From the multiplexer 9 ethernet connections are terminating in Cisco 2960G 24 port swith and it is connected through fiber uplink to one Cisco 3560G 48 port switch in first floor, which is connected to server.
How I will configure the 3560G to make communicate with 2960G and bring all these 9 ethernet connections to server. All the 9 connections are from different IP. and server also have different IP.
It seems my 2960s and 3560s switches have enough flash space and memory to support the 15.0 IOS should I be OK to jump to this from 12.2(35)?
View 10 Replies View RelatedI'm having issue with one stubborn process that is consuming nearly all the CPU on all of my switches. I tried googling it, but had no luck. The process is "hulc nrgyz PD di"
View 4 Replies View RelatedYesterday Cisco released IOS 15 code into the wild for the 2960 and 3560/3750 families but the link to the release notes is not working. Because I already have a whole bunch of 4500/Sup7's running IOS 15 I am thinking about taking the plunge with 30 3750-X's I have on order but want to review the release notes first. where they might be hiding?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have CISCO RPS 600 (PWR-AC-RPS) is it support Catalyst 2960 and 3560 ? and which type of cable require since i have cable 22-18 pin and on my switch require 22-14 pin.
View 2 Replies View RelatedWhen did this wonderful feature get introduced? Is it going to moved down to the 3560s/2960s type switches?
View 0 Replies View RelatedI would like to test the possibility to reload devices via SNMP for new switches like 2960, 3560 and so on.I know that the command "snmp-server system-shutdown" has to be configured, then I need to send the set query to the device via SNMP.
I have found on the net the OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.2.9.9.0 but it belongs to an old MIB and doesn't seem to work with new switch models.
RACK 1 is the old rack and NEW RACK is the rack which is going to be procurred for some new Servers. All the Servers in the RACK 1 has a default gateway as PIX Inside IP. As of now the 3560 Switches acts as Layer 2 and does not have L3 IP routing enabled. How can I enable conenctivity between 192.168.36.0 range and 192.168.57.0 range wihtout making any change to current PIX inside IP address 192.168.57.1?Is it possible that I can enable IP routing on the 3560 Switches , create interface VLAN 36 and since already Switch 2 has it 's default gateway as 192.168.57.1 , Would the traffic from 192.168.36.0 be routed to 192.168.57.1 ? Or do I need to create static route for that ?Since L3 Routing is not enabled and since the 3560 Switches are just acting as L2 , the VLAN 2 - 192.168.57.0 range does not have any interface VLAN configured. When it is changed I would need to create interface VLAN 2 on 3560 Switches?
View 18 Replies View RelatedConfiguration details: I have 2 nexus 5K switches and both 5K is connected to four 2960 access switches in each floor through fiber(shown in the attached picture). I have configured each VPC for each floor and portchannel configuration on 2960s switch to communicate to 5K switches. Now I am not able to communicate PC 1 connected in 1st floor to PC2 connected in 4th Floor.
I have attached topology map of my infra and the configuration files also. 1st floor switch and 4th floor swich have same configuration except IP address and switch name.
I would like to ask about following setup.
Internet --> Cisco ASA 5515X --> 2 Gbits etherchannel --> Cisco 2960T-48 --> 40 customers, each has own VLAN
Cust 1 -- VLAN 10 --port Fa0/1
Cust 2 -- VLAN 20 --port Fa0/2
Cust 3 -- VLAN 30 --port Fa0/3
Cust 4 -- VLAN 40 --port Fa0/4
Cust 5 -- VLAN 50 --port Fa0/5
etc
I have to provide sharing internet connectivity for all customers.Speed is 100 Mbits, I have to garantee 3 Mbit to every customer and max speed will be not limited.ASA do routing, firewalling, nat etc.
I know only one method to restart Cisco switch through Telent using command " RELOAD". How can we restart Cisco 2960/3560 switch phyically....can i use mode button to restart cisco switch ?
View 11 Replies View RelatedI want to implement port-based and MAC-based in these two switches: 2960 & 3560 (both of them have this IOS version: 12.2(55)SE1). And I haven't found a way to implement both of them at the same time. This is what I got:
ip dhcp use subscriber-id client-id
ip dhcp subscriber-id interface-name
ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.0.0 192.168.0.2
ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.0.251 192.168.0.255
[code]....
With this configuration I can use port-based, but not MAC based. If I remove the first two lines and change the last line for this one:
address 192.168.0.7 client-id 0112.ae1d.af58.60
Then, the computer with that MAC address got the correct IP, but then the port-based doesn't work. Also, I got this line in the interface what I want to use MAC-based:
ip dhcp server use subscriber-id client-id
Is it possible to daisy chain from a 3560 to 2960-S switch using a SFP interconnect cable (daisy chain cable)
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe have quite a few 3560 & 2960 on our edge network - what I have been looking at was to access switches via web-interface i.e. web-browser. Only problem with this is it always gives you access on privilige level 15 which is not ideal as not all who we decide to give access to these switches will be admin and allowed to configure these swicthes - In the 3560/2960 data-sheet states:
"Alternatively, a local username and password database can be configured on the switch itself. Fifteen levels of authorization on the switch console and two levels on the Web-based management interface provide the ability to give different levels of configuration capabilities to different administrators"
Where as there is no mention of how to configure these two levels of Web-based management in the configuration guide.
As per the attached diagram: How do I configure the 2 ports on the 3560 (Ports 6 & 7) and the connected ports on each of the 2960 switches (Port 25) to provide redundancy.
If the up link from Switch A dies then I need the traffic to flow through the trunk and utilize the up link on Switch B with minimal delay (milliseconds).
I have a Cisco 3560 running as a Level3 device in my network running 10 V LANs and routing between most of them (nothing complex with ACLs) and running spanning-tree mode pvst. The main network is run on a net gear GS748TPS stack of three switches running MSTP.
I have just bought an additional 3560 and a 2960 to plug in. I have set them up with IP addresses and then plugged them into the net gear. This brought the whole network down until I unplugged the new switches.
I have confirmed the IP addresses aren't duplicated and that DHCP is not running on the switches so I can only assume it's something to do with DHCP. I cannot afford for the network to go offline again, so is there anything I should check? Am I running incompatible spanning tree methods between the net gear and Cisco devices?
I am using Packet Tracer to simulate Cisco networking.As the existing IOS of the 3560 and 2960 switch are in older version which has no new feature in new IOS, how to upgarde the IOS of Cisco switch at Packet Tracer?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI had a strange issue yesterday when onsite installing a new access switch.Port capacity full on a two switch stack of 3750 x48 PS switches (WS-C3750- 48PS-E)- New 2960 x48 PS - WS-C2960S-48FPS-L racked, with the plan of using it just as an edge switch via SFP Stacking cable.Setup the two connecting ports with simple initial config: - switchport mode trunk- no encapsulation option on the 2960, default dot1q- dot1q set on 3750 port- no shut on both sides.Connected the SFP Stacking cable but it didnt work:- %PHY-4-SFP_NOT_SUPPORTED: The SFP in Gi1/0/1 is not supported
This is ok as I had a backup:- Next step tried using 2 x Short Haul SFP SX GBIC's with LC - LC OFNP 50/125 fibre patch lead - no joy- Extra backup of 2 x Long Haul SFP LX GBIC's with the same fibre patch - no joy- Checked the fibre and it was not a cross over so transmit and receive going down the same side, switchedand still would not come up.- Used Fibre as a straight through and still the same.In all cases there was no indication of any life in the connection.It is pointing to a faulty fibre patch lead but I know it has worked in the past. Could it be something to do with the config or device incompatibility? Or any setting I need to activate?
I have an existing stack of 4 x 2960-S switches connected by stack cables.I would like to add another 2960-S switch to the stack but am unable to as the 2960-S will only allow 4 x 2960-S switches per stack.how I would add the 5th 2960-S switch to the existing stack of 4 x 2960-S switches.
