Does the 3750G divide blocks of memory between adjacent ports? We have 6 high use devices on ports 1 through 6 and I was told that splitting them up allocates memory better. Is this correct?
View 1 RepliesHas any come across show ver memory details on 3750G-48PS as below, One of our Catalyst 3750G running software 12.2(44)SE2 shows unexpected DRAM as below:
cisco WS-C3750G-48PS (PowerPC405) processor (revision F0) with 0K/12280K bytes of memory. This would equate to around 11MB memory which does not seem right... Is it a known IOS bug?
We had a stack of 4 qty 3750g running IP base on ver 12.2.32, then installed a 3750x to the stack and upgraded the whole stack to 15.0.2 SE3. In doing so, we noticed that the memory utilization jumped from 60-70% to 83-84%.
We had the same issue occur when upgrading to 15.0.2 SE3 on another stack that was 6 qty 3750g running ip-services, but this one jumped to 90%. On the 6 qty stack, we downgraded to 12.2.55 and the memory util went back down to 60-70%.
On the mixed stack, we replaced the 3750x with another 3750g and downgraded the whole stack to 12.2.55, however, the memory utilization did not drop down. As far as I can tell, no config changes have changed from the original IOS.
I have a Cisco RV042 Wired Router. I've got a static IP and a MS Small Business Server in my Router Network. I have forwarded the essential ports to use the IIS and the Exchange Server of my SBS2011 (HTTPS, HTTP, smtp, rpc). I have also created some access rules for these ports, but I don't have any access on my server services, if the firewall is activated.
Here are my Firewall Access Rules from the RV042 Web Interface:
I have an ASA that is logging the message %ASA-3-321007: system is low on free memory blocks of size 2048. I ran the "show blocks" command and the "Cnt" value for the 2048 blocks is 0. How do I reclaim these blocks and what are they used for?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a problem after upgrading the ASA5505 unlimited to 8.4.1, the message shown after startup is:IO memory blocks requested from bigphys 32bit: 9672 It has 512 Mb of ram and this is the view from sh ver:
Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance Software Version 8.4(1)
Device Manager Version 6.4(1)
Compiled on Mon 31-Jan-11 02:11 by builders
System image file is "disk0:/asa841-k8.bin"
Config file at boot was "startup-config"
[code]....
I try to insert a picture, to make the situation easily understandable.
The problem: After I have connected one more PC to the unmanaged switch, it cannot connect to network neither by DHCP IP, nor Static IP. (Physical Link is Ok, but no communication)
Tests made:
- PC1 turned off, to test connection, but PC2 cannot connect
- portfast has been turned off on the port of Cisco (which connects to Mediaconverter), but PC2 cannot connect
- PC2 has been reinstalled, replaced, other network adapter has been inserted, but cannot connect.
- the unmanaged switch has been replaced to a new one, but no success.
PC2 can connect to Cisco only if connected directly to RJ45 port of D-link Mediaconverter. But this is not a solution, because in that office, I would need for both of the PCs.
running config of the switch:
System image file is "flash:c2900XL-c3h2s-mz-120.5.2-XU.bin"
cisco WS-C2924C-XL (PowerPC403GA) processor (revision 0x11) with 8192K/1024K byt
es of memory.
Model number: WS-C2924C-XL-EN
#sh run
Building configuration...
Current configuration:
[code]....
I work for a small pharmacy that uses a Cisco RV120W router to separate hospital VPN traffic from general internet traffic. The VPN traffic is redirected to a dedicated T1 line (Or T-something, I wasn't involved in the actual setup of the VPN) connecting our store directly to the local hospital, and general internet traffic gets redirected to a ZyXel PK5000Z DSL modem (We have Qwest/CenturyLink 7m/768k). The DSL modem is running the latest version of our ISP's custom firmware.
