Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750G - Stack Switching Priorities Not Correct

Mar 21, 2012

I got Two Distribution Switches of Cisco 3750G. Each Distribution have two 3750G switches stacked. I also have one Cisco 3750V2 Access Switch connected to both Distribution. When I am checking for redundancy, I can only get redundancy test pass for one link not atall for other. If I have a link up with Distribution 1 only then its fine; but disappointment with Distribution 2 link. I can see that the switch priorities of Dist 2 is not correct ie. Master's priority is 10 and Member's is 15.
My question is that due to misconfigured priorities on Distribution 2 stack switches I am failing with redundancy if ONLY Dist 2 is up and Dist 1 is down.

View 4 Replies


Cisco Switching/Routing :: Is It Possible To Stack A 3750G And 3750X

May 26, 2011

I have a 3750G and bought a new 3750X.  It possible to stack these two together?

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750G Won't Join A Stack

Jan 29, 2013

I have a 3750G switch that can't detect another switch or be detected through its stack ports. I tried the recommended test; looping a cable between the ports and rebooting. I get the following message as the switch boots: SM:  Detected stack cables at PORT1 PORT2. However, if I connnect another switch, it won't detect it and can't form a stack.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Upgrade IOS On A 3750G-24T Stack?

Feb 20, 2012

I'm trying to upgrade the IOS ver on a 3750G stack (2 switches), but the img on the switch is too old.The stack is running IOS c3750-i9-mz.121-19.EA1d.bin, and when I tried to upgrade to a newer version, I tried to go to IOS ver c3750-advipservicesk9-mz.122-35.SE5.bin since I need to enable ssh on the switch, but the switch did not reload.
Here's a prtscreen of the switch ver:
Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
IOS (tm) C3750 Software (C3750-I9-M), Version 12.1(19)EA1d, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
Copyright (c) 1986-2004 by cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Mon 05-Apr-04 22:40 by antonino
Image text-base: 0x00003000, data-base: 0x007CBC3C

what IOS ver can I upgrade to that is not already deferred?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Switch 3750G Stack

Jun 17, 2012

have one 3750G stack with 4 switches and this stack is presenting the follow log message:
%PLATFORM_UCAST-4-PREFIX:  One or more, more specific prefixes could not be programmed into TCAM and are being covered by a less specific prefix, and the packets may be software forwarded.
In this stack we are using the layer 3 with OSPF routing, and the current sdm prefer is default:
switch-01-3750#sh sdm prefer
The current template is "desktop default" template.
The selected template optimizes the resources in
the switch to support this level of features for
8 routed interfaces and 1024 VLANs.(code)

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Mixed 3750-X And 3750G In A Stack?

Jul 17, 2012

Any one try to form a stack with mixed 3750-X and 3750G? Is there any prerequisites in hardware and software?

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750G Stack Slow Performance

Nov 19, 2012

I am currently having performance issues running a 3 x stack 3750G (different models) as a core for a network of roughly 12 x distribution switches. [code] As above, I have a 12 port Fibre switch and 2 x 3750G-48 port switches. [code] I tried to change the SDM to route but hit another issue where the 3750g-48 does not support SDM route so I had to revert back to desktop VLAN.Could the SDM Template be the reason for slow performance? If so which SDM Template should i use as this is the Core L3 switch.

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Stack 3750G-12S-S With 3750X-48T Switch?

Apr 14, 2012

if we can stack the 3750G switch with a 3750X switch ?

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Adding 3750X To 3750G Stack?

Jun 13, 2012

Our customer has a stack of 6 3750G switches.  They want to add another switch to the stack.  I tried to quote another G, but I got a warning that the G series is EOS January 30,2013.  Can I add a 3750X to the stack?  I know that no matter what switch I get, I will have to upgrade the IOS in the stack, as the stack is running 12.2(25)SEE2. 

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Difference Between Stack 3750G And 3750X?

Jul 15, 2012

I have a cisco WS-C3750G-24TS with IOS flash :/ c3750-mz.122-ipservicesk9-25.SEB4.bin "
I purchased a new Cisco WS-C3750X-24 with the IOS flash :/ c3750e-universalk9-mz.150-1.SE/c3750e-universalk9-mz.150-1.SE.bin. ( NEW )
When i configured a stack between the two 3750,  the new switch restarted due the version mismatch (different IOS´s);
 We have two versions: 
WS-C3750G-24TS-ipservicesk9 flash :/ c3750-mz.122-25.SEB4.bin "
WS-C3750X-24 flash :/ c3750e-universalk9-mz.150-1.SE/c3750e-universalk9-mz.150-1.SE.bin.
Is that possible to configure a stack between then?
Tenho  um cisco WS-C3750G-24TS com o IOS flash:/c3750-ipservicesk9-mz.1
Adquiri  um novo cisco WS-C3750X-24 com o IOS flash:/c3750e-universalk9-mz.150-1.SE/c3750e-universalk9-mz.150-1.SE.bin.


View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750G Spanning Tree On New Switch Stack

Nov 3, 2011

I am about rip and replace my current 3750G stack with a 3750X stack. I have trunked over vlan and vtp info and implemented a config so it should be ready to go other then moving cables onto it. However one thing I want to correct with our current setup is that the root bridge on our vlans including vlan 1 is on a separate set of switches that we control, however I would like this new stack to be the root bridge for all of our vlans. It will be the central set of switches that all other switches trunk into.  I have pre-set higher spanning-tree priorities for each vlan on the new stack so I expect as I move lines into it that the tree will be re-calculated with it as the root bridge. I've ensured that there are no root guards on any of the other switches trunks and priorities are all at default levels for each vlan. Should I enforce root guard on the trunk interfaces of the new master stack?  Most of the trunks are port-channels to the other switches - do I need to set root guard on the Port channel interface or on the individual ports that make up the Port channel? On both? Any other recommendations in regards to implementing spanning-tree with the new stack? I know using port channels eliminates a lot of potential for loops but not every trunk is and I'd still like to have spanning-tree on.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Can Stack 3750G-12S-S Switch With 3750E-24TD-S

Apr 22, 2012

Can we stack a 3750G-12S-S switch with a 3750-E-24TD-S switch?

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: EtherChannel Cross-Stack Between 3750g And 4507R?

Oct 23, 2012

I am running out of ports on a 4507R and would like to use a 3750G-24TS stack that I already have to expand capacity. Is it possible to configure EtherChannel between the 4507R and the 3750G stack and if so what is the best way to do it? without LACP, with active-active mode LACP or passive-active mode LACP...
This is what I have in mind:On the 4507R side I would like to use interface GigabitEthernet3/5 and interface GigabitEthernet4/5 where modules 3 and 4 on the 4507R are "6 1000BaseX (GBIC) (WS-X4306-GB)". On the 3750G side I would like to use ports 28 on both switches in the stack which are equipped with Cisco GLC-T= 1000BASE-T SFP transceiver module for Category 5 copper wire with RJ-45 connector. [URL] Cross-Stack EtherChannel Without PAgP or LACP should look like this:
3750switchstackA(config)#interface gigabitethernet 1/0/28
3750switchstackA(config-if)#channel-group 1 mode on
3750switchstackA(config-if)#switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
3750switchstackA(config-if)#switchport mode trunk
3750switchstackA(config)#interface gigabitethernet 2/0/28
3750switchstackA(config-if)#channel-group 1 mode on


is that what I should be doing? is there any benefit to the active-active mode LACP or passive-active mode LACP and which are applicable to the case above?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750G Stack-wise Port Error?

Aug 7, 2012

I have a stack of 3750G's where the connection between switch 1 port 1 and switch 2 port 2 are down
Stack Port Status             Neighbors
Switch#  Port 1     Port 2           Port 1   Port 2
  1       Down        Ok              None       3
  2        Ok        Down                3      None
  3        Ok         Ok                   1        2
I have ruled out the stackwise cable as the problem but would like to know which switch has the problem

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750G - Adding Additional Switch And Making It Stack

Feb 29, 2012

I currently have Cisco 3750G which is currently live and active and fully populated and only have remote access.
I have an additional same switch which I would like to stack. My initial plans were to have 2 GIbit etherchannels, but I came across the option to Stacks both switch with each other.
When I do a show switch on the live switch its set as a Member: [code]

I would like to add the new switch to the stack without losing the config for the switch which is live. I understand that the highest priority of the switches becomes the Master but as the live switch is Priority 1, would chancing this affect the switches config, or would it lose connection at all?
Also when I plug in the new switch and it reboot how do I ensure it becomes the slave without rebooting the live switch?The cables on the switch do they have to go to port1 on the live switch and port 1 on the new switch or can they be port 1 and port 2?

