I have a RV042 with multiple subnet, 192.168.10.0 and 192.168.9.0. 192.168.10.0 is assigned to the LAN, 192.168.9.0 is created under multiple subnet. Both subnet can access Internet by accessing IP address, but 192.168.9.0 cannot access Internet by using host name. It looks like DNS is not working for the 9.0 network.
I'd like to set each individual LAN port with different address i.e. LAN 1 192.168.1.1 and LAN 2 10.1.1.1 instead of using the multiple subnet feature and having all ports replying for the addresses created.
I'm trying to set up 2 subnet with two RV042 routers. One router will act as a gateway and both WAN ports will be used by two different isp connection. The first router (gateway) LAN IP will be 192.168.0.1/24. I would also like to set up another router behind the gateway with with separate subnet 192.168.1.X/24. And I would like clients on the 192.168.1.x subnet to use the internet through the gateway router and clients on the 192.168.0.x subnet to access resources on the 192.168.1.x subnet. Am I able to do this with two RV042?
I have RV042 Router, I'm using only one Internet conection, I'm using IP group like this 192.168.95.x, my DHCP setting use 192.168.95.120 to 192.168.95.240, but in this time I have 245 workstations (may be I will have 25 additionals workstations) and some times I see IP conflict message in my current work stations.
I had read about SUBNET like response about my problem, but I'm not sure about that and how to make subnet with my RV042.
We connected to locations to the RV042 by setting up 2 Gateway - to - Gateway VPNs - both locations can communicate with the RV042 and devices within the local LAN of the RV042 - however at the moment it is not possible to send traffic from 1st VPN Location to the 2nd VPN location
Small office, 2 RV042, 2 DSL connections. 1 is used striclty for the business side, and the other is for our CCTV network. They also have seperate DSL connections as we have 2 external IP address for clients to connect remotely. We don't want to take away our exisring setup, but would like to bridge both networks so a few of our internal clients can connect to our CCTV network and use some of the devices. Right now they come in on VPN but its not as fast.Is this doable without adding additional hardware? Both networks need DHCP enable as well.
Breakdown:
DSL 1 | RV042 | 192.168.20.X
|| Would like to somehow join the 2 networks together.|
I have an RV042 with the PPTP server configured, which is working because I can connect with my iPad and droid phones, however, I'm unable to access resources on the RV042 side (192.168.1.X) when my local network is the same ip scheme (192.168.1.x). It works fine when I'm on a different network like 3G or someone else's Wifi network (192.168.11.X).
my RV042 is not able to propperly update my ddns. If you try to resolve my dyndns subnet kitus-network.dyndns.org you will get 192.168.0.2. How can I make the router update my ddns with the real public ip rather than the private ip it "sees" on the WAN interface?
I have 2 questions to confirm and/or get direction on how to modify.
1) is there a way to get around the (seemingly arbitrary) class C (slash 24+) subnet restriction for the primary/main IP address for the internal LAN?
(I realize I can setup multiple internal subnets but that also seems to introduce restrictions for port ‘forwarding’ and ‘one-to-one NAT’ use because those features seem to be restricted to the primary/main IP subnet)
2) it seems like all traffic is passed to the host on the internal side of a ‘One-to-One NAT’ regardeless of the firewall rules in place, is that what is be expected?
Here's what I want to do with my RV042: I have a bunch of devices, including a server, inside my network at 192.168.1.100
I've set up VPN using PPTP. It works, but if my clients have their own remote DHCP set up to 192.168.1.x, they can't get to the server. If their home DHCP is 10.x.x.x., everything works
I am considering changing my internal network to something obscure.
My server has two NICs. So I thought, I why not set one address up to 10.x.x.x But the two nets can't ping each other. I tried using "multiple subnet" on the RV042, setting up 10.1.1.1, but no luck.
We have 4 RV 042 routers and cisco router at HQ, we have Site to Site VPN tunnels in between, All branch offices are connected to HQ via S2S VPN tunnels
now lets say i am branch 1, i can access 10.10.1.0/24 network but cant access 10.10.5.0/24 network, means i dont have branch to branch connection, it should be through HQ, means my RV042 at brnach should fwd all traffic to HQ for another branches also. Under VPN tunnel if i try to configure remote destination 10.10.0.0/21 its not allowing me it says network overlaping with local network, how i can sole it, I know how to do in cisco, we can permit those networks in access lists.
We have setup a new internal web server so now we have two internal web server and both or hosting sites on port 80. Currently we have port 80 forwarding to one of the web servers and users are able to hit it from the outside.
Is there any way to configure the RV042 to route web traffic to the correct web server by using the site name or dns? If a user puts in the address{URL}, be routed to one web server but if they put in {URL}, be routed to our second web server. I've checked with our vendors and the both web servers applications need to run on port 80. If we have forwarding setup on the RV042 to forward port 80 to web1 then users can't access web2 from the outside?
We have Point to point T1 environment where 3 additional WAN sites get internet access through our RV042. When we setup load balancing we have problems with https traffic, so we setup protocol binding for https and everything worked great from the local LAN. When trying to access https content from the remote LAN across the WAN the sites failed and I see no option to add additional subnets to the protocol binding. Is there a command line feature that supports adding additional subnets for protocol binding or is the local LAN the only option?
if possible with the RV042.Primary External IP address uses port forwards for some ports, all okay.I would like to have other external ip addresses assigned to machines on my lan.Basic host multiple web servers, on different IP addresses, using port 80. [code]
From what i am reading, it looks like the RV042 can do this, but I am not real clear what my rules should look like.
I would think my high priority rule for each external IP address would be to deny all traffic first for each machine on the lan.Then create one entry with source 202.x.x.2 port 80 -> 192.168.168.2 ?
How should I set my rules to do this, and what settings should I have on the Nic of the second machine?
We have RV 042 deployed for internet access/firewall purposes. Due to growing number for Wireless devices and also to separate WLAN traffic from wired devices, we have created a separate VLAN/IP Subnet for the wifi devices. We are having trouble accessing the internet from the WiFi VLAN/IP Subnet. Cisco 3750 is layer 2 and layer 3 device. We have VLAN 1 (10.10.10.0/255.255.255.0), all wired devices and RV 042 are part of VLAN 1. Connectivity to internet from VLAN 1 is good. VLAN 2 (192.168.1.0 / 255.255.255.0) was created for wifi devices, 3750 does the inter-vlan routing, I have enabled the multiple subnet feature on the RV 042 and added 192.168.1.2 / 24 to the subnet list, we still have issues accessing internet from vlan 2 devices.
As a workaround, I shutdown vlan 2 and added 192.168.1.0/24 as secondary address to the VLAN 1 interface on 3750 and i was able to access internet from 192.168.1.0/24 network with wifi devices also on vlan 1, we want wifi devices to be on separate vlan / ip subnet. Looking at the documentation for RV series routers, it talks about supporting multiple subnets access to internet by enabling multiple subnet feature but it doesn't seem to work.Are there restrictions on having multiple vlans?
I have an RV042 with the PPTP server configured, which is working because I can connect with my iPad and droid phones, however, I'm unable to access resources on the RV042 side (192.168.1.X) when my local network is the same ip scheme (192.168.1.x). It works fine when I'm on a different network like 3G or someone else's Wifi network (192.168.11.X).
I would like to the the RV042 for a one to one NAT, but I need it to NAT to an address that is not on it's local subnet. I have it routing properly to the address, but web interface only allows adding an IP on the local subnet. Is there a way around that?
The network topology is like this. Router with DHCP_Server on it.
VLAN 10 VLAN 20 VLAN 30
My question is how to configure the router so that all devices on all 3 VLANS can obtain IP from the router. I've tried to enable proxy arp on all interfaces and create sub interfaces and trunk them to their appropriate vlans, but I can't specify the gateway on all trunked sub interfaces because I get a warning that addresses overlap. Then I tried to set access-group on all sub-interfaces and still doesn't work.
I am designing a network right now that is going to have 356 devices. I need to use vlan separation with subnetting for a number of reasons. The first (and most obvious) is that there are 356 devices that will require an IP. Too many for one subnet. The second is that a good portion of the devices that I am using are a litlle to chatty with the broadcast traffic for my comfort. I have two subnets that are going to be specifically alocated to these chatty devices. Our switches are being provided for us by the client for unknown reasons. They are providing us with HP ProCurve E2810 switches which are layer2 switches.
