Cisco Switching/Routing :: HWIC-2FE And 2811 Compatibility?
Jan 24, 2013Just double-confirm that 2811 is compatible with HWIC-2FE based on your experience? Which IOS is compatible with HWIC-2FE? [URL]
View 3 RepliesJust double-confirm that 2811 is compatible with HWIC-2FE based on your experience? Which IOS is compatible with HWIC-2FE? [URL]
View 3 RepliesI would like to ask if a cisco 2811 running on an ios c2800nm-adventerprisek9-mz.124-25a.bin should be able to make an HWIC-1FE card work? I am also not detecting the card on any show commands. Plus i am seeing that all the LEDs (FDX/COL,100 and LINK/ACT) are lit steadily even though there is no cable attached to it, is it safe to say that the card could be defective?
View 6 Replies View RelatedDoes Cisco 1921-SEC/K9 support HWIC-4ESW ? I require 4 x 10/100 Ethernet ports
If yes how many ? are there any drawbacks if i use this module instead of a switch?
[URL]The Cisco 2811 does not support the HWIC-4T1/E1 module. But, I installed HWIC-4T1/E1 on the 2811 running 124-24.T2.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have cisco2811 and HWIC-1CE1T1-PRI in the main office are using to connect 10 branches ( 10 ISDN lines) for Data.
I have available channels in the used E1 so I can use them for voice using PVDM2-64 ?
I have a Cisco 2811 router with c2800nm-adventerprisek9_sna-mz.124-2.T6.bin as IOS and i wsh to install this HWIC 4port to increase available ports on my router. Wish to know if this is going to work,that is, if i installed it the IOS available will recognise this card
View 4 Replies View Relatedi am currently trying to configure a four port ISDN BRI interface on a Cisco 2811 router.Upon upgrading to a later version of IOS, c2800nm-advipservicesk9-mz.124-25d.bin, access to the HWIC-4B-S/T module is lost, the router no longer detects it. In fact iI can only get the router to detect the module using the original IOS version c2800nm-advipservicesk9-mz.124-20.YA3.bin.
Is there some special feature needed in the IOS code to support these modules, if so what would be a suitable version/train to upgrade to?I have tried using the Cisco Software advisor tool but it generates an error when searching on a hardware configuration containing this module type.
The reason for upgrading the code is we have a potential bug with the current version which appears to be preventing the BRI interface syncing up with the providers switch (switch type correctly defined and provider confirms isdn line has been provisioned correctly).
The debug error seen is:
GMT: ISDN BR0/0/0 SERROR: L2_Go: at bailout DLCB is NULL
L2: sapi 63 tei 127 ces 0 ev 0x650
My main question though is why the module is not being detected after a code upgrade and if there is a specific code version/train needed to support this module in a 2811?
I am adding another ISP (and plan to use BGP). I am looking at having two 2811's with one connected to each ISP, or a single 2811 (with an additional HWIC) connected to both ISPs. I am not sure if there is a best practices or an ideal configuration for this.
Currently I have:
ASA5510 ---> 2811 ---> ISP_A
Should I purchase another 2811 for ISP_B and connect it to an available port on the ASA? Or should I just purchase a HWIC-1FE and add ISP_B to the existing router?
I see some advantages to both, but not sure the best way to go. Of course, I could be looking at this wrong and if I plan on buying another router then maybe I should use HSRP and both routers should connect to both ISPs.
Is there an ethernet WIC/HWIC that supports NAT for the 2811. I have one 4 port 10/100 card but it doesn't support NAT overload.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have a 2811 router runnning IOS 12.4(21) and have added an HWIC 1FE card to slot 2. But the card doesnot show up in the router and all the three lights on the HWIC card is steady green. I have gone through some cisco documentation and found that i have to upgrade the IOS.
I have few questions before doing the upgrade.
1. Which IOS version should I upgrade to?
2. Will this erase my exisitng running configuration ? I have VPN services, PPPoATM, PBR etc.. all running on this router at present.
3. Presently i have a 128 MB CF card on the router. Will this be enough or do i need to upgrade this card also? Can i choose an IOS which will fit into this card otherwise while keeping all existng features?
4. I want to use the HWIC card for the ISP's internet service through PPPoE. Will this be possible with the upgraded IOS ?
I am trying to connect HWIC-2FE Card to my Cisco 2811 Router. The router is unable to detect the card. I get the following error message:
' %GT96K_FEWAN-1-UNKNOWN_WIC: NM slot 0, wic card has an unknown id 53BPort Statistics for unclassified packets is not turned on.'
