Am trying to find out what is the suitable SPA for ASR1000 routers to connect ATM DS3 through the local telco. Currently this is connected to a NM-ATM-DS3 module on a C3845 router. The reason for asking is we need to upgrade the WAN router to ASR1000.
We have asr1006 with 2 esp-40 and 2 rp2 and 2 sip-40. we need to bridge vlan from portchannel (2*10) to single 10ge port.
So fn said that EVC on Port-Channel supported on our software and document [URL] have such example - configure terminal - interface port-channel channel-group - service instance id ethernet
But on our router we have not service command on port-channel. only on non portchannel interface.
But other document have Restrictions for Configuring EVCs on the Cisco ASR 1000 Series Router The following features are not supported: EVC on Etherchannels
Connect ww port-channel 1 2 tenGigabitEthernet 0/1/0 2 this is possible command on our router (but i can't create service instance on portchannel interface)
We need to bridge l2 without l3 termination ? is this possible with port-channel ?
we're trying to integrate our SBC instances (CUBE SP on ASR1000) into our network management system (EMC SMARTS)Syslog messages from SBC instances are some kind of cumbersome with lot of line breaks resulting in multiple syslog messages the NMS must parse.How do I configure it to just put it all into one line just as "normal" log messages?
I have a question regarding netflow and NAT. I have read some documentation (on ASR1000) regarding monitoring NAT process on Cisco ASR1000 that can be done using netflow version 9 (the term was called netflow event logging a.k.a NEL). The problem is, I have not found the netflow collector that can do that. I have queried several software such as manage engine "Netflow Analyzer" and Lancope, but they said their software can not do that.
I'm trying to use EPC on ASR1001 running IOS-XE 3.4, and it won't work. Configuration commands are accepted by the router, but there are no packets in the capture buffer.In release notes for IOS-XE, in the 2.5 section, there is a statement that EPC is not supported on ASR1k. Is it true also for newer versions of IOS-XR?
One of our customer would like to connect 3 datacentres and decided to use VPLS to extend layer 2 VLANs . For this purpose they have bought six Cisco ASR1000 edge routers( two at each side).They also wanted to buy MPLS SP backbone but have decided to buy 2x10G dark fibre links instead.My question is,
1-Will it still possible to run VPLS over dark fibre? Because all the documents I read regarding VPLS are deployed over MPLS backbone.
2-Any sample configuration for implementation VPLS in ASR1000 ?
how the ASR1000s are being setup.I am looking at ASR1000s as part of network refresh and was looking at RJ-45 based Gigabit Ethernet ports compatible with the ASR1000s SPA-5X1GE-V2 seems to be an option but they are all SFPs. Are there any options for RJ-45 ones on ASR1000s?
There is an option for the 2 port where one can mix and match SFPs and RJ45 but I was looking for something which is RJ45 only.Are there any options for them available.I know I could get something with FastEthernet type but was looking for the GigabitEthernet type.
I'm trying to find out what platforms support Multilink PPP with Link Fragmentation and Interleaving over a single link, when that single link is PPPoE. In searching the documentation, the best information I can find is that it seems to be supported in one direction on the ASR1000 url...Many platforms appear to support PPPoE and also MLPPP w/LFI, but it's not clear that both features are supported on the same link.
The application is a radio that has an Ethernet interface on its terrestrial link, and acts as an Ethernet bridge. Would like to use Multilink PPPoE with LFI in order to provide LFI in order to run VoIP over lower speed links (e.g 256kb). For what it's worth, the radio also supports RFC 5578 PPPoE Extensions for Credit Flow and Link Metrics. It was fairly easy to find what platforms support RFC 5578. But RFC 5578 would be used to support variation in the capacity of the link. If the link speed is fixed, RFC 5578 is not needed. I was trying to find if the set of platforms supported increase if the need for RFC 5578 is taken off the table.
In particular, I'd be interested in the whether the ASR 9000 series supports MLPPP bundles with LFI when the links are PPPoE.
We're installing ASR1000 series (ASR1001 and ASR1006) routers on a new WAN and have a requirement to enrypt the traffic between the EIGRP neighbors. Each ASR will be connected to the MOE with a gig interface and we will be using L3 on the interfaces with EIGRP as the routing protocol. We have advipservices-k9 IOS-XE
The ASR1006 is our datacenter WAN router and all remote sites have the ASR1001s. The ASR1006 WAN interface will be configured with L3 subinterfaces, one to each remote location, using a /30 mask.
What is the best method to encrypt the traffic between the ASR1006 WAN interface and the remote ASR1001 WAN interface?
Any equivalent show command to get the "FIB TCAM Usage" on An ASR 1006 ?the "show platform hardware capacity forwarding" does not work on ASR1006 Example on 6500: Router# show platform hardware capacity forwarding.
I want to know what the default behavior about the command 'mls qos trust dscp' under router platform interface. the router is ASR1000 series.we don't need to put above command line to trust dscp in case of router? otherwise, we have to add it as welll as like switch platform.
I am working on a network which has two ISP connections (Active/Active) terminating on router (ASR1000). From the LAN side (6500 switch) all the traffic need to be route on ISP1 but some of the specific subnets like 10.250.0.0/16 need to be route on ISP2 connection.
I am planning to use PBR and NAT with route maps. any documents or refrences are provided.
So I've got a IPv6 tunnel with Hurricane Electric and it's currently physically segmented off of my home network. A 1841 terminates the tunnel and if I want to use it I need to plug into a port thats on a VLAN with no SVI and connect outbound to test IPv6 stuff. I'd like to give access to some other users and Im wondering if 6 over 4 tunneling with AnyConnect will work for that. My thought was that they could terminate on my main firewall (5505) and then terminate their VPN session in another vlan which was connected to the IPv6 router. I have this config working right now with IPv4 and I can browse out but Im struggling with the IPv6 support piece. The admin guides from Cisco seem to indicate that I'll need to configure IPv6 addressing on the ASA which makes sense, but doesnt fit my current design.
I understand that IPv6 uses the MAC address of a LAN interface to make up the EUI-64 of a serial interface since serial interfaces don't have MACs. What happens when there is no LAN interface available? What if the switch has only serial interface cards?
i just came to know Assurance feature license doesn't come for free when upgrading from LMS4.2 or NCS1.1. It has to be purchased. Before buying this license, i would like to know if IPv6 netflow is supported.
I need to implement IPv6 for ASA VPN. According to the ASA_8.4_cli_cfg.pdf , IPv6 is not supported on ASA IPSEC vpn and remote client vpn. I do not have a ASA 8.4, any way to verify on ASA8.4 whether the crypto command support ipv6 address ? If the crypto command do support ipv6 address then probably there is chance it will work.what i mean is eg. crypto map xxx set peer <ipv6 address| ipv4 addres> able to set ipv6 address.
Currently on internship in a multi-site company, I am studying the IPv6 transition.I have to perform several tests and i was wondering if is it was possible to make a Site-to-Site IPSec VPN with IPv6 between a Cisco Asa 5550 and a Cisco 881 router.
According to the url below, i could find that there is a separate module required for asr 9k, is it so; doesnt it sufficient to have the 4.3.0 Ios-xr version for the cgnat supoort features of nat 44, nat64, ds-lite.. like things?URL
recently migrated APs from a 4400 to 5508 which had the 7.4 code and encountered an issue that I haven't see before, in short the APs would never join the 5508 even when the selction rules said it should.The AP would get a discovery response from both controllers and even though the 4400 had 98 APs attached and the 5508 just 1 and a factory reset was made on the AP, it would always join the 4400.
A packet capture showed that the first CAPWAP address from the 5508 was always an IPv6 whilst the 4400 always sent IPv4 CAPWAP control adressess, disabling the global IPv6 option on the 5508 ensured that the the first CAPWAP control address was now an IPv4 and the AP then happily joined the controller, IPv6 addresses were still showing up in the discovery responses but since it was no longer the first one in the packet the AP didn't mind.
I am setting up a Linux apache and bind server to test the behaviour of Windows XP,Vista, 7 and Mac OS X.I have setup a apache and bind already and they were tested individually. I used Firefox and IE to access the apache page by type in the IPv6 address and the page was showed correctly. And I have tried to query the AAAA record of a local zone "testing.com" in my Bind server using nslookup and the result is good too.However, it is strange that I cannot get it work if I type in the FQDN "http://testing.com" in Firefox and IE. I tried to capture the IPv6 traffic in Wireshark (Attached in this post) and there are no DNS query when I try to access the page. Is there anything that I have to set to get it work properly?(Actually I have tested the same thing on Mac OS X and Vista too but the result is the same)Below is my Windows 7 network setting and some nslookup query:
My internet is really slow and i keep getting disconnected. the ipv6 box says local only. when i uncheck it it goes to limited my pc is running vista home premium
when i do netsh int ipv4 reset reset.log AND netsh int ipv6 reset reset.log - the command prompt says Reseting Echo Request,Failed.Access is denied.There's no user specified settings to be reset.
i tried to disable the ipv6 using the regedit and all and i restarted my pc but when i check the local network are connection and properties the ipv6 is still checked.
