Cisco Switching/Routing :: AIR-CAP1602I-N Access Point Compatibility With AIR-WLC2112-K9
May 22, 2013I have Cisco Access point AIR-CAP1602I-N-K9 ,My doubt is,is this AP support on WLC AIR-WLC2112-K9
View 1 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Access Point Wireless Router Compatibility?
Apr 1, 2012I have a cisco/linksys wireless router connected to a cable modem. Also a belkin universal range extender in another part of the house, which picks up the wireless router signal and boosts it - but not very strongly. The belkin RE can also be used as an access point. Can I run a wire & connect it to the cisco/linksys wireless router? Will my laptop pick up the wireless signal from either device depending where in the house it is?
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco Wireless :: 5508 / FlexConnect Compatibility With Access Point
Apr 22, 2013Subject: FlexConnect compatibility with Access Point? We have today one Cisco 5508 and those access point on remote sites
o CISCO AIR-LAP-1131AG-E-K9
o CISCO AIR-LAP-1231G-E-K9
o CISCO AIR-LAP-1142N-E-K9
We plan to use redundancy on the controller and implement Flexconnect on the remote site. What we need to know is if I can implement Flexconnect on all actual access point - I think it is possible on 1142N + 1131G but do not know on 1231AG - is it correct or I'm wrong ? We plan to install the latest SW version for 5508 controller.
Cisco Wireless :: Regulatory Compatibility With AIR-WLC2106-K9 Controller And AIR-LAT1142N-N-K9 Access Point
Apr 26, 2013I am in the process of building a small educational lab. I just want to make sure that I am not going to have any AP registration/join issues due to regulatory compatibility with a AIR-WLC2106-K9 controller and a AIR-LAT1142N-N-K9 access point. Will this work and if so, will I then be in the clear as far as having devices like my computer and phone attach to the SSID?
View 5 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: Using 871W As Additional Access Point
Apr 25, 2012I have an 871w set up to add wireless connectivity to an existing network. When adding a client to the physical interfaces to test VLAN internet connectivity, however, a DHCP address is assigned but internet traffic on the terminal never reaches the network nor does the network recognize the IP the terminal shows as being 'connected'. Also, pings sourced from the VLAN do reach destinations. I've attached my config file, I think it's a routing issue of some kind.
10.26.99.0 is the existing network. 10.26.99.1 is an existing 871w router set as the DHCP server for that network and 10.26.99.10 is a Windows Server 2003 DNS box. VLAN 2 and DHCP pool alpha were control sets for trialing DNS settings.
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 1130 / Access Point Not Working?
Feb 14, 2012I have a 1130 cisco access point,we are using this for wireless cisco IP phone connectivity to the network.Earlier access point was woring fine and we were able to make calls through IP phone.But we have relocated to new place.Now the access point is not working and we are not able to make the calls on the wireless IP phone as the access point is not working.But the access is in the netwrok and we are able to ping the IP address of the Access point.
We are contonuously getting the below loggs on Access point and the access point is getting power from the ethernet port of the switch not through the external powerr adaptor.
error message:
: %CDP_PD-2-POWER_LOW: All radios disabled - NEGOTIATED WS-C
4507R (0012.7fb6.6e6c).
how to make this work.
Cisco Switching/Routing :: SG300 Restrict Port To Only One Access Point
Jun 10, 2012On a small Bording School we have the students living in several small houses, each equipped with an AP.Each Ap serve 4 Vlans.I want to restrict the switch for these AP, in a way to keep the students from removing the AP and connecting their own equipment.I tried using the secure port feature on the SG300, but that had the result of allowing the AP but denying all the users connected to the AP.The switch is a SG300-28P placed in L3 mode.
View 3 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: Connect HP 420 Access Point To 4500 Switch
Apr 3, 2012i am trying to configure my HP 420 access point. I have configure different SSID on it, This access point is connected to cisco 4500 switch, i have configure trunk on up link to access point.my problem is the client are not able to get an IP address form the correct vlan if i tagged the SSID to it.
in the following the output of show run int in cisco 4500 switch:
interface GigabitEthernet3/13
description ==== HP ACCess point ====
switchport trunk allowed vlan 99,130,132
switchport mode trunk
[code]....
Cisco Switching/Routing :: Access Point Aironet 1040 Configuration - Not Getting 802.11n To Work?
Jun 25, 2012I can't figure out how to get the config right for the 802.11n channel to work.
View 4 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: 881w-gn-a-k9 Access Point Not Serving DHCP Addresses
Jan 27, 2013i have to Bridge the AP to VLAN1 which has the DHCP pool. For some reason when I try to do this from iOS console it tells me that gig0 is not a bridgable interface. I am newb to Cisco iOS (24 hours new ). I got the Cisco Configuration Professional working and would like to fix my issue through there if possible? why my AP wont get anything but APIPA addresses?
version 12.4
no service pad
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
no service password-encryption
[code]....
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3560 Default QOS Trust Behavior On Access Point Changed
Oct 27, 2011I've just been testing QOS on 3560 with version 15.0(1) and it seems the the default qos trust behavior on access ports has changed. By default the trust state of a port is not to trust anything, however rather than rewriting the DSCP value of the incoming packets and settign it to 0 the switch now seems to leave the DSCP value unchanged.
SW04-C3560(config)# do sh mls qos int g0/2
GigabitEthernet0/2
trust state: not trusted
trust mode: not trusted
trust enabled flag: ena
[Code]......
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3600 Accessing Wireless Access Point From Remote Subnet
Mar 28, 2013I recently installed a couple of Cisco Aironet 3600 Series Wireless Access Points at a remote site. While I was at the site everything seemed OK, The clients were able to get connected to the access points, the guest network worked fine, I could SSH into the access points, and I could ping them. The problem is when I went back to my home site I tried to SSH into the access points through an ASA IPSec VPN Tunnel and it couldn’t find it. When I try to ping the access points they “time out”. I can ping and connect all other addresses (via RDP, HTTP, etc..) on the same subnet which should rule out an access list problem. A couple of notes to be aware of:
The WAP’s have the Autonomous IOS installed (Version 15.2(2)JB) The WAP’s are connected to Dell PowerConnect 5724 (Not by choice.. We are a Cisco shop, these were already there and have plans this year to replace)
I can ping and SSH with Putty to the WAP’s from the local subnet I cannot ping or SSH from a remote subnet to the WAP’s. I can access all other IP’s and Computers from a remote subnet.
Cisco Switching/Routing :: Compatibility Between 887VAM-W-E-K9 And 800-IL-PM2?
Jun 13, 2012Are 887VAM-W-E-K9 and 800-IL-PM2 compatible? We have got both of them but it seems that router has a 30W power source and module has a 80W power source.
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: WS-X6748-GE-TX And SUP-2T Compatibility?
May 13, 2013I have a WS-X6748-GE-TX with the WS-F6700-CFC daughter card. Is it possible to replace the WS-F6700-CFC daughter card with a WS-F6K-DFC4-AXL to make this compatible with the SUP-2T? Or, are there differences between the CFC and DFC base modules?
View 11 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: CAT 6509 STP Compatibility With F5 LTM
Sep 1, 2012We have connected a single F5 box with dual links to 2 different Cisco Catalyst switches using 802.1Q trunks. F5 is configured with RSTP mode and on Cisco Switch RPVST+ is configured.STP root bridge is hardcoded on the Cisco side. Loop Guard is globally enabled.On F5 STP link type is Auto, STP Edge port is disabled since that port is connected to the cisco switch.When we are failing over the F5 primary link to the secondary link we see 'Loop Inconsistent' on the cisco switch and things dont work after the failover.We have tried configuring the F5 as STP passthrough but that doesn't fix out the issue.I have checked out the forums and found out following recommendations
1. Configuring MSTP bw F5 and Cisco for better compatibility (Not possible from Cisco side because of a major change in large production setup)
2. Configuring VSS in Cisco switches (not possible due to hardware limitation)
3. Connecting F5 using single links to each switch (redundancy compromised)
I am wondering that on which default vlan does the F5 STP instance0 sends the STP BPDUs ? the term used on Cisco side is native vlan and others use PVIDs; that F5 default vlan should match the native vlan on cisco trunk side.
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 10.0.2.1 / Routing Over A Point To Point Ethernet Connection?
Feb 15, 2012I have 2 data centers miles apart. They are on a Paetec MPLS. I have a Lightower point to point Ethernet link between the two data centers as well. At data center A, I have a Paetec managed router (192.168.2.1). The subnets behind that router are 192.168.2.0, 192.168.100.0 and 192.168.101.0. I also have a Cisco 1841 that is configured with fa0 addressed as 192.168.2.250 and fa1 as 10.5.5.1. Fa1 is the one end of the point to point Ethernet link to data center B.At data center B, I have a Paetec managed router (10.0.2.1). The subnets behind that router are 10.0.2.0, 10.0.100.0 and 10.0.101.0. I also have a Cisco 1841 that is configured with fa0 addressed as 10.0.2.250 and fa1 as 10.5.5.2.What I want to happen is any traffic headed from data center A destined for 10.0.100.0 or 10.0.101.0 to be routed through the point to point Ethernet link. I had Paetec add routes in their managed router to route any traffic headed for 10.0.100.0 and 10.0.101.0 to my Cisco 1841 (192.168.2.250).I wanted to do the same for traffic destined for 192.168.100.0 and 192.168.101.0 from data center B. Paetec added the appropriate routes to the router at data center B.Now, if I trace from data center A to 10.0.100.45, I see this:
1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.2.1
2 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.2.250
3 4 ms 4 ms 4 ms 10.5.5.2
4 3 ms 3 ms 3 ms 10.0.2.1
So the routing seems to be ok. However after it hits 10.0.2.1, it gets lost after that.Am I missing something? Is this a misconfiguration on Paetec’s routers?
Cisco Switching/Routing :: Compatibility Between Nxos 5.2.(4) And Epld 5.2(3)
May 31, 2012we have to upgrade to nxos 5.2(4) but i cannot find same image for epld , i only see a downlable image with version 5.2(3). Do you see any problem if we upgrade kick and system image to 5.2(4) with epld 5.2(3)?
View 3 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: Nexus 5020 And GLC-T Compatibility
May 27, 2012The below nexus 5020 nx-os version and type/revision of my GLC-T is compatible with each other? I noticed also the "Transceiver calibration is invalid" when i do show int e1/8 transceiver details , what does it mean?
View 8 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: FSM726S - GBIC Compatibility
Oct 22, 2012I've inherited a network. It looks to have been setup as 10/100 originally, using Netgear FSM726S switches with fibre connecting the switches. The fibre to copper conversion is mainly achieved with 10/100 media convertors rather than GBICs - not sure why - though there are some GBICs in use. Some of the "key" switches have been upgraded to Cisco Catalyst 2960G switches, but nothing else has been touched, so most of the network still runs at 100MB.
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: VSS With VS-S720-10G-3C And WS-X6748-GE-TX Compatibility?
Feb 7, 2012We are upgrading two standalone 6509E chassis to a VSS system with new VS-S720-10G-3C cards. The 6509's have WS-X6748-GE-TX card with DFC3B daughter cards (see below). The compatablity matrix (see below) states that 67xx cards are supported but it goes on to state DFC3C or DFC3CXL cards are needed. So does this mean that the existing WS-X6748-GE-TX cards have to be upgraded or will they be supported?
Core #1Mod Ports Card Type Model Serial No.--- ----- -------------------------------------- ------------------ ----------- 1 48 CEF720 48 port 1000mb SFP WS-X6748-SFP SAL 2 4 CEF720 4 port 10-Gigabit Ethernet WS-X6704-10GE SAD 5 2 Supervisor Engine 720 (Active) WS-SUP720-3B SAL 6 2 Supervisor Engine 720 (Hot) WS-SUP720-3B SAL 7 48 CEF720 48 port 10/100/1000mb Ethernet WS-X6748-GE-TX SAL 8 48 CEF720 48 port 10/100/1000mb Ethernet WS-X6748-GE-TX SAL
[code]....
Cisco Switching/Routing :: HWIC-2FE And 2811 Compatibility?
Jan 24, 2013Just double-confirm that 2811 is compatible with HWIC-2FE based on your experience? Which IOS is compatible with HWIC-2FE? [URL]
View 3 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: Stack Compatibility With WS-C3750X-12S?
Dec 18, 2011Can a WS-C3750X-12S coexist in an existing stack made up of a WS-C3750G-12S and a WS-C3750G-24TS?
View 7 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: 3825 - Sfp And Fiberxon Compatibility
Feb 4, 2012I have a Cisco 3825 router with a sfp module .(multi mode Cisco sfp ) connected to a Alcatel switch with fiberxon sfp. On a Cisco router the sfp card is been recognized and is seen when i used " show ip int brief " or show inventory commands. However the line protocol is down.
is their any compatibility issue with one side Cisco sfp and other side fiberxon sfp ? we have tested Cisco sfp -------Cisco sfp works fiberxon ----------------fiberxon works .
Cisco Switching/Routing :: Switch IOS Compatibility WS C4503
May 7, 2012Currently i've a cisco ws-c4506-e edge swith loaded with cat4500e-ipbasek9-mz.122-53.SG4.bin image file. Can i use this image file on a ws-c4503-e as well?
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: Compatibility Between 3750 And 3750v2
Mar 25, 2012I would like to confirm if Cisco 3750 and 3750v2 can work in a stack? My Cisco 3750 is working on 12.2(37)se while 3750v2 is working on 12.2(50r)se.
I tried to configure the above on a same stack but seem to have compatibility issue and fail to work.
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 1941 / K9 VPN Router MPLS IPVPN Point-to-point
Mar 15, 2012I have 2 cisco 1941/K9 vpn router. I have configured both with LAN ip address given by our vpn provider which is 172.10.10.1 and the other is 172.10.20.1. Both IP addresses are configured to GigabitEthernet port 0/0 on both routers.
1. Is it possible to configure our own set of ip address like 10.71.10.1 and 10.71.50.1 on the GE 0/0 port?
2. Or can we configure our own set of ip addresses (10.71.10.1 and 10.71.50.1) to GigabitEthernet port 0/1 and maintain the other ip addresses on port 0/0?
The first purpose is to have our own set of ip addresses for LAN connection and I will be able to connect or telnet whichever ip address or port is up.
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960 To Assign 2MB To Point To Point Connection For Voice Vlan
Sep 11, 2012recently i just connected a non cisco ip phone(from panasonic) to Cisco 2960 POE switch at site A. The PABX system is located at site B,Site A and site B are connected using MetroE Point to point.I would like to apply QoS for voice vlan. I want to assign 2MB to the point to point connection for voice vlan.
View 3 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: WS C3750 Stack Switch Compatibility
Mar 13, 2011We have existing stack of 3 units of WS-C3750-48TS-S ( 100 mbps ports with Gigabot uplinks). with IOS as follows, Can we add WS-C3750G-48PS-S in this same stack (this is 48 Gigabit ports)?
View 2 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: C3KX-PWR-1100WAC / WS-C3750X-24P-S - Compatibility
Mar 5, 2012Is the C3KX-PWR-1100WAC= compatible with the WS-C3750X-24P-S?
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: Nexus 5596 / 2248 TP - Compatibility With SFP-10G-SR
Jan 31, 2012I am looking to see if Nexus 5596UP & Nexus 2248TP GE compatible with SFP-10G-SR? The reason is because a consultant was hired on to "design" the network layout and has decided to purchase Cisco SFP+ Copper Twinax Cables which have a 10M limit. A small handful of the Data Center racks are 10-15M away... just out of reach of the Twinax. I would prefer NOT to move the LAN row so that it is more centered in the room. Can I use the SFP-10G-SR to connect the 2 switches (5596 & 2248) together? This SFP has a 26M reach on standard 10gig fiber, the small cost increase per connection is of no concern.
View 2 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: 6513 Compatibility With 10GE Blades
Jun 4, 2012I am getting conflicting info about this, and need to get confirmations.Is the older 6513 (non E) model compatible with WS-X6407-10GE blade?The switch we're getting this for have WS-SUP720-3B, 6000W power supply, and WS-C6K-13SLT-FAN2.From what I read they are compatible if entered in slot 9-13, but I also heard that 10GE modules are not compatible with the non E chassis.
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: 1921-SEC/K9 - HWIC-4ESW Compatibility
Jan 9, 2012Does Cisco 1921-SEC/K9 support HWIC-4ESW ? I require 4 x 10/100 Ethernet ports
If yes how many ? are there any drawbacks if i use this module instead of a switch?
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6506 / 6509 - Compatibility Matrix
Mar 28, 2012Will a WS-X6748-GE-TX work with a Sup 32 in a 6506/6509?
View 2 Replies View Related