I manually set an IP address in my new SG200-26, and turned off the dhcp client. I cannot access the webpage or ping the switch at the statically set IP. I have also run a network scan and tried accessing the switch at all of the IP addresses in my DHCP Pool that were being used, it is not available there either.
View 1 RepliesI have a Cisco SG200-08p that's acting up. After setting up 2 larger 200 series switches I pulled this out for its config. I changed the default password and assigned the new static IP address of 192.168.0.103, that's it. The settings applied and worked normally but after rebooting the switch it reverted itself back to the default ip of 192.168.1.254, it retained the new password. After this happened a few times I upgraded the firmware to the latest version, reset the device to factory settings and applied the new address again to have the same problem. It doesn't matter if I reboot the switch in the management interface or physically. Is there a problem with having a zero in the third octet (that would be lame)?
View 6 Replies View RelatedI currently work in the IT field part-time as a end-user support technician while I am finishing my Bachelor's Degree in Network Administration. I'm not completely new to networking at this point, but I am by no means a master of it either. The basics of small networks (less than 10 PCs) and the lower-end of small business grade Cisco equipment are not unfamiliar to me. Up until this point however, I have had very little experience with any higher-end Cisco networking equipment.
Now on to the questions, which may seem like the answers should be obvious, but let's face it, I do not have the resources to own much equipment myself at this time for experimentation purposes, nor does the school I am attending have a lot of financial resources to provide us with recent hardware to learn on. What I want to know are a few things about PoE as implemented on Cisco devices, specifically the SG200-50P small business series switch. According to the technical documentation, the switch supports PoE on 24 of its 48 ports, specifically 1 - 12 and 24 - 36; simple enough. The switch is currently installed in an office that has less than 24 connected devices, but that is currently expanding. None of the PoE ports are utilized as of yet, but going forward, there will be more than 24 connected devices. Will another switch need to be installed if the additional connected devices (PCs and printers) are not using PoE, or is the PoE an auto-sensing feature that will simply remain disabled if a device that does not require power over the network cable is connected? Is there some setting that needs to be changed through the management interface to keep devices that should not be drawing power from doing so?
There will likely be some additional questions generated by my inquiry, and I fully understand if these are completely novice questions, but I admittedly do not know the answer. When I Googled it, I was greeted by a few hundred thousand results, the first dozen or so pages of results all being for places to purchase this particular type of switch, so I thought I would try my luck on the forums of the place that made it.
Does Cisco SG200-50 50 port gigabit smart switch have support for SNMP ? I have updated the firmware and still can not find any option for snmp.Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App.
View 3 Replies View RelatedMy SG200-50P Switch Log appears as follows with Random ports going up and down. I am trying to find out if this links to another problem I'm having with a Client Server software locking up on the client end. The hardware, thin clients and desktops, are working and have checked all sleep and power settings. All items in working order, now I'm wondering about the switch
2147483369 2013-Feb-20 15:12:07 Warning %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: gi19: STP status Forwarding
2147483370 2013-Feb-20 15:12:02 Informational %LINK-I-Up: gi19
2147483371 2013-Feb-20 15:12:00 Warning %LINK-W-Down: gi19
2147483377 2013-Feb-20 14:51:31 Informational %LINK-I-Up: gi45
2147483378 2013-Feb-20 14:51:28 Warning %LINK-W-Down: gi45
[code]....
I bought a CISCO SG200-18 switch. I added the Switch to my LAN and started the Switch (as described in the manual). The Switch starts the booting procedure (green blinking status LED) After a while, the LED starts to blink orange and green, instead of steady green.
In generally the Switch seems to work. I can access my whole network, but not the web interface of the switch itself. I also can't see the switch in the ADSL / DHCP rooter.
I also tried to boot the switch only connected to the PC. But ping on 192.198.1.254 is not working. The switch is in the same subnet like my other LAN components.
Subnetzmaske . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
Standardgateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.1
I exchanged the switch. But the new switch shows the same behavior.
I have a linksys router and i'm having quite a big issue. it's been since 2010 that I bought it and have no problems up until recently. I was playing/ going through all the security settings just to what all there was to secure my router. I noticed an ip setting and I 95% sure I did something which changed it; and now i am unable to access my router settings. Whenever I type the old ip address (192.168.1.1 or any of the few other ip addresses) it gives error page and says this page is non existent or it gives me a link to click on with the failed ip address to do a google search. My question is, is there any way that I can reset the router (like a system restore on a computer),
View 2 Replies View RelatedI was configuring link aggregation between a Cisco3750 and Cisco SG200 and the switched network went down just a few minutes after the port channel came on.I rebooted the SG200 and all hosts came back up for a minute before I lost them again. The etherchannel was between two trunking ports. I never set link aggregation on the SG200, could that be the reason? All machines are connected to the SG200. The 3750 is only being used as a layer 3 device for inter vlan traffic.
View 1 Replies View RelatedCan a Cisco SG300-10P switch power a Cisco SG200-08 switch over POE? Or an SG200-08P power an SG200-08 via POE? I have an area where I'd like to put a small switch, but would like to avoid having to have electrical power run to it. Or will the SG300 and SG200 POE switches only power endpoint devices such as cameras and IP phones?
View 4 Replies View RelatedHow to setup a port channel between a SG200 and 3750 and am having problems.
What do I need to do on the SG200 I have added the port into the lag but the port will not come up.
I spent half a day messing arround with the web interface and I am unable to get the port to come up.
The Cisco 3750 is a standard port channel config which I have setup maytime before. channel-group 1 mode active channel- protocl lacp Switchport mode trunk
I have two separate companys both with staff at two locations and thier own networks connected with a wireless antenna which provides a high speed LAN connection between offices. I only have a single path through this antenna bridge. I have an SG200-08 switch at each end. What I am attempting to do is utlise the switches to take the two subnets at one office, combine them to one for transfer through the antenna bridge, and then resolve them into the two separate networks again at the other end.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am going to be putting an SG200-08 (8 port switch) inside a 2U rack mount chassis. To enhance cooling I thought I would remove the outer case. Are there, or would there be any issues with using the switch with the cover removed?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI was given a task of creating a vlan and isolating one pc to access an internal website (192.168.90.15) on a specific port (port 8080)The pc is connected in the following manner:
PC--> HP Switch --> Cisco Small Business SG200 switch --> 3550 Catalyst 1, 3550 Catalyst 2 and 3550 Catalyst 3.
I have created a vlan 110 on the Main 3550 Catalyst switch and successfully added the pc to that vlan.However, that PC must be able to access the internet and an internal website on port 8080.I have placed an access-list on the main 3550 catalyst switch which is connected to our router as below:
Client ip address: 192.168.100.2
VLAN 110: 192.168.100.3
access-list 110 permit tcp host 192.168.100.2 host 192.168.90.15 eq 8080access-list 110 permit icmp host 192.168.100.2 anyaccess-list 110 deny ip 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255 ? I was unable to access the webserver even after many attempts.
I have a Cisco SG200 26 Port Switch, 2 Cisco WAP4410N Access points, and a VLAN aware Router. I have created 4 VLAN's. For the sake of this conversation lets call them.
98 - Intel Vpro
99 - Management
100 - General
101 - Guest
The Access points are capable of doing V LAN tagging so I plan on having them tag a guest network as V LAN 101. That can get sent to the V LAN aware router and out. No problem. I have some devices, or management pages that I don't want accessible from the general network. (Intel V pro KVM, Remote Management Cards, AP Config Menus, Switch config menu...) . I need to be able to take a V LAN unaware device, plug it into port 1, and have it communicate with V LAN 98, 99 and 100.
My second problem with sg200-08 (firmware: SG200-08x_FW_1.0.6.2.stk) is when I try to add specific MAC address as secure:MAC Address Tables - Static Addresses - Add; insert vlan id, port, mac address and select "Secure":I get error message: "Error: Failed to Add 'Static Address' entry.
View 3 Replies View RelatedSG200-08 and SG200-08P fail to hold or update Date/Time.(New installation for a UC320 setup.)I've got both an SG200-08 and SG200-08P that are failing to maintain date/time when set with "Use Local Settings". Every restart/powercycle causes them to reset to Dec 31 1969. Other settings save fine.I first tried to set time via SNTP Unicast using a variety of public time server addresses including the 3 hard coded to the SG200-08 firmware:
Sadly though it always just shows "Active Server Server Host Address: 0.0.0.0" and continues having 12/31/1969 as the date. Both after a config save and a reboot.I can ping the NTP servers just fine from the switches either by IP or by hostname.At this point I've decided that I must be missing something simple. At least I hope so... otherwise it's a firmware bug which means waiting for a fix.Other devices behind the same firewall/gateway (RVS4000) are updating NTP
how to connect our new SG200-18 to an existing Cisco network, in particular a C2960S.Here's what I've got:
<----- Rest of network ------- C2960S ----------- SG200 ----- (PC connected directly to the SG200)
On the C2960S-side here's what I've got on the corresponding interface:
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/1
switchport mode trunk
On the SG200-side I've set the IP-address and default-gateway accordingly, however:From the SG200 I can't ping any other host on the same IP-subnet as the switchFrom the SG200 can't ping the default-gatewaycan't ping from any other host or the default-gateway *to* the switch But:On the SG200 I've got plenty of MAC-addresses under "Dynamic Address Table" - however only MAC-addresses that belong to the management-VLAN of the SG200 (i.e. VLAN9 in my case)The MAC-address table on the SG200 even includes the MAC-addresses of hosts on the same VLAN I tried to ping without success. For example: I tried a PING from a host having a MAC-address of 00:19:bb:31:91:30. This MAC shows up in the arp table of the SG200. To cross check I connected a dedicated PC to the SG200 and assign it an IP-address out of the management-LAN-range of the SG200 - in this case I can access the switch (i.e. PING, WEB etc.)So to summarize: Connectivity is OK when going from directly connected devices to the SG200. No connectivity from devices that are behind the C2960S towards the SG200 and vice versa. (The problem is definitely not with the C2960S-side since we've got plenty of them hooked together without problems.) I'm enclosing the screenshots of the corresponding definitions on the SG200.
I'm baffled by the poor performance that I'm seeing when passing traffic between my two Cisco SG switches.
The configuration is as basic as I can make it, no VLANs, QoS or bonding. Both have been updated to current firmware as part of the troubleshooting process.
When I transfer data within one of my switches I see 50/60Mb/s. When I pass the same traffic between both switches I see 0.6 Mbs/ or less.
I have tried to eliminate every possible factor including switching out the cables. No success.
Implement the procedures required so that machine 1 and machine 2 can communicate statically with one another. Outline the TCP/IP settings to be used on each of the machines and set this machine up accordingly.
View 4 Replies View RelatedThis question is in the context of servers sitting in a colocation environment behind an ASA5510 with security plus license.Our colo provider is going to be statically routing a /28 public subnet to our ASA5510 (say 1.1.1.0/28). We will also be getting a single IP (say 2.2.2.2/30) on a small router-to-router subnet (2.2.2.0/30) to which the 1.1.1.0/28 subnet will be statically routed to our ASA5510 from our colo provider.I will obviously set the outside interface of the ASA to be 2.2.2.2/30 so that the colo provider can route the 1.1.1.0/28 subnet to it. I will also set a default route to 2.2.2.1 which is the IP of our colo providers gateway (and the router that will be statically routing the 1.1.1.0/28 subnet to us).
We have various servers in the same rack as the ASA (connected via a 3750G switch). Some of these servers need to be exposed to the internet (web, email, etc servers) and some do not (database servers).I'm considering 2 different ways of designing the network but I have questions about both and not sure which way to go:
1) Scenario #1: Using NAT and private IP's for all servers.In this scenario where/how do I assign the internal network (say 10.1.1.0/24) and the public routed subnet (1.1.1.0/28)? I assume the internal 10.1.1.0/24 is an inside network assigned to the interface connected to the 3750G (to which all the servers connect). However, where do I assign the public routed subnet (1.1.1.0/28) since it is somewhat "nebulous" in that it has to reside somewhere on the ASA so that it can then NAT to the internal (10.1.1.0/24) IP's. Also, is it considered an outside or inside network - and on which interface? My confusion is that If its added to the outside interface then won't that conflict with the 2.2.2.2 IP to which the colo provider is routing our 1.1.1.0/28 subnet to? And if its on the inside interface connected to the 3750G then wont that conflict with the 10.1.1.0/24 private IP range of the servers?
2) Scenario #2: Using public IP's for all servers:This scenario seems more straightforward to me: I would want to assign IP's from the statically routed subnet (1.1.1.0/28) to my servers so that range would be configured as an inside network on the interface connected to the 3750G (to which all the servers connect). This would be configured on a specific VLAN (say vlan 50). I would then have another VLAN (say VLAN 100) on the 3750G that has a private IP range (say 10.1.1.0/24) so that non-public servers (database, etc) would reside on there. All public servers that need access to private servers would have a NIC on both VLANS (50 + 100). My question is is this the correct way of approaching this? I also like this because I dont have to worry about NAT and the ASA can act as a router/firewall and things are clear in terms of whats happening.
Ultimately I'm not sure which is the best way to go in terms of having all servers on a private IP range and just NAT to them (as per scenario 1), or implement scenario 2 where servers have two interfaces.The main thing thats bugging me from scenario 1 is I'm not sure where/how to assign the statically routed subnet (1.1.1.0/28) on the ASA? (inside? outside? which interface?).
I am working on replacing our Checkpoint Firewalls with ASA's, and am running into the following NAT problem. On some of our Checkpoints, there are external NAT's that are mapped to multiple internal hosts based on ports.Is there any way to translate that to the ASA? I'm not sure the ASA will let you have multiple internal hosts mapped to one external IP using static NATs. The main issue, is these are alarm panels that receive data from external hosts (the traffic is initiated externally on the Internet) so I can't use dynamic PAT with this.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI purchased an IP Cam for my girl friend to monitor her dog, she lives in an apartment complex that provides internet. I have been able to get the camera setup at my house to be accessed through the internet. I have a cable modem and a router, setup a dyndns account, port forwarded my router and boom it worked. Went to my gf's apartment and I didn't think of it at first until I was frustrated, but realized the apartment complex probably has a router of its own. I can access the cam on her LAN but not through the internet.
View 3 Replies View RelatedThis is my first time trying to configure a WAP for out network. I have an AP1141 connecting to an SG300-28 switch. The subnet for my WAPs is 10.10. 40.0/ 24. The rest of my internal network is 10.10.10.0/24. There are four other WAPs on the 10.10.40.0/24 network that I did not configure. When I assign an IP address - 10.10.40.7 to my WAP with the gateway as 10.10.40.100 (router), I cannot ping anything. If I assign the WAP an IP address - 10.10.10.192 with the gateway 10.10.10.100 (router), I can ping everything.
View 6 Replies View RelatedMy organization wishes to host a LAN gaming event. The setup I have in mind involves a 24-port switch for connecting all the player computers and having that switch connected to a smaller "core" switch which has the the game server and router connected to it. I'd like to know if I can set things up as follows...
SG200-26 with ports 1-24 on seperate VLANs so they cannot talk to eachother. I'd then like ports 25 and 26 to be an aggregated (for bandwidth and redundancy) trunk port to carry all 24 VLANs plus an additional management VLAN (ex. VLAN 100) that will be used for accessing the switch. I'd like those aggregated trunk ports to connect to an SG300-10 "core" switch which will be connected to the game server and to a router for internet access.
I'd like the ability to have two network connections from the game server to the switch, one on the management VLAN and one on a different VLAN (ex. VLAN 50) that will be accessed by the players (ports 1-24 on the SG200-26). The core switch needs the ability to perform restricted inter-VLAN routing, in that it doesn't allow VLANs 1-24 to talk to eachother but they can talk to the server's VLAN but only through specific service ports (ex. port 12345, 12346). Is this possible?
Furthermore how would I configure the SG300-10 to allow VLANs 1-24 to talk to VLAN 50, but not themselves or VLAN 100. As well, I'll probably have the router on it's own VLAN (ex. VLAN 60) and allow VLANs 1-24 to access it but only through HTTP port 80 for web access.
I disconnected and reconnected the powercable while holding on to the setup button until system, alert, setup go amber. The system led light began blinking green. I waited until one of the leds lights on the ports starts blinking green I then connected the ethernet cable connected to my pc. I made sure my lan connection on my computer was set to dhcp.In the docs claim it should take about 1 minute to grab a new ip address. After a few minutes i check the ipconfig on my pc and I get the apipa address.The setup light on the switch remains green while system is amber. The led for port 1 stopped blinking and remains green.My pc is not grabbing an ip address I don't know what else to do.
View 7 Replies View RelatedWe have a Router with one External IP and a couple of VLANs. We have got a Teleconferencing Unit that needs almost every port known to man to work, so decided to get the unit its own External IP.
We have the IP now and how to get it in the router and then also to use it only for the Video unit (From outside straight through to Video).
Im comfortable adding lines to the router but just don't know what the lines should be.
The new IP's purchased are 116.199.222.200/30 (Only need to use one address, lets say 116.199.222.200). No idea what the subnet mask should be...
The router config below stripped of irrelevant stuff:
interface FastEthernet0
no ip address
!
interface FastEthernet1
[Code]......
I would like to know why Cat3550 SVI's mac address is always same.for example if I configure interface vlan1 and vlan2.mac address is same as like 000d.bdfc.xxxx but Cat3750 is different, each SVI has unique mac address.
View 1 Replies View Relatedhow to configure an IPaddress for a PWR-RPS 2300?.I tried finding info on the website but no luck as yet. RPS 2300 will be used on stack of 3750E series switches.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI'm fairly new to Cisco configuration and I am looking at a problem for a client that involves the use of a Cisco 887 (wired only) as the main router/gateway. The problem I am investigating involves the allocatoni of DHCP addresses from the device to a product we have designed that connects to the router. I am attempting to set the 880 up on the bench with no ADSL connection and just use the DHCP feature of the box for the 4 switch ports on the back. I have tried all kinds of configurations from default. Whatever I do I can't get the router to assign an IP address to anything that is plugged in (Windows or Linux machines). What could I be doing wrong ? It can't be that difficult to get the system to just act as a DHCP server.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a POE switch running 12.0(5). I have port 24 connected as a trunk connected to the main switch. I need to add an ip address on vlan 21 which is where the network vlan is. I created it but I can not seem to enable it. I have issued the no shut command several times, but doing "sh ip int brief" it keeps showing up as administively down.
View 13 Replies View RelatedI would like to enable port security to hardcode the MAC address on the ethernet switch. There are 5 ethernet ports in the same ethernet switch to be assigned for one person (one note book), e.g. port 5, 6, 15, 16 and 23. The model of ethernet switch is cisco 2960S and one MAC address is configured on 2960S.
1. Does 2960S support this requirement to allow input the same MAC address to 5 different port?
2. If yes, can ethernet switch "smart" enough to forward the packages to "active" ethernet port which is connected to notebook and the rest of four ports are inactive.
3. if no, any solution or any work around to achieve this requirement
The customer has 4 6500 switches. 2 Physical locations, and 2 switches at each locations. The locations are connected via 1 200mpbs metro ethernet(layer 2). We ran into an issue during a DR exercise. We had created a VLAN for DR testing purposes, that did not have any SVI configured, but the VLAN did exist on one of the 6500s. When the customer restored a VM to the DR VLAN, we lost connectivity to the production server. After some troubleshooting, we found the cause to be the same mac address showing up, but in a different vlan. Once we removed the DR vlan from the 6500 all was well. It seems like switches are ignoring the VLAN in the mac address table, and forwarding to the incorrect ports. The switch is not reporting any mac flapping in the logs. No spanning tree topology changes are occurring. Code version is 12.2(33)SXJ2 on all switches.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a new 881 router and am simply trying to change the ip address from the default 10.10.10.1 to 192.168.15.1
I tried doing this both in the CCP Express app loaded on the router, and also using the desktop CCP client. I can change other parameters without any problems, but when I change the ip address of the vlan the program hangs (as expected since the ip address should be changing). I then try to open it back up and reconnect but get no response from the router.
I can ping it no problem, and the http server is running according to the serial terminal.