View 12 Replies View RelatedI have a 24 port 2960-S that is not communicating with a 2960-LST that it is directly connected to over fiber. The link is up on the LST but will not come up on the -S. What command should I use to bring up this link? I have tried no shut from the (Config-if)# prompt.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have a question regarding QOS and possibly dedicated bandwidth. The environment is ISP goes into an ASA that up links to a 3560 and fiber up links to other 2960s throughout the building for internet. My question is for certain sections of the building if I segment the network can I guarantee them a certain amount of bandwidth. For example, if 1 gigabit is coming into the building from the ISP and into the ASA, can I guarantee one room in the building no less than say 200 Mb of the full internet pipe at all times?
View 7 Replies View Relatedhave few doudts on MIB file upload.
1) What will be the extension of MIB file ? *.mib or *.my
2) I am running with 12.2(25)SEB IOS .Is thre any dependency with IOS for downloading MIB file.
3)I have 3560 switch and 2960 switch. Is thre any difference in the MIB file extension.
We had a new building thats gone up and complete now and we're trying to get a ip phone working down that end of the school on a vlan. We seem to be having trouble with the VLAN going through on the 2960 switch but it works fine on our core 3560 switch.
There looks like a slight variation in the config of the switches, the 3560 switch supports the "switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q" command on the interface where as the 2960 doesn't support the "switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q". Is this why the vlan is working on the 3560 and not the 2960, or is it something else?
Both switches are using the 12.2 IOS
Heres the trunk port configured on the 3560 going down to the new building and connecting into the 2960 with a 1gbit fiber link
interface GigabitEthernet1/2 description 3560X Port UpLink as Trunk Mode switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport mode trunk udld port storm-control broadcast level 60.00 spanning-tree guard root
Heres the trunk port configured on the 3560 going to a Linksys switch which then connects to the DHCP server (The other end of the 3560 is also configued as trunk)
interface GigabitEthernet0/6 description Edge Switch port for clients switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport mode trunk spanning-tree portfast
Heres the working vlan port on the 3560, the ip phone is able to get an ip and ring all other phones etc
interface GigabitEthernet0/7 description Edge Switch port for clients switchport access vlan 2 switchport mode access spanning-tree portfast
Ok now heres the config for the 2960
Heres the trunk port configured on the 2960 going back upto the 3560 switch
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/25 description Port UpLink as Trunk Mode switchport mode trunk udld port storm-control broadcast level 60.00
Heres the access port configured on the 2960 which isn't passing on vlan information. Is there another command i need to use to enable encapsulation as dot1q?
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/19 description Edge Switch port for clients
switchport access vlan 2 switchport mode access spanning-tree portfast
3560--------------------------2960 connects via single mode Fiber and now will have another redundant Link between 3560 and 2960 with Ethernet interface ( Wireless). 3560------------trunk config---------2960 < Fiber Link >
what config I need on Ethernet interface on 3560 and 2960?what config is needed to alwayz have fiber as primary connection and Wireless as backup.
Im trying to Connect a 2960-S Catalyst Switch to a 3560 Catalyst Switch. It worth pointing out im newish to switching although i know some commands and what they do This is my first time connecting 2 switches together.They are connected via a crossover cable and have green lights flashing on the connected ports When i run "show CDP neighbours it sees the new switch Unable to ping new switch...just timesout Here is the the interface on the 3650
GigabitEthernet0/40 is up, line protocol is up (connected)
Hardware is Gigabit Ethernet, address is 001b.532f.8428 (bia 001b.532f.8428)
Description: Uplink to Switch 2
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 100000 Kbit, DLY 100 usec,
reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
[code]....
Cisco 3560 does not support "set ip next-hop verify-availabilty". I need this command in my config. "set ip next-hop" do not do the same job.
View 8 Replies View RelatedThe last few days I've been exploring options in getting rid of some old routers accross a wan connections. I have a cat 3560 to play with and I thought I would try and use the no switchport command test out routing with switch. I've got some type of route issue and I tried a few things which I thought would fix the issue but had no effect. I'll post the config and a few commands so you can see what the basic setup is.
Here we can see in the arp that it knows about both 10.7.1.2 (PC unable to ping 10.3.3.254) as well as 10.3.3.254 (ASA).I tried adding in a ip route of 10.7.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.3.3.110 as well as 10.3.3.254. Neither produced the results I wanted allowing 10.7.1.2 (PC) to ping the ASA (10.3.3.254). [code]
I have an environment of 3 X 3560G of which I have 1st switch-CORE(f0/10) connecting to the VPN router(CE) interface-f0/0. Remaining 2 Cisco 3560's(Access) are connected to Gi0/1 and Gi0/2 on the 1st switch-CORE via gi0/1 . On all three switches I have created multiple VLANs and assigned ports to these VLAN. The switch to switch connection is trunk allowing all VLANs created on all these 3 switches. Now the issue is how I am going to have all these VLANs routed through single interface on the routeri-e f0/0, as all these subnets will communicating to remote site over VPN. What should be default gateway on the 2 Access switches and the CORE switch, also what static route should be on router to reach all subnets(VLANs) created on these 3 switches.
I have read inter-VLAN routing i-e creating sub interfaces on router but dont want to proceed with that and looking for any other way to have my VLANs talk on all three switches and then are accessible to remote site ove VPN?
I have tried to make policy based routing on Cisco 3560. I use ipservices ios (SW version 12.2.(50)SE3 and SW-IMAGE C3560-IPSERVICESK9-M) For below configuration there is no problem and pbr is working.
“Access-list 100 permit ip host 1.1.1.1 host 2.2.2.2
Access-list 101 permit ip host 1.1.1.1 host 3.3.3.3
Route-map pbr1 permit 10
Match ip address 100
Set ip next-hop verify-availability 1.1.1.2 1 track 11
interface fasthethernet 0/1
ip policy route-map pbr1”
But when i add another sequence to the "pbr1" with another sequence number like that.
“Route-map pbr1 permit 11
Match ip address 101
Set ip next-hop verify-availability 1.1.1.3 1 track 12”
pbr is not working. Switch gives message "PLATFORM_PBR-3-UNSUPPORTTED_RMP:Route-map pbr1 not supported for Policy Based Routing”"ip policy route-map pbr1" command not shown in the running config. And "show ip policy" output is blank.Configuration guide says you have insert many sequence to the route-map with the same name. And also this command is not in the unsupported command list.
I am trying to get my workstation to talk to a workstation on a different sub-net through a Cisco 3560 switch. The switch is running the following IOS version: [code]
My primary network is 172.16.0.0 and I am trying to connect to a device on a 192.168.111.0 sub-net. [code]
What would be the best way to get the two workstations talking via the switch?
I implemented access list on cisco 3560 switch but it never works. I want to block access from network B to Network A and allow from Ato B
Network A. 10.0.12.0/24
Network B 10.0.24.0/24
The configuration is
interface Vlan1
description Data VLAN
[Code].....
We recently purchased Cisco 3560X Layer3 Switch. We need to perform simple Inter VLAN routing. We have configured VLAN1 (name-server_vlan) and VLAN2 (name- user_vlan). We have also assigned the Ports and IP address to both the VLANs. After assiging this if we plug Laptop A into VLAN1 then it doesnt communicates with Laptop B (btw, Laptop A is able to Ping VLAN2 Gateway ) in VLAN2 but on the other hand Laptop B is able to communicate with Laptop A and ping everything i.e. Gateway of VLAN1.
View 17 Replies View RelatedWe have two catalyst 3560 switches running c3560-ipbasek9-mz.122-58.SE2.bin They are connected using etherchannel using gi 0/21 - 24 interfaces.
on 3560-1 switch, there isn't any ip-default gateway or ip route configured. It only have 1 interface vlan configured.
on 3560-2 switch, there is ip default gateway configured along with 1 interface vlan.
What i dont understand here is that, i can reach out to other subnets from 3560-1 switch in which the routing is not enabled?