I have an ASA which is managing internet access from mutiple VLANs configured on a 3560 switch. I want to be able to limit the 100MB internet connection on the ASA on a per subnet (VLAN) basis for the multiple subnets configured on the switch..
so for example
VLAN10 - 10.0.10.0 - limit to 5MB VLAN20 - 10.0.20.0 - limit to 10MB VLAN30 - 10.0.30.0 - limit to 3MB
I recently bought SG-300 28P to create the VLAN. My network hs 3 subnet 192.168.1.0, 192.168.2.0 and 192.168.3.0.My main net work is 192.168.1.0. I want to divide it to VLAN to eliminate the boardcast storm; especially from the domain 192.168.3.0
But I want all the devices from 192.168.1.0 to access other subnet.
I have a home office with multiple VLANS/subnets I have many VPNs that connect only a specific subnet to a specific remote offfice. On a 5520, can I create a S2S VPN to different remote offices that have the same IP scheme, but from different home office subnets? For example at my home office let's say I have two independant, distinct VLAN/subnets: 192.168.140.0/24 and 192.168.150.0/24. Can I create an S2S from the 140 subnet to a remote office with a 10.10.10.0 addressing scheme and another S2S from the 150 subnet to a totally different office also with a 10.10.10.0 scheme?
I am a employed at a credit union with 17 branches. We have a mpls circuit connecting the branches to our main office. I setup DSL as a backup connection. I have 17 RV042 Cisco VPN Routers. I created a secure vpn tunnel for every branch to the main office. I made a delayed route in our main router to fail over to the VPN, in case the mpls failed. Almost everything works great except our ATM's are required to connect to a router at our main office to a different subnet than the tunnel is connecting, therefore not routing through the tunnel. I've tried creating another tunnel but only works with one of the branches, cause I get a conflict at the main office when I try a second tunnel with the same ip network. Also I tried routing all the traffic through the vpn by putting in the address 0.0.0.0 subnet 0.0.0.0, at the branch site. But I can only do that for one branch, The Downtown Cisco won’t let me create another tunnel with that setting.
We have 36 cctv cameras slowing down our oracle network pc's all in same subnet. I want to remove the dvr's of cctv to a separate network to improve performance. How to accomplish that with a Rv042 linksys router? Or is there any other better way around. 5 Users access the cctv cameras all the time.
How to set up a home network with 2 routers, where R1 acts as the DHCP server and R2 is basically a switch, connected LAN to LAN and everything is on the same subnet. Currently I have a different setup:Both routers have the DHCP server enabled and I connect R2's WAN port to R1 LAN. Therefore I have 2 subnets. Now my special requirement is that R2 is a DD-WRT router, which establishes a VPN connection to StrongVPN, so that all internet traffic via R2 is encrypted and goes through the StrongVPN server. Now my question:If I change my router setup to the same subnet, meaning R2 connects LAN to R1 LAN and I disable DHCP server on R2, will R2 still be able to establish the VPN connection?
I have RV042 and E4200 routers . I tried the manual UPnP port forwarding using Rv042 router and was succesful ( by typing 192.168.1.1 in the explorer and logged in using user name and password )
I am using a linux embedded system whose Internal IP ,Internal port are mapped .This system is connected to one of the LAN ports
I want to try auto UPnP port forwarding both for RV042 router and Linksys E4200 routers
After enabling the Upnp option only and logging out ,Can i add a port mapping entry in this router without logging in using a C++ program which runs on linux embedded system .
I was looking for a small business router that has VPN support and dual WAN support for load balancing. Upon reading reviews, I think RV042/RV042G is a good choice. Now am thinking if it supports intervlan/ router-on-a-stick configuration?
I'm trying to setup this router with my IP range 192.168.100.1 to 192.168.101.254 but if I try to enter a subnet mask other than 255.255.255.0 I get the error - Invalid subnet mask. It should be 255 for given class of IP address at 255.255.xxx.0.
Every other device on my network allows that subnet mask, why not this router, it's stopping access from my 192.168.101.x devices.
I'm wanting to use the SRP527W (from Telstra) to route a block of assigned internet addresses (/29) over the WAN internet IP address. Is this possible on the 527W, or does it only do NAT routing?