Cisco Switches :: Link Aggregation On SG 200-26
Mar 5, 2012
I'm trying to setup Link Aggregation on this switch for an HP server with a 4-port NIC which is teamed. I create the LAG and see in the HP Network Utility where each port in the team disconnects then reconnects and the server has internet access, but workstations cannot access the server (can't browse UNC, RDP, ping, etc.) and vice versa. This is the only switch at the site, all the workstations are plugged into it. Rebooting the switch after creating the group didn't have any effect.
View 1 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Aug 21, 2011
Having issues waking NAS devices using a magic packet when using link aggregation on an SG300-28 switch.
Without link aggregation everything works fine so I know the magic packet is being generated correctly and the NAS device is correctly configured to wake. After configuring link aggregation the device does not wake. Have tried dynamic (LACP) and static link aggregation but neither allowed the device to wake? When the NAS is powered off, the ports in the LAG still show as being connected at 100M but it appears the magic packet is not being transmitted.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 22, 2012
I have a Synology 1512+ and trying to setup Link Aggregation but no success. I have configured LAG Management with LACP enable or disable but still failed.
At the Synology 1512+ setting page, there are 2 options: IEEE 802.3ad Dynamic Link Aggregation and Network Fault Tolerance (Non-802.3ad network enirovement), I selected IEEE802.3ad, which i think S200-18 should be able to support. right?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 14, 2011
answer regarding stacking the SGE2010 switches versus link aggregation if greater than 1 Gb connectivity is required between individual switches? Currently have several switches in a stack configuration but would like to increase the bandwidth between some or all of the switches. Does stacking support a link aggregation configuration? If so what ports can be used and how should the link aggregation be configured in conjunction with the stacking?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 11, 2012
We have a pair of N7K distribution switches connected to a pair of N7K Aggregation switches.We run vPC on both pairs of n7k's.
-n7k-d1 has two interfaces in a Port-Channel connecting to n7k-a1 & n7k-a2. (PC1)
-n7k-d2 also has two interfaces in a Port-Channel connecting to n7k-a1 & n7k-a2. (PC2)
My problem is that Spanning-Tree is blocking PC2 and all traffic from n7k-d2 is traversing the Peer-Link before reaching the Aggregation layer. Is this the best design for connecting two pairs of n7k's with vPC or if a better design would be to connect all 4 links into the same Port-Channel and vPC?
View 7 Replies
View Related
Sep 5, 2012
whether VSS technology support on 3560 switches.I'm planning to intergrate new Cisco 2x6509 with VSS and all the access swtiches 3560's uplink to core 6509..if not support, what will be the solution or any bug fixing or new IOS releasing
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 13, 2012
what is the difference between "link aggregation" and "STP"?
For example:
I have two switches connected with two ethernet cables together. Why I will use link aggregation on trunk ports (without load balancing) when STP will do same service?
View 13 Replies
View Related
Feb 16, 2012
We want a solution for routing between N5K and VSS with aggregated WAN links.
DC1: It has 2 cisco 6509 with VSS. There are 4 server farm cisco4948 switches connected with VSS with redundant uplink via MEC. Server gateway is the VSS. VSS is running Eigrp routing.
DC2: This is a new datacenter we are going to establish soon. We are planning 2 N5K at core layer with L3 daughter card and 4 N2K as server farm switch. 2 N5K will have vPC peer between them. Each 4 N2K will connect with redundant uplink via vPC with this N5K. N5K will run Eigrp routing and will be the gateway of this new DC server.
WAN between DC1 & DC2: DC1 VSS will connect with DC 2XN5K with 2X10G links. we want to do MEC at VSS side and L3 vPC at DC2 side. If we have VSS at both end it might not be a problem. Both the link will work together as 20G aggregated link. But as we are using N5K at one end, so it creates a confusion whether it will work properly is this scenerio or not.Also I would like to know,
1) In VSS I have configured 1 VLAN interface for server gateway. But in N5K do I have to configure at 2 switch seperately?
2) In WAN routing VSS shows as 1 device. Does this 2 N5K will show as 2 seperate hops or L3 vPC will allow them to act as a single device while traceroute from one end to another end.
View 19 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2011
I am trying to setup a home network where I have multiple low bandwidth or rather lower bandwidth links coming in. They are suppose to be broadband but I do feel the need for a fatter pipe. Since this is in India and we have limited availability of bandwidth options like here in the US I thought if I could double or even get close to doubling my bandwidth using some sort of device for link aggregation or a network / pc setup which can achieve thisThe links I am getting are above 1mbps, possibly even 2mpbs and its relatively cheap, 100$/yr so I can add 3-4 to get desired results. A dedicated 10mbps connection costs nearly 12000$/yr so I have a lot of margin to create a substantial pipe without the cost if what I am thinking is possible.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 10, 2011
i'm installing a Firewall Cisco ASA 5550 with 8 Gigabit interfaces.
I have installed firmware 8.2.3.
Is it possible to make link aggregation on ASA to have more bandwith?
View 7 Replies
View Related
May 19, 2013
I've been having some issues lately where if I am copying large amounts of files two and from my NAS and thus saturating my gigabit ethernet, web browsing and internet streaming slows down which is a bit of a bummer. I figured I might fix this with link aggregation.
My switches (Procurve 1810G-24 in basement and 1810G-8 in office) both support 802.3ad Link Aggregation. It works beautifully to connect them together, as well as to connect my FreeNAS box to the switch as well.
how do I set it up to work with my Windows 7 box?
I can't find the options for 802.3ad in the windows menus anywhere, and googling has not led me to the answer yet...
My motherboard has two on board Intel gigabit ports (Intel 82574L and Intel 82579V). Is it possible to link these two, or do I need to pick up another Intel PRO PT dual port copper gigabit NIC like I have two of in my server?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 7, 2012
I am looking after a mixed collection of Cisco and HP switches and use a Perl script to extract configuration data.I use the ifStackStatus table (OID: 1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.2.1.3) from RFC1573 to sucesfully obtain the EtherChannel data from the Cisco switches but, though I do obtain data from the same table from the Procurve switches it seems to bear no resemblance to Link Agregation. I could look at other tables and may have to - but would like to use this one in order to simplify the code.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 16, 2012
if my SA520w will support link aggregation for network devices within my LAN. If so, is there a Cisco wiki or how-to on how to setup this up in the SA520w? I only find a brief mention of this in Section D of the manaul.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 8, 2012
I have two 2960 switches connected with two links. One of them is transparent modem connection with 2Mbps limit, and the other is optical link with media convertos on both sides. Is there a way to set up etherchannel, LACP or any other kind of link transparent to switches or I have to use some sort of STP?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 4, 2012
I have two workstations running 7 Pro, each has a quad port intel card (PCIe) which I have created teams for on both sides using link aggregation. On my switch, a Cisco SG500X-24, I set up two LAG's with 4-ports each and have both servers connected as necessary. I turned on Jumbo frames and disabled energy saving. The teams were set up without LACP turned on, however I tried it with LACP and I also ran into the same problem. Both workstations have a 26TB arrays running in RAID 6 (so plenty of read/write speed), however, with this setup, I can only get about 100MB/s (single port speed) and multiple data streams cause the speed to divide. Only single ports blink on the cards as well.
Questions 1 is probably a no-brainer, but it's my first time setting this up, but once this is working properly, would it allow a single file to transfer at ~400MB/s or would I need to start multiple datastreams to take advantage of link aggregation.
Question 2 is what do I need to change to make the link aggregation work?
I do have a little linksys router plugged into a non aggregated port to do DHCP but that wouldn't mess anything up, would it? Considering I can unplug it once everything is talking, all the transfer should take place at the switch level, correct?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 28, 2011
We have an ASR1006 and I'm just discovering net flow aggregation cache.
I tried prefix aggregation and worked fine. But i cant get any information when checking AS aggregation. All I get is 0 in source and destionation AS. [code]
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 6, 2013
We are running a Cisco 887VA router for our internet access but of course the port connected to the internal network only supports 100Mbit/s. There are a few 100Mbit/s ports on the router; I was wondering whether it was possible to use more than one port to provide aggregation to get higher speed such as two ports providing 200Mbit/s? We are running Gigabit internal.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Aug 27, 2012
I believe it was around 2004 when we first setup our network. We have four data closets with fiber going between them. Each have three D-Link DSS-24+ switches with 10/100 ethernet. We would like to upgrade to switches with gigabit ethernet but are having a hell of a time finding a variety that use SFP modules.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Apr 2, 2011
setting up my D-Link wireless router to my computer which is Windows Vista. have a step-by-step walkthrough with regards on how to set this up.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 1, 2013
We have 3 WiFi links between 2 buildings, these links carry a main data network, a VOIP network and a CCTV network. Occasionally due to unestablished factors we loose one or other of the links for a short period (5mins to an hour). In order to give some redundancy I opted to use a pair of switches and utilize MSTP to give a low cost solution. I have installed an SF302-08P in one building and an SRW208G in the other building and connected ports 1-3 as trunk ports to the three wifi links on both. Ports 5-7 on both switches are set as access ports and connect to the respective networks within that building. MSTP region is set the same on both switches and the instances and VLANs are the same on both switches. I have set port priority and cost to force the three networks to use their own link until a failure occurs. Then within the MSTP instances I have set the path costs such that CCTV or MAIN failover to VOIP last of all. During testing on the bench using patch cables to simulate the wifi links all went well. Upon installation things got a little more difficult. The VOIP network seems to work well but the CCTV won't pass the video traffic until the SF302-08P is rebooted even though I could connect a PC and login to the CCTV devices from either direction. More serious though is no matter what I do the MAIN network will not pass traffic. The MSTP interface settings show the correct port states with (in the case of MAIN network - MSTP instance 3) Port 1 Alternate, Port 2 Discarding, Port 3 Forwarding and Port 7 Forwarding.However a pcap shows no traffic across the wifi link on VLAN 4 (MAIN) although Layer 1 must be ok as VLAN1 is fine. The only other factor that may be relevent could be the wifi units themselves as the CCTV and VOIP links use an older 2.4GHz bridge while the MAIN link uses a newer 5GHz bridge. The 2.4G units have no knowledge of STP while the 5G units are 802.1d aware but I'm sure I read somewhere that 802.1d devices will cause problems with RTSP or MSTP networks due to the BDPU message format compatability, therefore I left it disabled.
View 10 Replies
View Related
Mar 10, 2012
I have a problem with switches SPS208G2. They're conected with SFP module after Linksys SPS224G4 and another swithes. After reboot switches which are conected with SPS208G2 don't see link. However previous switches phisical link status is up show LED, but protocol status is down show command "show interface status". I changed Firmware, it doesn't work, i changed SFP module it doesn't work. Yesterday i got new Firmware ls_sps2xx_bx-10600.ros but no luck. I don't understand what's wrong with switches SPS208G2. I have 500 or 700 switches SPS208G2. They installed different places at city. They don't ping until reboot their or previous switches. Reboot previous switches usually doesn't work, works only physical reboot or pulling SFP module.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 24, 2013
I just deployed two stacked SG500X switches. I noticed these messages in the log (see below). Despite these messages everything appears to be functioning.
21474818342013-Jan-25 11:41:17Warning%Stack-W-LINK DOWN: link 0 on unit-2, aggregated (369)
21474818352013-Jan-25 11:41:17Informational%Stack-I-LINK UP: link 0 on unit-2, aggregated (369)
21474818362013-Jan-25 11:37:25Warning%STCK SYSL-W-UNITMSG: UNIT ID 2,Msg:%Stack-W-LINK DOWN: link 0 on unit-2, aggregated (1)
21474818372013-Jan-25 11:37:25Warning%Stack-W-LINK DOWN: link 0 on unit-2
21474818382013-Jan-25 11:37:25Informational%Stack-I-LINK UP: link 0 on unit-2
[Code]....
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 30, 2011
I have 8 apartments that have a single internet connection coming into the building, I then have a PoE Access Point in each of the 8x apartments.
What I would like to be able to do is to have each apartment within its own vlan, but to be able to use the internet via one of the non-PoE ports (port 9 say) but do not want residents in different flats to be able to see each others devices on the same network.
I have a Cisco SG 300-10MP which has 8x PoE ports and 2x Ethernet ports, one of which my Internet connection is plugged into (using WiMax).
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 11, 2012
I have several SGE2010P switches connected in a stack. They are working fine as a stack.
Question is - what traffic, besides stack control, is carried over the stacking links?
All unused ports are VLAN 1U. Ports in use belong to VLANs 100, 101, and 105.Since I cannot configure or see the stacking ports, I am unclear if any non-default VLAN traffic passes over those links between switches?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 16, 2012
how to open the tp-link interface setup for my TD-W896ON? i have a user and a password but where do i add them ??
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 27, 2011
l have a web-site and when l go on it it comes up with blank page internet explorer cant load this page.l have phone talk talk and they cant fix it.l have a d-link router,its only my own web-site l cant access all other web-sites l can access.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 6, 2011
i m using ISP provided modem+router and another D-Link Wireless router at the same time... My computer is connected to D-LInk's Router and D-Link's Router is connected to ISP's Modem...My modem's Ip address is : 192.168.1.1 Router's IP Address: 192.168.0.1ok but now problem is that now Dlink is connected to ISP's Modem and ISP's modem assigns different ip to Wl.Router. Both have DHCP enabled... But i want modem (which is also a router) to assign D-Link's router the STATIC IP... like 192.168.1.54Router Model is D-link DIR-615 Modem Model is ZTE EchoLife HG510a
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 9, 2012
I am trying to connect two D-link 24 port switches thru cat 6 cable, distance is less than 50 meters, but its not working but if i connecting it with a Laptop i am able to connect to the network. But if i connect the switch in between it fails i tried changing the switch and cable but no use anyone have a clue how it fails?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jul 28, 2011
I just purchased a Cisco SF 102-24 unmanaged 100 series swith with a MGBSX1 mini-Gbic converter. My goal is to connect this to a building that is connected with a Black Box LH1706A-ST media converter that has 100mb ST fiber connections. In my testing the Black Box shows both a Fiber link and RJ45 port link at 100mb, but the MGBSX1 does not show any link lights or traffic. So a computer connected to the Cisco switch is not able to communicate over the fiber connection.
Can the MGBSX1 be connected to a media converter that only has 10/100 ST fiber connectors?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 9, 2012
I have two switch SG300-10 that need to be interconnect togheter with a simple redundant "cable fail safe" configuration.My idea is use the two uplink copper port of the first switch, connected to the two uplink copper port of the second switch.
How to create a working setup configuration? The first setup that i need, is with only one VLAN1 for all ports,
The second setup is with the VLAN1 assigned to the ports 1-2-3-4 of all the two switch, (linked togheter by uplink ports)
and the VLAN2 assigned to the ports 5-6-7-8 always linked togheter with the same uplink ports.
Is possible use the two uplink port at the same time, as cable fail safe? or use a uplink port 1 for the first group and the second uplink port for second group?
I need to use this configuration for audio cobranet transport, and i need to test the correct configuration for the primary and secondary audio stream, if can work togheter on the same VLAN or i need to separate the two stream, from start to the end.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 12, 2013
My buffalo link station 3t was giving me problems due to avg firewall blocking access to my drive. so switched it off to work . now that the drive is working but now when i click to access the drive the back ground on the desktop goes black on windows 7 its a acer laptop and the graphics are blurey.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 24, 2012
I have 4 workstation at 4 different power substations. Each substation have switches. All substations is link with fiber optic cable throw switches. Each substation has 100 relay (IED) with different IP address it connect with substation switches. The IP address of substation is[CODE]
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 4, 2013
I'm working with a customer who has an SGE2000P and a Catalyst 2960 to setup and configure a single mode fiber link. The SGE2000P has an MFELX1 fiber GBIC and the 2960 has a GLC-LH-SMD GBIC. When I have the customer plug in his fiber, there is a power light that comes on on the MFELX1 GBIC. Neither GBICs/switches show that a link or activity is occurring, but the presence of that light makes me think that they are connecting somehow. Are these two switches/GBICs compatible?
View 1 Replies
View Related
