Cisco :: Routing Traffic Between Two Cell Interfaces

Jan 28, 2013

I would like to ask a question about the setup that I'm trying to implement.I've got two WICs, 3G and LTE, in the router, one has its static IP address using 3G network, and another one has negotiated IP address using LTE network.There is no physical circuit/connection coming in to this place.Let say 3G network is (A.A.A.A|Cellular 0/0/0), and LTE network is (Negotiated IP|Cellular 0/1/0).There are two different network coming to the router. Let say they are 10.1.1.0/24, and 10.1.2.0/24,I want to route 10.1.1.0/24 traffic using 3G Network A.A.A.A Cell0/0/0,and route 10.1.2.0/24 traffic using LTE network, Negotiated IP Cell0/1/0. We're talking about only the default routes here.

View 1 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2911 - Allow Traffic Between Two LAN Interfaces?

Nov 15, 2011

I have a 2911 router. One interface is configured external (WAN) and two interfaces are configured on separate internal private subnets. What is the configuration to allow all traffic in both directions between the two internal subnets?

View 21 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 3925 Router Not Routing IP Traffic Between Two GB Interfaces?

Jan 14, 2013

We currently installed a 100Mbps fiber line with Ethernet hand-off.  I  purchased a Cisco 3925 ISR to be the gateway for this connection.  I am  not going to use it for any security purposes.  I have an ASA5520 that  will do that work.  Right now I am currently just trying to get the  router online.
 
I know the following

Laptop <--->GB 0/1((()))GB0/0<---->Ethern
et handoff from ISP. 

I  can ping and SSH to the outside interface of the router from outside  the network.  I can also ping and SSH to the router from the laptop that  is directly attached to the routers GB0/1 port.  From the Router's CLI I  can ping IP addresses on the internet. From the laptop I can not. I can not access the internet through the router though. Here is my config.Building configuration... 

Current configuration : 3724 bytes!! Last configuration change at 02:17:03 UTC Tue Jan 15 2013 by ggsis! NVRAM config last updated at 02:09:33 UTC Tue Jan 15 2013 by ggsis! NVRAM config last updated at 02:09:33 UTC Tue Jan 15 2013 by ggsisversion 15.1service timestamps debug datetime msecservice timestamps log datetime msecno service password-encryption!hostname XXXNAMEXXX!boot-start-markerboot-end-marker!!logging buffered 51200 warningsenable secret 4 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX!no aaa new-modelmemory-size iomem 20!no ipv6 cefip source-routeip cef!!!!!no ip domain lookupip domain name XXXXXXXXXXXXXXDomainXXXXXXXXXXXmultilink bundle-name authenticated!!crypto pki token default removal timeout 0!crypto pki trustpoint TP-self-signed-XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXenrollment selfsignedsubject-name cn=IOS-Self-Signed-Certificate-XXXXXXXXXXXXXrevocation-check nonersakeypair TP-self-signed-XXXXXXXXXXXXXX!!crypto pki certificate chain TP-self-signed-XXXXXXXXXXXXXXcertificate self-signed

[code]...

View 10 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: ASA 5520 - Can't Ping / Pass Traffic Through Interfaces

Apr 17, 2012

I've just started a CCNA course and my lack of knowledge has me a bit stuck. My network is comprised of Cisco components and I'm semi familiar with them just from reading and looking through options. I currently am using a Cisco ASA 5520 on my network and I am trying to join another network via one of the interfaces. My network is 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 and my inside interface is 192.168.1.1 255.255.0.0. I enabled a second interface using a static ip of 10.0.0.1 with a subnet of 255.255.255.128. Connected to that interface, I have a Fortigate firewall at 10.0.0.2 255.255.255.128. I can ping just fine from the Fortigate network to the 10.0.0.1 interface on the Cisco ASA 5520 network, but I can not ping the 10.0.0.1 interface (or anything past it) on the ASA 5520 from any computer on the Cisco network. I've read that ACL's and NAT have to be done as well as enabling traffic between interfaces with the same security levels. (both interfaces have security levels of 100 and the option is checked to allow traffic).

Note: each network has it's own internet connection. The connection is to share information on servers on both networks with each other.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: ASA5510 Can't Seem To Route Traffic To Both Interfaces

Sep 12, 2012

I currently have a site to site VPN running connecting a branch office and the Main office using a ASA5510 and ASA 5505. currently PC's at the branch can access the network in the main office using interface 0/1, but we have added another ip range using interface 0/2 and I can't seem to route the traffic to both interfaces. I currently have 0/1 as inside 192.168.10.1 which works, and have added 0/2 as Inside2 192.168.20.1. I know I am forgetting something, any commands to route incoming VPN traffic so PC's at the branch office can connect to both IP ranges?

View 14 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: 5520 VPN Traffic Between Interfaces

Jun 12, 2011

Our ASA 5520 firewall is running 8.0(4) IOS.I have an internal L2L VPN terminating on my firewall (from an internal remote site) on ENG interface.With the default "sysopt connection permit-vpn" command enabled, VPN traffic is allowed to bypass the ENG interface acl.The security level on the ENG interface is set at 50.The security level on the destination interface PRODUCTION is set at 40.Inbound VPN traffic bypasses ENG interface acl and since higher-to-lower security level allows VPN traffic to flow freely from ENG to PRODUCTION, it seems the only place to check/filter VPN traffic is an ACL placed on the PRODCTTION interface and set at INBOUND (outbound VPN traffic).

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5505 Traffic Flow Between Interfaces

Jun 13, 2012

I am fairly new to configuring ASA's. I have an ASA 5505 with one outside interface and three inside interfaces (inside1, inside2, and management). I need inside1 and inside2 to be able to talk to eachother but cannot work out how to make this happen. They are both configured to the same security level and the 'Enable traffic between interfaces with same security level' box is ticked. I have also tried adding appropriate NAT and Access rules. The packet tracer suggests the rules are correct for allowing traffic flow between interfaces but obviosly this may not be the case.

View 14 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5505 - Allow Traffic Between Inside Interfaces

Nov 9, 2011

I trying to allow traffic between 2 inside interfaces with the same security level.  VLAN1 and VLAN15.  The are on different physical ports on the ASA.  I tried to configure this through the GUI Web interface and checked ' enable traffic between two or more interfaces with the same security levels'.  With this ASA version, I do not need NAT to allow this, correct?
  
ASA Version 8.2(1)
!
hostname ciscoasa

[Code].....

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: Forcing Traffic Through Specific Interfaces ASA 5510

Mar 6, 2012

How to force traffic back out the same interface from whence it entered.  Review the following topology.
 
Internet ---> ASA 5510 ---> Static IP1 ---> F3.1 ---> 1811 F0
                             |-------> Static IP2 ---> F3.2 ---> 1811 F5 ---> VLAN Int
 
ASA F3.1        10.1.254.9/30
ASA F3.2        10.1.254.13/30
1811 F0          10.1.254.10/30
1811 F5          10.254.1.14/30
 
When pinging the public IP of ASA F3.2 from the internet a reply is never received because the default route on the 1811 points to ASA F3.1.
 
How do I get the replies from the 1811 to go back out the same interface from whence it entered ? I am sure the answer is policy-based routing, but not sure how to write the config.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5510 - 2 Internet Interfaces Without Traffic

Jan 15, 2013

I need to route to sub nets form 2 different ASA interfaces. The ASA also has an outside interface works like gateway for internet access. Here is my configuration:

ASA Version 8.2(1)
host name ICE3
names
interface Ethernet0/0
name if outside
security-level 0
ip address 201.199.xxx.xx 255.255.255.248
[Code]....

View 9 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA5510 - Traffic Between Multiple Inside Interfaces

Oct 10, 2011

I've been trying to figure this one out for quite a while.  I currently have 2 inside interfaces (data, phone) and I am moving to 3 inside interfaces (servers, workstations, phones).  I have not been able to get any traffic between the interfaces.  With the current setup it was not a major problem.  With the new setup it will be a major problem.
 
Below is a sanitized version of the config.

ASA Version 8.2(1)
!
hostname BOB

[Code].....

View 11 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA5505 - With Two Trusted Interfaces / Traffic Not Going Out Of Inside2?

Nov 14, 2011

I'm going nuts with this ASA5505. This is a secondary firewall used only in emergencies when the primary Checkpoint failes.
 
The basics, it has two trusted interfaces, E0/1 and E0/2-6. E0/1, inside2 has 192.168.01/29 and inside is 192.168.200.1/24.  I'd like any traffic to be allowed from inside and inside2 to outside and any traffic from the inside interfaces should be routed. No restrictions should apply between the two interfaces.
 
inside works just fine but no traffic is going out of inside2, not to outside or to inside.

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: Configure ASA To Send All Traffic From (3) VLans To Interfaces That Connects To 2960?

Apr 18, 2013

I have a an ASA 5520 connected to a Layer 3 (3750) switch (Inside) and a connection to a 2960 switch (Outside) to get to the internet. . I have created vlan interfaces on the 3750 switch and enabled ip routing on the switch to enable the vlans to communicate with each other.
 
Vlan Interfaces on the switch:
Vlan 100 172.17.1
Vlan 200 172.18.1
Vlan 300 192.168.3.1 
 
I want the devices connected to the 3 vlans to be able to pass through the firewall and get out to the internet.I have connected the ASA to the 3750 by routed interfaces (10.10.10.1) --------- (10.10.10.2) and they are able to ping each other.I have also put a default route on the 3750 sending all traffic from the switch to the ASA inside interface (10.10.10.1)The issue that i am having is that the ASA also connects to a 2960 which has a connection to the Internet, and they are handing off an ethernet connection from the 2960 that sits in VLAN 55 (Vlan 55 is the Internet accessible vlan).How do I configure my ASA to send all traffic from my (3) vlans to the interfaces that connects to the 2960 switch?

View 21 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 1841 / Routing Through Sub-interfaces Fails?

May 31, 2013

I have a problem accessing my wireless router through VLAN sub-interface on my Cisco 1841 router. My hardware:
 
Cisco Catalyst 2960 switch (192.168.100.4 /24)
Cisco Catalyst 3550 switch (192.168.100.6 /24)
Cisco 1841 router (192.168.100.7 /24)
Asus RT N66U wireless router (192.168.100.2 /24)
 
Here's my network topology:
 
I have two VLANs - 10 and 20. 2 DHCP pools are configured on 2 1841's interfaces - 192.168.1.0 /25 and 192.168.1.128/26 with default router sitting on 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.1.129 respectively. No issues with obtaining IP address from any of those pools.Laptop connects to L3 3550 switch (switchport access vlan 10), which, in turn, connects to 1841 router through trunk (with VLANs 10 and 20 allowed).3550 is connected to 2960 through trunk with VLANs 10 and 20 allowed.Wireless router is connected to 2960.I can successfully ping my wireless router and outside world from 1841 from fa0/1 interface, but not from fa0/1.10 or fa0/1.20 sub-interfaces -  all packets got dropped. My laptop can obtain IP from both pools (depending on port I connect it to), but can't ping my wireless router and anything beyond it.
 
I attach my configs:Cisco Catalyst 3550:interface FastEthernet0/1 switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport mode trunk switchport port-security mac-address sticky speed 100!interface FastEthernet0/2 switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport mode trunk!interface FastEthernet0/3 switchport access vlan 10 switchport mode access!interface FastEthernet0/4 switchport access vlan 20 switchport mode access!Cisco 1841:
 
ip dhcp pool Vlan10DHCP network 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.128 default-router 192.168.1.1 dns-server 208.67.220.220 domain-name home.local
!ip dhcp pool Vlan20DHCP network 192.168.1.128 255.255.255.192 default-router 192.168.1.129 dns-server 208.67.220.220 lease 0 12
interface FastEthernet0/1 ip address 192.168.100.7 255.255.255.0 duplex auto speed auto!interface FastEthernet0/1.10 description VLAN10 Sub Interface encapsulation dot1Q 10 ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.128!interface FastEthernet0/1.20 description VLAN20 Sub Interface encapsulation dot1Q 20 ip address 192.168.1.129 255.255.255.192!
Routing table on 1841:

[code]....

View 19 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 1941 - Routing Between 3G Interfaces?

Apr 11, 2012

I'm trying to get two Cisco 1941 routers with HWIC-1T and HWIC-3G-HSPA interfaces to use the 3G interfaces if the frame is down (as it is right now).In the lab, I was not able to get these to use the 3G interfaces as a backup (i.e. backup interface cell 0/1/0) and I've not been able to workout the correct incantation for static routing either.
 
kununurra#show ip int br d1
Interface                  IP-Address      OK? Method Status                Protocol
Dialer1                    172.31.2.94     YES IPCP   up                    up

[Code]....

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: Routing Between Interfaces On ASA 5520?

Jul 10, 2012

We have an ASA 5520 which is in multiple context mode. We are trying to pass traffic from the outside interface to the dmz interface. We have a /27 public ip range. We need a small amount of those addresses to be in the DMZ for SIP servers specifically. The rest of the addresses are NAT'd to the inside interface.So i created the outside interface GigabitEthernet0/0 with 1.2.3.192/28 Inside Interface GigabitEthernet0/2 with 192.168.20.0/24 DMZ interface on GigabitEthernet0/2.1 with 1.2.3.208/29 So all i want to do is route traffic that comes in the outside interface and out to the DMZ interface for the 1.2.3.208/29 subnet. I set the gateway address as 1.2.3.214 which is the DMZ interface address on the ASA.

View 20 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 1921 - Routing Between Built-In Interfaces

Nov 19, 2012

I am trying to figure out exactly what I need to buy to to connect to an ISP's fiber switch. We need to install a router between the fiber switch and our own core switch to be able to access the IP's allocated to the property. We installed a 1700 with the below config, but we want to purchase a brand new router and we were looking towards possibly the 1921 if the budget allows. Our distributor is telling us that we need to purchase an Ethernet WIC also, but if the router already has 2 ethernet interfaces, why do we need to purchase more hardware? I am a little out of the loop with routers at the moment, so I am not sure if they correct or not, just looking to see if this is the case and if so, why?
 
interface Ethernet0/0
ip address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.248
full-duplex
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
ip address y.y.y.y 255.255.255.252
speed 100
full-duplex(code)

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Same VLans 20 And 21 At WAN And LAN Interfaces

Dec 12, 2011

I have VLans 20 and 21 set by ISP for Voice and Data respectively.What will happen if I already have VLans 20 and 21 in my Local network?

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: Routing Between Two Sub Interfaces On ASA 5520?

Oct 15, 2012

I have two virtual interfaces on my ASA 5520:

GigabitEthernet0/1.338     172.30.0.81/28
GigabitEthernet0/1.345     172.30.0.129/28
 
I have the security levels for both set to 50 and in the ASDM I have checked off "Enable traffic between two or more interfaces which are configured with same security levels"
 
But now the need has arisen that we allow each subnet to be routable to each other for SMTP traffic, how can I accomplish this?

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 2960g Interfaces Going Up And Down?

Jun 14, 2012

i have a cisco catalyst 2960g and for some reason out of the blue, some interfaces go down and then up. It started doing it after a power cycle.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3500XL / VLAN Interfaces Will Not Come Up

Jan 9, 2013

I am using an Old 3500XL and I simply created a
 
interface VLAN 100
Description ***********
ip address 10.0.1.100  255.255.255.248
no ip directed-broadcast
no ip route-cache
shutdown
 
no matter what I do i cannot get it to come up, the rest of the switch is default config, I know I am just forgetting something, But I don't know what?

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Output Errors On N5k 10G Interfaces?

Jan 9, 2012

today I witnessed a cisco n5k that stopped playing fair. For a yet unkown reason several interfaces started to show output errors all begining within the same second. While i instantly thought this would be a wiring issue I began to ask myself what an output error actually means. Google usually brings up output drops, not regular output errors. So what is it and how can a 10G fiber interface even detect that there is a problem without receiving what it was sending?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco :: CME Won't Pick-up From A Cell Phone

Feb 19, 2013

I have a CME that has a FXO card, I can call the CME's number from an on-site phone and it works just fine, but when I try from my cell phone it picks up but doesn't give the dial-tone like it's suppose to, but if I hook an analog line to the phone line I can call that no problem from my cell?

voice-port 0/0/0
supervisory disconnect dualtone mid-call
secondary dialtone
timeouts call-disconnect 2
timeouts ringing 30
timeouts wait-release 2
timing hookflash-out 500
caller-id enable

dial-peer voice 201 pots destination-pattern 9T port 0/0/0 and I can see it pick up.

I was under the impression that an FXO card didn't have any clue about inside/outside etc, all it knew was that it was getting a signal to ring.

View 1 Replies View Related

Phone Computer / So They're On A Cell And I'm On Mic

Jan 24, 2011

Any way to simply have someone phone my computer such that they're on a cell and I'm on my mic? It seems like such a simple thing for this day and age, but my attempt at a Google search is resulting in things that aren't exactly what I mean, such as where I can phone them first, but would have to incur charges, as if I'm using a cell myself instead of a mic. Any way, a site, or a software, to make such a setup work? To be clear, someone using a cell phone--not a mic and not a computer--would somehow "phone" my computer/a software I have, and I would hear them through the speakers as usual and communicate by my PC mic--not a phone and not a cell.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Security :: ASA 5510 / Routing Http Flow On Two Different Interfaces?

Jun 21, 2012

I use 3 interfaces on an ASA 5510. First interface is Lan, Second interface is Outside, Third interface is ADSL The Outside interface is used for VPN L2L and smtp traffic. (Leased line on router managed by ISP)The Adsl interface is used for Http traffic. (Adsl Cisco router) I use this configuration found on another forum subjet for routing.route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 x.x.x.x 1route adsl 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0  y.y.y.y 2 nat (inside) 1 0 0global (outside) 1 interfaceglobal (Adsl) 1 interface static (Adsl,inside) tcp 0.0.0.0 www 0.0.0.0 www netmask 0.0.0.0 The problem is now I have an www intranet server on the VPN remote site. How i can exempt the http traffic to the intranet server routed through Adsl interface?

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Sub Interfaces And Recommended Configuration Not Works On 861

Jun 11, 2012

I am currently trying to setup a GRE tunnel on a cisco 861. As part of a configuration template provide by an outside source I am recommended to use a sub-interface on the router but the recommended configuration does not work.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 4503-E Cannot Bring SFP Fiber Interfaces Up

Sep 2, 2012

I am trying to connect a 6509 switch to a 4503-E switch using single mode dark fiber over a distance of less than half a mile. Although a routine task, it does not work..We have a care 6509 switch where we concentrate all of our dark fiber connections for our remote sites. The 6509 switch already has 30 remote sites, most of them with 4503-E switches, connected in this way therefore it is a tested scenario. For the connections we use the GLC-LH-SM SFPs on both switches. Out of these 30 sites we had a similar problem with two of them, which we solved with the use of CWDM SFPs. With the CWDMs the fiber came up right away. However, I cannot keep using this solution because it is way too expensive! I had the losses of the fiber measured end-to-end and they are negligible (>0.5 dB).
 
In this latest case, like I said, we could not bring the connection up between the core 6509 switch and the 4503-E switch using the GLC-LH-SM SFPs. I then replaced the 4503-E switch with a 3560 and the link came up! Then I tried using a CWDM-SFP in the 4503-E, while keeping the GLC-LH-SM SFP in the 6509 and the link came alive again! Of course we already tried replacing the fiber patch cords with no luck. [code] I find it very weird for the link to work with the 3560 or with a CWDM in the 4503 but NOT with the SFP in the 4503!

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: 5510 ASA Cannot Create Sub Interfaces For Intervlan Routing

Apr 8, 2013

I am trying to setup intervlan routing with a Cisco ASA 5510 and two 2960-S switches. The 5510 currently is using ASA Version 7.0(2) and has a base license. I tried to create a sub interface today based on some info I found regarding the routing piece and it didn't recognize the command. I'm thinking I may need to update the IOS code or the license on the firewall. I know the syntax was correct because I looked it up and found it in a Cisco document.

View 15 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Nexus 5548UP / Two Management Interfaces For N5k

Jan 10, 2013

I have a Nexus 5548UP that would be managed by two organizations. Is it possible to set IP addresses for mgmt0 and an SVI (or an L3 interface) without using the L3 daughter card? I don't want to route between VLANs, just to separate management traffic.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 4510 No Link On Access Interfaces

May 3, 2012

I just upgraded all of our switches on campus to Version 15.0(2)SG4 after about a month of testing. On two switches so far, we are seeing that clients can not connect, and the switch isnt detecting a link. I dont see anything out of the ordinary in int status, port-security, or errors on the interface. Plugging in a different computer does nothing. Only thing that works, is a shut, no shut of the interface. After that, its connected.

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2610 Configured IP Addresses On Interfaces

Feb 10, 2013

I'm working on my CCNA.  I purchased an old router 2610 with two ethernet ports.  I configured the IP addresses on the interfaces and added the default gateway.  I configured NAT to go out my ATT DSL router to the internet.  With the 2610, I'm able to ping the back end or internal DSL router, but I can't ping the front end, external router, or out to any internet site such as google. 

View 10 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: N7K M1 Interfaces Stuck In Initializing State

Jul 12, 2012

We did an upgrade from NX-OS 5.1.5 to 5.2.4 and found all M1 line card interfaces were stuck in initializing state for long time.'show module' status says ok. And we cannot execute shut/no shut command under the interface.  N7K-M108X2-12L & N7K-M148GT-11 are the two M series cards. Only option was to downgrade back for the time being.

N7K01# sh int e1/1 | in down
Ethernet1/1 is down (initializing)

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Bonding Two Interfaces On Two 2940 Switches

Jun 6, 2013

I have two switches (sanitized configs attached) and I am trying to bond int gi0/1 and gi0/2 between the two. Then I need int gi0/3 back to the main LAN switches. These are new Vlans created 982 and 983 for these switches. Question #1: do the configurations look correct? I haven't placed any laptops on the interfaces to test interconnectivity yet but I am wondering if it will work with no default routes.
 
The admin team needs these switches at location A for setup then they will be moved to Location B. The only thing that sucks for me is that the network admin before me created gateway interfaces for all the local Vlans on a main router as sub interfaces. For example, for these two subnets, I need to create subinterfaces below (at location A), which is why a gave the Vlan on the switches, ip addresses.
 
interface GigabitEthernet0/0.982
encapsulation dot1Q 982
ip address 10.98.2.1 255.255.255.0
ip flow ingress
no cdp enable
service-policy input mark-mplsqos-in
 
interface GigabitEthernet0/0.983
encapsulation dot1Q 983
ip address 10.98.3.1 255.255.255.0
ip flow ingress
no cdp enable
service-policy input mark-mplsqos-in
 
When I move the subnet to location B, I will also move the gateway. These two switches will be used mainly for a VMWare and HyperVisor environment so Vlan 982 is for VMA network and Vlan 983 is for management. The admin tells me the software needs to tag the packets, I am not sure if I care as the switches should handle that also.

View 1 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved