Cisco Switching/Routing :: Gateway 7600 / How To Know If Bgp Neighbour Advertised Subnet Or Not
Nov 27, 2012
how to know if my bgp neighbour advertised my network from his side or not ???
here is my config :
Gateway7600#sh ip bgp
BGP table version is 8, local router ID is 192.168.40.3
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal,
r RIB-failure, S Stale, m multipath, b backup-path, f RT-Filter,
x best-external, a additional-path, c RIB-compressed,
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
RPKI validation codes: V valid, I invalid, N Not found
Already this config is there need to advertise one more network 131.4.4.0.if i do that will it get added and need to know also if it removes other config of router..router bgp 65000 as I only need to add 131.4.4.0 and other config should be as it is. [code]
When mutiple Policy based routing configured on 7600 routers, did the router performace degraded with the number of policy based routing rules?Also, did 7600 running 12.x use per-flow based routing or per packet based routing?
I have Cisco 7609 router and we have observed that router is rebooted due to the following error ;SLOT 3: Apr 13 16:06:26.621: %CARDMGR-2-ESF_DEV_ERROR: An error has occurred on Egress ESF Engine: Control Store Parity Error SLOT 3: Apr 13,Slot -3 we have SIP-400 card. We would like to know if there is any MIB which can monitir such reboots.
I want to ask about cisco 7600 model is it a switch or router or layer3 switch or Multilayer switch ?
here is the sh version : =================================== Gateway7600#sh version Cisco IOS Software, c7600s3223_rp Software (c7600s3223_rp-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version 15.2(1)S, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport Copyright (c) 1986-2011 by Cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Sun 27-Nov-11 15:27 by prod_rel_team
I am trying to bridge the traffic(including different vlan traffic) from rtrA to rtrB using "bridge-group" functionality.I achived the same using a 7200 using the below configuration. [code] When I tried the same using 7600 router ping failed between rtrA and rtrB. Then from the documents it seems "bridge irb" is not supported in 7600.Is there any other way we can achieve the same fuctionality ( eg: using switchport also fine) ?
in both case some times i obtain lowing traffic on interface and highest cpu - to 100% after clear cef linicard i obtain growing traffic and cpu 0%
#sh proc cpu s CPU utilization for five seconds: 87%/83%; one minute: 91%; five minutes: 96% PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process 7 1711512 87883 19474 4.06% 0.84% 0.89% 0 Check heaps
I´m looking for an IOS on a 7609 SUP720/MSF3 that supports the NAT-PT feature (IPv4 to IPv6 translation). I searched on the Cisco Feature Navigator but the tool didn´t show up any IOS for the 760x platforms. I only got the feature "NAT-PT: Support for Overload (PAT)" with IOS 15.xS train.
i have cisco 7600 router , here is show run : Gateway7600#sh run Building configuration...
Current configuration : 4787 bytes ! ! Last configuration change at 09:08:04 UTC Sat Apr 20 2013 by xxxx ! version 15.2 service timestamps debug datetime msec [Code]....
I have Cisco 7606 and wanted to test whether Cisco can drop frames due to invalid v lan ether type . i have configured the ports as
interface GigabitEthernet5/1 no ip address switchport switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport mode trunk
interface GigabitEthernet5/2 no ip address switchport switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport mode trunk
I have configured port also with encapsulation trunk dot1q ether type 88a8. i injected traffic with v lan ether type 0x8100. I expected to see drop traffic , however traffic passed in port to port.
i want to to ask about redirecting in MLS 7600 .assume the user a has an ip x.x.x.xand that user requested url...i want to to redirect his request to url...the users that have to pay the monthly bills , i want to give thim an ips and redirect all the http requests from this to a special local webpage .is is applicable to to it on router cisco 7600 ??or is it applicable on router 7206 npeg2 ? also i have siwtch 2960g.i dont want to do it by proxy server.
I am a soon to be network admin and have never set up a network to an existing network. Steps you need to add a new location to a company's network. For example if they are using 8 Building with 7600 Routers and 6500 and you need another building and they are using MPLS or Private Network, or Internet.
