Cisco Switching/Routing :: 5505 Running Out Of Available IP Addresses On Subnet
Oct 7, 2012
I have a customer who has an ASA 5505 that is handling the routing for their internal network. They are running out of available IP addresses on their subnet 192.168.1.0/24. They have dumb switches that don't suppport multiple vlans or trunking & they are only able to connect to one switchport on the ASA. He doesn't not want to purchase any new equipment or rearrange their existing equipment at this time. The customer would like to statically assign IP addesses for 192.168.1.x & 192.168.2.x and have the ASA hand out DHCP addresses for 192.168.3.x addresses. The customer suggested configuring a super subnet. A 192.168.0.0/22 address scheme would provide an ip range 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.3.255 on a single VLAN. I know this is an unconventional way to setup an internal network & I will definitely advise the customer that this should only be considered as a temporary solution until they get more appropriate network equipment.
View 3 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Dec 14, 2012
I have an ASA 5505 with Security Plus License ?I have 5 Static IP Addresses from my ISP?I have the following interfaces. Outside (vlan 2) / Inside (vlan 1) / Guest (vlan 3)For my Vlan3 guest network I have set it up so that DNS must be routed through opendns.org's DNS servers ( for web filtering, etc ) However, its using the static ip that I have plugged into the ASA.
What I would like to accomplish is to put my inside interface (vlan1) on another static ip for outside access if thats possible, so that I can route those clients through opendns.org however however giving them more web privlieges than what the guest network is getting.
View 14 Replies
View Related
Sep 24, 2012
I inherited a Cisco ASA 5505 and am trying to piggy back the device off of an established Network. Here is the basic layout:
192.168.10.1 (Core Router - Handles DHCP/DNS)
192.168.10.9 (ASA 5505 - Piggy backing off of Network)
192.168.40.x (ASA 5505 - VLAN)
I'm able to get onto the Internet without any problems. Devices from the 192.168.10x Network can not ping the inside VLAN1 (192.168.40.x). However, I would like traffic going from the inside VLAN to the Outside VLAN to be blocked, except for 192.168.10.1 and 192.168.10.9. I've tried using ACL's but end up killing my Internet connection. 192.168.10.1 is the default route and is how I get out to the Internet. Is this possible? Essentially, I'm trying to set up a small Network that guests can connect to. The idea is that they can get to the Internet, but that is it. They can't get to internal resources on the 192.168.10.x Network
Here is the config:
ASA Version 8.2(1)
!
hostname ciscoasa
enable password EeCsulrpu.9LalEE encrypted
[Code].....
View 5 Replies
View Related
May 4, 2011
I'm new to Cisco equipment much more familiar w/ Sonicwall w/ that said......I have a 5505 w/ Security Plus licensing
I have set up multiple VLANs as follows
VLAN 1 inside - still setup as 192.168.1.1 (will not be using this for our lan)
VLAN2 - outside
VLAN100 - LAN 10.1.1.1/24
[Code]....
If I do add all the VLANs above I understand I will probably have to make a trunk port since I only have 5 usable interfaces
View 12 Replies
View Related
Oct 8, 2012
Why do we need them? Could we leave the LAN with a subnet broadcast packet (for instance with an address of 192.168.1.255 /24). Are those addresses used for something?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Dec 22, 2011
I have a Belkin model F9K1102 router supplying WAN/LAN connection to three PCs and 2 laptops. Two of the PCs are hardwired with the remainder PC and laptops are wireless. I'm using the default router IP of 192.168.2.1 and my ISP is Charter Cable (if that's of significance). The router is picking up all the dynamic IP information from my ISP and internal DHCP is enabled. Here's the issue though - when I connect a PC, laptop or iTouch (wired or wireless) with obtain IP settings automatically enabled the IP address it receives an IP address on a different subnet ie, 192.168.3.x and thus won't have WAN/LAN connection. I have tried to set the router IP to 192.168.3.1 and set the scope in the .3 subnet but the IP obtained by the device is .4! This makes no sense to me at all. The router is on the latest firmware (according to Belkin) and there doesn't seem to be any other update I can find. I have also tried another Belkin router (older model: F5D8236) and it does the same thing.
I'm not sure if this is related but I upgraded my service with Charter to a 18MB connection and a D3.0 Ubee cable modem - this issue seem to have began after this upgrade but I don't see how that would have any bearing on what is happening on my LAN IP scope and Charter tech support is pretty useless. My workaround is that I've static assigned an IP for each device in the same subnet as the router but it would be nice for the DHCP to function correctly.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Mar 4, 2011
Our company is a small one and steadily growing towards mid size. We currently have about 200 or so users. Naturally we have run out of IP addresses and now we must redesign the entire IP schema.Initially our plan was to just implement a class B subnet for the whole network with certain ranges belonging to certain kinds of devices/machines/servers.Are there any cons to this? If so, could you link me to documentation that explains this?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Apr 22, 2013
Is it possible to NAT source & destination addresses (twice nat) on an ASA5520 running 7.2(5)?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 20, 2010
The 1130ag was the LAP model but I upgraded it to run in autonomous mode. My understanding is that it cannot assign IP addresses but I just want that confirmed. It is not connected to a WLC nor a server that can do DHCP.
View 5 Replies
View Related
May 24, 2012
Got a shiny new SG 200 26P which seems to work fine operationally.owever, when I am trying to access the web interface from a different IP subnet, the web brower just times out.If I put my PC on the same IP subnet, it works just fine. From the other subnet, I can ping the switch fine. The default gateway is set on the switch, and from the web interface I can ping and dns resolve other hosts and on the internet. I've tried to create a management profile to 'allow all from everywhere' basically, but still no luck.I'm completely stumped. I've tried to reset to firmware defaults, and I'm now runinng the latest firmware. I woudl suppose that the switch would allow itself to be managed via the web interface from all subnets by default. Any thoughts? The fact that the switch can ping internet hosts makes be believe it's own default gateway and IP are all ok and working.. (and I can ping it from anywhere in my network).
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jul 16, 2012
Getting a lot of the following errors on our 5508 form the same subnet: 10.20.0.1 255.255.248.0 . I tried researching and not getting much.
broffu_SocketReceive: Jul 17 10:11:10.068: %DATAPLANE-3-DP_MSG: broffu_fp_dapi_cmd.c:2891 FP0.09:(7089389)[cmdAddIpv4:2921]failed to find ipv4 10.20.6.58
[code]....
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 27, 2012
I have a stack of 2 x 3750X switches these are running 12.2(55)SE5. I needed to add some static IP routes and found that the ‘ip routing’ command is not supported. I came across a document that stated “On switches running the LAN base feature, static routing on VLANs is supported only with Cisco IOS Release 12.2(58)SE and later.” So I have upgraded to 12.2(58)SE2, but ‘ip routing’ is still not a valid command.
The release notes state:“On the Cisco Catalyst 3560-X and 3750-X Series, it adds support for 16 static IPv4 routes in the LAN Base image.”
I have read other posts that talk about running the ‘sdm prefer routing’ command which I have done, but I am still unable to add any routes or run the ‘ip routing’ command.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 20, 2012
I’ve configured a small WLAN for a school that wants to have wireless network access for their staff as well as for guests doing presentations. They want the staff to have access to everything on the 192.168.1.0 /24 network as well as the Internet. They want the guests to only have access to the Internet. I have attached a picture which shows how the network has been configured with 4 Cisco AP1242G AP’s attached to a Cisco SF302-08MP PoE switch and then to a Symantec Security Gateway to the Internet.
I can authenticate wirelessly to the STAFF SSID and ping anything on the 192.168.1.0 /24 network and access the Internet.I can authenticate wirelessly to the GUEST SSID and ping anything on the 172.16.1.0 /24 network, but not anything on the 192.168.1.0 /24 network (which is what we want). However, when on the GUEST network you can’t access the Internet. I added a default route to the Cisco 302-08MP switch to 192.168.1.1 (Symantec firewall) thinking that would forward the traffic from 172.16.1.0 /24 to the Symantec firewall out to the Internet, but that isn’t working.How would I go about getting the traffic from 172.16.1.0 /24 to hit the Symantec firewall and the Internet, without hitting anything else on 192.168.1.0 /24? Do I need to put the Symantec firewall in a different subnet like 192.168.2.0 /24? Am I missing anything else?I’ve worked with Extreme Networks & HP / 3Com CLI in the past, but never with Cisco and never with web based management
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 9, 2012
I have Catalyst C3750G switch
with configured route to subnet 192.168.201.0/24
ip routing
ip route 192.168.201.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.160.13
192.168.160.13 is accessible
[Code].....
View 5 Replies
View Related
Feb 14, 2012
we have some devices on the network which cannot be secured and we need to isolate from the rest of the subnet.Our switches are Cisco 2960.Is it possible to via an ACL local a specifric port down to only allow traffic from specific MAC addresses? I've had a go at this myself but not been able to make any progress. The traffic type is TCP/IP.
View 10 Replies
View Related
Jan 14, 2013
We have two switches; a WS-C3550-48 and a WS-C3548-XL connected via fiber uplink ports. Both switches are on the same subnet 192.168.1.0 /24. I would like to change the subnet of the second switch, WS-C3548-XL, to be on 192.168.2.0 /24. Would it be possible to assign 192.168.2.x IP addresses to both uplink ports to achive this?
Or would I need to create a separate VLAN and assign both GigabitEthernet0/1 uplink ports to this VLAN?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Feb 5, 2013
I have an issue with the device in subject. I need that some server, listed as service on CSS, can contact a content VIP on the same subnet. To allow that traffic I configured grouping on CSS (group 1) with vip address and an ACL that allow traffic from subnet 10.1.1.0/24 toward same subnet 10.1.1.0/24 and I have bound this ACL with sourcegroup 1. The nat and portmap works but never at first attempt, instead since second attempts it works. Seem like a CSS require to much time to create nat entry.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 10, 2013
We have a 3750 running IOS ver 12.2 (44) SE, it has performed great and we have never had a problem with it. However we have noticed that when we had an outage some of our Wireless APs didn't come up as they get DHCP from the 3750. The DHCP scope said IP was depleted although there were IPs to give. We had to delete and recreate the DHCP Pool. However two days later we got the same problem and then had to do the same thing over again.
View 8 Replies
View Related
Jun 12, 2013
I Lease fiber between two locations, My operator limiting number of MAC addresses to 8 macs. Is there any possibility using some feature available in the Cisco 3750 switches to (hide mac addresses) encapsulate traffic witch flowing via operator network ?
I need to send data between locations with 1Gb/s speed. If 3750 switches can't do that, which models of switches 1 or 2U can do it. May Metro switches ?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 16, 2012
I have Catalyst 3750 running IOS version c3750-ipservicesk9-mz.122-55.SE.bin. I have an access port that connects to a Redhat Linux version 5.4 64 bits machine. When I perform a "show mac address-table interface g1/0/3" where the redhat machine is connected to, I see two mac addresses on this access port. One of the mac addresses, 0025.9006.4898, belongs the the redhat machine. the other mac address, I have no idea where it comes from. I tried to perform clear mac address-table dynamic g1/0/3 several times but it does not work either.
View 8 Replies
View Related
Jan 11, 2012
I currently have a the following configuration and am unable to get more than 2 DHCP addresses for the devices connected to the Cisco new SG 100-16 Switch.The AP have no trouble handing out DHCP to the wireless clients, but we are unable to get the SG 100-16 to be able to do the same thing to wired clients. It is currently connected to the 2960-8 in port 1. We can get 2 devices connected without a problem, but the 3rd machine and beyond do not work. Also, setting up a static IP does not work. Using a static will not even allow us to ping or tracer back to any devices beyond the SG 100-16.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Mar 15, 2013
I have forgot this technology name, but, I remember it can achive on between Nexus 7000s in two location, and also between two catalyst 6500.Can I ask if it can be done between one nexus and one catalyst 6500?
View 8 Replies
View Related
Dec 13, 2011
We have 10 ADSL lines and 5 of them goes in the load balancer (One gateway) and the rests are used as default gateways for internet access. We use ADSL routers as access points for internet, but those routers should be part of our network and should be given an address in order for them to act as default gateways for internet access. I'm facing a real prob with the ADSL routers Linksys WAG54G2 because they doesn't support a subnet mask 255.255.0.0 Any recommendation for an ADSL router model that support a netmask 255.255.0.0 ?
My cisco 2811 router interface configuration ip address: 172.20.0.1 255.255.254.0.Load balancer output lan ip address: 172.20.0.5.My ADSL routers will be in the following range : 172.20.0.6 - 172.20.0.10
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 25, 2012
I recently bought SG-300 28P to create the VLAN. My network hs 3 subnet 192.168.1.0, 192.168.2.0 and 192.168.3.0.My main net work is 192.168.1.0. I want to divide it to VLAN to eliminate the boardcast storm; especially from the domain 192.168.3.0
But I want all the devices from 192.168.1.0 to access other subnet.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jun 28, 2012
I need to configure the C3560-24TS, QoS control by IP or subnet.i tried to study books and videos many times but still feel i am not well known about QOs...
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 27, 2012
how to know if my bgp neighbour advertised my network from his side or not ???
here is my config :
Gateway7600#sh ip bgp
BGP table version is 8, local router ID is 192.168.40.3
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal,
r RIB-failure, S Stale, m multipath, b backup-path, f RT-Filter,
x best-external, a additional-path, c RIB-compressed,
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
RPKI validation codes: V valid, I invalid, N Not found
[code]....
View 5 Replies
View Related
Oct 21, 2012
I'm not sure if this is a possible config, but I have an ASA that I need to be able to SSL VPN to, and get an IP Address that is on the same subnet as my internal interface. The reason is, the person connecting in has a utility that does a broadcast on the internal network to discover the devices he is trying to connect to. Therefore, connecting over VPN and getting put on a different subnet wont work. In this case, I am going to start the ASA configuration from scratch. If its possible to do the above, what are the correct commands to configure it? I was planning to use 10.50.0.1/24 for the internal interface, and then hand out IP Addresses on that subnet to both the lan, and the vpn, This is an ASA 5505. Its on IOS 8.4.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 21, 2012
we have a 3750 and use dhcp services on the switch. every so often we run out of ip's even though we have much less users than the size of the allocated dhcp pool. I've noticed that the dhcp bind table is full but a ping-sweep only shows very few ip's being assinged and used. It looks like the IP addresses are not being released from the table even though I have decreased the lease time to 8 hours.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 10, 2013
I'm working on my CCNA. I purchased an old router 2610 with two ethernet ports. I configured the IP addresses on the interfaces and added the default gateway. I configured NAT to go out my ATT DSL router to the internet. With the 2610, I'm able to ping the back end or internal DSL router, but I can't ping the front end, external router, or out to any internet site such as google.
View 10 Replies
View Related
Feb 2, 2013
I used to use a CentOS self-made server for intranet for my little office, but I bouth few days ago a Cisco 861 router to replace the linux box.
1. I have 2 public IP classes from my ISP. 1 class is limitted to 80mbit upload, the other to 30mbit upload. So I need some sort of DNAT to be able to know exactly which intranet computer uses big internet and which one limitted internet.
2. I need DHCP server and with static IP addresses (one computer must always have the same IP address, etc).. i have my needs for this.
3. Also I need external access to some servers inside (web, ftp, etc) [code]
So far so good, all looks simple and I can achieve this in 2 hours on a centos linux box (correct routes, ip forwarding enabled and few iptables rules for NAT/SNAT/DNAT).
But on this brand new Centos router well, i'm not even successful in pinging the outside world, nor the inside world I'm tired of reading the forums, the documentation..i want (at first) a simple scenario: vlan+dhcp, fa4 with 1 public ip address and ACCESS to the real world. I wasn't able to achieve not even that much. [code]
View 6 Replies
View Related
May 14, 2013
We want to permit certain mac addresses on the cat 4506 switch wherein only those mac addresses will get access to network.
Configuration Planned: For testing purpose we have created mac access list on cat 4506 and deny laptop mac address in this access list. The mac access group is applied to the port where the laptop is connected to cat 4506.Even after applying the mac access group on the port, the laptop is able to ping the vlan ip of cat 4506 [code]
laptop with ip address 192.168.10.2/24 connected to port 2/1 is able to ping 192.168.10.1 even after applying the mac access-group
Note-we have tested same configuration on cat 3560 and its working fine. We apply the mac access-group command on interface and clear the arp-cache and we are not able to ping vlan interface ip. The moment we remove the mac access-group,ping starts again.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 23, 2011
I have a 1941 router tt needs to be setup with the range of WAN ip addresses ip nat inside outside don't allow me to use it..How can i configure on the router to ensure from outside i'm able to access to firewall (129.2.1.2) ?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 2, 2011
Had a problem with a 3750 this morning not handing out DHCP addresses. The following is a sanitized config of what the switch is using. [code] The IOS installed on the switch is c3750-ipbasek9-mz.122-55.SE1.bin. What got my attention was that the sh ip dhcp pool PC showed 180 addresses being excluded. In doing the math from the dhcp excluded addresses, only 64 should be excluded.
My next step was to remove the second dhcp excluded-address line above. Doing a clear ip dhcp binding * started letting the DHCP service hand out addresses but the sh ip dhcp pool PC stil showed 180 addresses excluded.
It finally took removing the dhcp pool and putting it back in to drop the number of excluded addresses down to a value that matches the first excluded-address line. Didnt see a dhcp bug in the bug database that would explain this.
I tried re-entering the second excluded-address line from above and saw the number of excluded addresses rise as expected. When I negated the line, the number of excluded addresses dropped back to its previous value.
View 1 Replies
View Related
