Cisco VPN :: Iphone Ipsec To ASA5520 Not Communicating To Local Devices
Aug 16, 2012
I have an exisitng ASA5520 which is already working with remote clients using Cisco vpn client configured using ipsec over tcp, I am now trying to get vpn access for Iphones working and having a problem where once connected the Iphone cannot ping any internal device. The configuration on the Iphone does not allow for Ipsec over tcp and therefore uses udp 500 by default, if i create a new profile from a pc and do not use ipsec over tcp it has the same issue where it establishes a vpn tunnel but cannot ping any internal device as soon as I change the profile to ipsec over tcp it works fine.
1 Mac OS 1 Windows XP 1 Linksys Cisco WRT600N router
My Mac OS will be on a local subnet (example 192.168.1.0/24), and my Windows XP will be on another local subnet (example 192.168.2.0/24).
How am I supposed to configure my router in order for both of my 2 subnets (Mac OS & Windows XP) to "talk" to each other ?
On another note, I would also like my MAC OS IP address to be dynamically assigned from the router (DHCP server for this subnet), while my Windows XP IP address can be statically assigned.
Panasonic TV (DLNA Device) - Ethernet WDTV Live Plus (DLNA Device) - WLAN Windows 8 PC - Ethernet Windows 7 PC - WLAN Samsung Galaxy S3 - WLAN
The WDTV can act as a media player for both the Windows 7 PC and Samsung Galaxy S3.The TV can act as a media player for the Windows 8 PC.If I connect the Windows 7 PC via Ethernet, then the TV sees it and can act as a media player for it and the WDTV no longer can.The TV can't act as a media player for the Samsung Galaxy S3 nor can they see each other to use the Galaxy S3 as a wireless remote (Viera remote android app) .Why can my wireless devices talk to each other and my wired devices talk to each other, but the wireless devices can't talk to the wired devices?
I've got several devices (two laptops, Xbox, WiiU, Apple TV, 2 ipads, and an iphone) that can connect to my home wifi network just fine. However, when connected it seems these devices cannot communicate with one another.
Homesharing between my iphone/laptop and Apple TV is no longer functioning. Also, I can not sync my windows media player with my Xbox, and I can not connect my iphone to the Xbox using AirMusic.
Here's my hardware: Motorola SB5101U SURFboard modem, Netgear Wireless N WNR2000 router.
Microsoft Windows [Version 6.1.7600] Copyright (c) 2009 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. C:Windowssystem32>ipconfig/all
We have a new site-to-site configuration comprised of two ASAs (a 5505 at the remote site and a 5510 locally). The site-to-site tunnel is up and appears to be working fine, with the exception of one thing; two identified IP addresses on the remote end cannot seem to communicate across the tunnel.
For example: address 192.168.3.81 is able to see resources at our facility, but 192.168.3.82 (an HP Laser jet P2055dn) cannot. However, 192.168.3.82 is ping able from the inside interface of the remote ASA and doesn't appear to be having any other connectivity issues. Also, the default gateway of this device appears to be set properly. When checking the real-time log viewer, I'm not seeing any error messages, it just appears as if the .82 device is not routing to the remote ASA, but strangely enough the local ASA's logs do seem to show communication with .82. (See the below logs.)
When we attempt to ping the 192.168.3.82 address from a local PC (10.10.10.10) that participates in the VPN tunnel, we see the following:
Local ASA 6|Jan 31 2012|16:03:53|302021|192.168.3.82|0|10.10.10.10|512|Teardown ICMP connection for faddr 192.168.3.82/0 gaddr 10.10.10.10/512 laddr 10.10.10.10/512 [ code]....
Remote ASA 6|Jan 31 2012|16:03:53|302021|10.10.10.10|512|192.168.3.82|0|Tear down ICMP connection for faddr 10.10.10.10/512 gaddr 192.168.3.82/0 laddr 192.168.3.82/0 [ code].....
We can successfully ping 192.168.3.81 from the same local workstation we see the following on the remote ASA :
6|Jan 31 2012|16:03:38|302021|10.10.10.10|512|192.168.3.81|0|Tear down ICMP connection for faddr 10.10.10.10/512 gaddr 192.168.3.81/0 laddr 192.168.3.81/0 [Code]....
We have no IP address overlapping and neither ASA's logs show any errors. Unfortunately, we don't have access to the remote site's router configurations, but we've been assured that the issue is not on their end.
I have a Cisco ASA5520 with Software Version 8.2(5) in place, most my users are Mac Users and I am currently looking into Cisco AnyConnect in comparison to using VPN client.
I have a couple of questions
1) Does Cisco AnyConnect make use of IPsec or is it soley SSL VPN based?
2) From the license information I have below in my ASA I understand that I can have max 750 vpn peers however am I right in saying that this does not apply to Cisco AnyConnect peers? and that with Cisco AnyConnect I can only have 2 peers? Also what are the disabled anyconnect options for?
Licensed features for this platform: Maximum Physical Interfaces : Unlimited Maximum VLANs : 150
[Code]....
3) When trying to set up Cisco Anyconnect on the ASA using ASDM, I noticed I needed to upload AnyConnect client images however when I did this by uploading the .dmg file for mac machines I got the error message "not a valid SVC image". Is this because I am running 8.2?
laptop and iPhone should get access to the private LAN
- Speedport is connected to ADSL with an dynamic IP, but DynDns is activated - Speedport uses NAT for forwarding ports 500 and 4500 to RV042 - RV042 should be the VPN-server - LAN should be completely able to be accessed by the VPN-client (network printer, shared folders on windows, remote access ...) - VPN connection should use IPSec for high security - NAT-T must been used because Speedport only forwards UDP/TCP-ports and no protocols
I have some questions:
- how should I configure the IPSec on RV042?
- which VPN client software should I use ( NAT-T an Win7 64bit must be supported ) and how should it been configured?
This scenario with VPN-server behind a router should be a common one, but I can't realise it alone.Normally I work as professional supporter for Cisco SMB (since 3 weeks), but this scenario is new for me and I don't know how to solve this problem.
I've came across IP address that aren't enough for some users in the company. The IP addresses are more than enough to cater to the user's notebook or PC. However, some users does not know that there are actually limits to the IP we have, so quite a number of them actually uses their mobile / pads to tap the company's wireless.
I was wondering if i could restrict that particular user from tapping onto the network. I know it sounds a bit impossible because DHCP doesnt have that smart function to block whoever we sees deemed as a "nuisance".
I really worked hard not to write this question here but here I am. I am trying to route all traffic through vpn but I cant browse the web. It seems no traffic goes through the vpn tunnel. Split tunneling works but it doesnt route the traffic through vpn tunnel. I have a cisco asa5505 with base license,
When I try to browse the web with one of the clients I see lots of
6Apr 07 201309:40:5510.10.50.136088410.10.10.153Built inbound UDP connection 834 for outside:10.10.50.13/60884 (10.10.50.13/60884) to outside:10.10.10.1/53 (10.10.10.1/53) (xxxx
messages but at the end I see " Safari could not open the page because the server stopped responding" message or smth similar.
Offsite Central Office -------- ----------------- --------------- ------------------------------ ----------------- ---------- ------- | PC | | 3560-EMI | | ASA501 | | Comcast Business | | ASA5520 | | 6509 | | PC | -------- ----------------- --------------- ------------------------------ ----------------- ---------- -------
I've got a VPN L2L tunnel between my offsite and my central office. Everything seems to work most of the time, but every now and then i loose connectivity to random devices.for example, right now I cannot ping the interface on the 3560-EMI, however i can ping the PC on the other end of it. A few minutes from now, the 3560 will be pingable and i will probably notice another device that is no longer accessible.It almost seems as if the ARP table is corrupt or inconsistant. Another example would be 2 separate PCs on the Offsite side, I can ping one but not the other. If i telnet into the 3560 i can ping both PCs without issue, but once i get to the other side of the ASA5520 I no longer can see both devices...A few minutes later the second PC will be visible again from the Central Office.
We are trying to add an additional LAN-to-LAN IPsec VPN to our network. We currently have one remote office connected, when we configure the second VPN matching the first the tunnel never begins to establish. There is an ACL that is dening the static IP for our remote office.
The layout is as follows:
Main office = ASA 5520 Remote Office A = ASA (Unknown Model) Remote Office B = Adtran Router
All devices have static IP addresses.
We used the ASDM VPN wizard to create both VPN's.
We have created a rule allowing all traffic from our remote office IP, and that had no effect on the VPN aside from eliminating the following message from our logging:
We have verified that both sides are configured the same however the VPN never is initiated so as of right now the ASA is simply blocking all attempts from our remote office to connect.
We have ASA 5520 running 8.2(3) software and we're trying to make Remote Access VPN (l2tp/ipsec) working from Android. We succeeded in making IPSEC tunnel (ending "Phase 2 completed"), but we cannot make L2TP tunnel working.We're using RADIUS for L2TP authentication, but ASA doesn't even try to check credentials entered by use. The same set of credentials entered on Windows {XP, VISTA, 7, Mobile} works ok. Which debugging options should we turned on?
I am using an ASA 5520 running 8.2(4). My objective is to get a VPN client to access more than one network on the inside of the network, i.e., I need to VPN in with an IPSec client and be able to establish tcp connections to servers at 192.168.210.x and 10.21.9.x and 10.21.3.x, I believe I am close to having this resolved, but seem to have a routing issue.
We have an ASA5520 configured with a IPSec VPN, from any ADSL home/office our VPN clients can connect without any problem, but when we use our cellular phones in tetering mode (as an accesspoint) our VPN clients are impossible to connect. Same machines,same software, same operating system, same remote IP (ASA5520 external IP) only change Wifi connection (ADSL to cellular phone). The signal of cellular phones is not the problem we was doing the tests with different phones (IPHONE & ANDROID), different locations (all in spain) and differents providers (vodafone, orange and movistar) of internet by cellular phone.We think that perhaps the problem is the licenses that our ASA5520 has..
Our ASA5520 comes with this licenses: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Licensed features for this platform: Maximum Physical Interfaces : Unlimited perpetual Maximum VLANs : 150 perpetual Inside Hosts : Unlimited perpetual Failover : Active/Active perpetual
I need to connect 3 computers in local lan by using ipsec on win7. How can I do that? I tried to do something from windows firewall; but I see incorrect header checksum errors in wireshark.
I am testing a EasyVPN IPsec server set up on a cisco 891. Here is how I have it set up right now- the 891 is connected to our backup internet connection (different ISP from our main line) and we have a cisco 1921 as our production router.
I am experiencing a problem where when I am on our internal network off the 1921 and I connect to the VPN on the 891 I lose all local network connectivity. Nothing works, can't ping, can't telnet to the 1921, can't browse the internet, its not just DNS either.
I believe the issue lies in the configuration of the IPSec server on the 891 because when I connect to our client's cisco IPSec VPN I experience full local connectivity with no issues whatsoever. It seems to me that ALL traffic is being routed through the tunnel.
Other than the local issues the VPN is working fine and I can remote desktop to the PC I have set up off the 891 and telnet to the 891 from there.
Current configuration : 8967 bytes ! ! Last configuration change at 20:45:17 UTC Thu Dec 29 2011 by admin ! NVRAM config last updated at 19:52:26 UTC Thu Dec 29 2011 by admin ! version 15.0 service timestamps debug datetime msec
How can I NAT the same set of four hosts and give them access to two different networks across an IPSEC site-to-site VPN tunnel? I'm using an ASA5520 running 8.04.
I cannot get it to work : if interesting traffic comes ffrom the IPSO side, the box would not even try to set up the tunnel. and If it comes fomr the ASA side, the box attempts to do so but it with this strange message : AM_WAIT_MSG2
Im working for a client at the moment and I've had to setup a network printer for them, I've got 4 Windows 7 machines easily printing over the network to this printer that is connected wirelessly but they want one of there machines to use the scanning functionality of the printer.The scanner doesn't show up at all in the local network devices like the printer does and to be honest i don't really have any experience with scanning over a network to a windows 7 machine, but this printer does support scan to ftp so my idea is to setup a small ftp server on the windows 7 machine with a folder to stored scans on the desktop or something, then put the details of the server in to the printer making it as easy as possible for the customer to scan stuff and just get it from the folder on the desktop, i could also share this folder over the network for anyone to open and get a scan if needs be.
This is the configuration I am running:Internet > Cable Modem > Netgear WNDR3700 Router ~~ DAP-1522 > Wired Windows 7 PC + Linux PC + Printer.The Windows 7 and Linus PC's do communicate well to the internet as do any laptops accessing the router wirelessly and any devices wired to the router. That is the good news.
The bad news is that any devices located after the DAP-1522, including the DAP-1522 do not show up on the network map of either the router or any of the wireless laptops. Neither does the Win 7 PC connected through the DAP-1522 show any networked devices, whether through the DAP-1522 or not, even though network discovery is turned on.
Right now the DAP-1522 is set up to function as a bridge and is in "Static IP" mode. I tried changing it to DHCP, but the DAP-1522 will not allow saving that setting, even though it will allow changing it. It just reverts back to "Static IP". The firmware version is 1.31, and the firmware update went well after a workable logon to the admin page was discovered. Also the one-button (WPS) set-up to the router worked as far as allowing an internet connection.
What needs to change to allow all the devices to show up on the network maps and maintain internet access? Ultimately, I would like to stabilize the IP's of the major components of the network to make troubleshooting easier. But to do that the devices need to show up on the network maps, particularly of the router, so they can be added to the IP reservation table by selection.
I am trying to connect my RV110W from my home office to our office IPSec router. I have a dynamic IP address and am using DDNS, therefore the RV110W local endpoint needs to be configured with my FQDN, not the IP address as this will change.
On page 100 the manual states
Step 4 -
• Local WAN (Internet) IP Address—Enter the public IP address or domain name of the local endpoint (Cisco RV110W).
This option is not available in my router - I am running firmware 1.2.0.9
I have a Linksys WAG200G, I only use it for 2 devices a Win 7 PC and an iPad.
Surfing the net is fine, I'm get an average of 30ms when I ping to my local ISP.
But when I try to stream music or movies from my PC to iPad via iTunes, it starts playing for a couple of seconds then it stops, and then it will start again for a few more seconds. I tried pinging from PC to iPad and get a range from 400ms-2500ms.
I'm not sure which settings I need to adjust to make it work correctly.
I wounder if there is any way to ping the local deviceses connected to a network hosted by a Cisco 1921 router? I wan't to be able to ping the device(computer name) but currently cant do that.
show cdp neighbors command shows two devices connected through the same local port?I have a Cisco 3560 that when I issue the "show cdp neighbors" command I get the following results: [code]
the question is why is this showing that Gig0/3 is being used twice to connect to two different devices. I have verified there is no hub connected to this port and in fact Switch3 is not connected to Switch1 at all yet it still shows up in the CDP table.
I have cleared the CDP table on every device at this location and still get the same results.
Region : UnitedKingdom Model : TL-WDR4300 Hardware Version : V1 Firmware Version : 3.13.23 Build 120820 ISP :
Region : UnitedKingdom Model : TL-WDR3600 Hardware Version : V1 Firmware Version : 3.13.23 Build 120820 ISP : BT Infinity
I am running a Windows Home Server machine called "mserver" that has an IP address supplied via DHCP.There is also a local webserver running on port 8089 that I use to access media from several devices (Android Phone, Blackberry Playbook & HP Touchpad...i.e. not Microsoft).When I had the BT Homehub3 in use I could access the webserver via http://mserver:8089 and it would be loaded on all devices. With the WDR3600 used in place of the Homehub3 it cannot resolve mserver into a local IP address on a non windows device. I can access it via http://192.168.0.xxx:8089 so the route is there.Does the WDR3600 have any local DNS resolution? I repeat the BT HomeHub3 CAN do this, so why can't the TP-LINK?
P.S. I have tried :-
Disabling hardware NAT Turning off UPNP & Port Forwarding Restoring to factory default Disabling all ALG's in security
Writing my first router config from scratch for an 1801. I have wireless devices able to connect & authenticate with WPA. Wired devices can talk with wireless devices & on both interfaces devices obtain a DHCP lease. I can ping web based resources from the FA0 interface; the problem is, LAN devices can't ping has FA0. I'm pretty sure (well a hunch) that this is going to be down to NAT
version 12.4 service timestamps debug datetime msec service timestamps log datetime msec service password-encryption ! hostname Router0
We have cisco 3550 switch i have configure 3 vlans in this switch. i have enable routing between this vlans but vlans not able to communicating with each other.
I have a cisco 2811 with security bundle with IOS 12.4(13r)T I am planing to use this router as a VPN gateway for company ( i.e)
1. LAN 2 LAN VPN ( Supporting if remote site is having dynamic IP)
2. Remote access VPN for VPN client
I have configured the router ( attached is the configuration) I have not tried to use the LAN to LAN VPN ( first i complete remote access VPN and then check L2L) I tried to use the remote access VPN I am able to connect from vpn client software and got the IP address but unable to ping the servers in LAN.
