Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 2960S / Multicast Not Working Between Two Data-centers?

Jan 28, 2012

Multicast is not working between our two datacenter, we have catalyst 2960S (two stacked) as the internal lan switch, and catalyst 3560E as the external switch, same configuration for both datacenters.The two sites are connected using metro, the external switch (3560) is doing qinq and encapsulate the data from the internal switch with the metro vlan (611).
 
IGMP snooping is disabled for all switches, although we prefer to enable it for the internal switches.For each datacenter there is a different firewall which also act as the router, we are using fortigate as the firewall.Following is the important configuration section:
 
Port 43 in the internal switch is connected to the external switch (both sites):
 
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/43 
switchport mode trunk
 load-interval 30 
 
Port 3 in the external switch connected to the internal switch (both sites):
 
interface GigabitEthernet0/3 
switchport access vlan 611
 switchport mode dot1q-tunnel 
no cdp enable
 no cdp tlv server-location
 no cdp tlv app
 
 Port 8 on the external switch connected to the metro link (both sites) vlan 350 is the internet and 611 is the metro:
 
interface GigabitEthernet0/8
 switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
 switchport trunk allowed vlan 350,611
 switchport mode trunk  

vlan 611 on external switch:
 
interface Vlan611 
ip address 192.168.168.2 255.255.255.0
 no ip route-cache 
no ip mroute-cache

View 6 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Deploy OTV Using ASR 1001 Between 2 Data-centers?

Apr 9, 2013

deploy OTV using ASR 1001 between 2 data-centers? We want to acquire HSRP localization there, but at this moment I can only see lots docs are saying how to do this on N7K, not ASR. I saw it has a FHRP filtering enabled by default when the OTV configuration is done, and also see there is a access-list created by default call otv_filter_fhrp, Im just wondering besides this IP ACL there should be MAC ACL applied?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960S - Multicast Imaging And VLANs

Oct 2, 2012

This is the deal, I used Acronis for imaging workstations.  Obviously when I do that it drags everything down to a halt, as all the ports are being flooded with packets.  So what options do I have to image (as opposed to doing it after hours or try to plug all the computers into one isolated switch? = )
 
VLAN 1 has well everything in it, PXE server, DHCP server and workstationsVoice VLAN 100 is on every trunk or connection a workstation would be attached to.  
  
There is another equipment I'm not illustrating... although a part of me wonders if my topology is correct.
 
In any case, I've read about IGMP Snooping, CGMP, etc-- but I think the 2960S are only capable of IGMP Snooping.
 
And from there I'm a little confused about configuration of IGMP...

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: How To Enable Multicast Routing On 2960s

Mar 23, 2013

I need to enable multicast routing on 2960s but the command "ip multicast-routing" isn't available on my release (12.2.(55)).
 
From which release this command is available?     

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960S Multicast Routing

Jan 17, 2012

while i am configuring a port on switch .The switch reloads.After reload the show version says,System returned to ROM by bus error at PC 0x458F6C, address 0x0,show version from the effected switch is,Cisco IOS Software, C3750E Software (C3750E-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 12.2(58)SE2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1).

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Collect Data About Traffic On 2960S?

Mar 25, 2012

How can I collect the data about the traffic on my Cisco 2960S? Have I use only the snmp? Any workaround for simulate a netflow? The IOS c2960s-universalk9-mz.150-1.SE2.bin.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Multicast Data Drop On 3750X?

Apr 23, 2012

We are currently experiencing random multicast data dropouts on ports that are connected to a 3750X in VLAN ports. A test PC was connected to a routed port and we do not have any dropouts of the multicast data.We also took a 2960G and plugged it into VLAN ports on the 3750X.  Any test PC that is on the 2960G does not lose traffic. The traffic only drops on PCs that are connected to a port on the 3750X that is in a VLAN.  The data drops are random and last approximatly 55-59 seconds before we start receiving multicast traffic again.
 
I do not see any input/output errors on the interfacessh platform port-asic stat drop also show no drops
 
CPU runs at about 50% on the 3750X
 
Below is the configuration of the 3750X
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 8454!!version 12.2no service padservice timestamps debug datetime msecservice timestamps log datetime msecservice password-

[Code]......

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Nexus 7000 / How To Have Multicast Data Across OTV Extensions

Nov 5, 2012

have multicast data across OTV extensions?  We run OTV between two pairs of Nexus 7000 in different datacenters with mcast underlying encapsulation. We stretch 10 or so vlans between the sites. We have encountered multiple bugs over the last two years and had to upgrade code and have rarely been clear for any period of time.
 
We've had an ongoing Tac case where IGMP requests are not getting across the OTV VLAN extension to the PIM forwarder on another site. You can see OTV IGMP snooping on the AED VDC is picking up the request on the local site but it does not get to the remote site that is the PIM forwarder so no multicast gets onto the VLAN. For a while we had a hack where we would get a local server to the PIM forwarder router to request the same groups and then this would somehow get across to the other site. Since clearing the overlay interfaces to try and fix the original problem the hack no longer works and I can't get multicast to the receiver at all.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960s / Marking The Traffic Between Two Hosts (Data Replication)

Feb 6, 2013

in switch 2960s ( c2960s-universalk9-mz.122-55.SE5 ) , i want to marking the traffic between two hosts (Data replication), i choose to use " mac access-list"  to classify my trafic before apply the policy marking . but did'nt work . c

!  my mac ACL
mac access-list extended test
permit host 000a.1a41.aa52 host 000a.1a41.1bc2
!
class-map match-all test
match access-group name test

[code]....

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 2960S IOS 15.0.2 IPv6 Don't Work

Aug 8, 2012

Just I have upgraded some 2960S to IOS 15.0(2)SE from a IOS 15.0(1)SE3 and the catalyst don't switch any IPv6 traffic. Don't work any RA and also don't work any unicast IPv6 traffic from any interface. I can see some references to IPv6 changes in the FHS (First Hop Security) in the Release Notes, but no any reference to changes in the configuration.
 
The switches don't have any IPv6 specific configuration and the sdm is the default templata. Returning to 15.0(1)SE3 everything work ok.
 
On Catalyst 2960, and 3560E this IOS version seem to work fine with IPv6.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Upgrade Catalyst 2960S And 3560x

Jun 20, 2012

i want upgrade my catalyst 2960S and 3560x at midnight, but i am worried about config loss.  If i upgrade my switch throught web interface, will need I reconfigure the switch?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 2960S Stack Required

Dec 1, 2010

I have a new problem with Catalyst 2960S. We have four switch in a stack and now I get the message:
 
“%PLATFORM_RPC-3-MSG_THROTTLED: RPC Msg Dropped by throttle mechanism: type 37, class 14, max_msg 32, total throttled 73968 (hostname1-2)”
 
Traceback= 13A686C 160862C 160E0B4 15E2088 184FD48 18467B8
 
sh switch de
Switch/Stack Mac Address : 68bd.abc9.0000
H/W   Current
[Code]....

View 36 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 2960S For IPTV Backbone

Nov 26, 2011

we have Catalysts 2960S for switching in our Wireless high capacity backbone network. As agregation switch we are using 3560x.
 
I just need to know, if are these 2960S good solution for igmp snooping for whole IPTV stream. It put only a range from backbone and put out on another port. But just specified multicast addresses.
 
Imput will be 239.128.0.10 to 239.128.0.20 on Gi 0/1,Output wil be 239.128.0.10 - 15 on Gi 0/24
 
IPTV will be separated on different VLAN for eg VLAN 20,Is needed any priorization configured od switches?,The capacity for IPTV is around 500 mbps

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 6513 - Scalability Of Multicast?

Aug 1, 2007

I am running a network comprising of Catalyst 6513's with SUP7203B's. at present we have 800 VLAN's as we make use of a VLAN per access layer switch model.
 
I know have a problem that as soon as I enable multicast routing my SUP720's CPU runs at 100% and the system goes into a slowdown.where I can find information on the scalability of Multicast?

View 15 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 2960S Format Flash Failure?

Jan 3, 2013

I recently tried to manually format the flash on a model WS-2960S-48TS-L switch running IOS version 15.0(2)SE.  While executing the operation I got the following error - mifs[8]: Failed to create superblock  %Error formatting flash (I/O error).As a result the flash is no longer accessible by the switch.  I spoke with Cisco and they indicated that a switch reload would remount the flash and make it accessable again but the .bin file would need to be reloaded using the xModem recovery procedure (what a pain).The next IOS version 15.0(2)SE1 will supposedly fix this bug but it has not been released yet.  In the meantime if you are running 15.0(2)SE you may want to hold off performing a "format flash:" function on a 2960S.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 2960S - Protected Port But Allow Specific MAC?

Nov 5, 2011

We are using catalyst 2960S Lan Base IOS on Radio towers. We just bought 50 Accest points, thas are GPS synchronized. Problem is the APs need to be connected on L2-mac betwen each other. But at this time we are using port isolation on each switch (tower) by protected port function to isolate clients from each other.
 
My question is, is possible to specifi a Mac addresses in specific vlan thats can comunicate betwen protected ports? On tower is one Master unit and others are slave. I thing there is only 1 dirrection comunication - from master to slave.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 2960S / Downgrade 10GB Twinax CU SFP Cable To 1GB?

Oct 30, 2012

specifying Cisco devices and I've made an error.I have 2 Catalyst 2960S switches (C2960S-24PS-L).Based on this snippet of web copy from the Cisco website:What's new for the Cisco Catalyst 2960-S Series Switches with LAN Base Software: # 10 and 1 Gigabit Ethernet uplink flexibility with Small Form-Factor Pluggable Plus (SFP+), providing business continuity and fast transition to 10 Gigabit Ethernet I bought a cable assembly "SFP-H10GB-CU3M" (3 meter copper twinax cable with 10GB SFPs on each end).  Unfortunately, it appears after more careful reasearch that my specific model 2960S's are not directly compatible.  , can I force these 10GB SFPs down to 1GB and get them to work with my switches or do I need to return and repurchase?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 2960S Port-Based Address Allocation?

Sep 27, 2012

I just bought a Catalyst 2960S to test out the feature "Port-Based Address Allocation" which is required for our factory. I followed the instruction from Cisco IOS and did all the steps but I could not get it to work, my network client did not received the expected IP address that I configured.

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Multicast Traffic Not Forwarded On Catalyst 6506 VSS Supervisor

Nov 30, 2009

I have two Catalyst 6506 in VSS mode with VS-S720-10G running 12.2(33)SXI1 IP SERVICES.I have two firewalls that communicate on to the other through a dedicated VLAN created on Catalyst 6506.
 
One firewall is able to ping the other one on this dedicated VLAN but if I send multicast traffic from firewall-1 I didn't receive it on firewall-2.I found a bug related to multicast issues on Cisco WS-C6509-E with VS-S720-10G. The bug ID is CSCtc59038.

View 9 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 2960S - Dynamically Assign IP Address To Computers Via DHCP

Aug 30, 2012

I am administering a Catalyst 2960S switch and I would like to connect several computers to it.  Some of those each have a static IP address.  For a few of them, I would like the switch to dynamically assign an IP address to them via DHCP.  Is the switch capable of doing this?  If so, how can I do it? I tried looking through Cisco Network Assistant and I couldn't find it.  Some web pages have suggested I telnet into the switch and issue commands like "ip dhcp ?" to see what commands are possible.  I can telnet in and if I type  but I get an "Unrecognized command" for both "ip ?" and "ip dhcp ?".  This makes me think I'm reading the wrong web pages. I did come across the term "DHCP snooping".  It seems relevant, but very difficult for me to grasp. 

View 9 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Memory Leak On Catalyst 2960 And 2960S - Similar To Bug CSCts52797

May 6, 2013

after upgrading about 35 Catalyst 2960 and Catalyst 2960S to IOS 15.0(2)SE2, we experience a memory leak on several switches. After some days / weeks the switches are not accessible via Console/Telnet/SSH/Web any more. Only SNMP seems to work properly.Attached users do not experience any decrease in service.
 
Trying to connect to the console, we get following error message:

"% Low on memory; try again later"
 
The only (temporary) solution is to reboot the switch. The behavior is similar to Bug CSCts52797.With regards to the Bug notes this bug should only affect Catalyst 2960 with 64MB of RAM and should already be solved with IOS 15.0(2)SE2.
 
We experience the erroneous behavior with

-WS-C2960-48TC-S      running IOS 15.0(2)SE2
-WS-C2960S-48LPS-L  running IOS 15.0(2)SE2

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Route Data From Vlan 10 To Vlan 20 On 2960s?

Mar 31, 2013

i need to solves this little problem on 2960S lan BASE but i dont know if it is possible.
 
Uplink port config for gi 1/0/28 is:
 
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk alloved vlan 10,11
  
but on interface gi 1/0/1 i want to have data from vlan 10 tagged as VLAN 20.
At this time i have solved this issue very primitively
 
I have set up gi 1/0/2 as int mode acces, acces vlan 20 and i have connected gi 1/0/2 with gi 1/0/3 with eth cable. int gi 1/0/3 is switchpor mode acces, switchport acces vlan 10

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 3750 / 2960 - Some Data Cannot Pass Through VLAN

Sep 4, 2012

I have a problem, here are the situation

- 1 Catalyst 3750
- 1 Catalyst 2960
- 4 Finger Print
- 1 HUB
 
Configuration

- Catalyst 3750
Interface VLAN182
IP Address 10.62.182.254 255.255.255.0
Interface G0/2
Description Finger Print Server
Switchport mode access

[code]....
 
Here are the problem,If i connect Finger Print Device to port catalyst 2960, some device not sending data to server, but if i connect all Finger Print to HUB and from HUB connect to Catalyst 2960 at port F0/5, All Device(Finger Print) can send data to server...Is there any special configuration in catalyst so all device can direct connect to port catalyst 2960 without HUB?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: SFP-H10GB-CU3M Not Working In 2960S

Feb 15, 2013

We have a 2960S using a single SFP-10GBase-SR to our Core switch. We are planning connecting the 2960S to a pair of Nexus 5k switches using Copper SFPs. We are already doing this on another 2960S so I didn't expect any surprises.
 
When I removed the unused SFP-10GBase-SR from te1/0/2, the interface was removed from the config and a gi1/0/50 was created in its place. Once I inserted the SFP-H10GB-CU3M, I expected that it would create a new te1/0/2 interface, but it didn't. I got the following errors: %GBIC_SECURITY_CRYPT-4-VN_DATA_CRC_ERROR: GBIC in port Gi1/0/50 has bad crc %PM-4-ERR_DISABLE: gbic-invalid error detected on Gi1/0/50, putting Gi1/0/50 in err-disable state
 
I didn't personally order the cables, but there is no Cisco label on them, so I'm assuming it is a 3rd party SFP. After looking at other posts related to unsupported SFPs, I ran the following commands: no errdisable detect cause gbic-invalid service unsupported-transceiver
 
After reconnecting the SFP, it didn't go into err-disable, but I still received the following error: %GBIC_SECURITY_CRYPT-4-VN_DATA_CRC_ERROR: GBIC in port Gi1/0/50 has bad crc
 
My other working 2960S appears to be using 3rd party SFP as well, but I can't see the brand. Is there anything else worth trying or should I just suck it up and order Cisco SFPs?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Traffic Policy Is Not Working On Catalyst 3750?

Jan 28, 2013

Unable to limit traffic on catalyst 3750 gigabit ports it has fiber modules,
 
I want to limit traffic 2mb per port
 
I have tried srr-queue and policier but it is not working and there is no ratelimit command under any interface, Applying policy to output is not supported of the interface
 
policy-map rate-limit
class class-default
police 2000000 8000 exceed-action drop
int gi1/0/3
service-policy input rate-limit 
 
still when I start download it goes to 10 mbps

View 12 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 4507R+E With WS-X4748 Blade - Ports Not Working

Mar 28, 2011

I have a Cisco Catalyst 4507R+E  (with Sup7-E) and two blades; one WS-X4748-RJ45V+E and one WS-X4648-RJ45-E.
 
When I connect a device to a port on the WS-X4748-RJ45V+E blade the port will not come up, show interface shows the status as "notconnect". When I connect the same device to the WS-X4648-RJ45-E blade the interface comes up.
 
The WS-X4748-RJ45V+E blade seems to have initialised okay, it appears in the output of "show module" as OK.
 
I get exactly the same effect on a second, identically configured Catalyst 4507R+E.
 
The software version is IOS XE 3.1.0SG, which according to the release notes supports the WS-X4748-RJ45V+E blade

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: How To Multicast RS-232 Serial Port Data

Sep 5, 2012

We want to multicast several serial ports over the WAN/LAN network.In few words what we need to do is transport is several serial ports, is like a RS-485 network but in this case via IP.I do some similar to transport 4E&M lines with great results but I don't know how to start to do the same but with the Serial ports.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 3560G Multicast Routers Bombarded With Data

Apr 19, 2011

We have a Lan with several multicast routers. Each router handles different multicast groups sent by remote sources to the hosts on the Lan. All the routers are connected to a Cisco 3560G switch. The routers range from 7204s to 2621XM, and even a 6503 switch. We found that each router is constantly bombarded with multicast data from each other router, even though the router did not join any groups. Obviously, we'd rather not have this happen, because it causes each router's CPU to rise to very uncomfortable levels. If I bring a new router onto the Lan, as soon as I enable multicast, the data starts hitting the router's interface. In an attempt to stop the traffic, I protected each router port, so that (supposedly) the router will not be able to communicate with any other protected port.

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco :: 2960S Catalyst Access Switch From VPN

Dec 10, 2012

I have a 2960S Catalyst switch in my LAN, with the firewall and the servers in the same VLAN (vlan 3).All the servers and the firewall are in the vlan 3 are in the "192.168.19.0/24" subnet, the firewall has the IP "192.168.19.1".I can land on the firewall with a VPN (192.168.130.0/24) which has a complete view on the subnet 19/24.I can access, manage and get SNMP information of the Catalyst from the servers but I can't do the same from the VPN.Is there some feature I need to enable on the switch in order to allow 192.168.130.0/24 to access it?

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco :: IP SLA Responder On Catalyst 2960S Stacked?

Oct 19, 2011

I have a pair of switches stacked:
 
Switch Ports Model                          SW Version          SW Image
------     -----     -----                             ----------                 ----------
     1    52      WS-C2960S-48FPS-L  15.0(1)SE             C2960S-UNIVERSALK9-M
*    2    52      WS-C2960S-48FPS-L  15.0(1)SE             C2960S-UNIVERSALK9-M
 
When I try to enable ip sla responder on the stack I get: 
 
%SYS-3-HARIKARI: Process IP SLAs Responder top-level routine exited
 
I have been able to find a bug in the toolkit. Should ip sla responder be supported on the stack as above?

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: Multicast Routing Between Vrf (Cat 3750) - Multicast Vpn Extranet?

Feb 19, 2013

I try to pass multicast traffic between two vrf on the same 3750 switch. I have IP services IOS and sdm template routing.
 
here is my config:
 
ip routing
!
ip vrf vpn2
rd 1:1
mdt default 232.1.1.1
route-target export 1:1
route-target import 1:1

[code]....
 
Now I'm stuck - I don't know what to do to pass multicast traffic. Do I have any chance to run this config on 3750 chassis?Perhaps "Configuring Multicast VPN Extranet Support" document will be useful, but it concerns Catalyst 6500? [URL]

View 0 Replies View Related

Cisco :: Catalyst 2960S Series Switches Supported In LMS 2.6

Jul 25, 2011

I have a CiscoWorks LMS 2.6 and i would like to know if the new Switches Catalyst 2960-S Series are supported with this LMS version?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Why Does Routing Work Without Declaring Vlan10 On 2960s-24td-l

Oct 28, 2012

I have recently split the voice vlan (10) from the data network (1), and am wondering why my catalysts and router do not require an interface Vlan10 statement.  In the past I used OpenBSD boxes to do the routing, and I first needed to configure vlan 10 on the interface before I could get inter-vlan communication to work.  With these Cisco devices it works, and I am wondering if it is because of VTP, for the fact that the ports maybe just pass all traffic, or is there some other explanation?  Below is the setup, and firmware is up-to-date on all of the devices.
 
When I plug a phone into the POE SGE, the phone turns on, obtains an address on the proper subnet, and conversations are clear (whereas without the ip nat inside on the new subnet the calls had a lot of static).  Possibly the reason that it works is because the phones properly create the tcp/ip packet, and it hops over the trunks and creates the states so that traffic routes back properly.  I will install wireshark to see exactly what is going on, but is there a simple explanation that I am overlooking?

View 1 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved