CPU utilization for five seconds: 61%/59%; one minute: 62%; five minutes: 63% PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process 578 5856 9392486 0 0.55% 0.50% 0.50% 0 IP SLAs XOS Even 231 90364 576908
Our Router 7606 is in a problem with high CPU Utilization. We are using one EBGP and one IBGP session. We are also running OSPF with area 0 between two IBGP router to exchange few local networks. When bandwidth cross 100 MB than only CPU use become 100%. when bandwidth consumption is 80MB CPU use become 80% end so on.
Out put is when bandwidth consumption is 34MB
CPU utilization for five seconds: 44%/43%; one minute: 42%; five minutes: 30% PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process 78 44 9625 4 0.39% 0.03% 0.00% 2 Virtual Exec 13 40 375 106 0.07% 0.00% 0.00% 0 ARP Input 30 116 1098 105 0.07% 0.01% 0.00% 0 IPC Seat Manager
Today I've received reports of slow internet access/activity and have noticed myself that it seems a bit slow today. On the dashboard of our asa 5510 the "outside interface" traffic usage is running constantly high. It's at the top of the graph. How can I tell what is causing the spike in utilization. It usually runs at about 1500-2000 Kbps, and now it's up over 10,000.
We installed a solution with 2 Cisco 2801, BGP multihomed failover.
1) The router which is currently getting all the traffic gets to 55% to 60% of CPU usage when handling 40 SIP/RTP streams . This equals 10Mbit up/10Mbit down and it showed around 5800 packets TX and around 5800 packets RX, with a majority of them CEF switched. As those figures are way less than the performance figures published by Cisco, we wonder if we made any mistake in setting up our router, or if we can do something to improve the router setup.
2) Does it have an impact on router performance if we increase/decrease RTP packet size, thus increasing or decreasing the pps relative to the consumed bandwidth?
3) If it is not possible to improve router configuration, we also wonder about possible replacement units for those routers. Would a 2901 do a good job? By how much would it rise the capacity? What other models would you recommend if we plan to rise the number of concurrent calls by a factor of 4 or even 8 times of what we have now (so up to 48000 pps and 80Mbit).
Here is what we tried:
- ip route-cache same-interface does not seem to improve anything
- ip flow ingress on or off makes no difference
- disabling the inbound ACL on fa0/0 seems to reduce load by 10%, although I don't understand why - a very high percentage is CPU interrupts, and ACLs are process switched, or not?
- we tried following the Cisco guide for high CPU due to high interrupts, with no success
Here are some usage statistics:
The graphs that we plot via SNMP show a propotional growth/increase of CPU and bandwidth (and thus pps) At the highest loads, we had a bit more than 55% CPU utilization with more than 50% interrupt CPU.
CPU utilization for five seconds: 36%/30%; one minute: 30%; five minutes: 30% PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process 127 13140 954 13773 2.00% 0.29% 0.07% 194 SSH Process
I need to create a policy to provide only 4 Mbps bandwidth for mail out of 16 mbps pipe terminated on 7606 router (at Datacenter) having WS-SUP32-GE-3B.But I can't create policy with bandwidth percent,even exact value with priority command does not work. When I am going to enter service policy output command at interface it is showing as"priority command is not supported in output direction for this interface Configuration failed!" All I want to restrict bandwidth at backbone link for mail traffic. From all remote locations use to access mail server over the same link.
who to configure the interface of cisco 7606 router. As it is not getting up by doing normal configuration like "no shut"? iterface and line protocol both are down.
I have a fresh piece of 7606-S router, i am planning to install a new IOS ( 15.2.4S or 12.2.33-SRD8 ) SIP-200 / RSP720 moduls ... would ypu plese provides me a configuration guide for installing IOS for 7600 serise router.I have the image on TFTP server.
I was trying to install a SPA-IPSEC-2G on 7606-S chassis. I installed the SPI/SPA cards in slot 3, after that I checked with "sh module" and we could see the module "OK". After this we tried to configure a VPN tunnel but we received messages in the other router about "no ipsec package".
I was checking and I tried "sh crypto engine accelerator statistic" and we got the message: " There is no crypto device".
I don't know about installation commands in references and I don't know about restrictions or configuration modes.
I have a 7606 router with sup 720-3bxl. IOS has been crashed recently and i can use only Roman mode now. Ive tried to upload ios image using tftp server but the command tftpdnld id not available in this router. I don't know why. Then i tried to boot from flash disk but finally it also shows an error like
System received a Software forced crash signal= 0x17, code= 0x24, context= 0x42359674 PC = 0x402d248c, Cause = 0x1020, Status Reg = 0x34008002
We have 7606 router without any ipsec module on it,so i check the ios and it has all commands in interface tunnel for configuring the dmvpn multipoint tunnel and also protection profile for ipsec! so i have this question: do we can run dmvpn between this router and our wan routers wich are 3845.
I've setup and configured the following local monitor session on a 7606 but it doesnt seem to be outputing anything. Any guess as to why, or what I might be doing wrong? Gi1/1 is doing ~40Mb/s egress & 15Mb/s ingress. Both source and destination ports are routed ports.
monitor session 10 source interface Gi1/1 monitor session 10 destination interface Gi1/10 ingress interface GigabitEthernet1/1 description WAN Link to ********************* ** CORE BACKBONE ** mtu 9000 ip address ************** 255.255.255.252
I need to put a FWSM and a line card WS-X6148A-GE-TX to a router 7606. The FWSM version is 3.2(13). The router is running IOS 12.1(18)SXD3. The Cisco document here says the required IOS for router 7606 is 12.2(18)SXF or higher. I have downloaded the IOS 12.2(33)SRD4 and loaded it to the flash card. When I turn the router on, it doesn't load the new IOS and goes to rommon. Which IOS I should use to make the router 7606 work and accept the FWSM.
We are planning to configure the ipv6 PBR on our 7606 routers. We have configured the route-maps successfully .but when we tried to apply those on interfaces we are facing an problem .
when we trying to give command # ipv6 policy route-map <route map name> . we are unable to find policy command option in the command list.
IOS Version : c7600rsp72043-advipservicesk9-mz.122-33.SRE3.bin.
We have an environment where we terminate our DSL customers over PPPoE on a 7606-S MPLS PE router with RSP720. The PPPoE sessions are terminated on a GIG V2 interface of a SIP-400. Currently the IOS running on the device is c7600rsp72043_rp-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M, Version 12.2(33)SRD. The following is the current configuration used.
bba-group pppoe 7virtual-template 7
interface GigabitEthernet2/1/3.142647 accessencapsulation dot1Q 14 second-dot1q 2647pppoe enable group 7
interface Virtual-Template7 ip vrf forwarding TESTip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.252
In the above scenario everything works well.
However we had to upgrade the router IOS to 15.2(4)S Advance IPServicesk9 to support 4-byte ASN. After the upgrading we observed certain commands used to terminate PPPoE on the sub-interfaces not available on 15.2(4)S , although PPPoE on Gig and Ethernet with QinQ support is listed under 15.2S feature set.
I have two Cisco 7606 routers using BGP to connect our customers to the internet. Recently we added a new 1G circuit in addition to an existing 1G circuit and all traffic inbound is now on this new 1G circuit. We would like to shift some of the inbound traffic over to the other 7606. Our Tier provider has the same AS number for both paths. One path goes directly to New York and the other goes to Boston then New York.
I used the below syntax to check the snmpwalk to an interface of a cisco 7606-s router from an LMS 4.0 version cli.
NMSROOT/Objects/jt/bin>snmpwalk -v 2c -c <snmp-string> <ip-addr> 1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.6 Timeout no response from <ip_address>
This is the error im getting in cli prompt. But i could see that reports are generating.If i try with the loopback ip address, i get proper snmpwalk outputs.. I have increased the timeout and retry options..
I have a 7606 Router with single Route Switch Processor 720 at the chassis works as active RP ( Route Processor ). Can I add another RP to the chassis as standby in case of failure of the first RP ?
I have made an etherchannel between 6509 and 7606 with two giga interfaces on eatch one to have more bandwidth (2Go), but the Etherchannel does not exceed 1 GB (Below is a capture for Etherchannel taken from Solarwinds).the both 6506 and 7606 use ws sup 720 3bxl
its a hardware problem or just not get power to module 1 for module WS-X6748-GE-TX? this is the capture from show module and sh log :
------------------ show module ------------------
Mod Ports Card Type Model Serial No. --- ----- -------------------------------------- ------------------ ----------- 1 48 CEF720 48 port 10/100/1000mb Ethernet WS-X6748-GE-TX xxx 5 2 Route Switch Processor 720 (Active) RSP720-3CXL-GE xxx Mod MAC addresses Hw Fw Sw Status
Any know how to close these open ports on my Cisco 7606 router? Any know what these TCP ports are used for? : 49 - Not sure what this one is other than what IANA reports about TCP port 49 4510 4509 2222 : I'm sure I could add an ACL to block communications to my router based on this ports but would rather figure out how to close 'em so this already overloaded router doesn't have additional processing.
I have the following configurations in cisco CISCO7606 (R7000). Its meaningful to have the below configuration, wherein , we are allowing multiple vlans on the access port?
Our router suddenly reloaded. Below are the crashinfo obtained:
1st crashinfo:
7606_Router#more sup-bootflash:crashinfo_20120604-02260500:00:05: %PFREDUN-6-ACTIVE: Initializing as ACTIVE processor 00:00:05: %SYS-3-LOGGER_FLUSHING: System pausing to ensure console debugging output. 00:00:05: %PFREDUN-6-ACTIVE: Initializing as ACTIVE processor 00:00:05: %SYS-3-LOGGER_FLUSHED: System was paused for 00:00:00 to ensure console debugging output.
[code]....
We are running s72033-advipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-18.SXF9
I've already found this kinds of cases, in this community. So, It seems that Changing the current configuration to 'mls aging fast threshold ## time ## ' is most suitable in our situation.But, I don't know how to calculate the apt threshold value and time value.
[1] sh run | in mls mls ip multicast flow-stat-timer 9 mls flow ip interface-full no mls flow ipv6 no mls acl tcam share-global mls cef error action freeze
I have my router 7606-S rebooted by itself. According to output of show version command it's rebooted by software bug.
================ Snipped from crashinfo file ================= Jan 14 05:33:50.822 GMT+7: %C7600_MEM_ECC-2-MBE: Multiple bit error detected at 0xC09F4D38 Jan 14 05:33:50.822 GMT+7: %C7600_MEM_ECC-3-SYNDROME_MBE: 8-bit Syndrome for the detected Multi-bit error: 0x0 05:33:50 GMT+7 Sat Jan 14 2012: Unexpected exception to CPU: vector 1500, PC = 0xB7922BC , LR = 0xB792250
==================== Show Version ====================== Cisco IOS Software, c7600rsp72043_rp Software (c7600rsp72043_rp-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version 15.1(1)S1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Technical Support: [URL] Copyright (c) 1986-2011 by Cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Thu 10-Feb-11 19:27 by prod_rel_team
ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.2(33r)SRD5, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) BOOTLDR: Cisco IOS Software, c7600rsp72043_rp Software (c7600rsp72043_rp-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version 15.1(1)S1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) [Code]...
I have a cisco 7606-S with dual RSP720-3CXL. Devices reloaded and now none of the RSPs are booting.When I have tried to take the console using only one RSP, card going to rommon mode after that it hangs. I guess its firmware is corrupted.
I have one Cisco 7606 and i need to install a WS-X6748-GE-TX with WS-F6700-DFC3CXL.When I install the WS-X6748-GE-TX the module is powered off with the following warning:
00:01:45: %C6KPWR-SP-4-UNSUPPORTED: unsupported module in slot 1, power not allowed: Unsupported baseboard/earl combination. [code]