Cisco WAN :: 3750G-48PS-E Stack-Wise 50CM Stacking Cable

Jan 21, 2013

just wonder if the Cisco Stack Wise 50CM Stacking Cable is freely available when purchasing Cisco Catalyst 3750G-48PS-E or we need to pay for it?

View 2 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Cisco Switching/Routing :: CAB-STACK-50CM Bent Stack Cable

Feb 27, 2013

Is there a stacking cable that is "bent"?Im using this cable:"CAB-STACK-50CM", "Cisco StackWise 50CM Stacking Cable".But it takes up to much room in the back of the switch, is there such a thing as "bent" stacking cable.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750G Stack-wise Port Error?

Aug 7, 2012

I have a stack of 3750G's where the connection between switch 1 port 1 and switch 2 port 2 are down
 
Stack Port Status             Neighbors
Switch#  Port 1     Port 2           Port 1   Port 2
--------------------------------------------------------
  1       Down        Ok              None       3
  2        Ok        Down                3      None
  3        Ok         Ok                   1        2
 
I have ruled out the stackwise cable as the problem but would like to know which switch has the problem

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Stacking WS-C3750-48PS-S With WS-C3750G-48PS?

Apr 17, 2013

I have production stack in the following config:
 
Switch   Ports  Model              SW Version              SW Image
------   -----  -----              ----------              ----------
*    1   52     WS-C3750-48P       12.2(25)SEE4            C3750-IPSERVICESK9-M
     2   52     WS-C3750-48P       12.2(25)SEE4            C3750-IPSERVICESK9-M
 
I want to add 3-rd switch to it:
 
Switch: WS-C3750G-48PS   12.2(25)SEE3           C3750-IPSERVICESK9-M
 
Will this configuration work? My main concern is IOS difference?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Stacking WS-C3750-48PS-S And WS-C3750G-48PS?

Mar 3, 2013

I have 3750-48PS-S in production and would like to stack it with C3750G-48PS. Both switches are running code:

c3750-ipservicesk9-mz.122-50.SE3.bin

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750x Replacing 2nd Stack Wise Cable?

Nov 20, 2011

I have two 3750G switches stacked together however it's not in a full ring configuration:

Stack Ring Speed        : 16G
Stack Ring Configuration: Half
Stack Ring Protocol     : StackWise
 
And as shown below it's obvious which cable is not working:
 
show switch neighbors
Switch #    Port 1       Port 2
--------    ------       ------
1         2            None
2        None           1
 
It's not flapping - it's like the cable isn't there at all. I'm going to try reseating the cable in there and perhaps an all out replacement if necessary. My question - is there any threat of a reboot of the switch stack or of partitioning of the switch stack by trying to get the 2nd cable working?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 Stack-wise Cable Long Enough To Connect Two Racks

May 8, 2012

We have two dedicated racks for our DMZ. We need to connect them to a firewall. We do all the cabling inside the rack, so each of them must have a top of rack.Problem is, switch in rack 2 will be connected to rack 1 and then to firewall, so if switch 1 fail, we lose both of them.
 
I would love to stack them like 3750 but I don't think there is stack-wise cable long enough to connect two racks (and I suppose this length isn't supported by technology).We have only one port left in the FW.

View 9 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 3750G / WS-3750G-48PS Memory

Jan 15, 2012

Has any come across show ver memory details on 3750G-48PS as below, One of our Catalyst 3750G running software 12.2(44)SE2 shows unexpected DRAM as below:

cisco WS-C3750G-48PS (PowerPC405) processor (revision F0) with 0K/12280K bytes of memory. This would equate to around 11MB memory which does not seem right... Is it a known IOS bug?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960G Configuring Ether-channel On Stack-wise Stack

Sep 24, 2012

A site that i am responsible for has the following equipment installed: 

2 x 3750G Switches configured as a stack using Stackwise - Collapsed Core/Distribution Layer
5 x 2960G Switches as Access Layer switches
 
WAN connections into the Core/Distribution Layer are all Gigabit Ethernet over Fibre.This is a dedicated CCTV Network with 50 Cameras all streaming video into the Core (decoders connected to access switches)Each 2960G has 2 links to the Core/Distribution 3750G Switches, 1 to each switch - Gigabit.I'm running rapid-pvst on all switches, so spanning tree is blocking one of the ports and effectively halving the 2 gig bandwidth. Next year our customer is going to add in a further 50 - 60 cameras.After monitoring the current loading on the ports in use, we have suggested to the customer that the 2 connections to each should be Ether-channeled together. [code]
 
First interface takes commands no problem, keep getting the message that etherchannel cannot be configured across different switches in a stack when i try to put the second interface commands on.

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750X - 48PS Switches Power Stacking

Mar 28, 2012

In my office we bought 7 cisco 3750X - 48PS switches. We configured Data Stacking between those switches. We also want to configure Power Stacking between those 7 devices.
 
I found in the Data Sheet that we can only configure 4 devices in power stacking at a time. If it is like that how to configure the rest of 3 devices. Need configuring power stacking between those devices in a better way..

power stack cable part no we have is
CAB-SPWR-30CM

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Stacking 3750G And The 3750E?

Nov 20, 2012

have 2 3750's one is an 3750E the other one is a G... Since they are 2 different versions Do I need to correct ios for each for example my 3750E switch i would have
 
IP BASE
 c3750e-ipbasek9-mz.122-53.SE2.bin        and for my 3750G switch should i use
  
IP BASE
 
c3750-ipbasek9-mz.122-53.SE2.bin
  
Which would be 2 separate images

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Stacking 3750X With 3750G?

Apr 22, 2013

I have one 3750X with C3KX-NM-10GT, I need to interconnect using stackwise to 3750G-24TS. The 3750X needs IOS 15.0(1) to use C3KX-NM-10GT, and the latest IOS for 3750G-24TS is 12.2.55. How can I interconnect them using diferent IOS?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750G - Maximum Throughput Reduced By Stacking Or Any Of Other Features

Mar 21, 2012

We are experiencing output drops on our 3750G-12S (IOS 12.2.55).
 
I have monitored throughput with MRTG, but it doesn't seem that high compared to that the 3750G is supposed to handle 17.8 Mpps.
 
The 3750G's are stacked, running ospf, qos, multicast (IPTV) and etherchannel.Is the maximum throughput reduced by stacking or any of the other features?
 
I don't know if one can estimate what the maximum throughput is per ASIC or per port, but on one of the ASICs that is having drops the peak unicast load is 1.3 Mpps and multicast Mpps is 0.9 Mpps. Total ~2.2 Mpps.
 
This doesn't seem high at all and I don't understand why the drops are appearing. What I can do to find out the reason for these drops?

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Stacking 3750g And 3750x - Hardware Version Mismatched

Jul 18, 2012

I am trying to stack a 3750g with a 3750x. At the moment they will not stack with their current IOS as the hardware version is mismatched.
 
According to various posts this is possible as long as the same IOS is in use. The following IOS are currently in use:
 
3750g     -     c3750-ipbaselmk9-tar.122-55.SE5
3750x     -     c3750e-ipbasek9-mz.150-1.SE3
 
I have tried to downgrade the IOS on the 'X' to 122-55.SE5 however, i get errors regarding firmware incompatibility.
 
I am unable to upgrade the IOS on the 'G' to 150-1.SE3, as the size of the IOS image is larger than the available flash (Version 15 IOS for the 3750G (c3750-ipbasek9-mz.150-1.SE3.bin) is 16,074,189 bytes whereas the 3750G has 16MB of flash memory or 15,998,976 bytes total which mean the IOS will not fit).
 
Has not actually stacked these devices successfully? I understand there may be license implications of upgrading to 15 but at the moment I just want them to stack!

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco AAA/Identity/Nac :: Ws-c3750-48ps Enable Dot1x On Stack I

May 31, 2013

I have 3 ws-c3750-48ps in a stack and i'd like to enable dot1x on the stack I entered the commands: [code] I also have dot1x enabled on several interface on the 2nd and 3rd switches in the stack with these commands [code] dot1x successfully works on these ports and I see the logs in acs, heres where the problem comes in when i try to enable dot1x using the above commands on any interface on the first switch in the stack it doesn't work its like the switch doesn't support dot1x. I'm assuming that there is a bug in version 3 but after googling I didn't come up with much.

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 48PS Stack IOS Upgrade

Jul 9, 2012

I want to upgrade the IOS version of 3750 48PS switches. these stacks are located on different building some of the them having 2 members and some have 3 members in a stack.step by step to upgrade the IOS of these switches.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Infrastructure :: 3750-48PS Switch Stack Unable To Boot?

Aug 25, 2012

I have been experiencing a strange problem i have a switch stack of 3750 in which 4 switches are cascaded. there is one one switch shows PROVISIONED status when I run "show switch". i have verified the stack cable connectivity its OK.
 
now when i try to console that particular switch i am unable to access it as well. I tried to reboot that switch and on reboot it only shows one LED syst blink once and after that remains constant and nothing happens to other LEDS. from the back of the switch FAN is working fine.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: WS-C3750G-48PS / Unable To Update Boot Path In Stack Switches

Sep 11, 2012

I am in the process of upgrading our stack of 4 switches consist of WS-C3750G-48PS. Upon reading release notes found that there are two versions of release notes 1 day apart, the one 02 Sep 2012 saying that WS-C3750-48PS is not supported in this version. Then in release next day 03 Sep 2012 that note has been removed. Which one is correct. Is it supported with my model of switch or not.also unable to update boot path in the stack switches, "switch all" is not supported in the current IOS. Master switch has new boot path but unable to change in slaves.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Is It Possible To Stack A 3750G And 3750X

May 26, 2011

I have a 3750G and bought a new 3750X.  It possible to stack these two together?

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750G Won't Join A Stack

Jan 29, 2013

I have a 3750G switch that can't detect another switch or be detected through its stack ports. I tried the recommended test; looping a cable between the ports and rebooting. I get the following message as the switch boots: SM:  Detected stack cables at PORT1 PORT2. However, if I connnect another switch, it won't detect it and can't form a stack.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Upgrade IOS On A 3750G-24T Stack?

Feb 20, 2012

I'm trying to upgrade the IOS ver on a 3750G stack (2 switches), but the img on the switch is too old.The stack is running IOS c3750-i9-mz.121-19.EA1d.bin, and when I tried to upgrade to a newer version, I tried to go to IOS ver c3750-advipservicesk9-mz.122-35.SE5.bin since I need to enable ssh on the switch, but the switch did not reload.
 
Here's a prtscreen of the switch ver:
  
Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
IOS (tm) C3750 Software (C3750-I9-M), Version 12.1(19)EA1d, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
Copyright (c) 1986-2004 by cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Mon 05-Apr-04 22:40 by antonino
Image text-base: 0x00003000, data-base: 0x007CBC3C

[code]...
 
what IOS ver can I upgrade to that is not already deferred?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Switch 3750G Stack

Jun 17, 2012

have one 3750G stack with 4 switches and this stack is presenting the follow log message:
 
%PLATFORM_UCAST-4-PREFIX:  One or more, more specific prefixes could not be programmed into TCAM and are being covered by a less specific prefix, and the packets may be software forwarded.
 
In this stack we are using the layer 3 with OSPF routing, and the current sdm prefer is default:
 
switch-01-3750#sh sdm prefer
The current template is "desktop default" template.
The selected template optimizes the resources in
the switch to support this level of features for
8 routed interfaces and 1024 VLANs.(code)

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Mixed 3750-X And 3750G In A Stack?

Jul 17, 2012

Any one try to form a stack with mixed 3750-X and 3750G? Is there any prerequisites in hardware and software?

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750G Stack Slow Performance

Nov 19, 2012

I am currently having performance issues running a 3 x stack 3750G (different models) as a core for a network of roughly 12 x distribution switches. [code] As above, I have a 12 port Fibre switch and 2 x 3750G-48 port switches. [code] I tried to change the SDM to route but hit another issue where the 3750g-48 does not support SDM route so I had to revert back to desktop VLAN.Could the SDM Template be the reason for slow performance? If so which SDM Template should i use as this is the Core L3 switch.

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Stack 3750G-12S-S With 3750X-48T Switch?

Apr 14, 2012

if we can stack the 3750G switch with a 3750X switch ?

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Adding 3750X To 3750G Stack?

Jun 13, 2012

Our customer has a stack of 6 3750G switches.  They want to add another switch to the stack.  I tried to quote another G, but I got a warning that the G series is EOS January 30,2013.  Can I add a 3750X to the stack?  I know that no matter what switch I get, I will have to upgrade the IOS in the stack, as the stack is running 12.2(25)SEE2. 

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Difference Between Stack 3750G And 3750X?

Jul 15, 2012

I have a cisco WS-C3750G-24TS with IOS flash :/ c3750-mz.122-ipservicesk9-25.SEB4.bin "
 
I purchased a new Cisco WS-C3750X-24 with the IOS flash :/ c3750e-universalk9-mz.150-1.SE/c3750e-universalk9-mz.150-1.SE.bin. ( NEW )
  
When i configured a stack between the two 3750,  the new switch restarted due the version mismatch (different IOS´s);
 
 We have two versions: 
 
WS-C3750G-24TS-ipservicesk9 flash :/ c3750-mz.122-25.SEB4.bin "
  
VS
 
WS-C3750X-24 flash :/ c3750e-universalk9-mz.150-1.SE/c3750e-universalk9-mz.150-1.SE.bin.
  
Is that possible to configure a stack between then?
 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Tenho  um cisco WS-C3750G-24TS com o IOS flash:/c3750-ipservicesk9-mz.1
22-25.SEB4.bin"
Adquiri  um novo cisco WS-C3750X-24 com o IOS flash:/c3750e-universalk9-mz.150-1.SE/c3750e-universalk9-mz.150-1.SE.bin.

[code]...