Prior to installing the VPN and RV120W, LAN traffic was handled with a basic D-Link DI-604 wired router. The router itself was configured with an IP of 10.100.100.254 (With all LAN clients assigned DHCP IPs in the 10.100.100.XXX range) and "WAN" IP of 192.168.0.4, and the modem configured with a LAN IP of 192.168.0.1. The router was connected from it's WAN port to one of the LAN ports on the modem.
The modem has it's own built-in router, but the store owner wished to have an "extra layer of protection", so to speak, and had the D-Link router installed to serve that purpose. Prior to connecting the VPN, a second router was admittedly redundant and unnecessary. However, now that we have the hospital VPN, a second router is REQUIRED to properly separate the VPN traffic from other internet traffic, since the router built into the DSL modem doesn't have the capabilities to perform this task (We had already attempted to operate the VPN over DSL...it failed miserably and spectacularly. A dedicated T1 was the only reliable option).Anyway, when installing the RV120W, we duplicated every possible setting from the old router, including configuring it with a LAN IP of 10.100.100.254 and a "WAN" IP of 192.168.0.4 and connecting it in exactly the same fashion as the old router (Modem LAN to Router WAN). Essentially, the RV120W was set up exactly the same as the old D-Link router, just with the added VPN functionality.
The problem is this: ever since installing the RV120W, we are no longer able to access the DSL modem's administration page (http://192.168.0.1). We were able to do this without any trouble whatsoever with the old D-Link router, but the RV120W seems to be blocking it somehow. Any attempt to load the modem administration page just forever sits at "Waiting for 192.168.0.1...". It never times out, it never shows any error messages. It just sits there, forever trying to load the page, showing nothing but "Waiting for 192.168.0.1..." at the bottom of the screen.
Now, we know for a fact that it is NOT a problem with the modem, because if we connect a computer directly to it via ethernet (Completely bypassing the RV120W), the administration page loads perfectly fine. And, admittedly, we could configure the modem in this manner whenever required. HOWEVER, the modem is located in a rather inconvenient location (In the ceiling, sitting on top of a ceiling tile), and having the ability to remotely manage it like we could before would definitely be something we want to be able to do again...especially since there are plans in motion to install new pharmacy equipment that will require us to do a ton of "trial and error" configuration to the modem.The RV120W has been updated with the latest firmware, yet the problem still persists.
I want to understand - if 10G ports of 4948E (4 x 10Gb) they are block or non-blocks? I want to connect this switches with 20 GB (lag) to my BB switches and i need to prepare my infrastructure to 17.5GB troughput of video traffic.
View 9 Replies View RelatedI have a fresh SR520 that I only did two things to it using CCA 3.2(1):
1. Assign the address of FA4 to be 1.23.456.90 with a mask of 255.255.255.252
2. Declared a static nat of 1.23.456.90 port 80 to 192.168.75.12 port 80
I connected laptops to two ports:
1. FA0 (DHCP assigned laptop the address 192.168.75.12)
2. FA4 with the address on the laptop set to 1.23.456.90 and mask of 255.255.255.252
This is an exercise to simulate a cable internet configuration I will install the SR520 into.I can ping and point my browser to 1.23.456.89 and access the web server running there on port 80 via the inside laptop.I CANNOT point my browser to 1.23.456.90 from the outside laptop and make a connection.
What I am doing wrong with NAT? (I believe the problem lies therein as I did even try telling CCA to delete the firewall and I still could not connect to the inside web server).I have a network monitor (Wireshark) on the inside and see nothing coming across. I THINK I see successful NAT translations in the NAT logging (also in the attachment).
I got Two Distribution Switches of Cisco 3750G. Each Distribution have two 3750G switches stacked. I also have one Cisco 3750V2 Access Switch connected to both Distribution. When I am checking for redundancy, I can only get redundancy test pass for one link not atall for other. If I have a link up with Distribution 1 only then its fine; but disappointment with Distribution 2 link. I can see that the switch priorities of Dist 2 is not correct ie. Master's priority is 10 and Member's is 15.
My question is that due to misconfigured priorities on Distribution 2 stack switches I am failing with redundancy if ONLY Dist 2 is up and Dist 1 is down.
I've one Cisco 3750G-12S with ip routing enable, the swtich is with IP Service firmware, with PRR support.Currently set my default static route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.1.18.71 to my Firewall A Currently all of the VLAN for will be routed to 10.1.18.71
I've created a new VLAN 2 for my 10.1.2.0/24 network with the VLAN interface 2 ip address 10.1.2.10, my intention is to route 10.1.2.0/24 traffic to my 10.1.2.1 by creating the access list and route-map.
I've configure my test pc with a static ip and my gateway pointing to 10.1.2.10 (VLAN 2 gateway) , i'm not able to route to 10.1.2.1.
I have a couple of 3750G-24T-E switches running IOS 12.2 I would like to upgrade to IOS 15.x. Is this possible? Where do I find some information on the required licenses and costs? I must admit that the cisco search function did come up with a few pages but i was not able to extract the required information. I have not used the new software activation features yet.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI've got a requirement to do Inter-VRF routing (need MP-BGP) using a private AS Number on a stack of 7 x 3750G's, my question ultimately is the performance overhead of doing such a change.
The stack will have no more than 300-400 routes even with the duplicates invoked from doing VRF leaking so I can't see much of an issue myself, we already have 2 VRF's and OSPF running in each VRF just don't have MP-BGP to do the VRF leaking.
Ultimately there will be about 4-5 VRF's (I know there's a Software limit of 26 VRF's on a 3750G).
I am trying to stack the following -
3750G 12S - 12.2.53(SE2 IP Services) Running EIGRP & OSPF
with
3x 3750X 48P-S - 12.2.53(SE2 IP Base License)
Doing some research, the IP Base does EIGRP on the 3750X, does it do OSPF?
If not I will have to get licence for the 3750X?
I am having a switch 3750G (WS-C3750G-24TS-S) running a software version (c3750-ipservicesk9-mz.122-55.SE6.bin) and using the PBR with IP SLA.While, i am applying it on interface, it says not supported....
route-map TO-CAS-E0 permit 10
match ip address 125
set ip next-hop verify-availability 10.116.199.200 10 track 100 (if i change this command to set ip next-hop 10.116.199.200, it works)
!
WAN-L3-3750SW01(config-route-map)#interface GigabitEthernet1/0/11
[code].....
I have one switch 3750G12S I joined the company new, I found that they want to replace it with Alcatel stack switches. I didnt configure this Cisco switch before. how to configure it. I have 4 other new cisco switches in the topology which is not created yet. the 4 switches are all 2960.
View 17 Replies View Relatedhave 2 3750's one is an 3750E the other one is a G... Since they are 2 different versions Do I need to correct ios for each for example my 3750E switch i would have
IP BASE
c3750e-ipbasek9-mz.122-53.SE2.bin and for my 3750G switch should i use
IP BASE
c3750-ipbasek9-mz.122-53.SE2.bin
Which would be 2 separate images
I have a 3750G and bought a new 3750X. It possible to stack these two together?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have a 3750g on which I am trying to configure the ip policy route-map command on each of the vlan interfaces. However after entering the command it does not appear. I'm not sure what to do at this point. I have changed the SDM template to routing and I am running the IPServices image.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have just received a new Cisco 3750G Switch from my parent company. When attempting to install the switch, I discovered that it will not boot to CLI, only to the bootloader. After using the command boot, the switch attempts to boot the most current IOS version, but fails, stating "error loading XXXXXXXXXX.bin".
Obviously, I just need to get a functional version of the IOS onto the switch to boot, but the problem is exactly how can I do that? All (or most) the commands with which I am familiar are unavailable in the bootloader, so all methods known to me fail. Is there a simple way (maybe using the copy command?) to put the .tar or .bin file onto the flash?
I am trying to create an ACL that walls off a VLAN and only allows it to the internet. This is on a 3750G, currently the 3750G I am attempting this on is in a stack. I have another 3750G that is a standalone.
The first way I attempted this was to create two access-lists: access-list 101 permit tcp 10.249.1.0 0.0.0.255 any eq 80 access-list 102 permit tcp any 10.249.1.0 0.0.0.255 established
Let's call the 10.249.1.0 VLAN 2. I applied this to the VLAN2 interface, 101 out, 102 in. It didn't work. If I place a deny statement with nothing else, that works.
The second attempt was this: access-list 101 deny ip 10.249.1.0 0.0.0.255 any access-list 101 permit ip any any
I applied this to a VLAN I wanted to block VLAN2's traffic from reaching, let's call that one VLAN 3.
This lets all traffic from any VLAN (including the one I'm trying to block). If I remove the "permit ip any any", then all VLANs are denied. Which I understand is correct due to the implied deny all. What I don't understand is why it isn't applying the ACL to the specific VLAN.
I have a 3750G that used to be a Stack Master of a stack comprised of 2 identical switches. Since then, we have removed the stack from production, and I factory defaulted the stack MEMBER and that went fine. I just held the "Mode" button on the front until the lights all lit up and then issued the reload command and the switch came back with no configuration OTHER than the vlan database I issued the "del vlan.dat" command to no avail. I just manually removed all the vlans.
The stack MASTER on the other hand will NOT go back to factory defaults, and will also NOT erase the vlan database. Everything I try will NOT work. I've tried the following
1) Hold mode button & issue a reload after the lights start flashing
2) issue "Write Erase" then issue "reload"
3) issue "Write Erase", then issue "Write", then issue "reload"
4) issue "erase start" then issue "reload" (just in case the "write erase" command is being depriciated or something weird)
5) issue "erase start" then issue "copy run start" then issue "reload"
Is there a special way to reset a StackMaster back to factory defaults?
I have one 3750X with C3KX-NM-10GT, I need to interconnect using stackwise to 3750G-24TS. The 3750X needs IOS 15.0(1) to use C3KX-NM-10GT, and the latest IOS for 3750G-24TS is 12.2.55. How can I interconnect them using diferent IOS?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a 3750G switch that can't detect another switch or be detected through its stack ports. I tried the recommended test; looping a cable between the ports and rebooting. I get the following message as the switch boots: SM: Detected stack cables at PORT1 PORT2. However, if I connnect another switch, it won't detect it and can't form a stack.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to upgrade the IOS ver on a 3750G stack (2 switches), but the img on the switch is too old.The stack is running IOS c3750-i9-mz.121-19.EA1d.bin, and when I tried to upgrade to a newer version, I tried to go to IOS ver c3750-advipservicesk9-mz.122-35.SE5.bin since I need to enable ssh on the switch, but the switch did not reload.
Here's a prtscreen of the switch ver:
Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
IOS (tm) C3750 Software (C3750-I9-M), Version 12.1(19)EA1d, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
Copyright (c) 1986-2004 by cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Mon 05-Apr-04 22:40 by antonino
Image text-base: 0x00003000, data-base: 0x007CBC3C
[code]...
what IOS ver can I upgrade to that is not already deferred?
have one 3750G stack with 4 switches and this stack is presenting the follow log message:
%PLATFORM_UCAST-4-PREFIX: One or more, more specific prefixes could not be programmed into TCAM and are being covered by a less specific prefix, and the packets may be software forwarded.
In this stack we are using the layer 3 with OSPF routing, and the current sdm prefer is default:
switch-01-3750#sh sdm prefer
The current template is "desktop default" template.
The selected template optimizes the resources in
the switch to support this level of features for
8 routed interfaces and 1024 VLANs.(code)
I have two 3750G switches that are in a stack, and I am seeing these errors in the log:
002258: Feb 4 17:06:06.355 UTC: %PM-3-INTERNALERROR: Port Manager Internal Software Error (vlanid >=0 && vlanid < PM_MAX_VLANS: ../switch/pm/pm_vlan.c: 1279: pm_vlan_get_vlan_data) (CBAC01-3750-2)
-Traceback= 190F078 19729A0 1972A64 1963764 110BC24 195F2F8 110BB9C 196D2C8 195ECD4 110BC24 19658B0 110BB9C 196D1D8 194C2B8 195D24C 110BC24 (CBAC01-3750-2)
002259: Feb 4 17:06:06.355 UTC: %BIT-4-OUTOFRANGE: bit 4096 is not in the expected range of 0 to 4095 (CBAC01-3750-2)
-Traceback= 10273BC 1027478 1972B50 1963764 110BC24 195F2F8 110BB9C 196D2C8 195ECD4 110BC24 19658B0 110BB9C 196D1D8 194C2B8 195D24C 110BC24 (CBAC01-3750-2)
002260: Feb 4 17:06:06.355 UTC: %PM-3-INTERNALERROR: Port Manager Internal Software Error (vlan > 0 && vlan < PM_MAX_VLANS: ../switch/pm/pm_vlan.c: 773: pm_vlan_set_portlist) (CBAC01-3750-2)
[code]....
According to my boss every 3 to 4 months he has to restart our 2821 with a 16-esw module installed because of a low memory issue dealing with CEF. Here is the exact error message.
%% Low on memory; try again laterJun 8 11:18:51.777: %FIB-2-FIBDOWN: CEF has been disabled due to a low memory condition. It can be re-enabled by configuring "ip cef [distributed]" Jun 8 11:19:51.823: %FIB-2-FIBDOWN: CEF has been disabled due to a low memory condition. It can be re-enabled by configuring "ip cef [distributed]" %%
Low on memory; try again later
%% Low on memory; try again later
%% Low on memory; try again later
Jun 8 11:20:51.868: %FIB-2-FIBDOWN: CEF has been disabled due to a low memory condition. It can be re-enabled by configuring "ip cef [distributed]" Jun 8 11:21:51.914: %FIB-2-FIBDOWN: CEF has been disabled due to a low memory condition. It can be re-enabled by configuring "ip cef [distributed
Today, one of our Cisco 3750 got unmanaged from NOC, we were able to ping the switch, also, traffic was flowing fine but not able to telnet or local login.On trying to login through console following messages were coming:
%% Low on memory; try again later
%% Low on memory; try again later
%% Low on memory; try again later
%% Low on memory; try again later
%% Low on memory; try again later
%% Low on memory; try again later
[code].....
We given power on reset, after which we were able to login switch again. I wanted to know the actual reason behind it and if there is any other way to recover switch other than power reset.?
Any one try to form a stack with mixed 3750-X and 3750G? Is there any prerequisites in hardware and software?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI am currently having performance issues running a 3 x stack 3750G (different models) as a core for a network of roughly 12 x distribution switches. [code] As above, I have a 12 port Fibre switch and 2 x 3750G-48 port switches. [code] I tried to change the SDM to route but hit another issue where the 3750g-48 does not support SDM route so I had to revert back to desktop VLAN.Could the SDM Template be the reason for slow performance? If so which SDM Template should i use as this is the Core L3 switch.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI currently have a stack of 3750G switches with a cross stack etherchannel connected to a 3750E stack in the distribution layer.The 3750G stack is running 15.0-2SE IP Base. I began noticing the Mac flap issue when I was Re-enabling dot1x on the switchports. As first I thought dot1x maybe have contributed to this so I removed it from the stack temporarily.I am still seeing Mac flap logs usually when a machine reboots or re-connects back to the network. These are all wired desktops.I started looking at the etherchannel configuration which is using LACP. The 3750E stack looks fine with all ports in mode active. On the problematic 3750G stack I noticed 3 of the ports in the etherchannel set to mode active and 1 port set to mode passive. The port shows as bundled but I can't imagine this is ok.The only other difference on this one port is there is no mls qos commands like on the other 3 interfaces in the port channel.I mainly need to know what the Mac flapping is about. Whether it is a bug or related to the current etherchannel configuration.
View 9 Replies View Related