Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3560x / VPC Peer Not Able To Ping Server
May 28, 2013
The setup I currently have is a server attached via an etherchannel to a 3560x switch, which is connected to a pair of 5548UP's that are connected via vpc. The 5548's both have a single connection to 6500 series switch that does the layer 3 routing, the ports that connect the 5548 to the 6504 are trunk ports. The problem that I am having is that one of the 5548's can ping the server that is connected down stream while the other 5548 can't. While the local switch can ping the server, and other servers on the same switch in the same vlan can ping it as well. The vlan interface I am pinging from on each switch is on the same subnet as the server I am trying to ping. One other thing, Nexus #1 which can ping the sever has the mac address in its mac address table, while Nexus #2 doesn't. However I added the static mac entry to Nexus #2 and that did not allow me ping either.
View 2 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Nov 25, 2012
i have a cisco 3560x poe. ny currnet version is 12.2(58)SE2.the cpu process is aboute 30% average.my problem is- ping to the switch itself show me 12ms which is high latency.*note- data between two hosts no this has no latency.i realize the packet go into the cpu itself but, the cpu is not loadedusy. so my question is- is this natural behavior?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 10, 2012
On a csico 3750 switch I have ntp server < IP of stratum 1 Time Server> I want the swit to sync to the to time server and provide time to peers on my network. Do I have to be configured for ntp peer < IP of stratum 1 Time Server> for that to work?
View 7 Replies
View Related
Feb 25, 2013
I am working on wi-fi networks (ISP), So I need to block the peer to peer on my network.My network involves cisco switch 2950/2960, cisco 2800 routers and Access Points, config for peer to peer blocking, for this where I need to config either switches or router.My network basic setup is, The internet will pass from router to switch and then Access Points.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 13, 2013
I am facing issues in blocking Peer to Peer applications in LAN. I am using 881 Cisco router and below is the config done. [code]
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 28, 2011
One of the schools whose networks I administer has a peer to peer network running about 30 xp machines. DHCP is achieved and DNS settings distributed via a basic Linksys router; is there any way of distributing proxy server address and port short of entering manually in LAN settings of IE on every terminal - there is no budget to install a server.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 12, 2012
I have 2 routers, one is an Apple AirPort Extreme with a static outside IP address, I also have a Cisco 871 with a static outside IP address. The Airport Extreme connects to a switch on the private network and has an IP address ending in .1. The Cisco 871 connects to the same Private network and it ends in .2. The 871 is setup as a VPN Server. now when clients connect to the VPN they can ping the VLan IP Address on the 871, but they can t ping any other hosts on the smae network. The hosts on the private network can ping the vlan on the 871.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Oct 28, 2012
I have the switch ============>>>>>
sw2960g============server linux
As u see above , the inetrface Gi0/6 , Gi0/7 are connected directly to linux server by two redundent links .
I mean that Gi0/6 is connected to interface0 in linux server
and Gi0/7 is connect to interface interface1 in linux server
Gi0/6===>vlan 1
Gi0/7===>vlan 2
each interface of linux server has a different ip and different gateway .
Now from switch, I make ping to interface 0 of linux server and i have a reply , every thing is ok but when i type the command :
#sh mac address-table | i Gi0/6
There is no Mac addresses and seems no Mac address relative to Gi0/6, I mean that doesn't it mandatorty to learn the mac address of linux server and write in mac table relative beside interface Gi0/6 ? How I could ping the server but no mac beside Gi0/6 ?
View 11 Replies
View Related
May 2, 2012
Connected server on a tenGigabitEthernet interface simple configuration setup
switchport
switchport access vlan 201
end
for server connection. Connected with Fibre. The interface is up and up but cannot ping server?
View 10 Replies
View Related
Oct 24, 2011
I have an Cisco 6500 CS and there is a Cisco Unified Communication Manger Server connected directly to the Core Switch.I tried to change duplex and speed ( fix and auto ) for both sides, but the same problem.
View 9 Replies
View Related
Jan 17, 2013
My management has tasked me to give them a high level overview of the different switching we can choose for our new building.
This is what I know so far.4 Closets, each closet has 450 ports,One MDF room that is will contain one UCS Chassis and a Nimble iSCSI SAN.
I am working on the spreadsheet and it looks like this (Not totally filled):
2960s3560x3750x45064510Approx cost (Each, 48PORT, POE+, 10G uplink, Dual PS, IP BASE)
6K7K8K45K75KMax Capacity192432432192384Backplane speed206464520520ProLeast ExpensiveStackable to 9Stackable to 9ProDual PSDual PSDual PSDual PSDual PSProLayer 3 opt
Layer 3 optDual SupsDual SupsConExpensiveExpensiveConNo Dual PSConLayer 2 OnlyCannot stack more than 4
For the MDF I would like to use 2 Nexus 5548's with FEX's, and the layer 3 daughter board. For the IDF's I was thinking of two 4010's.
View 12 Replies
View Related
Mar 25, 2012
I have an environment where i have two nexus 7010 switches, along with 2 nexus 5510's. I need to run OSPF as a layer 3 routing protocol between the vpc peer links. I have 1 link being used as a keep alive link, and 3 other links being used as a VpC link.
1) Is it best to configure a separate Vpc VLAN i.e 1010
2) Is it best to configure a vrf context keep-alive
3) just have the management address as the peer ip's.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 6, 2013
i cant find any difference in these two devices when i am trying to compare throughput.I need upgrade our new POP and there will be around 4900 MAC adresses in VLAN 150 and 130 MAC adresses in vlan 200.Uplink is 1 gig routed internet connection and there is 14 downlinks to separate villages.i found a few differences for eg stack interface on 3750x but i dont need it.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 25, 2012
What is the function of the VPC peer-link? Should be the composite of all VPC links that are dual homed between switches? is it necessary to have 8 x 10G links as shown above. The links connecting the 7Ks to the 5Ks are VPC links.
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 23, 2012
I unpacked a new 3560x and went to put our standard code version on it c3560e-ipbasek9-mz.122-53.SE2. Everything seemed to upgraded fine but it won't boot to a console prompt. It seems like it loads the IOS image fine but can't get passed the Front-end Microcode IMG MGR: Programming device 0. [code]
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 9, 2012
We have a small site that has an Avaya voice switch connected to a c3560x switch.The avaya tech told us to set this on our ports to which the phone and the desktop are connected.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 3, 2013
i am in process of building a new datacenter with 2 nexus7k in core/aggregation and 2 n5k in access layer. I am running fabric path on F2 cards between 7k and 5k, also enabled vpc+ on 7k and 5 both. There are few vrfs on 7k which are communicating with each other through firewall contexts. Now there are few vlans which are used to connect differnt vrfs and firewall contexts on n7k and running hsrp as well. now since these vlans are not traversing FP network i should not logically configure these vlans as FP vlans. But since the vpc+ peer link is a FP link it will not allow non-FP vlans to communicate through itself. I have configured a vpc trunk link between 7k and fws. Diag is attched. Now my question is can i configure vlans used for connecting vrf and fw contexts as FP vlans so that hsrp running between those vlans can communicate with each other over vpc+ peer link on n7k.
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 14, 2013
I have seen a similar post here from last year about a 10/half connection, but this is different. I have a provider using a 2950 switch (they left CDP on so we can see it). And we have to be set to 10/full to make this connection (as you know 10/half connected here would be or is horrible). I have had this connection running on my 2921 router w/o issue but when I connect it to my 3560X, then I get no link light (shows down/down, not connected).
What else to know about what has been tried: Connecting link to switch with switch set to auto/auto (sp/dup). Speed is 10 (as it should be) but of course w/o the other side pulsing the voltage to know what to auto to, it defaults to half so this is unacceptabel, but, I do get a link light and can pass traffic, it's just a horrible experience.
Also tried the same setting speed and duplex vs. auto disco speed and duplex on other ports of the switch, no difference, same results. Also different patch cables, same results.
My current work around is to connect the providers 2950 (10/full) to my 2921 router @ (10/full) with a BVI to another port on the router which continues on to my 3560X at 1G/full. And this works just fine. Here's more info from my 3560X and the providers 2950:
3560X:
License Level: ipservices
License Type: Permanent
Next reload license Level: ipservices
[Code].....
View 11 Replies
View Related
May 23, 2013
If the 3560 or 3750 "X" series support GRE.I am pretty certain the older 3750-E does not support GRE (both in hardware and software)Was hoping the new super duper X series do. If not, it could get expensive
View 5 Replies
View Related
Feb 18, 2013
I have a 3560X switch with interfaces 36-48 on the same LAN. All interfaces are switchports. Hosts on 38, 39 and 40 are multicast senders: all sending to the same single multicast address. Hosts on 36 and 37 are receivers, having joined that multicast group. I created an SVI for the LAN and put it in ip pim passive. (That is the only PIM mode allowed for an SVI with my IOS.) Show ip igmp snooping groups shows that 36 and 37 are the only interfaces in this group. I attach a laptop to interface 42 and Wireshark, and the laptop is receiving the multicast traffic. The laptop does not join the group. I expect it would not see the traffic.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 25, 2013
last week we have changed the connection of small town from licensed radio to direct fiber with clasic 1gig sfp.After that we have connected the new fiber , we can see 5 min outages of customer internet connection. If we are conncted on the same subnet anywhere on network, we can ping the customer all the time. But if we try to ping the customers public IP it is each 5 min for 5 min unreachable. I have tryed to sho logg in all switches but there are no mesasages. I just see, when comunication have lost, the MAC and IP of customer will disapear from routers ARP tabbel. What is going on?When i enter sho mac address-table i can see customers MAC address in all switches. There are exactly 5 min outages. 5min it runs ok, 5 min outage and it repeats agan.
I looks like the swith blocks the ARP packets from customers to their default gateway.The routers are connected to catalyst 3560x lan base ios, This switch is connected to another 3560x lan base ios and it is connected with fiber to ME3400 where are customers connected.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 24, 2013
I have 3560X-24T-S switches with IP Services loaded at remote sites that I have been having troubles with. Originally, they had IOS 12.2(58)SE1 on them. I have up to four diverse paths via point-to-point microwave at the remote sites. The Microwave equipment is by Microwave Networks and is a Prodeus M series which Ethernet support. The original issue manifested itself as hardware loopback errors on some of the ports that were connected to the microwave links.
My experience in the past has been that when a hardware loopback error occurred it is usually a bad switch port. In this case however, if I disconnected all of the microwave Ethernet links and rebooted the switch and then connected the Ethernet connections to the microwave links again, everything works fine. No hardware loopback errors. That is, until the next switch reboot. Then the hardware loopback error would return. Interestingly, it would come back on different ports connected to the microwave links every time. So if a reboot was done without disconnecting the microwave Ethernet links the hardware loopback error would change from one microwave link to another after each reboot.
I then went through and read the lengthy release notes for IOS version 15.0(2)SE and found several fixes that I thought could fix my issue. So I downloaded it and updated a couple of the offending switches (not all of them were having this problem). After going through the second update required to resolve the 'open file error' that happens going between 12.2(58)SE1 and 15.0(2)SE the problem seemed to be resolved on the offending switches. So, I went ahead and updated the IOS on all of the switches with point-to-point microwave connections.
I now have one switch that was updated that is crashing and rebooting continuously when the Ethernet links for the point-to-point microwave are connected. Again, if I disconnect all the microwave links and reboot, it comes up fine ands stays fine when the microwave links are connected back up. It will work fine until the next reboot and then the crash and reboot loop starts over again. Below is a portion of the putty log when the crash occurs:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
previous memory block, bp = 0x59BF838,
memorypool type is Processor
data check, ptr = 0x59BF860
========= Dump bp = 0x59BF87C ======================
59BF77C: 0 0 0 FD0110DF AB1234CD FFFE0000 56 383FDB4
59BF79C: 212AC68 59BF838 59BF6F4 80000042 1 0 A504F53 543A2050
59BF7BC: 6F727441 53494320 506F7274 204C6F6F 70626163 6B205465 73747320 3A20456E
[code].....
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 12, 2012
It would be so easy but failed to upgrade 3560X switch to ip services licence is bought and paid for mail and log from the CLI and tftp server attached
View 17 Replies
View Related
Mar 14, 2012
Im going to be ordering a new 3560X L3 switch (ws-3560x-48pf-s). We currently have a 3560 V2 switch and I've read it supports stacking, but looking at the back I just see a console port. Is there an extra card I have to get for this 3560V2 to make it stakable with the 3560X?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 20, 2013
I was viewing the 3560x switch datasheet and i need network module C3KX-NM-10G. I have dark fiber with over 12 km distance to i guess i will be needing SFP EX for single mode.
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 9, 2012
I currently use L3 switches as edge routers to my WAN. I want to use a pair of 3560x switches with IPbase to provide a failover path to my WAN using HSRP at one location but had some problems testing the configuration. My plan is use a virtual address on the LAN interface (VLANx which port gi0/1 accesses) and the WAN interface (VLANy which port gi0/24 accesses). I want switch 1 to be primary since it will have an IPS attached to it, and switch 2 will be backup and used only when switch 1 or the IPS requires maintenance. On both the LAN and WAN sides there is no advanced routing going on, the various hosts just depend on the availability of their respective default gateways, so HSRP should be sufficient to provide a failover in either direction.
In my testing I got 1 or the other link to fail over but not the entire switch. What should my config look like to achieve failover of the entire switch in the event 1 or the other interface goes down, and fail back when the primary links are again available?
View 7 Replies
View Related
Feb 6, 2012
I am stuck at a very early stage in the configuration of 3560x switch. It seemed very unusual and that is the reason, I configured basic config for line con 0 with login local. And then I had just put "enable secret xxxxxx."
Now I simply logged out and when i tried logging in, it is asking for a username. Now the thing is that I had not programmed any username. I tried using just "." followed by my secret password, but it did not work.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Oct 14, 2012
we just got brand new 3560X with LANBASE license installed. Wanted to confirm with a "show license"
To my surprice (output below) I hav IP Services evaluation. I tried to test with an "show ip route" and "ip route..." in configuration mode with no success. How do I use the trial license?
Switch#show license
Index 1 Feature: ipservices
Period left: 8 weeks 4 days
License Type: Evaluation
License State: Active, Not in Use, EULA not accepted
License Priority: None
[Code]...
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 17, 2013
if a connect to the switch via Internet Explorer or every other browser I can't enter configuration because I receive a screen as you can view in image below. And I can view those errors:
message: 're_preFlt_txt33' is not defined
Linea: 31
Carattere: 1
Codice: 0
URI:
[URL]
If I connect in HTTPS with IE8 in compatibility mode I view the image as in attachment with_https.jpg.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 1, 2011
why Cisco make 3560x switches with Lan Base(no routing functions)? What happen if I load an Image L3, previously downloaded? my device lost the warranty? or it doesn matter?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 2, 2013
We recently had a pair of Nexus 5k switches setup in our network. We had professional services handle the initial configuration but they weren't able to setup config sync for us. Each Fex is connected to each 5k, so we need a switch-profile to maintain a consistent setup on our interfaces. I went through the process in Configuring Switch-Profiles, but when I check the status of the peer, it says not reachable. [code]
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 5, 2013
Can you use twinax cables to connect two Nexus 7010 switches for VPC peer link? They would connect on F2 modules and have Sup2 on the chassis.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 3, 2012
I need to enable vPC "peer-switch" command on a pair of Nexus 7018s which are currently vPC peers (primary and secondary). The STP root and Secondary root are currently configured across these switches.Can I enable the peer-switch command in this configuration without impacting services, and then modify both switches to have the same bridge priority without impacting services ? We have a few downstream 5ks which are not dual homed to both vPC peers (work in progress) so need to understand if the peer-switch command will in any way break this connectivity for now.
View 1 Replies
View Related
