versa.
Furthermore, as far as I know if I have configured "mls qos trust dscp" on Gigabit ethernet port, switch (7600) should work in this order:
- make internal DSCP from packet DSCP
- since I don't have configured DSCP mutation DSCP should stay the same (46)
- using map DSCP - COS ( 46 -5 ) switch will choose queue on outgoing interface in regards to mapped COS
I'm looking for iformation if CFM Local Maintenance End Point configured on Cisco 7606 router is able to respond to the Y.1731 Performance Monitoring (DMM/DMR ).I know I can use IP SLA to configure Y.1731 PM measurements, but I just need a reflector that will answer for incoming DMM messages with DMRs.
View 0 Replies View RelatedYou can configure EoMPLS on a port of the WS-X6724SFP card found in a Cisco 7600 with Supervisor 720.
View 1 Replies View Relatedif the 7600-SIP-200 supported in VSS mode or not ?
I have configured to Cisco Catalyst 6513 as VSS, both of them have the 7600-SIP-200 module, before converting them to VSS I was able to work with the 7600-SIP-200 module, but after I did convert them to VSS, both modules didn't work.
here is the show module output, after VSS conversion:
VSS1#show module Mod Ports Card Type Model Serial No.--- ----- -------------------------------------- ------------------ ----------- 1 0 4-subslot SPA Interface Processor-200 7600-SIP-200 JAE14500GMT 7 5 Supervisor Engine 720 10GE
[Code].....
Need to clarify this log message:
*Oct 23 06:20:07 UTC: %FPD_MGMT-3-INCOMP_IMG_VER: Incompatible ROMMON (FPD ID=5) image version detected for 7600-SIP-200 card in slot Detected version = 1.3, minimum required version = 1.4. Current HW version = 2.303.
I would like more information of performance to 7600 router with the SP-720, how many sessions full bgp routing it supports? I have 4 links 1 GB and a throughput of 900 MB.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have cisco 7600 core router in ISP , i want to put the bandwidth limit on it for outgoing traffic (for internet) on a subnet because i am using Bluecoat and i want to test my bluecoat.On this subnet i have no limit for bluecoat but after the bluecoat i want to limit it. On 7600 cisco router i have not rate limit command so how it can be possible for a perticular subnet ?
View 1 Replies View Relatedim having lms 4.2.2 and monitoring a cisco 7600 router interface ten gigabit ethernet x/x under dfm. When ever the interface is down due to any media issue i am not getting any alerts in dfm., the interface used to go down for more than 10 minutes. I am able to do an snmpwalk to this interface when the interface was down and getting the value as 2(for down). I am getting other information and configuration mode alerts in dfm for this device.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI posted also under Service Providers for my problem with MPLS/VPN. I just noticed I have the same issue with plain IPV4 BGP. [URL] I have two 7600 running on SRC3 and SRD6. Both acting as RRs.
I noticed that RR1 is reflecting the route to this other 7600 iBGP peer but not installing/importing the route. Other iBGP speakers are able to install and import the route. Is there any issue with 7600 SRC/SRD IOS for Route-reflection?
iBGP policy is similar to all but only the 7600 is unable to install the route. Other 7200 ibgp peers are successful.
Router with 2 RSP RSP720-3C-GE & Image: c7600rsp72043-advipservicesk9-mz.122-33.SRE2.bin We are getting the message as
------------------ show version ------------------
Cisco IOS Software, c7600rsp72043_rp Software (c7600rsp72043_rp-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.2(33)SRE2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
Technical Support: [URL]
[Code]....
Show log is attached & we are getting %DHCPD-4-DECLINE_CONFLICT: messages constantly.