View 19 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Upgrading Firmware On Mixed 3750G And 3750X Stack

Jul 3, 2012

I've got a mixed stack as follows:

Switch 1 - 3750X-24P
Switch 2 - 3750G-24TS
Switch 3 - 3750G-24T
Running 12.2(53)SE2, IP base.  Now I tried upgrading the firmware on the entire stack to 12.2(55)SE4 and ran into this error:(Command: archive download-sw /imageonly /overwrite /allow-feature-upgrade tftp://
 Error: The image in the archive which would to used to upgade system number 2 does not support that system type.I haven't as yet removed the "3750G-24TS" switch from the stack and re-tried as yet, however, is the expectation that without the 24TS, the upgrade should work?

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 3750G / WS-3750G-48PS Memory

Jan 15, 2012

Has any come across show ver memory details on 3750G-48PS as below, One of our Catalyst 3750G running software 12.2(44)SE2 shows unexpected DRAM as below:

cisco WS-C3750G-48PS (PowerPC405) processor (revision F0) with 0K/12280K bytes of memory. This would equate to around 11MB memory which does not seem right... Is it a known IOS bug?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: CAB-STACK-50CM Bent Stack Cable

Feb 27, 2013

Is there a stacking cable that is "bent"?Im using this cable:"CAB-STACK-50CM", "Cisco StackWise 50CM Stacking Cable".But it takes up to much room in the back of the switch, is there such a thing as "bent" stacking cable.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Configuring Stack-power On A 3750X Stack?

Oct 31, 2012

I have 3 switches in my 3750 X stack. I am getting the following error in the logs:  %PLATFORM_STACKPOWER-4-PRIO_CONFLICT: Switch 1's power stack has conflicting power priorities.  Not sure what I should do next. Below is my Stack-power configuration:
Power stack name: Powerstack-1    Stack mode: Power sharing    Stack topology: Ring    Switch 1:        Power budget: 735        Low port priority value: 20        High port priority value: 10        Switch priority value: 2        Port 1 status: Connected        Port 2 status: Connected        Neighbor on port 1: c464.1308.7900        Neighbor on port 2: e8b7.4827.e680
    Switch 3:        Power budget: 729        Low port priority value: 22        High port priority value: 13        Switch priority value: 4        Port 1 status: Connected        Port 2 status: Connected        Neighbor on port 1: 2894.0fd9.9f00        Neighbor on port 2: 2894.0fd8.e200
    Switch 2:        Power budget: 690        Low port priority value: 21        High port priority value: 12        Switch priority value: 3        Port 1 status: Connected        Port 2 status: Connected        Neighbor on port 1: 2894.0fd8.e200        Neighbor on port 2: c464.1308.7900
Each switch has its own 715W power supply in it and all check out OK.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960G Configuring Ether-channel On Stack-wise Stack

Sep 24, 2012

A site that i am responsible for has the following equipment installed: 

2 x 3750G Switches configured as a stack using Stackwise - Collapsed Core/Distribution Layer
5 x 2960G Switches as Access Layer switches
WAN connections into the Core/Distribution Layer are all Gigabit Ethernet over Fibre.This is a dedicated CCTV Network with 50 Cameras all streaming video into the Core (decoders connected to access switches)Each 2960G has 2 links to the Core/Distribution 3750G Switches, 1 to each switch - Gigabit.I'm running rapid-pvst on all switches, so spanning tree is blocking one of the ports and effectively halving the 2 gig bandwidth. Next year our customer is going to add in a further 50 - 60 cameras.After monitoring the current loading on the ports in use, we have suggested to the customer that the 2 connections to each should be Ether-channeled together. [code]
First interface takes commands no problem, keep getting the message that etherchannel cannot be configured across different switches in a stack when i try to put the second interface commands on.

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Correct Way To Lic VSS On 4500 SUP7L-E

May 13, 2013

What is the correct way to lic VSS on a 4500 SUP7L-E ? url... Under Table 5 - Support by Image Type; VSS is listed as available on IP Base (SUP7E only) and a plain Yes under Enterprise Services, inferring that you need Enterprise Services lic on SUP7L-E to get VSS? url...Under Table 1 - Minimum License for VSS; IP Base or higher (7-E) or special license (7-LE and Catalyst 4500-X)Can find no option on CCO / configuration tools to list a 'special' VSS license for 4500R+E chasiss with dual SUP7L-E and IP Base.How are you meant to purchase/license VSS on 4500E Chassis + SUP7L-E ?

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Correct 2960 For Small Datacentre

Jan 20, 2013

I have two cabinets in a datacentre (with 12 CAT5 links available between them), at the moment I just have a single firewall and a very basic 3Com 2824 unmanaged gigabit switch in each cabinet that are connected together.  This works perfectly as the traffic use is very light and is typically server->firewall->Internet rather than too much heavy inter-server traffic.I want to improve the redundancy and reliability however.  So I plan to get two Fortigate firewalls, put them in a HA cluster and have one in each cabinet with connections to the WAN.  The servers are all VMware so have mulitple NICs teamed.  The last bit then is between the VMware host servers and the firewalls - the switches.  I'd like to have each server connected to two switches to give multiple paths, so I'm looking at two switches per cabinet.  From doing a fair bit of reading it looks like I'll have no problem with this, STP should be able to sort out the multiple routes to whichever firewall is the active member at the time.  There will be some need for basic VLANing as I would like to separate management traffic and certain servers I wouldn't expect to exceed 5-10 VLANs.
As I said the traffic is very light and from what I can tell I don't require any "fancy" features, and given the I need to buy four switches I'm trying choose a switch that is reliable but will do the job and not much more.  If we experience growth down the road then we can buy more expensive switches then.  So I've been looking at the WS-C2960-48TT-S and the WS-C2960-48TT-L, the first using the LAN Lite software while the second uses the LAN Base.  The LAN Base version is virtually twice the price so I'm wondering if there are any features of LAN Base that are required in my scenario?  I've done quite a bit of reading but cannot really see a reason why LAN Lite should not work fine, but don't want to discover I missed something when it is too late .

View 16 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2950 Cannot Seem To Correct A Duplex Mismatch

May 14, 2012

I cannot seem to correct a duplex mismatch issue.I have a Cisco 2950 switch connected to a Cisco 2621 router.  I am running a per-interface Vlan.  I have two fastethernet ports and one NM-1E card installed on the router.  One fastethernet port is connected to my gateway router, the second fastethernet port is connected to my switch for one Vlan. The NM-1E Ethernet card is being used for the second Vlan which consists of nine IP cameras.  Though the cameras on the Vlan are working fine.Now, the NM-1E card is set to half-duplex.  I know that I should be using a fastethernet module like a 1FE 2W or a 2FE 2W card, (which I have,) but the router does not recogonize either one of these cards when they are installed, and yes, they have been confirmed as good cards.
Using Router-on-a-Stick configuration is out due to the bandwidth contention besides the fact that the router I am using it on will not handle this due to the flash being an older version.I have forced the switchport to half duplex, setting the speed to 10. I was getting fewer error messages at first, but they soon increased back to the frequency that they began with.I have set the switchport to duplex auto, but this failed to resolve the issue.Obviously, I cannot force the switchport into duplex full since the NM-1E interface is set to half duplex.  Can the NM-1E card be configured to full duplex?  I can't seem to find any documentation showing where it can be forced to full duplex mode.Could nine IP cameras just be too much for both the router and switch to handle?

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 4507S Not Showing Correct Information

Jun 14, 2012

Looking at the following output (show interface status) from one of our 4507s I see gig interfaces 3/2 to 3/6 are all trunked (dot1q). When I look at a show run they do not show as trunked. They should indicate switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q and switchport mode trunk (as does interface gig4/2). I have seven other 4507s all running the same IOS: 12.2(25)EWA8 and they all show the same information in show run and show interface status (as far as trunked goes). This is not a problem as I know the interfaces are trunked and working properly I am just puzzled as to why I see this difference.

Here is the sho int gig3/2 trunk. It looks like you are correct. I did not realize some were set to trunk mode on and others were not. I would think the running config would still show the port using dot1q but I guess not.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750E ACL Marked Traffic Are Not In Correct Queue

Apr 22, 2012

We tested a QoS in a Cisco 3750E, IOS: 12.2(58)SE2.Voice traffice in the correct Q without any problem, but all the others traffic the Defualt Q (0), tried to capture the traffic and tcp/udp port are correct.Any thing wrong with my ACL or DSCP - CoS?? ( that ACL works fin on 4500 and 6500) [code]

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Correct Number Of Port Asic In WS-X6704-LC

Jan 1, 2012

Clarifying whats the correct # of port asic in WS-X6704-LC?According to the following link (Catalyst 6500 Architectural white paper): [URL]
"In the WS-X6704-10GE line card, there are two port ASICs each supporting 2 x 10 Gigabit Ethernet ports"
 While in the document: Understanding Quality of Service on the Catalyst 6500 Switch: [URL]
Table 10.  
Number of 10 GE Ports 4
- QoS on 10-Gigabit Ethernet Line Cards (WS-X6704-10GE)
So whats correct? 4 port asic or 2 port asic?

# Port ASIC’s on the linecard 4
# Physical Ports per Port ASIC 1

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2950s / 3550s - Correct Spanning Tree Configuration?

Jan 12, 2012

The network in my building consists of several 2950s connected back to 3550s using redundant fiber links and MST.  Recently one tenant decided they wanted to run their own switch and use the existing building network for VoIP only which is on a dedicated VLAN.  I was thinking about creating an access port on the 2950 and setting it to the VoIP VLAN as I do not want to give them a trunk port.  The client can take this link and connect to their switch.  So far does not seem to be an issue.  Now what happens if the client configures spanning-tree on their switch?  I have no control over their device and cannot manage it.  Is there a way I can protect my edge switch and access port to allow them to run their own spanning tree without it interfearing with my existing MST instances? I was thinking BPDU guard but if they turn on stp and my switch sees a bpdu then the port is disabled and they lose VoIP access.  At the same time I dont want them to be able to create a loop on their switch and have it affect mine.  But since the is only a single cable from my device to theirs?

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Upgrade To IOS 15 On 3750G-24T-E

Nov 8, 2012

I have a couple of 3750G-24T-E switches running IOS 12.2 I would like to upgrade to IOS 15.x. Is this possible? Where do I find some information on the required licenses and costs? I must admit that the cisco search function did come up with a few pages but i was not able to extract the required information. I have not used the new software activation features yet.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750G-12S Policies Based Routing Configuration

Mar 4, 2012

I've one Cisco 3750G-12S with ip routing enable, the swtich is with IP Service firmware, with PRR support.Currently set my default static route to my Firewall A Currently all of the VLAN for will be routed to
I've created a new VLAN 2 for my network with the VLAN interface 2 ip address, my intention is to route traffic to my by creating the access list and route-map.
I've configure my test pc with a static ip and my gateway pointing to (VLAN 2 gateway) , i'm not able to route to

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750G 12S - IOS Features And Stacks

Oct 2, 2012

I am trying to stack the following -

3750G 12S - 12.2.53(SE2 IP Services) Running EIGRP & OSPF


3x 3750X 48P-S - 12.2.53(SE2 IP Base License)

Doing some research, the IP Base does EIGRP on the 3750X, does it do OSPF?

If not I will have to get licence for the 3750X?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750G Switch With PBR With IP SLA Not Working?

Oct 8, 2012

I am having a switch 3750G (WS-C3750G-24TS-S) running a software version (c3750-ipservicesk9-mz.122-55.SE6.bin) and using the PBR with IP SLA.While, i am applying it on interface, it says not supported....
route-map TO-CAS-E0 permit 10
match ip address 125
set ip next-hop verify-availability 10 track 100     (if i change this command to set ip next-hop, it works)
WAN-L3-3750SW01(config-route-map)#interface GigabitEthernet1/0/11


View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Switch 3750G-12S-S Configuration?

Jan 2, 2013

I have one switch 3750G12S I joined the company new, I found that they want to replace it with Alcatel stack switches. I didnt configure this Cisco switch before. how to configure it. I have 4 other new cisco switches in the topology which is not created yet. the 4 switches are all 2960.

View 17 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Stacking 3750G And The 3750E?

Nov 20, 2012

have 2 3750's one is an 3750E the other one is a G... Since they are 2 different versions Do I need to correct ios for each for example my 3750E switch i would have
 c3750e-ipbasek9-mz.122-53.SE2.bin        and for my 3750G switch should i use
Which would be 2 separate images

View 4 Replies View Related

Copyrights 2005-15, All rights reserved