Cisco Routers :: Connecting 2 RV042 To Different Subnet And DSL Connections?
Apr 29, 2013
Small office, 2 RV042, 2 DSL connections. 1 is used striclty for the business side, and the other is for our CCTV network. They also have seperate DSL connections as we have 2 external IP address for clients to connect remotely. We don't want to take away our exisring setup, but would like to bridge both networks so a few of our internal clients can connect to our CCTV network and use some of the devices. Right now they come in on VPN but its not as fast.Is this doable without adding additional hardware? Both networks need DHCP enable as well.
Breakdown:
DSL 1
|
RV042
|
192.168.20.X
|| Would like to somehow join the 2 networks together.|
I'm trying to set up 2 subnet with two RV042 routers. One router will act as a gateway and both WAN ports will be used by two different isp connection. The first router (gateway) LAN IP will be 192.168.0.1/24. I would also like to set up another router behind the gateway with with separate subnet 192.168.1.X/24. And I would like clients on the 192.168.1.x subnet to use the internet through the gateway router and clients on the 192.168.0.x subnet to access resources on the 192.168.1.x subnet. Am I able to do this with two RV042?
I have RV042 Router, I'm using only one Internet conection, I'm using IP group like this 192.168.95.x, my DHCP setting use 192.168.95.120 to 192.168.95.240, but in this time I have 245 workstations (may be I will have 25 additionals workstations) and some times I see IP conflict message in my current work stations.
I had read about SUBNET like response about my problem, but I'm not sure about that and how to make subnet with my RV042.
We connected to locations to the RV042 by setting up 2 Gateway - to - Gateway VPNs - both locations can communicate with the RV042 and devices within the local LAN of the RV042 - however at the moment it is not possible to send traffic from 1st VPN Location to the 2nd VPN location
I have a RV042 with multiple subnet, 192.168.10.0 and 192.168.9.0. 192.168.10.0 is assigned to the LAN, 192.168.9.0 is created under multiple subnet. Both subnet can access Internet by accessing IP address, but 192.168.9.0 cannot access Internet by using host name. It looks like DNS is not working for the 9.0 network.
I'd like to set each individual LAN port with different address i.e. LAN 1 192.168.1.1 and LAN 2 10.1.1.1 instead of using the multiple subnet feature and having all ports replying for the addresses created.
I have an RV042 with the PPTP server configured, which is working because I can connect with my iPad and droid phones, however, I'm unable to access resources on the RV042 side (192.168.1.X) when my local network is the same ip scheme (192.168.1.x). It works fine when I'm on a different network like 3G or someone else's Wifi network (192.168.11.X).
my RV042 is not able to propperly update my ddns. If you try to resolve my dyndns subnet kitus-network.dyndns.org you will get 192.168.0.2. How can I make the router update my ddns with the real public ip rather than the private ip it "sees" on the WAN interface?
I have 2 questions to confirm and/or get direction on how to modify.
1) is there a way to get around the (seemingly arbitrary) class C (slash 24+) subnet restriction for the primary/main IP address for the internal LAN?
(I realize I can setup multiple internal subnets but that also seems to introduce restrictions for port ‘forwarding’ and ‘one-to-one NAT’ use because those features seem to be restricted to the primary/main IP subnet)
2) it seems like all traffic is passed to the host on the internal side of a ‘One-to-One NAT’ regardeless of the firewall rules in place, is that what is be expected?
We have a Cisco RV042 Router. Two ISP's and using dual wan setup. We are trying to connect to a pc on our network using rdp. The pc we are trying to connect to has been configured to listed for rdp on port 3390. I have tested it internally and connect via rdp thru said port.
I have setup a port forward rule on the router to forward port 3390 to the ip of the pc. I have setup protocol binding for port 3390 service on wan1.
I'm tryig to put a computer into the DMZ and then access it from computers on the LAN using a local IP address. My reason for doing this is that I'd like my DMZ computer to be a locked down web server (just ports 80 and 443 open to the outside), but I need to be able to have more access to it from inside my LAN (e.g. I want to be able to SSH into it from the LAN).
Thus far I've been able to get a computer set up in the DMZ and can access the Internet from the DMZ computer. And I can access the DMZ computer from the LAN computers using the public address for the DMZ computer. But I can't access the DMZ computer from the LAN computers using a private address for the DMZ computer. see the attached file for a diagram of our current settings. A few descriptions:
- Verizon provides us with a number of static IP addresses, i.e. 71.123.123.10-12 (note these aren't actually the addresses, but representative).
-- In the RV042, I have the following configurations made: - Setup > Network > LAN Setting - Device IP Address = 10.4.20.1
how to connect 2 routers that both have an ADSL connection. When attempting this the Belkin router will lose the ADSL connection after a random amount of time.
I have an RV042 with the PPTP server configured, which is working because I can connect with my iPad and droid phones, however, I'm unable to access resources on the RV042 side (192.168.1.X) when my local network is the same ip scheme (192.168.1.x). It works fine when I'm on a different network like 3G or someone else's Wifi network (192.168.11.X).
I would like to the the RV042 for a one to one NAT, but I need it to NAT to an address that is not on it's local subnet. I have it routing properly to the address, but web interface only allows adding an IP on the local subnet. Is there a way around that?
I have few router Cisco RV042, and VPN links between them with a hub and spokes topology. Every spoke VPN works, they succeed to connect to the hub. The hub can see every spokes VPN active. A computer under the hub can connect to a computer under any spoke. A computer under any spoke can connect to a computer under the hub. That works great. Now, what I really need is to connect computers under a spoke to connect to computers under an other spoke. I was wondering if the Cisco RV042 can be configure to allow that and HOW? If it can't be done, what other router should I use as the HUB? Does I need to change the spokes as well?
How to set up a home network with 2 routers, where R1 acts as the DHCP server and R2 is basically a switch, connected LAN to LAN and everything is on the same subnet. Currently I have a different setup:Both routers have the DHCP server enabled and I connect R2's WAN port to R1 LAN. Therefore I have 2 subnets. Now my special requirement is that R2 is a DD-WRT router, which establishes a VPN connection to StrongVPN, so that all internet traffic via R2 is encrypted and goes through the StrongVPN server. Now my question:If I change my router setup to the same subnet, meaning R2 connects LAN to R1 LAN and I disable DHCP server on R2, will R2 still be able to establish the VPN connection?
I have RV042 and E4200 routers . I tried the manual UPnP port forwarding using Rv042 router and was succesful ( by typing 192.168.1.1 in the explorer and logged in using user name and password )
I am using a linux embedded system whose Internal IP ,Internal port are mapped .This system is connected to one of the LAN ports
I want to try auto UPnP port forwarding both for RV042 router and Linksys E4200 routers
After enabling the Upnp option only and logging out ,Can i add a port mapping entry in this router without logging in using a C++ program which runs on linux embedded system .
I was looking for a small business router that has VPN support and dual WAN support for load balancing. Upon reading reviews, I think RV042/RV042G is a good choice. Now am thinking if it supports intervlan/ router-on-a-stick configuration?
Small office, 2 RV042, 2 DSL connections. 1 is used striclty for the business side, and the other is for our CCTV network. They also have seperate DSL connections as we have 2 external IP address for clients to connect remotely. We don't want to take away our exisring setup, but would like to bridge both networks so a few of our internal clients can connect to our CCTV network and use some of the devices. Right now they come in on VPN but its not as fast.Is this doable without adding additional hardware? Both networks need DHCP enable as well.
I bought a Cisco Linksys RV042 (Firmware Version: 1.3.12.19-tm) a month ago. I installed it with two Cable Modems (Webstar DPC2100R2) from the same internet provider and with the same individual bandwidths for the two of those. My setup is Dual Wan mode since I only bought this device for load balancing the traffic through the two WAN connections. I need to clone both WAN MAC addresses on the router ports in order to get connected to my ISPs provisioning server. The RV042 has no issues getting a connection on WAN1 when MAC cloning has been made on this port, however, when I clone (user define, different from WAN1) MAC address for WAN2, this port never gets a connection and stays on IP 0.0.0.0 all the time.
I’ve tried factory reset, reloading the latest firmware (which already came pre-installed), switch modems from WAN1 to WAN2 and vice versa, disabling Firewall, turning on and off the ports on Port Management tab, changing SmartLink to Load Balance mode, enabling and disabling Network Service Detection, DHCP vs. Static IP on WAN ports, manual setup, setup through the wizard.
Nothing seems to make WAN2 port function correctly with the User Defined MAC address. The only way to make it work is using the factory (default) MAC address on WAN2, then it gets the IP address from the modem. Again, WAN1 works correctly with a user defined MAC address same as with Default MAC address enabled.I have read endless customer’s posts having the same issue from several years ago in this Community Forum and all over the web, and none of them have had a definite solution to the problem from the manufacturer.
I'm trying to setup this router with my IP range 192.168.100.1 to 192.168.101.254 but if I try to enter a subnet mask other than 255.255.255.0 I get the error - Invalid subnet mask. It should be 255 for given class of IP address at 255.255.xxx.0.
Every other device on my network allows that subnet mask, why not this router, it's stopping access from my 192.168.101.x devices.
I'm wanting to use the SRP527W (from Telstra) to route a block of assigned internet addresses (/29) over the WAN internet IP address. Is this possible on the 527W, or does it only do NAT routing?
I have 2 internet connections in my office one via Verizon Fios and another one via the local cable company. On the fios connection I have an RV042 VPN router and on the Cable company connection I have an rvs4000 router, I would like to know if there is a way I can connect the 2 so I can share a printer I have on one of the 2 networks from the other network without using the VPN feature, like via an ethernet cable connected between the 2 and some kind of static route maybe?
I'm trying to connect two routers and create a subnet but failing due to a little knowledge but no real understanding! I've read the ultimate setup thread loads of times but can't get my setup to work.
Here's the setup I'm trying to build:
Internet -> Master ADSL modem/router (No NAT, no DHCP) -> Slave cable router (NAT, DHCP)
I want to connect 3 Xboxes to the master router with external IPs to avoid the whole "moderate/strict" NAT nightmare. Then I'll connect everything else (PCs, Macs, wireless devices etc) to the Slave router which will assign IP addresses and do the NAT thing. Both routers are Netgear N150s (master is ADSL, slave is Cable).
Here's what I've tried so far:
Master router:
All IP addresses supplied by ISP Internet IP: xxx.68.160.143 DNS: xxx.xxx.3.xxx and xxx.xxx.6.xxx Router IP: xxx.68.160.142
I tried to update our production switch over the weekend with a newer unmanaged Gigabit switch. Everything was fine after the change and the network had a noticeable change in speed.But when I came back in on Monday the Internet was down. So I tried trouble shooting the switch to see if there was a loop or something like that and put it into managed mode so I could look at the config page and take advantage of the STP function. When trying to get to the config page I entered the default IP into my browser and a logon appeared so I tried to login and it failed then I noticed that the title of the browser tab said RVS4000. So out of curiosity I entered the creds for the router and lo and behold it let me in to the router. The router has a static IP and is using a different subnet then the default IP of 192.168.2.1 that the switch has. I have put the old switch back and removed the new one from production but can still get to the router with either IP, it's static address and the 2.1 address.
I want to use a subnet mask of 255.255.254.0. The setup window doesn't allow me to type in that mask, rather it only allows me to choose from options on a drop down menu (which doesn't include that mask). Is there a way to do this?
I have 2 sites located 500 meters away and i connect it via 2 x RVS4000. I managed to get the site to site VPN up Via internet and from my network 192.168.1.x able to reach 192.168.2.x. -where 192.168.1.100 (user try to acces my FTP server 192.168.2.99) has no issues but it's slow due to my internet connection speed.
So i setup another link via wireless( wireless bridge ) purpose is to resolve slow connection via internet.
But some how i try to set traffics divertion from 192.168.1.x to 192.168.2.99 via local LAN faild.
how possible to setup the network such as picture attached with RVS4000?
Question 1. I have no idea how to route IPv6. My provider has provided me with a subnet. This subnet is for example 1:1:1::/48
The router of the provider is located at 1:1:1::1 and my router should get 1:1:1::2(Cisco router). Every subnet I want to create must be routed by 1:1:1::2, for example if I want to create 1:1:1:1111::/64 it needs to be routerd by 1:1:1::2
How do I configure this on the RV220w?
Question 2. I have the possibility to create vlans on the RV220W. I can configure IPv4 addressen per vlan. Only for IPv6 this is not possible.How do I configure this or when will new software be released to configure this?Or do I have to edit the configuration file?
I tried to update our production switch over the weekend with a newer unmanaged Gigabit switch. Everything was fine after the change and the network had a noticeable change in speed. But when I came back in on Monday the Internet was down. So I tried trouble shooting the switch to see if there was a loop or something like that and put it into managed mode so I could look at the config page and take advantage of the STP function. When trying to get to the config page I entered the default IP into my browser and a logon appeared so I tried to login and it failed then I noticed that the title of the browser tab said RVS4000. So out of curiosity I entered the creds for the router and lo and behold it let me in to the router. The router has a static IP and is using a different subnet then the default IP of 192.168.2.1 that the switch has. I have put the old switch back and removed the new one from production but can still get to the router with either IP, it's static address and the 2.1 address.
we are trying to configure one to one NAT translations on a Cisco 527W-U, but are having some problems. We are running firmware version 1.2.4 (003) on the 527.
The DSL line is assigned with a /29 address range x.x.x.64 /29?
The DSL WAN interface picks up x.x.x.65 /32 from the Radius server. We are using the default private IP address range 192.168.15.0 /24 on the LAN (VLAN1), and can get to the internet ok with a PC connected to the LAN.
However when we try to set up a public IP address in the same range (eg x.x.x.66 /29) on VLAN1 (with x.x.x.67 on the PC) it will not connect. (won't allow us to configure an address from the same range as the WAN on a new VLAN interface).
we would want to be able to do one to one NAT translations eg x.x.x.66 on the outside to 192.168.15.2 inside, x.x.x.67 outside to 192.168.15.3 inside etc, but this will not either. We have tried this on a normal IOS router (887) and it worked ok. We have also tried the same on a small DSL router / modem product similar to the 527 from another manufacturer and it worked ok on that, but we wanted it to be able to work on the 527.
We have tried the NAT bypass feature without any success, reading several other discussion forums on this website leads me to believe that one to one NAT is not supported on this equipment at the moment, or at least not at the current firmware release.
One work around would be to just assign a /32 to the WAN interface on the DSL and route statically to a different routed subnet configured on the LAN, however we were wanting to avoid having to do that if possible.
