Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 2960S - Protected Port But Allow Specific MAC?

Nov 5, 2011

We are using catalyst 2960S Lan Base IOS on Radio towers. We just bought 50 Accest points, thas are GPS synchronized. Problem is the APs need to be connected on L2-mac betwen each other. But at this time we are using port isolation on each switch (tower) by protected port function to isolate clients from each other.
 
My question is, is possible to specifi a Mac addresses in specific vlan thats can comunicate betwen protected ports? On tower is one Master unit and others are slave. I thing there is only 1 dirrection comunication - from master to slave.

View 2 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 2960S Port-Based Address Allocation?

Sep 27, 2012

I just bought a Catalyst 2960S to test out the feature "Port-Based Address Allocation" which is required for our factory. I followed the instruction from Cisco IOS and did all the steps but I could not get it to work, my network client did not received the expected IP address that I configured.

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 2960S IOS 15.0.2 IPv6 Don't Work

Aug 8, 2012

Just I have upgraded some 2960S to IOS 15.0(2)SE from a IOS 15.0(1)SE3 and the catalyst don't switch any IPv6 traffic. Don't work any RA and also don't work any unicast IPv6 traffic from any interface. I can see some references to IPv6 changes in the FHS (First Hop Security) in the Release Notes, but no any reference to changes in the configuration.
 
The switches don't have any IPv6 specific configuration and the sdm is the default templata. Returning to 15.0(1)SE3 everything work ok.
 
On Catalyst 2960, and 3560E this IOS version seem to work fine with IPv6.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Upgrade Catalyst 2960S And 3560x

Jun 20, 2012

i want upgrade my catalyst 2960S and 3560x at midnight, but i am worried about config loss.  If i upgrade my switch throught web interface, will need I reconfigure the switch?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 2960S Stack Required

Dec 1, 2010

I have a new problem with Catalyst 2960S. We have four switch in a stack and now I get the message:
 
“%PLATFORM_RPC-3-MSG_THROTTLED: RPC Msg Dropped by throttle mechanism: type 37, class 14, max_msg 32, total throttled 73968 (hostname1-2)”
 
Traceback= 13A686C 160862C 160E0B4 15E2088 184FD48 18467B8
 
sh switch de
Switch/Stack Mac Address : 68bd.abc9.0000
H/W   Current
[Code]....

View 36 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 2960S For IPTV Backbone

Nov 26, 2011

we have Catalysts 2960S for switching in our Wireless high capacity backbone network. As agregation switch we are using 3560x.
 
I just need to know, if are these 2960S good solution for igmp snooping for whole IPTV stream. It put only a range from backbone and put out on another port. But just specified multicast addresses.
 
Imput will be 239.128.0.10 to 239.128.0.20 on Gi 0/1,Output wil be 239.128.0.10 - 15 on Gi 0/24
 
IPTV will be separated on different VLAN for eg VLAN 20,Is needed any priorization configured od switches?,The capacity for IPTV is around 500 mbps

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 2960S Format Flash Failure?

Jan 3, 2013

I recently tried to manually format the flash on a model WS-2960S-48TS-L switch running IOS version 15.0(2)SE.  While executing the operation I got the following error - mifs[8]: Failed to create superblock  %Error formatting flash (I/O error).As a result the flash is no longer accessible by the switch.  I spoke with Cisco and they indicated that a switch reload would remount the flash and make it accessable again but the .bin file would need to be reloaded using the xModem recovery procedure (what a pain).The next IOS version 15.0(2)SE1 will supposedly fix this bug but it has not been released yet.  In the meantime if you are running 15.0(2)SE you may want to hold off performing a "format flash:" function on a 2960S.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 2960S / Downgrade 10GB Twinax CU SFP Cable To 1GB?

Oct 30, 2012

specifying Cisco devices and I've made an error.I have 2 Catalyst 2960S switches (C2960S-24PS-L).Based on this snippet of web copy from the Cisco website:What's new for the Cisco Catalyst 2960-S Series Switches with LAN Base Software: # 10 and 1 Gigabit Ethernet uplink flexibility with Small Form-Factor Pluggable Plus (SFP+), providing business continuity and fast transition to 10 Gigabit Ethernet I bought a cable assembly "SFP-H10GB-CU3M" (3 meter copper twinax cable with 10GB SFPs on each end).  Unfortunately, it appears after more careful reasearch that my specific model 2960S's are not directly compatible.  , can I force these 10GB SFPs down to 1GB and get them to work with my switches or do I need to return and repurchase?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 2960S / Multicast Not Working Between Two Data-centers?

Jan 28, 2012

Multicast is not working between our two datacenter, we have catalyst 2960S (two stacked) as the internal lan switch, and catalyst 3560E as the external switch, same configuration for both datacenters.The two sites are connected using metro, the external switch (3560) is doing qinq and encapsulate the data from the internal switch with the metro vlan (611).
 
IGMP snooping is disabled for all switches, although we prefer to enable it for the internal switches.For each datacenter there is a different firewall which also act as the router, we are using fortigate as the firewall.Following is the important configuration section:
 
Port 43 in the internal switch is connected to the external switch (both sites):
 
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/43 
switchport mode trunk
 load-interval 30 
 
Port 3 in the external switch connected to the internal switch (both sites):
 
interface GigabitEthernet0/3 
switchport access vlan 611
 switchport mode dot1q-tunnel 
no cdp enable
 no cdp tlv server-location
 no cdp tlv app
 
 Port 8 on the external switch connected to the metro link (both sites) vlan 350 is the internet and 611 is the metro:
 
interface GigabitEthernet0/8
 switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
 switchport trunk allowed vlan 350,611
 switchport mode trunk  

vlan 611 on external switch:
 
interface Vlan611 
ip address 192.168.168.2 255.255.255.0
 no ip route-cache 
no ip mroute-cache

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 2960S - Dynamically Assign IP Address To Computers Via DHCP

Aug 30, 2012

I am administering a Catalyst 2960S switch and I would like to connect several computers to it.  Some of those each have a static IP address.  For a few of them, I would like the switch to dynamically assign an IP address to them via DHCP.  Is the switch capable of doing this?  If so, how can I do it? I tried looking through Cisco Network Assistant and I couldn't find it.  Some web pages have suggested I telnet into the switch and issue commands like "ip dhcp ?" to see what commands are possible.  I can telnet in and if I type  but I get an "Unrecognized command" for both "ip ?" and "ip dhcp ?".  This makes me think I'm reading the wrong web pages. I did come across the term "DHCP snooping".  It seems relevant, but very difficult for me to grasp. 

View 9 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Memory Leak On Catalyst 2960 And 2960S - Similar To Bug CSCts52797

May 6, 2013

after upgrading about 35 Catalyst 2960 and Catalyst 2960S to IOS 15.0(2)SE2, we experience a memory leak on several switches. After some days / weeks the switches are not accessible via Console/Telnet/SSH/Web any more. Only SNMP seems to work properly.Attached users do not experience any decrease in service.
 
Trying to connect to the console, we get following error message:

"% Low on memory; try again later"
 
The only (temporary) solution is to reboot the switch. The behavior is similar to Bug CSCts52797.With regards to the Bug notes this bug should only affect Catalyst 2960 with 64MB of RAM and should already be solved with IOS 15.0(2)SE2.
 
We experience the erroneous behavior with

-WS-C2960-48TC-S      running IOS 15.0(2)SE2
-WS-C2960S-48LPS-L  running IOS 15.0(2)SE2

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Shutdown Specific Port On 3750x And Monitor Port At Same Time?

Oct 23, 2011

is it possible to shutdown a  specific port on my 3750x and monitor this port at the same time .for example , im dealing with a mac authenticated network using port security , i want to shut down all the ports that are not used at the moment , however , if some one gets connected to the one of the shutdown ports  i want to know the mac address of the user or atleast to know that i have someone who is just plugged in to the one of the shutdowned ports .

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960s PoE Port Class Detection?

Aug 28, 2012

Connecting Avaya 9611G  IEEE class 1 devices to a Cat2960s.  How ever some of the phone are registering as class 3 devices no matter what interface the phone is connected to. Typical port config is as follows:
  
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/2
switchport access vlan 25
switchport mode access
switchport nonegotiate
switchport voice vlan 22
srr-queue bandwidth share 1 30 35 5

[code]....

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960s Stack Port Shutdown

May 6, 2013

I have a single 2960s without stack module. The stack port has a status of down, however I'd like to disable it so that it does not generate a false alarm in my NMS. The documentation states that there should be a command "switch 1 stack port 1 disable" but the switch (running 15.0(2)SE2) doesn't seem to  be available. Is this a dcumentation bug or is the command not there at all?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: WS-2960s-48lpd-l Sfp+ Ports - Possible To Have SFP Port

Feb 24, 2013

The 2960s-48lpd-l comes with 2 SFP+ ports and is capable of supporting either SFP or SFP+ modules.
 
My question is:- if I have a SFP+ module in port 1, can I have a SFP in port 2? or do they both have to be either SFP+ or SFP?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: To Use Flexstack To Stack Two 2960S 48 Port Switches

Oct 11, 2012

I would like to use flexstack to stack two Cisco 2960S 48 Port switches (2960S-48TD-L) for redundancy. Each switch will have a single 10G uplink into our Nexus 7K. One switch in the stack will terminate to linecard 6 (N7K-F248XP-25) and the other switch will terminate to linecard 7 (N7K-F248XP-25). My question is how many flexstack cables are needed? Do I need only one cable or do I need two to connect the two 2960s ?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 7060 - POE Not Working On Specific Port

Mar 18, 2013

when plugging a Cisco 7060 to the specific switch port it does not power on.  The inline power consumption is abnormally high compared to the other phones that are plugged in, maybe double the amount. 

non Poe devices work on the same port.
 
I used multiple cables and phones.

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 1921 - Deny Specific Port From / To IP

Oct 7, 2012

I have a network with 3 segments and a 2921 router.v172.16.5.0/24, 172.16.0.0/27 and 172.16.2.0/23             .
 
I want to block all 135 TCP traffic from/to IP 172.16.5.5 to any host in other segment, but only TCP port 135 and only to the specified IP.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6513 - Disable Logging On Specific Port

Jan 18, 2012

Ask this question, if someone came across a 6513, one of the RJ45 ports are constantly falling.The question is how to disable logging on a specific portno logging event link-status does not work. 

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: C6500 Filter ARP Answer On 802.1q Port For Specific VLan

Oct 10, 2012

I am trying to filter ARP answer arriving on a C6500 trunk port, for a specific vlan.Filtering conditions are:

- packet arrive from vlan ID x on the trunk (on only for this vlan ID)
- source MAC address = xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx

Thae aim is that the C6500 with never enter into its CAM table this MAC address.I looked at several methos like service policy or vlan filter, but no solution for the moment.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 1433 - Span Port Configuration To Listen To Specific Traffic Only?

Nov 2, 2011

Is it possible to configure the span(switch port analyzer) port and restrict it to only listen to ingress and egress of TCP/1433 from the source port?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: SFP Port On Catalyst 2960 S?

Mar 18, 2013

I have Catalyst 2960 S (WS-C2960S-48FPS-L) Switch. I have plugged in SFP module but still interface is down and line protocol down. Is there any configuration to enable SFP module and make the interface up?
 
This port is connected to nexus 5 k.

View 11 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 892 When Connecting Port 0 To Catalyst It Shuts Down

Sep 3, 2008

I have a 892 router configured on fa0 with vlan1 and a catalist 3560. On catalist all ports are in access mode and vlan1. When I'm connecting port fa0 from router to catalist, the catalist port is shuted down What should I do on router on catalist to make the connection working ?

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Why Last Port Of Two Catalyst 3560X Are Connected Together

May 22, 2012

We have two catalyst 3560X 24T-S switches connected on two separate LANs (both the networks are redundant to each other). The last port of the switches are connected together?

View 15 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Port Mirroring On A Catalyst 3560-X?

Oct 21, 2012

I've just installed 2 of these in my workplace on a PLC network.I'm now looking to set one of the ports up as my diagnostic port and would like to be able to mirror any of the other ports to this port.I believe it is called SPAN on Cisco switches.The only reference I can find to it is configuring via Telnet which I haven't got a clue about.On my old Wiedmuller switches it was just a few clicks away.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 3500 Fx Port Configuration

Jun 12, 2013

I am connecting two catalyst 3500 XL switches via fiber fx ports for layer 2 connectivity. Do I need to configure anything in the IOS or do I just plug in the fiber?
 
What needs to be configured?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Port Numbering On A Catalyst 3560 / 3750X

Apr 10, 2012

Assume I had Catalyst 3560X/3750X with 24 ports. The partnumber is WS-C3560X-24P-LI would like to how is the numbering defined if the switches have a C3KX-NM-10G installed with 4 SFP-GE-L.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Port Grouping On 3750 Like On Catalyst 4500?

Mar 27, 2013

On 45XX catalyst , bandwidth is allocated across six 8-port groups, providing 1 Gbps per  port group. Example  for the following line card : WS-X4448-GB-SFP

I want to know if there is the same mecanism on 3750X switches. I mean is bandwidth allocated across a group of ports like on 4500 catalyst ?

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 2960 Switch Port Bandwidth Limit?

Sep 18, 2012

I want to configure switch port bandwidth limit for my Catalyst 2960-48, is there any hardware / ios limitation? can I configure it at all 48 switch ports?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 3546 XL / Switchport Port-security Command Not Available

Oct 26, 2011

Im trying to follow along documentation i see via train single videos and some online resources. I am trying to enable port security.I have a Catalyst 3546 XL when i type in "rtr1# switchport ?""port-security" is not only of the options to choose from.   I have already set this as an access port.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 3560 G POE 48 Port Cannot Access Password Recovery

Nov 5, 2012

Im trying to access the switch to reset the password to factory defaults (please see switch output Astrix has removed customer identifying information for security purposes.) Each time I reboot the switch and try and access the password recover mode this same output below starts and im still not able to access the recovery area of the switch
 
cisco WS-C3560G-48PS (PowerPC405) processor (revision F0) with 122880K/8184K bytes of memory.
Processor board ID FOC1133Y28Q

[Code].....

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 6500 / Port-Channel Down But Correctly Configured

May 23, 2012

I has a issue about etherchannel beetwen 02 Catalyst 6500 switch, i need your comment about it. if you had any similar experience:
 
1.- On Catalyst Switch 6500-1:   I configured interface port-channel 4 and associated it to G6/29 and G6/30 interface Port-channel4description IUU1_Gn1_HLIMSGSN01_Port_channel_6_29_6_30switchportswitchport trunk encapsulation dot1qswitchport trunk allowed vlan 406,408switchport mode trunkswitchport nonegotiatelogging event link-statusload-interval 30mls qos vlan-basedmls qos trust dscp!

2.- On Catalyst Switch 6500-2:  I configured interface port-channel 4 and associated it to G6/29 and G6/30
 
interface Port-channel4
description IUU2_Gn2_HLIMSGSN01_Port_channel_6_29_6_30
switchport
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 407,409

[code]....
 
and i see output "show interface Po4A" up up on switch-1, "show interface Po4B" up up on switch-2   
 
5.- In the show running-config not appear configured Po4A and Po4B. it only show on outputs
 
6.- Po4A and Po4 was not configured on neither switches, my question is why appear Po4A and Po4B on switch-1 and switch-2 respectively?  and why Po4 appear in down down.
 
7.- I solved this issue by shutdown and not shutdown to the interfaces on both routers, currently all is OK.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Port Security Dynamic Configuration On Catalyst 3560xPOE

Oct 2, 2012

I have connected a 10BaseT device to a CISCO Catalyst 3560xPOE switch with dynamic port security.  All seems to work fine when the distance between the two devices is closer then 200ft.  When I connect to 10BaseT devices farther out near 300ft the response from the attached device is lost. It works ok on unmanaged switches at the longer distance. Is there a minimum response time from attached devices for dynamic port security to work properly?  Is there any other explanation why it would work on cheaper switches, but not on the Port Secured Switch?

View 2 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved