In one of my client location I have deployed one Cisco 3560X (core switch) and one SG-200-18 (access switch). I’ve configured three vlans (vlan 2, vlan 3 and management vlan 1), relevant trunking and I’ve connected two pc to the access switch to vlan 2 and 3 respectively. So far everything (including inter-vlan communication) works fine, except that I couldn’t reach the vlan 1 (management vlan) devices (access switch and core switch) from any pc which is connected to either vlan 2 or 3.
I’ve configured the “port VLAN membership” settings in SG-300 as follows,
Interface mode Administrative vlans Operational vlans
GE 2 Access 2UP
I have a Netgear GSM7248R switch with 5 different Vlans including th management Vlan. Each of the vlans are connected to my layer 3 switch for routing. I want to access the management vlan form any of my Vlans so my layer two switch can be detected by my snmp manager.
Just got a new SGE2010P layer 3 switch. I'm trying to configure Vlan to reach a few subnet. I have the original 192.168.1.0/24 as vlan1. I want to reach our WiFi subnet 192.168.10.0/24. The WIFI router is directly connected. It's new for me as the previous Job i was sorking with a ws-3750-48.
i did from console change my switch to layer 3 mode... ( i want it as the DGW for each Vlan)from the web interface, i create a vlan4 for our WIFI Next i go to ipv4 to add an IP address to vlan 4 like 192.168.10.254 /24 As soon as I apply the IP the switch stop responding, Ping request time out.. i need to reboot the switch..
Any snmpset commands to add, modify and delete vlan table entries on SG300-10 switches? I checked url... however this information is apparently only valid for catalysts. The latest firmware is installed and the provided MIB files are used.
I got question about Cisco SF300-24P- is it possible to have management vlan in other vlan than in default vlan?I have default vlan 10 and voice vlan 20, I need to reach switch through voice vlan so I need to set up, interface vlan 20 with ip address. I ask these, because in gui, under Management Interface, IPv4 interface,under Management VLAN, I can only choose vlan 10, which is my default vlan, I dont have option to set ,up, in this case, vlan 20 as management vlan.
We've got a SG200-18 switch that is to be used as a workgroup switch in our environment (SW Version 1.1.1.8). Working with CLI on big and mid-range Cisco-gear over the past two decades I'm having a hard time figuring out the following on the SG200:
o) I want to change the Management-VLAN from the default "1" to the management-VLAN used in our environment. Sure enough I created that vlan in the SG200-config, however when it comes to assigning the management-IP and VLAN for the management interface in the corresponding pulldown under "IPv4 interface -> Management VLAN" the only thing selectable is the default "1". (see screenshots enclosed)So how do I set a management VLAN different from 1?
o) How do I enable telnet/ssh-access to the SG200-18 - I'd be far more comfortable with a CLI-environment?
I have a 2811 (running 12.4(15)XZ) with a WLCM (4.2.209.0).
I have reset the configurations on both. Set FE and WLCM IPs on the router and gave WLC Management and AP manager addresses. All + PC are on the same subnet. Router pings all addresses besides AP-manager(intended). WLC CLI cannot ping PC and PC cannot ping (nor http) to WLC. PC can however ping and telnet the router on both the FE and WLCM IPs.
I followed the guides on WLCM configuration, did I miss something?
How can I access the management IP and the web GUI?
2811 config:
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 1292 bytes ! version 12.4 service timestamps debug datetime msec
I've just reset our WISM2 in the test lab back to factory default as I needed to reconfigure the 6500 and the WISM2 itself. Bearing in mind I had it working before.I've just renamed and re-addressed some of the vlans so things flow better and make it easier to add more WISM2s in the future.Now I've run through the initial configuration and it's rebooted ok and show WISM status is showing Oper-Up and there's a port channel 407 been created as I would expect. However, I am unable to get to the management interface via GUI or SSH. In fact from the 6500 I can't even ping the management interface (but I can the service port).The Vlans have been changed in the 6500 config so it knows the native-vlan and service vlan etc and all the vlans are up/up.
I have 25 of these routers installed behind various providers and transport (DSL, Cable, UVerse). At sites where I have static IP, I can't reach any service inside, and in fact can't even reach the router for Remote Management. At all times the users indoes can do whtever they like, the have Internet access.
At sites where we draw a dynamic IP or use PPPoE, I can reach services and manage the router until a known issue stops the inbound traffic.
i'm setting up vlan and inter-vlan routing in my lab. My vlan work well (routing between them and dhcp relay) on the LAN side of the ASA but they cannot reach internet trough the ASA.
Here my ASA settings :
Note : I know that the physical interface musn't have an @IP but my present network needs one to work. I'll fix this during my next tests.
vlan interface and physical interface (that is serving for this vlan ) have different input/output counters, there is only one physical interface in this vlan .
sh int vlan 64 30 second input rate 9000 bits/sec, 9 packets/sec 30 second output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
We have recently started as Internet service provider in an open metropolitan.
We use a Cisco 3560G Layer 3 switch, where we have all our vlan where we have konfiguerat ex. Switch (config) # interface vlan 150, an interface for each VLAN capabilities such as int vlan 1 - 10/10 int vlan 2 to 30/10, int vlan 3 100/10 and so on. Our int vlan is configured as follows:
dhcp relay information trusted ip address <x.x.x.x> <x.x.x.x> ip helper-address <x.x.x.x> Ports (ex. int Gigabit Ethernet 0/1) are configured as follows: description Uplink switchport access vlan x
[Code].....
Now the problem; we have a customer in ex. vlan 3 who needs to access a server provided by another customer in the same vlan (vlan 3), and access to each other in the same vlan is not possible. You can access the server from any other vlan, but when it comes to access to another host in the same vlan, you will not reach it.
We suspect that the energy company has configured with pvlan isolated. If we use the command ip local-proxy-arp on each vlan, it works to reach each other, but it seems that our 3560 becomes overloaded when ip local-proxy-arp is enabled and it streaming and use IP telephony it doesn't work. The response time at ping is longer and the loss of packets increase with ip local-proxy-arp enabled. The other operators in the metropolitan also uses Cisco 3560G so the hardware should be sufficient.
We have also tried to add no split-horizon, but it made no difference. How do we get around this without negative consequences? Probably need something that makes you allow to send out the same interface that it came from, because it works as long as you are in another vlan.
I have a multiple Offices in my location , all my external users are connecting my site using Cisco Client to site VPN and accessing my 2 sites , All users are able to access my 2nd office servers which are in 10.10.0.x pool , I have a different vlan in that same location with 10.10.35.x series and users are not able to access this pool servers , I am not much familiar with Routing . i am using ASA 5520 firewall .
We just got many 3560x switches for a project. Curiously and in a very rate event (at least for me ) 4 of them died after workijg normally. 3 for some days and the last one for 3 weeks.Power supplies are ok and light up, they work on other switches, fans dont start kn the damagdd switch but work in ither switches.Syslog server doesnt show anything. It just goes puff. They are brand new switches biught one month ago from official channek distributor.
I have a sg300-10 switch. i update the firmware with the last one. Things are complicated when i create 2 VLAN. ( really 1 VLAN cause the first is native ).So i have the first VLAN with the interface 192.168.1.254 ans the VLAN 2 wich IP is 192.168.2.254
I'm connected with my workstation ( ip : 192.168.1.2/24 with GW 192.168.1.254 ) and i try to ping a web server on VLAN 2 ( ip : 192.168.2.2/24 GW 192.168.2.254 )
Ping is OK ! But when i try to reach any ports of the webserver : Nothing.
We are using 18 numbers of 3560X -Lan base series switches in our network(Access layer). We have 400 users and created vlans in access switches. we are planning to purchase Two numbers of 4900 M as Core layer switch and for redundancy. The uplink would be on 10 gig copper cable (CAT 7) between the access layer switches and core switches. I like to know whether 4900M can take the load of 18 access switches.
Can I change the untagged vlan on a 1131 to a new vlan. I need to move my management vlan from 10.1.1.1 on vlan 1 , to 172.16.0.1 on vlan 200. I attempted several configuration options including removing the vlan1 ip, changing my new vlan200 to untagged and mirroring it on the switch, and adding my new ip to vlan 1 untagged and then untagging the switch with access vlan 200 on the connected port. Nothing worked.
Below is a sample of what I changed:
interface Dot11Radio1 no ip address no ip route-cache
We are installing a 2504 with management on VLAN2. The management port is on interface 1 which is attached to a layer 3 3750. From other VLANs in the network we cannot manage the 2504 controller with the web manager. We are running the latest code, 7.2.103.0, since we are using 3600 APs. We have a TAC case open, but spent 3 hrs with them and they can't figure out the problem. TAC did some debugging and saw that the 2504 is ARPing for the address of the PC on the other VLAN instead of sending the packet to its default gateway. How to get success with the management interface on a VLAN and managing the controller from another VLAN?
recommend a cisco core switch and access switches in IPTV network infrastructure?I was ask to implement a network for IPTV system but i don't have idea what will be the model i will use.
Apparently on older switches you could just enter the "management" command under the new VLAN interface and it would pull the config from the old one, apparently that feature isn't around anymore. I've tried establishing a trunk to the damned thing and trying to switch over that way, but it doesn't seem to work.
It seems like the 4-ports switch in the 2504 can only one port can be used for management VLAN at a time ? I need all 4 ports to be untagged in the managment VLAN.
I'm having some problems with a D-Link switch. I believe it's filtering the management VLAN frames, which is really strange. If you look at the graph, you can see that the D-Link is connected to three switches by trunk links. I'll just use the numbers set in red on the graph to explain what's going on, it's simpler to see.So when I'm connected either to switch 4 or switch 5 (or the others on 5's level) I can use the management VLAN (ID = 1) to connect to all switches above number 3 (including number 3) but I can't get to switches numbers 1 and 2.The only way to connect to those switches is to either connect directly to one of their ports attributed to VLAN 1 or by connecting directly to switch 3. So that's why I concluded that switch 3 filters VLAN 1 frames. It's not switch 4 cause I can get from 5 to 3. But at 3, the frames stop.Also, this only happens for VLAN 1. We have some VoIP phones connected to switches 1 and 2 and their frames can communicate anywhere in the network.
We are trying to config vlan 10 for data and vlan 20 for voice on the same port - port 1 of swtich SF300-24P to run both data and voice on different vlans.Do I have to add vlan 10 as an untagged vlan to port 1 and add vlan 20 as an tagged vlan to port 1?If I do not want to assign the native vlan 1 to port 1, how can I remove it ? The GUI page - assign VLAN to port does not allow to remove it.Aslo, what mode shall I set up on port 1? General, trunk or access ?
I have a WAP321 I am trying to set up. It's connected to gi1/23 and the switch system mode is set to router. The rest of the network works just fine.I have an SG500-28p and the port. [code] On the WAP321 wizard, configured IP address on my management vlan and also configured the default SSID on that vlan. That works. (I plan to remove that one) Then I add the two SSIDs for vlan 20 and 22 (private and public access) and I can't associate to either of the two additional SSIDs. I haven't configured any other settings beyond the wizard and adding the other two SSIDs. I do want cisco mobile ios (jabber) to work on the private network and also do have a couple spa525g2s that need to connect wireless.
I am working to configure AP541n AP, is able to connect to the AP wired, assign AP static IP with proper subnet mask & default gateway, when it's done, everything looks perfectly, but since I changed the management VLAN ID from 1 to 2, I can't even connect to the AP wired from the PC, why does the change matter?
i have a small network with Polycom phones connected to the sf300 switch and have the pc's daisy chained via the second switch port on each phone. i have the pc traffic running on the default vlan 1 and the voice traffic running on the voice vlan 100. can i do bandwidth management on a vlan/port basis or is that not necessary. i want to ensure that the voice traffic is never impacted by the pc traffic on the same cable.
spam up the boards with the same basic CCNA level stuff, but I have a couple of questions about ios differences, limitations, and references. I have the following three switches. One appears to be considerably dated in regard to software version. My confusion/ignorance stems from managing VTP settings.
When I set either 2950 switch as the VTP server, and the other as a client, the client inherits the server settings as expected. However the 2924 requires that I go into the vlan database from priv exec and manually set vtp client. That's pretty similar to setting any switch to client mode. The problem I am observing is that after setting the 2924 to client, it still doesn't inherit vtp version settings or pruning settings. I still have to manually configure those. Additionally, if I copy run start the 2924 after making these manual settings, and then reload the switch, all the settings are lost and it defaults back to server mode with all features disabled. From my searches, it looks like vlan information is stored in vlan.dat, but all the documentation I've found is on 12.1 ios which doesn't appear to use vlan database for vtp setup, meaning it might still be an issue, but not one I'm focused on at the moment.
Is the vlan database dumped at reload? I've read vlan.dat is stored in nvram and should be saved after a copy run start, but that is not the case for me.I have since set the 2924 as the server, manually configured the server from vlan database, executed copy run start, and reloaded the switch. Oddly, my manual settings saved from the reload, meaning I only lose settings when the switch is in client mode.Am I missing additional necessary client commands to save the config, or is this just a limitation of either the 2924XL or the 12.0 ios?On a related but completed out of scope topic, without a cisco service contract, how am I supposed to make heads or tails of all the different versions of ios, along with the letter-based features and what-not? I can't even find my 2924 in the list of platforms when searching for ios upgrades.
I have an HA ACE deployment and all seemed to be working well until I tried to access the ACE via the management VLAN in the one non-system context, no go.The ACE is in one-armed mode with an Admin/System context and one user context (named Messaging). Source NAT has been set up in the user context. All VLANs are in a port channel back to the core switches.I can access the ACE via the Management VLAN in the system context, all OK. I can access the load-balanced servers via the VIP in the user/Messaging context, all OK. I CANNOT acccess the managment VLAN other than ping it (resonds to ping, but telnet, ssh, https, etc. fails).The system/Admin context has a default route to the Management VLAN on the core. The User/Messaging context has a default route to the core switches on VLAN 5, which is the VLAN where the VIP resides.If I change the default route in the User/Messaging context to the Management interface on the core switches then I can access both contexts for management, but then the load-balancing falls over and I cannot access the serverfarm (via the VIP). Traces on the rservers show that NAT is being hit on the ACE and the requests are coming from the real IP of the clients. Put the default route back to the User/Messaging VLAN on the core and NAT is back to what it would be expected to be, and then remote/management access to the ACE is gone.
Local DHCP (via the 5508) is for the guest network while the management and voice use the Windows DHCP server.
My problem, Voice and guest work fine. I have two SSID's (one 802.1X and the other PSK) that use the management interface that will not get an IP. I have enabled dhcp proxy from the cli on the controller. I tried with the management VLAN tagged and untagged.
I'm trying to figure out how to (or if I can) setup the management interfaces (fa1) on a couple of new 4500X switches. My issue is that the 4500X's themselves are the gateway for my management VLAN (.1 HSRP virtual, .2 and .3 SVIs on the pair of switches).
I would like to assign addresses from the management VLAN to the router Fa1 management interfaces but the software configuration guide seems to note this is not supported (and indeed it doesn't seem to work).
Physically I have Fa1 from core-1 into a port on an adjacent switch. Fa1 from core-2 also goes into a port on that adjacent switch. Both are in my management VLAN, whose SVIs are on the cores themselves.