I have a module of HWIC-4ESW installed into Cisco 2811 router where 3 WAN link is terminited. Suddently WAN links stopped working from last night. I have performed shutdown and no shutdown in the interface but still the the WAN link was not working. After performing a reboot the WAN link started working. No error logs were generated while the WAN link was down.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI currently have a Cisco 2621 powering a network at our co-location facility... It's a simple setup and is working well. The colo provides a redundant HSRP uplink, so I have their two uplinks going into a Dell switch. From that Dell switch I have a uplink into FastEthernet0/0 on the 2621, configured with my routing network, and then FastEthernet0/1 gets an address from my block of routable IP. FastEthernet0/1 then plugs into another Dell switch where I have all my servers connected. The servers get public routable IP addresses and use the address on FastEthernet0/1 as their default gateway.
It's time to upgrade off the 2621, so I aquired a Cisco 2811 which has two FE interfaces, as well as a modular HWIC-4ESW switch. My question is, can I get rid of the Dell Switch A in the setup above and just use the internal switch on the 2811 to accomplish the same thing? And I if I did this, would my two uplinks from the colo plug into ports 1 and 2 of that HWIC, and then port 3 would physically connect into FE 0/0? Or can I logically do that via configuration in the Cisco? I'm not sure how all this works and haven't received the new router yet, so I thought I'd get a head start and reach out to the experts.
My second question is unrelated, but each port on the HWIC switch cannot be configured as a network interface right? I'm pretty sure they can't as they aren't considered network interfaces but just thought I'd ask.
I'm looking for a HWIC card that will support SC fiber connections for a 2811. I know of the HWIC-1GE-SFP but this one only support the LC connections.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI've been collecting information on principles of SHDSL connection. I have found plenty of examples on how to configure only one SHDSL link. Very soon I'm going to the site to install two independent SHDSL links in Cisco 2811 which has one Cisco HWIC-2SHDSL module, so I can route one type of traffic through one connection and another type of traffic through another. Both SHDLS links have static IP addresses and probably different VPI/VCI values. how to install two SHDSL links into one HWIC-2SHDSL module, set one value for VPI/VCI on one link and another value for VPI/VCI on another link, also set one IP address on one link and another IP adddress on another link?
View 13 Replies View RelatedI am trying to configure a newly installed HWIC-4ESW on a 2811 router to bridge to the FE 0/0 interface. Currently, I have a cheap switch connected to FE 0/0 which in turn connects to all the phones, however now I just want to connect all the phones to the HWIC and have it internally bridge to FE0/0 for the connectivity to CME, etc.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have a 2811 ISR, a lab unit with almost nothing yet configured other than some IP networks on serial and FE interfaces to ping to other lab routers. And I have one HWIC-4ESW installed, and I amrunning IOS 15.2.I want to set the card as a single routable interface and just have the ports act like switch ports, which I imagine is the default design of these cardsI work a lot with Cisco 891 ISRs so figured it's the same here, assign an IP to interface Vlan1 and all is well. That was wrong, obviously more config is required.It seems there are a lot of differing answers out there, so far none what worked for me. The best looking one I could find said to assign an IP to the Vlan 1 interface, then go to each of the four FE interfaces on the switch module.
View 3 Replies View RelatedAre 887VAM-W-E-K9 and 800-IL-PM2 compatible? We have got both of them but it seems that router has a 30W power source and module has a 80W power source.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a WS-X6748-GE-TX with the WS-F6700-CFC daughter card. Is it possible to replace the WS-F6700-CFC daughter card with a WS-F6K-DFC4-AXL to make this compatible with the SUP-2T? Or, are there differences between the CFC and DFC base modules?
View 11 Replies View RelatedWe have connected a single F5 box with dual links to 2 different Cisco Catalyst switches using 802.1Q trunks. F5 is configured with RSTP mode and on Cisco Switch RPVST+ is configured.STP root bridge is hardcoded on the Cisco side. Loop Guard is globally enabled.On F5 STP link type is Auto, STP Edge port is disabled since that port is connected to the cisco switch.When we are failing over the F5 primary link to the secondary link we see 'Loop Inconsistent' on the cisco switch and things dont work after the failover.We have tried configuring the F5 as STP passthrough but that doesn't fix out the issue.I have checked out the forums and found out following recommendations
1. Configuring MSTP bw F5 and Cisco for better compatibility (Not possible from Cisco side because of a major change in large production setup)
2. Configuring VSS in Cisco switches (not possible due to hardware limitation)
3. Connecting F5 using single links to each switch (redundancy compromised)
I am wondering that on which default vlan does the F5 STP instance0 sends the STP BPDUs ? the term used on Cisco side is native vlan and others use PVIDs; that F5 default vlan should match the native vlan on cisco trunk side.
Just need to verify if HWIC-2T is compatible with the Cisco2800 routers?
View 4 Replies View RelatedMaybe this was listed in the release notes for the product and I missed it, but can this item support Etherchannel in a 2801 router? I installed the module into the router and the router recognizes the module. I can configure the ports as access or trunk ports, but I am unable to configure the channel-protocol or the channel-group for the Etherchannel. The IOS on the router is 15.1 M with the upgraded Bootloader version 12.3.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI Have installed HWIC-2T card in my cisco 1921 router but it is not able to detected in router. find the ver of router
Cisco IOS Software, C1900 Software (C1900-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 15.1(4)M4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
Technical Support: [URL] Copyright (c) 1986-2012 by Cisco Systems, Inc.Compiled Tue 20-Mar-12
[Code]......
We have been facing a problem at my company ! We have a Cisco Router 1921 with one HWIC-4ESW in trunking with a RuggedCom switch RSG2100.When I use the GigabitEthernet port to make a trunk, I create 2 sub-interfaces (one for each Vlan) and configure the Port on Switch as Trunk, the inter-VLan routing works with no problem.But now I need to use this configuration using the HWIC-4ESW on Router, and I can't do this work. I try creat interface Vlan for each vlan, and try creating the VLans at Router Vlans database, but no way. At router I enter in interface and try to do the switchport trunk command to add a Vlan, but doesn't work.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI just recently (and very expensively) purchased a HWIC-1ADSL for my 1841 router.
Unfortunately, it doesn't display in the configuration - nor any lights appear on it for power/link.
My first guess is I need to upgrade my IOS. The current version on my 1841 is 12.4(17). Which appears to be pretty current.
We have two cards HWIC-4ESW on router 3845 but we need that the two cards 8 ports conected betwen, if a pc on port 1 can ping a pc conected on port 8 on second card. tis comunication can,t doing a pc on port 1 can,t conected a pc on port 8.
the configuration is the folowing
interface FastEthernet0/0/0
switchport access vlan 100
speed 100
[Code].....
we have to upgrade to nxos 5.2(4) but i cannot find same image for epld , i only see a downlable image with version 5.2(3). Do you see any problem if we upgrade kick and system image to 5.2(4) with epld 5.2(3)?
View 3 Replies View RelatedThe below nexus 5020 nx-os version and type/revision of my GLC-T is compatible with each other? I noticed also the "Transceiver calibration is invalid" when i do show int e1/8 transceiver details , what does it mean?
View 8 Replies View RelatedI've inherited a network. It looks to have been setup as 10/100 originally, using Netgear FSM726S switches with fibre connecting the switches. The fibre to copper conversion is mainly achieved with 10/100 media convertors rather than GBICs - not sure why - though there are some GBICs in use. Some of the "key" switches have been upgraded to Cisco Catalyst 2960G switches, but nothing else has been touched, so most of the network still runs at 100MB.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe are upgrading two standalone 6509E chassis to a VSS system with new VS-S720-10G-3C cards. The 6509's have WS-X6748-GE-TX card with DFC3B daughter cards (see below). The compatablity matrix (see below) states that 67xx cards are supported but it goes on to state DFC3C or DFC3CXL cards are needed. So does this mean that the existing WS-X6748-GE-TX cards have to be upgraded or will they be supported?
Core #1Mod Ports Card Type Model Serial No.--- ----- -------------------------------------- ------------------ ----------- 1 48 CEF720 48 port 1000mb SFP WS-X6748-SFP SAL 2 4 CEF720 4 port 10-Gigabit Ethernet WS-X6704-10GE SAD 5 2 Supervisor Engine 720 (Active) WS-SUP720-3B SAL 6 2 Supervisor Engine 720 (Hot) WS-SUP720-3B SAL 7 48 CEF720 48 port 10/100/1000mb Ethernet WS-X6748-GE-TX SAL 8 48 CEF720 48 port 10/100/1000mb Ethernet WS-X6748-GE-TX SAL
[code]....
Can a WS-C3750X-12S coexist in an existing stack made up of a WS-C3750G-12S and a WS-C3750G-24TS?
View 7 Replies View RelatedI have a Cisco 3825 router with a sfp module .(multi mode Cisco sfp ) connected to a Alcatel switch with fiberxon sfp. On a Cisco router the sfp card is been recognized and is seen when i used " show ip int brief " or show inventory commands. However the line protocol is down.
is their any compatibility issue with one side Cisco sfp and other side fiberxon sfp ? we have tested Cisco sfp -------Cisco sfp works fiberxon ----------------fiberxon works .
Currently i've a cisco ws-c4506-e edge swith loaded with cat4500e-ipbasek9-mz.122-53.SG4.bin image file. Can i use this image file on a ws-c4503-e as well?
View 1 Replies View Related