I have a 7600 with ws-sup750 and when it boots it displays these errors:
Cisco IOS Software, s72033_sp Software (s72033_sp-ADVIPSERVICESK9_WAN-M), Version 12.2(33)SXH2a, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)Technical Support: [URL] Firmware compiled 07-Apr-08 22:12 by integ Build [100] 00:00:05: %C6K_PLATFORM-0-UNKNOWN_CHASSIS: The chassis type is not known.(0x6003)
[Code]....
Then it got stuck in rommon, i tried using a 7200 pcmcia card (I downloaded the 7600 IOS there) but if i do from rommon boot disk0:
it complaints with :open: file "c7200-atafslib-m" not found so, it doesn't boot.
Anything I can do to be able to boot this device ?
I am on a University campus and they have provided the following to connect to the internet along with DNS server addresses:
IP Address: 192.168.25.24 Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.0 Default Gateway: 192.168.254.1
When I connect my computer, it gives an error that the IP address and subnet mismatch, but it still connects to the internet just fine. However, if I try to put these settings into the DIR-655 along with my computer's MAC address, it gives me the error "WAN gateway IP address 192.168.25.24 must be within the WAN subnet" and requires I change it.
I am a little stuck trying to troubleshoot unusually high cpu on 7600 Platform.This has been going on for many hours and not been causing a problem, but this doesn't seem replicated in our network and I am concerned about the cause.I have attached some output below, and disabled netflow on interfaces to free some switching CPU. How to track the cause of this? We only have routing protocols and 5 static routes to Null 0, so I cant see how this can be a route loop, but willing to stand corrected. Routes are learned from BGP with OSPF/MPLS internally on the network. This switch also connects to access switches on RIP and EIGRP.
No change has been made to this device when this problem started to occur so I am suspecting something about the traffic has changed or there is a rougue user? [code]
today i installed new router 7600 , but im facing some thing the cpu is increasing and it reached 50 % and still increasing as the bw dissipated is increasing .im applying ip policy which set next hop for many internet source my question is , how to know the cu percentage which is used by this ip policy , also , how to know the percentage by access-list ??
i have a 7206 router to be used as a gateway for internet router 7206 inerfaces are connected directly to cisco switch 2960g note that 7600 work only at 1 gega , and cant be used for 10 or 10 . im looking forward to use router 7600 instaed of 7206 i copied the config of 7206 and pased in 7600 but some commands which are under interfaces command was not accepted here is the config which as not accepted in 7600 router
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% duplex auto speed auto media-type rj45 negotiation auto %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
note that the 4 lines above was not accpted in 7600. does these commands will affect the new config ?i just want to ask before im trying to apply this config to production network?
Actually i have 7600 router and all trafic passes through Gi0/1(Routed port) interface to 6500 series switch. I need to create a vlan on this router eg. vlan 10 Any how it is possible assign a vlan to routed port and traffic of wan interfaces and the vlan traffic passed together.
ES20+ QoS. As I understand for these cards QoS is MQC; i.e. similar to that of normal WAN cards
1- If i have 7600 with ES+ card only then I dont need to configure global command "mls qos" and the concept of trust boundries "mls qos trust dscp" will not exist , correct ?
2- For below output, why "show mls qos queuing" is giving an O/P similar to that of WS-X6xxx LAN modules.Also why it is WRR when scheduling is not configured.I expected that command will not work with this module as it is similar to WAN modules.
I have run into a problem testing static route failovers using ECMP. I have an edge device (SUT) that has 2 NIC interfaces to an internal Loopback. Each NIC is a unique Gi port on an 7609 VLAN tagged with unique IP subnets. The 7600 is configured to route the loopback via the 2 NIC. I am using CEF in the network for other traffic performance testing. Using an external sniffer we can verify that when a ping is initiated externall to the SUT loopback a specific path is selected by the router.
Now, when the selected path is taken out of server (pulling cable for example), the 7609 is not clearing the routing table to indicate that particular path is down and failing over to the secondary path. Other things I have noticed is the show ip cef still shows both peers as well as the arp table but the interface shows down (show interface gi1/21 for example). I am running 15.1. My understanding is that since the ports are directly connected to the router, the ports should be detected as down and any association of the IP for the down port should removed. This should trigger the static route to update the static route for the end destination to use the second path and traffic should continue.
ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.2(17r)S2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)BOOTLDR: Cisco IOS Software, c7600s72033_rp Software (c7600s72033_rp-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version 15.1(1)S1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
we are using 7609 router. it forwarding traffic to wards my firewall which was not allowd in my router. when ever im checking for routes in router using show ip route x.x.x.x its showing SUBNET IS NOT IN TABLE, but in workmy firewall dropped connection i can able to see that networks.
I have a port on 7600 connecting via Single Mode Fibre to my service provider. Service provider has 1000-Full with auto-negotiate. I am seeing following output on my 7600. [code] if this interface is only capable of doing 1000Mb, how come it is showing 100-Full. If I change to nonegotiate option (both my side and provider side), link goes down. My provider has confirmed they have 1000Full their side.
what my IP address, my subnet mask, and what my default gateway is. I have tried typing "ipconfig" into CMD but then I only got up 100 boxes saying "Permissionisconnected"
Have a problem with a laptop connecting to a Wireless Router. The laptop was working fine on the last router which was on an ADSL Network.. (not that that matters),When the new router (Virgin Media / Cable) was installed all other laptops where connecting to it without any probs, but not this one.The laptop in question still receives an IP address, Subnet mask and Gateway from the router - Vista says Local only, no internet access. It cannot ping anything else on the network either. When I do ping it comes back destination host unreachable.
Got a shiny new SG 200 26P which seems to work fine operationally.owever, when I am trying to access the web interface from a different IP subnet, the web brower just times out.If I put my PC on the same IP subnet, it works just fine. From the other subnet, I can ping the switch fine. The default gateway is set on the switch, and from the web interface I can ping and dns resolve other hosts and on the internet. I've tried to create a management profile to 'allow all from everywhere' basically, but still no luck.I'm completely stumped. I've tried to reset to firmware defaults, and I'm now runinng the latest firmware. I woudl suppose that the switch would allow itself to be managed via the web interface from all subnets by default. Any thoughts? The fact that the switch can ping internet hosts makes be believe it's own default gateway and IP are all ok and working.. (and I can ping it from anywhere in my network).
I’ve configured a small WLAN for a school that wants to have wireless network access for their staff as well as for guests doing presentations. They want the staff to have access to everything on the 192.168.1.0 /24 network as well as the Internet. They want the guests to only have access to the Internet. I have attached a picture which shows how the network has been configured with 4 Cisco AP1242G AP’s attached to a Cisco SF302-08MP PoE switch and then to a Symantec Security Gateway to the Internet.
I can authenticate wirelessly to the STAFF SSID and ping anything on the 192.168.1.0 /24 network and access the Internet.I can authenticate wirelessly to the GUEST SSID and ping anything on the 172.16.1.0 /24 network, but not anything on the 192.168.1.0 /24 network (which is what we want). However, when on the GUEST network you can’t access the Internet. I added a default route to the Cisco 302-08MP switch to 192.168.1.1 (Symantec firewall) thinking that would forward the traffic from 172.16.1.0 /24 to the Symantec firewall out to the Internet, but that isn’t working.How would I go about getting the traffic from 172.16.1.0 /24 to hit the Symantec firewall and the Internet, without hitting anything else on 192.168.1.0 /24? Do I need to put the Symantec firewall in a different subnet like 192.168.2.0 /24? Am I missing anything else?I’ve worked with Extreme Networks & HP / 3Com CLI in the past, but never with Cisco and never with web based management
we have some devices on the network which cannot be secured and we need to isolate from the rest of the subnet.Our switches are Cisco 2960.Is it possible to via an ACL local a specifric port down to only allow traffic from specific MAC addresses? I've had a go at this myself but not been able to make any progress. The traffic type is TCP/IP.
We have two switches; a WS-C3550-48 and a WS-C3548-XL connected via fiber uplink ports. Both switches are on the same subnet 192.168.1.0 /24. I would like to change the subnet of the second switch, WS-C3548-XL, to be on 192.168.2.0 /24. Would it be possible to assign 192.168.2.x IP addresses to both uplink ports to achive this?
Or would I need to create a separate VLAN and assign both GigabitEthernet0/1 uplink ports to this VLAN?
