Cisco WAN :: 2801 - HWIC Not Showing After Upgrading IOS?

Jun 11, 2012

I have Cisco 2801 router with IP Base image, i have upgraded its image into advance Ip services for using IP SLA features but after upgradation HWIC card not showing in configuration.
 
When i recall IP base image then configuration show presence of HWIC card but with advance IP services HWIC card not showing.

View 8 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Cisco WAN :: HWIC-2CE1T1-PRI Not Supported On 2801 Router?

Jun 18, 2012

The HWIC-2CE1T1-PRI card isn't supported on a CISCO2801 router

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Infrastructure :: 4-port Serial HWIC-4T Is Compatible For 2801

Apr 23, 2012

Just want to ask if 4-port serial HWIC-4T is compatible for the Cisco 2801?We need additional HWIC for Fast Ethernet but the problem is we don't have already slot for it.We already have two HWIC-2T 2-port serial which is inserted at slot 1 and slot 3. We're planning to buy 4-port HWIC-4T so we can use the slot 3 for HWIC Fast Ethernet.if it's possible to have the 4-port serial HWIC-4T be inserted to Cisco 2801.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 2801 Router Not Showing Temperature In Show Environment All

Jun 19, 2012

We have a Cisco 2801 router running IOS "c2801-spservicesk9-mz.151-4.M4.bin" which we upgraded from previous “c2801-spservicesk9-mz.124-3d.bin”.
 
Requirement.
 
We want to monitor the device temperature via snmp but unable to do because temperature ratings are not available on "show environment all" output like below.
 
Routeri# sh environment all   Fan  1 OK   Fan  2 OK   ILP  Power Supply - Absent   Fan Speed Setting: Normal
 
Where as on Cisco 2811/51 & Cisco 3825/45 we can get temperature ratings on "show env all" output.
 
As per link [URL] below commands are supported on Cisco 2800 series router.
 
Command options
• show environment all
• show environment fans
• show environment leds
• show environment power-supply
• show environment table
• show environment temperatures
• show environment voltages
 
I want to know whether this is Cisco 2801 platform limitations or something else. tried to find Cisco doc on this but no luck.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: Difference Between HWIC-1ADSL-M And HWIC-1ADSL?

Jun 12, 2013

What is the difference between HWIC-1ADSL-M and HWIC-1ADSL without the "-M"?Can either of the above ADSL cards be used in Cisco 3845 router? We are using HWIC-1ADSL-M in our Cisco 3845 routers everywhere?

View 1 Replies View Related

Vista Showing Normal Wireless SSID Plus Showing Second Unidentified Network

Feb 5, 2011

my computer is a dell dimension 1100, with a Linksys WMP54G wifi card, running vista home basic.In the wifi thing in the notification area, it shows two wireless networks, One is my normal SSID (Lower Net), and one is "Unidentified network". They are both on one wireless connection (Wireless Network Connection 3). When i try to go on the internet, it says i'm not connected. i tried disconnecting from the unidentified network, but that disconnects me from lower net too.

View 13 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 2801 Cannot Always Ping 8.8.8.8

Feb 5, 2013

I have a Cisco 2801 with dual ADSL WAN connections, PATing to a network hanging on the fa0/1 interface. From the server connected to the router (hanging off of the fa0/1) interface, I can ping any address and there are no issues. But from inside the Cisco CLI, pinging certain addresses causes erratic behavior. [code]

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 2801 Can't Seem To Get Protocol Up

Nov 9, 2011

I have a 2801 router.  The Fa0/0 int shows up/down.  I have plugged it into diffrent cisco and non cisco switches and even a cross over cable to my laptop.  I cant seem to get the protocol up.  I have changed the speed to 100 and duplex to full to try to get it up that way and nothing. [code]

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: To Add HWIC-2FE With 2821

Mar 27, 2013

I have an existing C2821 router (2 onboard GE + 1 HWIC-2FE) currently. Like to add another 1 HWIC-2FE. Saw this doc on Cisco website which states Max of 2 HWIC-2FE for Cisco2821. Want to confirm this is indeed so as another link states max of 1 HWIC-2FE.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: Using 3G HWIC On ASR1000

Jun 24, 2012

I am looking for a way to use a 3G connexion on ASR1000.Is it possible to install HWIC module of ISR2 in SPA slot or use an USB modem on the RP?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: Can SM-ES3-16-P Used In Place Of HWIC-2FE

Apr 4, 2013

I want a low cost solution router with 16 10/100 routed ports...The idea is to club 16 different segments on ofc to this router via media convertor and there will be dynamic protocols such as EIGRP or higher running between these segments.

The router needs to be security enabled...the equipments needs to be a router by defination (not a layer 3 switch)..As per my understanding there is limitation on number of HWIC-2 FE that can be put in ISR G2 series due to which I cannot reach that figure...
 
Kindly let me know if i can use SM-ES3-16-P in the place of HWIC-2FE for this kind of requirement.

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 2801 Route-Map Not Seeing DHCP Next-Hop

Dec 23, 2011

I have a 2801 with dual ISP connections, and I have configured route-maps to direct voice traffic over ISP1 (working just fine), and I'm attempting send all other traffic over ISP2 (traffic is load-balancing instead).  The connection to ISP2 is DHCP, and I have configured a route-map to route this traffic using the 'ip next-hop dynamic dhcp' command, but when I look at the route-map, it states the following: ip next-hop dynamic dhcp - current value is UNKNOWN..Is there something that I need to enable in order to see the next-hop, and properly send traffic over the ISP2 connection? [code]

View 9 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 2801 - Access Web Server From LAN

May 3, 2012

I have a Router 2801 What conf should i make to access the webserver from the same LAN.
 
!
no ip dhcp use vrf connected
ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.63

[Code].......

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: Use Of USB Interface On 2801 Router?

Jul 23, 2007

I looked but could not find any information on what's the use of the USB interface on my 2801 router. I saw something about Cisco USB memory module and eToken by Aladdin. Is this interface restricted to Cisco and Aladdin only?

View 17 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: 2801 VPN IPSEC Is Restarted

Oct 14, 2012

I have a Cisco 2801 with flash: c2801-advipservicesk9-mz.124-16.bin where I use to doing VPN IPSEC.My problem is where I do a connection with a client, if my VPN dont have a traffic, the tunnel are closed. If a receive or send any traffic, the tunnel get up again.If  don't have traffic, this tunnel is closed and after is opened other tunnel where is changed the conn-id to 999 for example.This comportament is normal? Exist a form that my tunnel never close? I enabled the parameters below: [code] But the tunnel continues closing if a don't have traffic.

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: 2801 IPSec VPN Not Working

Mar 21, 2012

We are setting up a new VPN from an ASA to a cisco 2801 router (behind a third parties checkpoint firewall).  We seem to be almost there with the setup but the tunnel is not working correctly.  I have included a debug from the 2801 router and its config and a diagram of the setup. [code]

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: Getting VPN Into Home Router With 2801?

Aug 4, 2011

I have a Cisco RV110W small business router setup at my home. It has one of those HTML GUI interfaces, check the boxes, etc.., to get things working. Basically, your typical home router with VPN.   I have enabled the VPN, it's PPTP, added the password, and now it's automagically configured! I can successfully VPN to my home with a Windows7 client.  Here's my problem, I now need to VPN into my home router with a 2801.  Is this possible? Everything I found on the subject has only been to setup a Cisco IOS router as a VPN server or tunneling to another IOS router. No examples using an IOS based router as the client.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 2801 Router Having High CPU 99%?

May 29, 2012

We have one Router Cisco 2801 at the customer site and facing issue of having very High CPU coming to 99%.CPU utilization for five seconds: 99%/28%; one minute: 99%; five minutes: 98%

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: MLS QoS Map Command Missing On 2801

Oct 31, 2012

I am trying to run the following commands on a 2801 router, but the commands are missing:
 
mls qos
mls qos map cos-dscp 0 8 16 40 32 46 48 56
 
The only QoS command i have in global config is (no MLS qos) :
 
REMOTE-ROUTER1(config)#qos ?
restore-show-output  Restore old show output
shape-timer          Set the HQF shape timer interval
 
The router is running IOS:
 
System image file is "flash:c2801-ipbasek9-mz.151-4.M5.bin"
 
Am i just running the incorrect IOS or am i missing somehting, i need to change the QoS Map for my Nortel VoIP.  The VoIP phones connect to a 3750 PoE which used to conenct to a 2651XM to route VoIP and data traffic over the same copper pairs (WAN link to hub site) hence the need for a Service policy but being Nortel phones, require changing the cos-dscp map.  the 2801 is going to replace the 2651XM using a new HWIC.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 2801 Max Ethernet Speed

Jun 23, 2011

We have a 2801 rotuer in place that hooks up to a metro ethernet link that's obviously dropped off to us via ethernet.  Anyway, the throughput granted to us is 20MB, but for some reason I can't get it to go anything above 11MB at the most.  I've spent a day going through documentation trying to find the fastest speed the 2801 supports and I can't find my answer.  I've seen that the high speed wan cards in this router support up to 45MB, but I'm not using a WAN card, only one of the two built in 10/100 ports.
 
what the maximum throughput speed is on a 2801?

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: VPN Access To FWSM LAN Through A 2801

Mar 26, 2011

I have a FWSM in my 6509, this firewall is managing three VLANs, one of which holds a file server. As you all know, FWSM do not support VPN like the ASAs and PIXs do. I have been trying to add remote access to this file server LAN all week. The only VPN device i have is a 2801 router.
 
first layout: VPN router behind FWSMstatic translation from FWSM LAN (private) to VPN WAN (public)default route was facing back at FWSMip address pool was to be NAT'd on the interface facing the FWSM  the idea was that my VPN address pool would be NAT'd back to the FWSM on it's VLAN. since the FWSM was managing this VLAN and recognized the source IP of the translated address pool, i would have access to my precious file server.
 
second layout: VPN router fa 0/1 on a /30 with 6509 (public)VPN router fa 0/0 still on the same LAN as FWSM (private)address pool for VPN once again NAT'd to fa 0/0default route pointed to fa 0/1static route of FWSM LAN pointed to fa 0/0  this idea was to have more of a 'inside' and 'outside' interface on the VPN router. this too did not work, having used every trick in the book, i could still not ping anything on the FWSM LAN while VPN'd in the network (aside from the LAN interface on my router)
 
trace route was showing that the all routes were headed out fa 0/1 (default route) and all to my FWSM died. i really don't think my address pool is being NAT'd, though my route map statement applied to the NAT policy is permitting my VPN address pool.
 
I am new to VPN technology, one of those things that happened to land on my lap. how this layout could work? there are no good VPN Remote access walkthroughs for a situation like this (2801 allowing access to a FWSM controlled LAN)

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: 2801 Can't Ping Local LAN

Apr 23, 2011

i have configured remote access vpn on my 2801 router's gio0/0 int ip x.x.x.1. i connected my laptop through vpn client from internet. i connected successfully and my vpn router gives me the assigned ip block y.y.y.1. from my laptop i can ping the other int gio/1 ip z.z.z.1 but i cant ping the ip z.z.z.2 of my core sw which is connected on router's int gi0/1.

View 14 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 2801 / Managing 6 WAN Connections

Jul 31, 2011

The application here is a wind power project, built in two phases, without any effort to coordinate or integrate the two sites during the design phase. All operations activities for both phases are performed by one staff out of a common location. This is a rural area and Internet connectivity is mission critical due to contractual obligation with Electrical Utilities.
 
The client has a need to reconfigure a network which has grown over time in a layer by layer approach, whereas at every point in time that an additional T-1 or other changes occurred to address a specific need, no thought was ever put into integrating the entire site as a whole. It is at best a dysfunctional solution which somewhat accomplishes thier needs, and at worst, a kludgy, grossly security compromised, and difficult to use infrastructure. There is every kind of equipment one can imagine, each installed by some entity providing needed services on the site, but forced to make uninformed decisions because the client really has no IT department to coordinate with. Over time, every vendor just provided their own switch, router, or maybe figured out how to reconfigure another existing device to also provide the routing or access needed, To say the least, it's a mess.
 
The client requests a solution which provides a means to accomodate 6 internet connections (4 T-1 lines, and 2 satellite) in a manner which aggregates available bandwith and provides redundancy. The T-1 lines will be the main internet access, with the satellite connections only used if available bandwidth falls below some threshold, say 3Mb. There are many internal networks which need to be routed to and between, in total, about 20 subnets. There are 2 SCADA (Control) networks which have a mandatory requirement of 1Mb each, a VoIP system which does not use any internet connetivity as there are 6 POTS lines dedicated to it, an internal office LAN and a turbine manufacturers site LAN.
 
The T-1 lines, at 1.5Mb x 4 = 6Mb.
 
The 2 SCADA networks require a guaranteed 1Mb each, the remaining 4Mb is to be allocated between the office LAN and the turbine manufacturer site LAN. The satellite connection are only to be active in the event bandwidth falls below 3Mb.
 
There are 2 Cisco 2801 routers on site which could be reutilized if appropriate. Each T-1 has it's own Adtran CSU with Ethernet out. All T-1 lines are /29 IP Blocks. 2 of the T-1 lines are adjacent IP Blocks, for what its worth.
 
Everything here is open to reconfiguration. The client wants this finally integrated correctly with the ability to address emerging Electrical Utility cybersecurity requirements in the immediate future.
 
An ideal solution would be fully redundant to eliminate the single point of failure at the edge router. As to whether there needs to be separate edge and interior routers, I just don't know that. I would guess everything could be done with just a pair of redundant routers at the edge, but perhaps it is better to do the interior routing between subnets on a different router(s).
 
Again, the goal is a well integrated, redundant, and secure solution. My part is mostly complete, with the OSP part of the network finally at 100% after 5 years of stupid and careless misconfigurations and bad fiber splicing (by others).
 
I'm absolutely covered up in business at Layer 1 & 2 on these sites, as the physical plant and associated network elements are typically very poorly designed, specified, and implemented. The complexity of this job leads me to seek outside advice and ultimately a more qualified Cisco professional than me. I'm experienced enough with Cisco to know when I'm in over my head. I know a diagram would be nice, but at this point I've only got a very detailed diagram which reveals too much site identity information to make public. I'll wait to see a few comments and in the meantime work on removing site identity info so I can post a good diagram for everyone to see.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: HWIC-2FE Module In ASR-1000?

Nov 15, 2011

Does the ASR-1000 accept an HWIC module, or must one go to a SIP/SPA for all modules?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: HWIC Card For 1861?

Dec 5, 2011

if the card HWIC-1SER is the equivalent card HWIC-1T for 1861 router?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 3845 HWIC-2FE Is Not Detected

Oct 3, 2009

I have cisco 3845 router with 4 HWIC-2FE card none of them is detected the message displayed is [code]

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 2801 How To Protect It For Sessions Of SSH And Telnet

Dec 19, 2012

Someone told me the commands, but I can't remember them.  Have a router (2801) at the end of a highly utilized T1 link/router.  How do I protect it so my SSH and/or Telnet sessions will get serviced if the router is real busy. 

View 9 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 2801 And Switch Trunk Port

Apr 20, 2012

1- Cisco Router
Eth0/0 : Ip address 192.168.1.1 /24   == connected my laptop of 192.168.1.2
 /1: Ip address : 192.168.2.1 /24   = connected cisco swith

2 - Cisco Switch
VLAN 2 Name : Sales : ip address 192.168.3. 1 = connected computer 192.168.3.2
VLAN 3  Name : Marketing : ip addres 192.168.4.1 = connected computer 192.168.4.2

So I want my laptop that connected the router Eth0/0 Interface should access both VLAN 2 and VLAN 3 computers

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 1841 / 2801 DSL Firmware Update?

Oct 3, 2011

I've been looking and I can really find much info about this, I got a 1841 and 2801 router with ADSL WIC cards and both are synching really low compared to my cheap home router
 
This leads me to believe I need a firmware update so I got the adsl_alc_20190.bin and loaded it into flash and reloaded my router but its still saying my firmware is using an embedded one.
 
sh flash:-#- --length-- -----date/time------ path1      1000636 Oct 4 2011 05:59:54 +00:00 adsl_alc_20190.bin
sh dsl interface atm0/1/0ATM0/1/0Alcatel 20166/20174 chipset information ATU-R

[Code].....

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 2801 Route-map For Static NAT Translation

Dec 6, 2010

I have a nat and vpn setup on my Cisco 2801 router.Everything is working as expected except the NAT.  I have a single static nat translation but it only works for inbound and not outbound.  Going outbound, it uses the default overload nat address of the outside interface. [code] I want to add another mailserver.  But I fear if one mailserver were to get black-listed, they would both be reporting there ip address as the same address (the one on the ethernet interface) which would blacklist both mail servers.Again, inbound nat works ok, but outbound is just using the IP of the ethernet0/0 address.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 2801 How To Bridge Through Public Ip Scheme

Dec 14, 2011

I have a cisco 2801 router, My ISP in which i receive my bandwidth from has assigned me a ip address/gateway etc for my FA0/0 from our Telco switch. I need to figure out how to bridge through the public ip scheme they are issuing me through FA0/1 (setting up a transparent bridge) so in example  if i was givin 192.168.1.189 on a /30 network for my router (assigned to FA0/0) how to i set it up to bridge through the publics?

View 9 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: Setting Up 2801 As Internet Router

May 31, 2011

I'm having trouble setting up a Cisco 2801 as an internet router between our firewall & our ISP.I've setup FastEthernet0/0 as the WAN port & FastEthernet0/1 as the LAN port.  I've setup a default gateway pointing the next hop (the ISP),when I plug in a pair of laptops configured to mimic our IP scheme, I'm able to ping thru, but when I put the router between our firewall & ISP I'm not able to get out to the internet (can't ping google)  I can still ping the next hop.,Our old router died, so I am unable to pull up its configuration. Here is the code I'm come up with so far.

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco :: How To Connect 2801 Router To 1841

Dec 26, 2012

I need some clarification if it is possible to do an IPL connection between Cisco 2801 (T1) to Cisco 1841 (E1) via Ethernet (2801) to Serial (1841).
 
I am unable to find any documentation about this and I need to connect our network to an offshore network.

View 2 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved