Cisco Switching / Routing :: Cisco 7600 - Support On ACL
Dec 8, 2011
I would like to know the IOS which supports :ACL Support for Filtering on TTL Value feature on my Cisco 7600 device. I check on cisco and found the Cisco 12.4T release but this software doesn't fit onto my chasis. which software should I upgrade to on my cisco 7600 to have this feature.
I´m looking for an IOS on a 7609 SUP720/MSF3 that supports the NAT-PT feature (IPv4 to IPv6 translation). I searched on the Cisco Feature Navigator but the tool didn´t show up any IOS for the 760x platforms. I only got the feature "NAT-PT: Support for Overload (PAT)" with IOS 15.xS train.
What are the limitations of Net flow v9 support on the 7600 platform for the SR code releases?
I know that Flexible Net flow is only available on newer releases with some newer hardware. Flexible Net flow gives you the ability to provide full support for Netflow v9 as well as IPFIX.
However, the documentation indicates that Net flow v9 is still supported in the SR code. So I am just trying to find out what are the limitations in how Net flow v9 is implemented without "Flexible Net flow". The Cisco TAC was unable to provide me any documentation about this.
When mutiple Policy based routing configured on 7600 routers, did the router performace degraded with the number of policy based routing rules?Also, did 7600 running 12.x use per-flow based routing or per packet based routing?
I have both ipv4 and Ipv6 config on all the three hops. Between Cisco and Sami module, I have the Ip config on vlan interface 1400(say). Its not on a physical interface obviously, I can ping ipv5 from DUT to Sami IPv4 address. But Ipv6 doesnt work. If I add a sttic route to DUT network on SAMI, show ipv6 route does not show it.
how many sessions a BGP Route Reflector can support? is it 10, 100 or 1000 BGP sessions? What degradation of performance may arise in the case of a BGP RR sessions overload? Consider that the RR I'm deal with has both the control plane and teh forwarding plane. Which command I may use for get the output about BGP sessions resurces used level?
The following are the data about the RR:
Cisco 7600 WS-SUP720-3BXL Version 12.2(33)SRD5 cisco CISCO7609 (R7000) processor (revision 1.2) with 983008K/65536K
I have Cisco 7609 router and we have observed that router is rebooted due to the following error ;SLOT 3: Apr 13 16:06:26.621: %CARDMGR-2-ESF_DEV_ERROR: An error has occurred on Egress ESF Engine: Control Store Parity Error SLOT 3: Apr 13,Slot -3 we have SIP-400 card. We would like to know if there is any MIB which can monitir such reboots.
I want to ask about cisco 7600 model is it a switch or router or layer3 switch or Multilayer switch ?
here is the sh version : =================================== Gateway7600#sh version Cisco IOS Software, c7600s3223_rp Software (c7600s3223_rp-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version 15.2(1)S, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport Copyright (c) 1986-2011 by Cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Sun 27-Nov-11 15:27 by prod_rel_team
I am trying to bridge the traffic(including different vlan traffic) from rtrA to rtrB using "bridge-group" functionality.I achived the same using a 7200 using the below configuration. [code] When I tried the same using 7600 router ping failed between rtrA and rtrB. Then from the documents it seems "bridge irb" is not supported in 7600.Is there any other way we can achieve the same fuctionality ( eg: using switchport also fine) ?
in both case some times i obtain lowing traffic on interface and highest cpu - to 100% after clear cef linicard i obtain growing traffic and cpu 0%
#sh proc cpu s CPU utilization for five seconds: 87%/83%; one minute: 91%; five minutes: 96% PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process 7 1711512 87883 19474 4.06% 0.84% 0.89% 0 Check heaps
i have cisco 7600 router , here is show run : Gateway7600#sh run Building configuration...
Current configuration : 4787 bytes ! ! Last configuration change at 09:08:04 UTC Sat Apr 20 2013 by xxxx ! version 15.2 service timestamps debug datetime msec [Code]....
I have Cisco 7606 and wanted to test whether Cisco can drop frames due to invalid v lan ether type . i have configured the ports as
interface GigabitEthernet5/1 no ip address switchport switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport mode trunk
interface GigabitEthernet5/2 no ip address switchport switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport mode trunk
I have configured port also with encapsulation trunk dot1q ether type 88a8. i injected traffic with v lan ether type 0x8100. I expected to see drop traffic , however traffic passed in port to port.
i want to to ask about redirecting in MLS 7600 .assume the user a has an ip x.x.x.xand that user requested url...i want to to redirect his request to url...the users that have to pay the monthly bills , i want to give thim an ips and redirect all the http requests from this to a special local webpage .is is applicable to to it on router cisco 7600 ??or is it applicable on router 7206 npeg2 ? also i have siwtch 2960g.i dont want to do it by proxy server.
I am a soon to be network admin and have never set up a network to an existing network. Steps you need to add a new location to a company's network. For example if they are using 8 Building with 7600 Routers and 6500 and you need another building and they are using MPLS or Private Network, or Internet.
I have a 7600 with ws-sup750 and when it boots it displays these errors:
Cisco IOS Software, s72033_sp Software (s72033_sp-ADVIPSERVICESK9_WAN-M), Version 12.2(33)SXH2a, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)Technical Support: [URL] Firmware compiled 07-Apr-08 22:12 by integ Build [100] 00:00:05: %C6K_PLATFORM-0-UNKNOWN_CHASSIS: The chassis type is not known.(0x6003)
[Code]....
Then it got stuck in rommon, i tried using a 7200 pcmcia card (I downloaded the 7600 IOS there) but if i do from rommon boot disk0:
it complaints with :open: file "c7200-atafslib-m" not found so, it doesn't boot.
Anything I can do to be able to boot this device ?
I am a little stuck trying to troubleshoot unusually high cpu on 7600 Platform.This has been going on for many hours and not been causing a problem, but this doesn't seem replicated in our network and I am concerned about the cause.I have attached some output below, and disabled netflow on interfaces to free some switching CPU. How to track the cause of this? We only have routing protocols and 5 static routes to Null 0, so I cant see how this can be a route loop, but willing to stand corrected. Routes are learned from BGP with OSPF/MPLS internally on the network. This switch also connects to access switches on RIP and EIGRP.
No change has been made to this device when this problem started to occur so I am suspecting something about the traffic has changed or there is a rougue user? [code]
today i installed new router 7600 , but im facing some thing the cpu is increasing and it reached 50 % and still increasing as the bw dissipated is increasing .im applying ip policy which set next hop for many internet source my question is , how to know the cu percentage which is used by this ip policy , also , how to know the percentage by access-list ??
i have a 7206 router to be used as a gateway for internet router 7206 inerfaces are connected directly to cisco switch 2960g note that 7600 work only at 1 gega , and cant be used for 10 or 10 . im looking forward to use router 7600 instaed of 7206 i copied the config of 7206 and pased in 7600 but some commands which are under interfaces command was not accepted here is the config which as not accepted in 7600 router
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% duplex auto speed auto media-type rj45 negotiation auto %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
note that the 4 lines above was not accpted in 7600. does these commands will affect the new config ?i just want to ask before im trying to apply this config to production network?
Actually i have 7600 router and all trafic passes through Gi0/1(Routed port) interface to 6500 series switch. I need to create a vlan on this router eg. vlan 10 Any how it is possible assign a vlan to routed port and traffic of wan interfaces and the vlan traffic passed together.
ES20+ QoS. As I understand for these cards QoS is MQC; i.e. similar to that of normal WAN cards
1- If i have 7600 with ES+ card only then I dont need to configure global command "mls qos" and the concept of trust boundries "mls qos trust dscp" will not exist , correct ?
2- For below output, why "show mls qos queuing" is giving an O/P similar to that of WS-X6xxx LAN modules.Also why it is WRR when scheduling is not configured.I expected that command will not work with this module as it is similar to WAN modules.
I have run into a problem testing static route failovers using ECMP. I have an edge device (SUT) that has 2 NIC interfaces to an internal Loopback. Each NIC is a unique Gi port on an 7609 VLAN tagged with unique IP subnets. The 7600 is configured to route the loopback via the 2 NIC. I am using CEF in the network for other traffic performance testing. Using an external sniffer we can verify that when a ping is initiated externall to the SUT loopback a specific path is selected by the router.
Now, when the selected path is taken out of server (pulling cable for example), the 7609 is not clearing the routing table to indicate that particular path is down and failing over to the secondary path. Other things I have noticed is the show ip cef still shows both peers as well as the arp table but the interface shows down (show interface gi1/21 for example). I am running 15.1. My understanding is that since the ports are directly connected to the router, the ports should be detected as down and any association of the IP for the down port should removed. This should trigger the static route to update the static route for the end destination to use the second path and traffic should continue.
ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.2(17r)S2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)BOOTLDR: Cisco IOS Software, c7600s72033_rp Software (c7600s72033_rp-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version 15.1(1)S1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
how to know if my bgp neighbour advertised my network from his side or not ???
here is my config :
Gateway7600#sh ip bgp BGP table version is 8, local router ID is 192.168.40.3 Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal, r RIB-failure, S Stale, m multipath, b backup-path, f RT-Filter, x best-external, a additional-path, c RIB-compressed, Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete RPKI validation codes: V valid, I invalid, N Not found
we are using 7609 router. it forwarding traffic to wards my firewall which was not allowd in my router. when ever im checking for routes in router using show ip route x.x.x.x its showing SUBNET IS NOT IN TABLE, but in workmy firewall dropped connection i can able to see that networks.
I have a port on 7600 connecting via Single Mode Fibre to my service provider. Service provider has 1000-Full with auto-negotiate. I am seeing following output on my 7600. [code] if this interface is only capable of doing 1000Mb, how come it is showing 100-Full. If I change to nonegotiate option (both my side and provider side), link goes down. My provider has confirmed they have 1000Full their side.
Does the nexus 7010 support virtual switching yet? All of the posts I have found from about a year ago say that it is going to be supported, but there were no dates listed. I heard the same thing from Cisco a while back, but haven't followed up with it.If it is supported finally are there any configuration guides available for it?
Coincidentally when i tried to configure router 877 as an adsl router i found that a vlan configuration is included. my question is what is the benefit of using vlans in router ??? i studied that we use it in switches for the purpose of network enhancment from broadcasts and netwrok segmentation. why we use vlans in routers ?
Does the 4500 support VSS (Virtual Switching System) ? On the official product overview page it says: 1.6 Terabits capacity with Virtual Switching System (hardware-ready)What means Hardware ready ? Does it mean that it supports VSS in the same manner as the 6500 ? The reason I'm asking this question is that I didn't find any info on the Internet about this. We would like to upgrade our network by interconnecting the 2 sites with Layer 2 redundant links (Layer 2 extension), but I'd like to use the both links in a load-balancing manner, which can be a real pain in the *** with STP. The choice is between 4500 and 3750 stackable core switches. The 6500s are very expensive.