Cisco Routers :: SA520W Does Not Get IP On Optional WAN
Feb 9, 2012
We are using a SA520W as our primary router and have a fiber connection attached to the default WAN interface. We would like to improve our uptime using a secondary internet connection on the optional WAN interface.
We have bought a dovado tiny 4g router for this other connection. It acts as a dhcp server but the Cisco router does not get an IP from the dovado router. The router works as expected when connected to a normal computer. But somehow the cisco router doesnt get an IP.
I have also tried to set a static IP for the Cisco router but that didn't work either. The dovado router is setup do deliver ip in the range 192.168.0.2-254
View 4 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Mar 20, 2012
I have a fibre connection on the dedicated WAN which was working perfect until someone somewhere cut through the line. The SA520 fell over to the Optional WAN port which is basic ADSL line which is connected. Logmein client is online too.
But it refuses to browse webpages, appears to be a dns issue or firewall or both.
I have added the ISP dns addresses into the forwarders on my server.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 25, 2012
I wanted to know if you can connect a Cable modem to a SA520W, then connect a RV082 to the SA520W?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Dec 14, 2009
I have a problem to configure a IPSEC VPN on the SA520W ( 1.0.39) with Cisco VPN Client (5.0.05.290). In the logs are following error:
ERROR: Could not find configuration for x.x.x.xERROR: Could not find configuration for x.x.x.xERROR: Could not find configuration for x.x.x.xERROR: Could not find configuration for x.x.x.x
View 9 Replies
View Related
Jun 28, 2012
connecting to separate private lans:
A) 192.168.1.x
B) 192.168.0.x
A is behind a Watchguard XTM25 11.5.3
B is behind a CISCO SA520W
Both have static public facing IP's.
B only has a IP based PBX system attached to it over a SIP ALG. (originally it was hooked up to the watchguard but they didn't play nice, but works great with the Cisco. Problem is the Cisco don't have all the features of the Watchguard)
A has all my users workstations attached. The issue is that computers on A need to talk to server on B for a desktop application to work. Since they are on separate subnets, it isn't working. The app itself still doesn't work by port forward/sNats, etc.
A & B are right next to each other, so cabling between them is not an issue.
Currently, I have a cable between the watchguard and the Cisco. The watchguard end is configured with a static private ip on the subnet A (the cisco side), and plugged into the lan on the cisco side. I have a policies to let all traffic flow freeley, and from the logs on the Watchguard, all A subnet traffic is correctly going to the Cisco via said cable.
But, nothing is coming back from the Cisco. So my question is, how can I get the Cisco to play nice with the other subnet and send traffic back to the B subnet?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 19, 2011
Is is possible to set the port number for syslog eg 192.168.75.50:20514 ? i presume the protocol would stay udp
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 27, 2013
A new Windows 8 computer can't access the SSLVPN corporate connection.
When we try to access the SSLVPN website to download the launcher (you have to download the VPN launcher everytime for our configuration), you can log in and that's fine, and then you can click on the VPN Tunnel link, a popup shows up but it doesn't actually download the launcher. Solutions we've tried so far:
1) Reinstalling C++ Redistirbutable
2) Adding the site to trusted sites and allowing unsigned ActiveX controls
3) Removing all internet objects through internet options.
Is there anything else we can try?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 17, 2013
Our company just recently bought a CISCO SA520W Security Appliance from a distributor here in the Philippines. Unfortunately, after a month of use, the LAN ports on the appliance started losing power. We reported this to the distributor and they sent a CISCO engineers to check on the unit. The engineers found the unit to be defective and need to be replaced.
Three weeks after the distributor pulled-out the unit, I have followed-up the status with them. They told me that they got no definite ETA from CISCO for the replacement unit. I followed-up with them again after a week. This time, they told me that the device is already in transit and it is coming from CISCO USA but they still don't have an expected time of arrival to give me.Does it really take more than a month for CISCO to replace a brand new defective unit? The serial number of our appliance is DNI1610G0G7.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 16, 2011
How can I attach an optional antenna to a Dir 615 router?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2011
Need to boost signal coverage on an SA520W (even though it is very good, building floor is too clutterd and too darn big.Even using a 2nd unit to extend things may not get it all done; However, searching the site tells me there is an external aerial (one of...) in the SMB range, and it uses "N" style connectors. Looking at the specs on the SA520W, it makes no mention of what sort of connectors those are (Happy to admit I am not a cable guy... well not co-ax anynore at least!).
View 0 Replies
View Related
Mar 17, 2011
I purchased a SA520W for my company, and i have some probles for configuring firewall. I want to deny access to facebook, youtube and twitter but not for 4 hosts which needs this websites for work. I tried to configure content filtering > blocking URLs but with this solution, I deny acces for all users, So, I tried to make IP v4 rules :
The 4 hosts who may access to these websites are 192.168.50.124 to 127
Example :
FROM Zone : LAN
TO : WAN
Service : Any
Action: block always
Source hosts : 192.168.50.32 to 192.168.50.123
destination hosts : 66.220.158.11 (one of the facebook's ip)
but it does not work. So, I am looking for an other solution, or maybe my rule is not correctly configured ?
View 5 Replies
View Related
May 14, 2012
We've got an SA520W that's performing nicely, but we need to extend our wireless coverage to a new area of the building (we can get a network cable there). What would be our best option? Just a second SA520W, or are there are APs we should look at?
View 7 Replies
View Related
Nov 8, 2011
I have an SA520W firewall, and am implementing a new AP541N. On the SA I am using port 4 to connect the AP. Trunking is on with Vlan 1 and 25. Connecting the AP I am able to use VLAN1, however when I assign a new VAP using Vlan 25, I only receive IP addresses for VLAN1.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 15, 2010
Any AP that would be able to wrielessly repeat traffic to my SA520W (so that the AP has no ehternet wiring at all). First off, there is no WDS option anywhere in the SA520W, so there is no method for which to simply create a WDS link between the two devices. Yet the Factory Default Settings table in the SA520W Admin guide indicates there should be (search on WDS in the PDF to find this). both at the lack of integration of these Small Business Pro devices, and moreso at the fact that I was told that these two would be compatible for wireless-only repeating. I've been messing around for hours trying to get something to happen. Maybe I'm just missing something obvious as this is my first time trying to get an AP to talk wireless-only to a wireless capable internet gateway device (the SA520W).
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 20, 2012
I have a problems with one SA520W.The LAN port don't work correctly. If i connect PC directly via ethernet cable (i try 2 different cable and 2 different PC) the DHCP don't assign an IP. If i reset to factory default and manual insert IP (192.168.75.1) don't work.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 19, 2011
I have setup an SA520W and configured SSL-VPN for our small business. Everything seemed to go smoothly and I tested SSL VPN by logging in and playing around a bit which seemed to be fine. However, shortly after deployment I started getting complaints about it being much slower than our old VPN through the consumer grade router I just replaced. I investigated and tested with IE8 and Chrome on Windows XP 32-bit with several different machines, and in all instances it did seem very slow indeed. While looking around I noticed that the Task Manager under the Networking tab shows the SSL VPN connection as VirutalPassage at 64 Kbps. Going into Network Connections shows VirtualPassage under the Dial-up heading with device name Virtual Passage SSLDrv Adapter. Additional properties describe it as an ISDN channel. I have attached an image of the Task Manager pane.The router is running the latest firmware of 2.1.51. It is connected via a static IP that does not require a login, to our dedicated 5 Mbit / 5 Mbit ethernet over copper link to our ISP. We get great speeds and low latency through everything but SSL VPN connections. I haven't done anything fancy so the router certificate is the factory default. Currently we are using the existing 2 SSL VPN licenses that come with the router until we need more access, at which point I want to upgrade to the 25 user bundle. However, I don't feel comfortable upgrading until I get this resolved, because 64kbps simply cannot work for us for a VPN solution.how to configure the SSL VPN to not limit at 64kbps? My engineers are making fun of me for bringing us back to dialup, and I have to agree with them!
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 26, 2011
I have a Cisco SA520W router and needs to set up VPN. Du to major problems with the SSL VPN Client and windows 7, I had to let it go and try a different approach.
That was the QuickVPN client, but as it turs out, it simply impossible from reading the user manual to understand just how I have to set thing up. For instance, the VPN Wizard tells you to enter a preshared key. But in the QuickVPN Client, where do I enter the key?
And shall the "Enable Cisco VPN Client" be ticket off, I assumed yes, but seriously it is impossible to know.
Then in the VPN Wizard again, in the Remote & Local WAN Adress, what shall use FQDN or IP Address. The if FQDN, what shall a enter, the domain name for the router, whats the point in that? The domain name of the VPN Client, seriously, what's the point in that? I would assume that 99% of the VPN Client does NOT have a domain name. Then, if IP address, am I supposed to know the IP address of the client? Same with the "Secure Connection Remote Accessibility", what am I supposed to enter. The IP address which the Quick VPN Client network adapter shall have?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 25, 2013
I have a sa520w router I configured w a vlan for the wireless and port 2. Now I would like the switch to handle both traffic from the default lan and the vlan. I tried creating a vlan on ports 28 and 10 but I cant get it to work. I have my other lan on port 27. Ive read something about switch layers? not sure. so I want port 10 to route to the vlan and other ports go to the default lan.
View 19 Replies
View Related
Sep 16, 2012
if my SA520w will support link aggregation for network devices within my LAN. If so, is there a Cisco wiki or how-to on how to setup this up in the SA520w? I only find a brief mention of this in Section D of the manaul.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 21, 2010
just wanted to know if the SA520W can wirelessly bridge (Workgroup bridge, WDS, etc -don't care which) to either an AP541N or AP1252... using WPA2-PSK
the 2 seperate examples would be
Internet --->SA520W --(Wireless 30 feet) --->AP541N -->ESW-540-24P-K9
internet --->Sa520W --(Wireless 30 feet)----> AP1252 -->ESW-540-24P-K9
internet --->AP1252 ---(Wireless 30 feet) ---->SA520W-->ESW-540-24P-K9
in other words do you just go into the config of the SA520W ... enter in an existing SSID name and the WPA2-PSK password and it joins that wireless network. lastly does the SA520W support POE to the switch above or only the AP541N
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 9, 2013
We have a Windows server based network (15 wired computers) and four wireless devices (more to come)We are using a CISCO SA520W appliance in the main building as the perimeter Internet gateway / firewall / wireless access. It all works well.We have a second building too far away for wireless devices to reach the SA520W radio in the main building.The second building is connected via fiber to the main building (switch to switch). Several wired computers are connected to the switch in the second building.We want to provide seamless wireless connectivity as wireless device users move between buildings.
We thought to mount and connect another simple B/G capable wireless access point, via ethernet wire, to the switch in the second building. But we're not sure of the best CISCO/Linksys model to choose for this. The choice should work well with the SA520W configuration and be relatively simple to configure in that environment.We're also unsure of the steps to configure a seamless wireless experience for the roving wireless device users.
View 11 Replies
View Related
Feb 1, 2012
I want to create a site-to-site VPN from one SA520w to another.The main office has a static IP, the branch office has dynamic.I have read the manual several times, but I am not sure what to do on the SA in the main office and on the SA on the branch office.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 1, 2012
I want to create a site-to-site VPN from one SA520w to another.The main office has a static IP, the branch office has dynamic.I have read the manual several times, but I am not sure what to do on the SA in the main office and on the SA on the branch office.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 7, 2011
I have an SA520W and have a working site-to-site vpn between my site and a peer IP. The site-to-site is setup to a subnet on the remote end which is 10.23.x.x. I only have access to a few host on the remote network.
However I now need to setup a second vpn connection to the same network. This is to a different subnet 175.31.x.x. When I try to add the new configration which is effectively a duplicate of my existing setup with a new subnet I get the error: "Can't share IKE policy with different remote/local endpoint"
Is there a way to do what I require with the SA520W?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 11, 2011
I have 2 internet connections in my office one via Verizon Fios and another one via the local cable company. On the fios connection I have an RV042 VPN router and on the Cable company connection I have an rvs4000 router, I would like to know if there is a way I can connect the 2 so I can share a printer I have on one of the 2 networks from the other network without using the VPN feature, like via an ethernet cable connected between the 2 and some kind of static route maybe?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jan 24, 2013
I have RV042 and E4200 routers . I tried the manual UPnP port forwarding using Rv042 router and was succesful ( by typing 192.168.1.1 in the explorer and logged in using user name and password )
I am using a linux embedded system whose Internal IP ,Internal port are mapped .This system is connected to one of the LAN ports
I want to try auto UPnP port forwarding both for RV042 router and Linksys E4200 routers
After enabling the Upnp option only and logging out ,Can i add a port mapping entry in this router without logging in using a C++ program which runs on linux embedded system .
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 22, 2012
I was looking for a small business router that has VPN support and dual WAN support for load balancing. Upon reading reviews, I think RV042/RV042G is a good choice. Now am thinking if it supports intervlan/ router-on-a-stick configuration?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jan 2, 2013
If your wireless indicator is flashing red when you discover the smurf, it can mean that someone has tried to logon with an incorrect password. this is not necessarily an attack, it could be someone you have allowed access too, who has forgotten the password? In this case entering the correct password will solve the problem.However putting your own MAC address into the filter will simply block your own machine.
View 6 Replies
View Related
May 24, 2012
For my work I am looking to create wireless capabilities to remote locations. To do this we are using a standard modem/router that is connected to an Engenius (802.11b/g) wireless outdoor radio connected to a dish antenna. We are able to go to locations (3+km) and then with a corresponding receiving antenna (using LoS), receive the Internet and connect both to computers at the transmitting point as well as to the WWW. The problem exists is that we want to employ a series of routers at the receiving end that would be able to carry the transmission to a different location (relatively close), due to the fact that some of the locations do not have line of sight to the antennas. We are using Encore routers, model # ENHWI-N3. When we connect the radio's Ethernet into the routers WAN reciever, we can connect to the Internet with a computer. The problem exists is we want to pass that connection over to a second router (R2). This connection is done when the routers are on access points set to a WDS function with R1 having R2's mac address and vice versa. Both routers are set to channel 1. Even when the routers are seperated by distances >50m a computer plugged into R2 can see a computer plugged into R1. Files can be transferred between the 2 computers wirelessly at speed around 3 mbps. However computer 2 on R2 can not connect to the WWW. This router features a spot that lights up if it has Internet access and R1's is lit up but R2's is not. How do we transfer the Internet and not just a LAN from R1 to R2 so it can be accessed further away from the point of the radio and antenna equipment. This setup has also been used where R2 is hardwired to R3. At R3 we change the channel to 11, and then connect through that with mac addresses wirelessly to 4th router. If comp is in R4 and far away it can still access and file share from comp at R1.*edit the ip address for the routers exist all on 192.168.1.xxx If the 3rd number is different between routers would this make a difference?
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 26, 2011
everything was all good, my brother went crazy and unplugged everything.it effects our house phone too, that could be the problem.i just dont know what wires went where. all the wires are the same color.but i know which is which. just again, dont know where.i would like to get it done before he gets home later on.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 7, 2012
We're getting the following message in the logs when we ry to connect: encrypted Informational Exchange message is invalid because it is for incomplete ISAKMP SA
One of the router is a V2 and the other is a V4 if that makes any difference.
View 12 Replies
View Related
Dec 31, 2012
The first router is wired to the DSL modem and works just fine as an access point with Internet access. The second router is wired from the first router using one of the 4 ports on both router hubs. The second router is visible but has no Internet. How to configure the second router regarding DHCP, LAN, WAN, DNS etc.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 28, 2011
What are procedures to deactivate di-604+di-704 routers+make the repeaters,connecting each of them,in a wired fashion,to my Belkin wireless N router?
View 1 Replies
View Related
