Cisco Switches :: How To Set Static IP To SML2008 Ports
Mar 7, 2013I have a SML2008 smart switch. I want to set a static IP to each port
View 4 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Cisco Switches :: SGE2010 Can Use 4 SFP Ports And Stack Of Two Switches At Same Time
Feb 15, 2012I looking to buy SGE 2010 swith, but I have some question:
1. Can I use 4 SFP ports and stack of two switches at the same time.
2. Is it possible to use for stacking ports other than 24, 48?
3. What is maximum possible number of ports to use for stacking (can I get more than 1Gb thruput).
Cisco Firewall :: 6552 Static Entries With Same Ip Address But Different Ports
Sep 15, 2011Our proxy/anti-smap/IPS box called PROXY is behind our Cisco ASA firewall. The PROXY is set in transparent mode.The PROXY internal ip is 1.1.1.1 (internal ip)We have the MX record for mail.domain.com with public ip 9.2.7.5 (public ip as we entered with ISP public DNS)What happens now is that the emails that come through get "caught" by the PROXY and then we setup a thing whereby the emails are then forwarded from PROXY to our mail.domain.com server. Also, we made a static entry in PROXY whereby we can https to our email server for the outlook web access from outside of work therefore allowing for users to see the outlook web access web page.On the Cisco firewall, we put the static entry that 9.2.7.5 is mapped to 1.1.1.1 thus the mail server public ip is mapped to the PROXY.
Now, the box has this thing whereby it sends an email to all staff once a day telling them how many mails are legit, how many rejected and how many are spam - the spam emails are listed within the email and staff can at a click of a release button next to each spam email release a particular email from the PROXY box and make it to into their inbox. This works fine from the inside network, but I have issues from the outside due to the DNS and other things.I also put in the PROXY that any network can release spam and that our staff vlan can release emails. Also, on the inside of the firewall we did an access list that computers from staff vlan can access 1.1.1.1 on port 6552 (Which is the release spam port).Hence, we can release emails from internal network through the Microsoft Outlook.
On the outside network, we cannot release emails when using outlook web access.The host name for the PROXY release spam is proxy.domain.com so what we did also today is ask "ISP" to make an A record entry for another public ip which is 9.2.7.6 for proxy.domain.com.We meanwhile made an entry on the access list that comptuers from outside can access 9.2.7.6 on port 6552 (which is the release port).Now the only question is in regards to the static entries:
1. do we (and can we?) static map 9.2.7.6 to 1.1.1.1 through a port 3840 on the Cisco ASA (although we have already mapped 1.1.1.1 to 9.2.7.5 - I have a doubt here as this might mean we might not get emails? Or would we have to do the static again for this one specifcying the 9.2.7.5 as an smtp entry and the 9.2.7.6 as a release button?
2. have I made a mistake in general and should I have just told the ISP to make a CNAME entry for proxy.domain.com with the public ip 9.2.7.5 (which is the public ip for MX record?)?
Cisco Switches :: SG 300-10 - How To Change Static IP
Oct 27, 2011How can I edit a static interface IP address? I don't seem to be able to edit the static IP address for my switch. How do I go about changing it? As you can see the IP Address field is not editable.
I have also upgrade to the latest firmware and I cannot figure out how to edit it via that as well.
Cisco Switches :: Set Static Ip Addresses To Each Port On Sf 300-08?
Dec 12, 2011Is there a way to set static ip addresses to each port on at sf 300-08?
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco LAN :: 3560 Switches - Static IP Routing
Oct 17, 2012I have been looking at deploying a small core switch design for an important branch office that would consist of 2 cores with an etherchannel link and then 4 POE access switches linked to both cores utilising STP. I will also want static IP routing on the cores and will set up HSRP for gateway failover.
The initial switch I looked at for the core was WS-C3560E-24TD-S however after finding that there is no stock around of this at the moment I have seen the WS-C3560X-24T-S which looks like it will do everything I need including IP routing, HSRP and QoS for VOIP. The thing that concerns me is this is about £1000 cheaper so i'm slightly worried im missing someting.
Cisco Switches :: SG200-8 Static Mac Address
Apr 22, 2013My second problem with sg200-08 (firmware: SG200-08x_FW_1.0.6.2.stk) is when I try to add specific MAC address as secure:MAC Address Tables - Static Addresses - Add; insert vlan id, port, mac address and select "Secure":I get error message: "Error: Failed to Add 'Static Address' entry.
View 3 Replies View RelatedCisco Switches :: Switch SF 200 Not Accepting Static IP
Feb 25, 2013I have fiber optics no router One static IP address, when connect SF 200 the system LED flashes and there is conductivity.I checked ther is no setting for static ip,Gateway,DNS, so is this unit only for Dynamic address
View 3 Replies View RelatedCisco Switches :: SG 300-10 IPs On Ports?
Apr 8, 2013i am deploying some SG 300's to some remote sites and will have static IP's assigned to them. the elements that will be plugged into the SG 300's ports will be DHCP. Is there a way to find out what IP's are assigned by port? Either by the Web GUI, the console, a log, etc?
View 2 Replies View RelatedCisco Firewall :: 3389 Static NAT Ports PIX Firewall
Jul 11, 2011There is a PIX firewall and it has this configured on it.static (inside,outside) tcp interface 3389 192.168.1.250 3389 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0.This line of code works ok for port 3389 but I want all tcp ports to be translated. Not just 3389.
View 2 Replies View RelatedCisco Switches :: SG200-50P Log / Ports Up And Down
Feb 19, 2013My SG20-50P Switch Log appears as follows with Random ports going up and down. I am trying to find out if this links to another problem I'm having with a Client Server software locking up on the client end. The hardware, thin clients and desktops, are working and have checked all sleep and power settings. All items in working order, now I'm wondering about the switch
Code...
Cisco Switches :: QoS On Trunk Ports ESW 500 And SF 300
Mar 27, 2012How does the ESW 500 or SF300 line guarantee QoS of voice traffic when trunking switch to switch? I have (2) ESW 500 series switches in series. The phone on switch 1 have no audio issues, but the phones on switch 2 (the last in the series) have intermittent voice quality issues when dialing across a WAN circuit to another office. The phone on switch 1 do not have that issue though they traverse the same circuit. They are all using the same VLAN 100.
View 1 Replies View RelatedRouters / Switches :: Computer Is Not Showing Static Ip?
Jan 17, 2011I got a static ip from my isp. I set up my static ip manually through my linksy router. I need the static ip to connect to a private network for my new job but cant connect to that network. I went to whatsmyip and found that my old dynamic ip is still showing up externally, it looks like my ip4 is using the dynamic as a preferred. My question is do i need to manually change the network connection on my LAN and wireless connection under ipv4 to change it from automatically obtain TO use the following address and put in my static? And do I have to change the DNS also? I am on a home network with one desktop on vista home premium and laptop windows 7.
View 5 Replies View RelatedCisco Switches :: SG300 DHCP Static Reservations Are Not Working
May 19, 2013I'm having troubles with this firmware in a SG300-28 switch. Actually the DHCP server, a new feature in this firmware release, doesn't work correctly. DHCP static reservations are not working: CLient ID and MAC address are not recognized correctly, and the DHCP server assigns the first free IP in the pool, rather than the reserved one.If Cisco engineers read this, plese correct the issue.
View 5 Replies View RelatedCIsco Switches :: SG300 Or SG500 That Has All Ports As SFP?
Feb 14, 2013Is there an SG300 or SG500 that has all ports as SFP ports?
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco Switches :: To Disable PoE Ports On SG200 26P
Jan 12, 2013I am thinking of buying a SG200-26P switch and have a few questions:Is it possible to disable the PoE function on the 12 PoE ports?I need al the ports but only 6 with PoE.What happens when you connect a non PoE device to a PoE port?
View 2 Replies View RelatedCisco Switches :: How To Block SG300 10 Ports
Sep 30, 2012I just recently purchased an SG300 10 port switch. After reading through many of the threads here, I was finally able to get the different VLANs to route properly. However, I'm having a unique issue that I'm not sure if it's related to the switch or not. I currently have 2 VLANs configured on the switch.ports 1-4 are native vlan 1 (192.168.1.X) ports 5-7 are VLAN 10 192.168.10.X (Trunk Port with VLAN 1 tagged and VLAN 10 untagged)I have a Hyper-V server connected to both of these networks. The VMs are running on both VLANs on port 5. I have the following problem:When I have a domain controller VM on VLAN 10, I notice that many of the DC communications failed. I took a network trace and noticed that many of the RPC port ranges were failing. I am able to ping all of the hosts on VLAN1 and vice versa. My question is as follows:Does this switch have some type of security option that blocks high range ports? I can't seem to find the menu option indicating that this is the case. I have already set-up a NETBIOS UDP proxy, but this hasn't worked much. I still have problems connecting to machines on this VLAN range.
View 5 Replies View RelatedCisco Switches :: Can SF300-24P Support POE On All Ports
Jun 18, 2012An end user is looking to connect 21x IP Cameras to the switch and they require at least 6W port port. Now, the datasheet states that each port on the SF300 provides 15.4W.I need to double check so that the end user will not start connecting the IP Cameras and then half of them might not fire up.
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco Switches :: How To Connect Gs 300-28 Ports To Network
Dec 10, 2011I bought 3 switches (gs 300-28 ports)and i need to connect them to my network, when all the switches are cisco 3560g, with vtp on the vlans.my question is, how to creat vlans on this switch? and Is it possible to make the gs300 learn the vlans on the 3560g?if he dosent has the vtp client?
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco Switches :: SG-300 What Is Referred To As Four Shared Ports
Jul 16, 2011I just purchased an SG-300 52 port switch. I'm not sure I understand the use of the extra ports. To the right of the 48 ports are a group of 4 ports. Are these what is referred to as the four shared ports? In practical terms, if I wire the 48 ports to different rooms in our office, and I have two other devices at the rack I want to connect to the SG-300 (a cable modem and a NAS Drive), what port numbers should these two devices be connected to?
View 3 Replies View RelatedRouters / Switches :: Manage Static IPS In VOIP Setup?
Jul 21, 2011I have VOIP and was provided a modem, a Tilgen Router (Vood 452_A). I also currently have a Linksys WRT54G router. I also have a home surveillance system with a DVR that can be accessed via the net. I am trying to allow the ports to open so that traffic can navigate down to the DVR.My IPs:My VOIP has provided me with 6 static IP addresses. For sake of this issue they are:
67.xx.xxx.153, through .158My subnetmask is set to:
255.255.255.248My Settings:
The Modem is connected to world. To the modem I have the Tilgen Router connected. The Tilgen is set with an ip of .153 and the subnetmask listed above. DHCP is turned on and has IP range set for .154-.158. It is set in Bridge Mode with NAT and Firewall turned off. To that I have the WRTG54G router connected and assigned the router an Static IP of .154.. The cable is going into the Linksys WAN port.From a computer connected to a LAN port on the WRT54G, I see my public IP as .154, currently my internal IP is 192.168.1.15 so I believe I have to assign one of my Static IPs to this PC, however when I try to connect to the Linksys Router (.154) from the outside web, I am get a time out error. (also from a ping test.) My thoughts are to assign the Linksys to DHCP and use a range of .155-.158 to give each lan item a static IP. My question is will this work? Will each item in the network have its own IP and if I forward the port to the DVR that i needed, ie 80 for web client or 6100 for desktop client, will that forward through?Or do I set it to Router Mode and use the Tilgen to assign the ips.
On the Tilgen I also have an option for a DHCP relay or to turn off DHCP.
For clarification here is the setup chain
Broadband/DSL Line>>Tilgen Modem>>(LANPort1)Tilgen Router(LAN Port2)>>(WAN) Linksys(LANPort1)>>DVR/Computers
Found this walkthrough on setting the WRT54G into a Switch. If I did this, in theory the VOOD would assign those computers/dvr connected downstream via the WRT54G a static ip from my range set on the router. Then in theory I would not need to port forward port 80 since the DVR would be on its own public IP.?
Routers / Switches :: Assigning Static IP To D-Link Router?
Mar 6, 2011i m using ISP provided modem+router and another D-Link Wireless router at the same time... My computer is connected to D-LInk's Router and D-Link's Router is connected to ISP's Modem...My modem's Ip address is : 192.168.1.1 Router's IP Address: 192.168.0.1ok but now problem is that now Dlink is connected to ISP's Modem and ISP's modem assigns different ip to Wl.Router. Both have DHCP enabled... But i want modem (which is also a router) to assign D-Link's router the STATIC IP... like 192.168.1.54Router Model is D-link DIR-615 Modem Model is ZTE EchoLife HG510a
View 1 Replies View RelatedRouters / Switches :: Configure 2 Static IPs Over Single Connection?
Jan 28, 2011This is the situation in our Lab.We have one telephone line with broadband connection and a system which is connected to a modem to use this broadband facility. Recently we have taken two static IPs over this connection for a project work.Now what I want to know is, how to configure these static IPs, so that I can connect two systems (each one to one static IP) to use these static IPs and continue to access the internet in the 3rd (already present) system.
View 7 Replies View RelatedRouters / Switches :: How Do FPS's Open UDP Ports
Nov 29, 2011How do FPS's open UDP ports without needing to configure the router to forward them?I never have to forward ports from my router to my PC. Every game i have somehow manages to open the UDP ports it needs without me having to configure my router. Yet when i check to see if those ports are open (prior to starting the programs) they always come back as blocked or closed. Now I'm currently working on a UDP Internet program and need to know how to do the same thing - open ports on a router without having to make the customer configure their routers. I'm THINKING that other programs start with a TCP/IP connection on the desired port and that opens the UDP port. Is this the answer or is there another method used?
View 5 Replies View RelatedRouters / Switches :: How To Forward Ports
Sep 17, 2011how to forward ports using routers
View 2 Replies View RelatedRouters / Switches :: How To Open Three Ports
Jun 25, 2011to access VOD database i must open three ports on the router - not sure how to
View 3 Replies View RelatedCisco Switches :: SG300 / Assign Static Ip Address On Vlan 1 Interface?
Dec 13, 2011I am trying to assign static ip address on vlan 1 interface , the model no of switch is SG300 & the firmware version is 1.1.2.0 .But whenever I type the IP address & press enter , a question is popped up asking for confirmation (switch0d851f(config-if)#ip address 1.1.1.1 255.0.0.0.
Please ensure that the port through which the device is managed has the proper settings and is a member of the new management interface.Would you like to apply this new configuration? (Y/N)[N] N )
Cisco Switches :: SG300 Static Route Default Gateway Per VLAN
Jul 27, 2011We have recently purchased a Cisco SG300 and have been configuring it. [code] The VLANs have ACLs set up to prevent any communication between the Holly and Tempo VLANs (and their associated WAN VLANs).Each VLAN has a WAN available for it's use, which connects to external networks (including the Internet).In order to facilitate this, we have set up all the necessary ACLs and routes and confirmed that this all works.However, the problem comes when we assign the static routes that specify the default gateways.We add the two static routes below:
-0.0.0.0 next hop 10.10.200.254 metric 1
-0.0.0.0 next hop 192.168.200.254 metric 1
In this case, only one of the VLANs has WAN access. It is either Holly or Tempo (it can be either if the order the static route is added is changed).What we need is to force Holly to use Holly WAN and Tempo to use Tempo WAN, but we cannot see a way of doing this.Effectively, we want the following static routes: [code]
Cisco Switches :: SG300-28P - POE Not Correctly Supported On All Ports?
Aug 10, 2012So, I spent some time this weekend troubleshooting the issues I've had with the new SG300-28P switch and POE to many of my devices in the office. As a recap, I cannot utilize all of the 24 POE ports on the switch for POE purposes. Really only every other port [with a few odd combinations thrown in between]. In addition, the SG300-28P switch, on occasion, is sending POE to non-POE devices [e.g. my Ruckus Zone Director 1106].
Here are my POE devices [all 802.3 af-compliant]: 3 Ruckus 7982 access points1 Pakedge access point2 home-automation controllers2 Polycom voip phones I called Cisco support several times in regards to this problem, and they figured it was a hardware issue - a faulty switch. So, Cisco sent me a replacement SG300-28P, which I hooked up today. The exact problem still occurs. Default configuration [fresh out of the box]. No way I can land, for example, the 3 Ruckus 7982 AP's on ports 1, 2, and 3 [or ports 1,13, and 2]. I have to put them on ports 1, 3, and 5 in order for them to power up. In addition, I can't plug any other POE devices on the ports either between or below them. I had to skip another port bay. This is very odd behavior!! Two Cisco SG300-28P's in a row with the same problem.
However, I also had one of the new Cisco SG300-10P switches in my possession for a recent project of ours. I decided to hook up the same POE devices to this switch. ALL POE devices were recognized and worked! No need to skip a port. And it didn't matter what device was plugged in first or not. I am now convinced that it is either a hardware issue [bad power supply/transformer?] inside all of the SG300-28P switches, or a firmware issue.
Both of the SG300-28P switches were running firmware 1.1.2 [the latest on Cisco's website]. So, I decided to install an older firmware version on the SG300-28P switch that I'm returning [installed 1.1.1.8]. Here's what I found out. I could then plug 2 POE devices [e.g. two Ruckus AP's] in adjacent horizontal ports, but not three in a row. In addition, not all adjacent ports. It's funky. For example, I could plug an access point in ports 20 and 21, but not in 21 and 22. No rhyme or reason in how it worked. And I still couldn't plug an access point in adjacent vertical ports [e.g. ports 1 and 13]. BUT...
It's interesting that the same exact switch that would not initially allow 2 horizontally-adjacent POE ports to be utilized WOULD allow 2 horizontally-adjacent POE ports to be utilized when running a different firmware version. It's also interesting to note that when plugged into a "non-working" POE port, the SG300-28P would actually make a small whining noise. Very subtle noise; I could hear it when approx. 1ft away from the switch. The noise was not noticeable when ports were skipped [and POE actually worked]. Therefore, I believe that Cisco has some SG300-28P firmware bugs [at least in the last two versions of firmware] that is not truly allowing all 24 ports to utilize POE correctly. This problem does not exist with the SG300-10P switch.
In addition, I'd like to know when they think a solution could be created if it's firmware-related. If hardware-related, I don't think I'll be recommending any 28P switches in our projects. Perhaps just the regular SG300-28 with a separate SG300-10P. It's a shame because the SG300-28P is more of a bargain when compared to the two separate components.
Cisco Switches :: SF-300 Deny Access To From One Port To Other 4 Ports
Jul 20, 2011I have 5 VLANs, I assign VLANs to its ports and make them all Untagged.I created ACLs and a ACE rules for each ACL, and then assigned to the ports.So what i am trying to do is to deny access to from one port to other 4 ports and granted access to any other ports. But it is not working, without last rule "allow any any" it has no access to any ports, with the last rule it grants access to every port even to those I denied.Router in Layer 3 mode, all VLANs have their IP's.
At some moment I was able to work it properly but without using any rules, I just tagged my untagged VLANs to those ports which I wanna get access to. As you can see I want allow ports GE1 - GE4 communicate with 1 to 24 ports but not to each other.
Cisco Switches :: SGE2010 Loses Untagged Ports
Mar 7, 2013I have 5 VLAN's setup in the sge2010. I have one port (uplink for the network) that I want everyone to see. But have separate VLAN's for different departments as to keep them all separate. Everytime i try and Untag that uplink port, i lose my untag in the original VLAN it was tagged in, and it changes to excluded.
View 13 Replies View RelatedCisco Switches :: SGE2010 Does Not Block Ports Even With STP Enabled
Jul 28, 2011We are experiencing bridge storms and network slow downs and we believe we have traced the issue down to users plugging a cat 5/6 cable between 2 ports on the wall both wired back to a SGE2010 switch.
So we did a test - we plugged a single short cat 6 cable between 2 ports on a SGE2010, our access switch. Suprisingly, even with STP enabled, the switch DID NOT block one of the ports and in a few minutes the ENTIRE NETWORK was down, as CDP, STP, and ARP traffic became a multi-gigabit storm throughout the network.
Why on earth does this switch not block a port that is obviosly looped?
Every other cisco switch since I started on 1900XL's did this in 1999.
Cisco Switches :: SRW 2016 Not Showing Activity On Ports?
Apr 8, 2013I have a Cisco / Linksys SRW 2016 switch, all was working fine. Powered off and powered back on a day later.Switch powered up and the system light lit.But non of the ports what had cables connected were active....If you connect a network cable to the switch and then a laptop / pc .. The computer knows that there is a connection, but only gives a 169 address. Presumably because the switch cannot get to my dhcp ?I have tried connecting a serial cable to the switch top see if I can see any error, but when running Hyper Terminal I only get the white screen and can not see any POST etc.As far as I under stand it is a straight through cable, do I need a null modem cable to console onto the switch?
View 1 Replies View Related