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750G Spanning Tree On New Switch Stack

Nov 3, 2011

I am about rip and replace my current 3750G stack with a 3750X stack. I have trunked over vlan and vtp info and implemented a config so it should be ready to go other then moving cables onto it. However one thing I want to correct with our current setup is that the root bridge on our vlans including vlan 1 is on a separate set of switches that we control, however I would like this new stack to be the root bridge for all of our vlans. It will be the central set of switches that all other switches trunk into.  I have pre-set higher spanning-tree priorities for each vlan on the new stack so I expect as I move lines into it that the tree will be re-calculated with it as the root bridge. I've ensured that there are no root guards on any of the other switches trunks and priorities are all at default levels for each vlan. Should I enforce root guard on the trunk interfaces of the new master stack?  Most of the trunks are port-channels to the other switches - do I need to set root guard on the Port channel interface or on the individual ports that make up the Port channel? On both? Any other recommendations in regards to implementing spanning-tree with the new stack? I know using port channels eliminates a lot of potential for loops but not every trunk is and I'd still like to have spanning-tree on.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Can Stack 3750G-12S-S Switch With 3750E-24TD-S

Apr 22, 2012

Can we stack a 3750G-12S-S switch with a 3750-E-24TD-S switch?

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: EtherChannel Cross-Stack Between 3750g And 4507R?

Oct 23, 2012

I am running out of ports on a 4507R and would like to use a 3750G-24TS stack that I already have to expand capacity. Is it possible to configure EtherChannel between the 4507R and the 3750G stack and if so what is the best way to do it? without LACP, with active-active mode LACP or passive-active mode LACP...
 
This is what I have in mind:On the 4507R side I would like to use interface GigabitEthernet3/5 and interface GigabitEthernet4/5 where modules 3 and 4 on the 4507R are "6 1000BaseX (GBIC) (WS-X4306-GB)". On the 3750G side I would like to use ports 28 on both switches in the stack which are equipped with Cisco GLC-T= 1000BASE-T SFP transceiver module for Category 5 copper wire with RJ-45 connector. [URL] Cross-Stack EtherChannel Without PAgP or LACP should look like this:
 
3750switchstackA(config)#interface gigabitethernet 1/0/28
3750switchstackA(config-if)#channel-group 1 mode on
3750switchstackA(config-if)#switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
3750switchstackA(config-if)#switchport mode trunk
3750switchstackA(config)#interface gigabitethernet 2/0/28
3750switchstackA(config-if)#channel-group 1 mode on

[code]....

is that what I should be doing? is there any benefit to the active-active mode LACP or passive-active mode LACP and which are applicable to the case above?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750G - Adding Additional Switch And Making It Stack

Feb 29, 2012

I currently have Cisco 3750G which is currently live and active and fully populated and only have remote access.
 
I have an additional same switch which I would like to stack. My initial plans were to have 2 GIbit etherchannels, but I came across the option to Stacks both switch with each other.
 
When I do a show switch on the live switch its set as a Member: [code]

I would like to add the new switch to the stack without losing the config for the switch which is live. I understand that the highest priority of the switches becomes the Master but as the live switch is Priority 1, would chancing this affect the switches config, or would it lose connection at all?
 
Also when I plug in the new switch and it reboot how do I ensure it becomes the slave without rebooting the live switch?The cables on the switch do they have to go to port1 on the live switch and port 1 on the new switch or can they be port 1 and port 2?

View 19 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Upgrading Firmware On Mixed 3750G And 3750X Stack

Jul 3, 2012

I've got a mixed stack as follows:

Switch 1 - 3750X-24P
Switch 2 - 3750G-24TS
Switch 3 - 3750G-24T
 
Running 12.2(53)SE2, IP base.  Now I tried upgrading the firmware on the entire stack to 12.2(55)SE4 and ran into this error:(Command: archive download-sw /imageonly /overwrite /allow-feature-upgrade tftp://10.20.20.13/c3750e-universalk9-tar.122-55.SE4.tar)
 
 Error: The image in the archive which would to used to upgade system number 2 does not support that system type.I haven't as yet removed the "3750G-24TS" switch from the stack and re-tried as yet, however, is the expectation that without the 24TS, the upgrade should work?

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750G - Stack Switching Priorities Not Correct

Mar 21, 2012

I got Two Distribution Switches of Cisco 3750G. Each Distribution have two 3750G switches stacked. I also have one Cisco 3750V2 Access Switch connected to both Distribution. When I am checking for redundancy, I can only get redundancy test pass for one link not atall for other. If I have a link up with Distribution 1 only then its fine; but disappointment with Distribution 2 link. I can see that the switch priorities of Dist 2 is not correct ie. Master's priority is 10 and Member's is 15.
 
My question is that due to misconfigured priorities on Distribution 2 stack switches I am failing with redundancy if ONLY Dist 2 is up and Dist 1 is down.

View 4 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved