I am having a bit of trouble with the following scenario; I have two 2901 ISRs and a 2924XL setup in the following fashion.
2924XL--->P2P-Fiber--->2901ISR--->P2P-Fiber--->2901ISR
I need to be able to reach the LAN 192.168.1.0 from 192.168.3.0 for TS but cannot get this to work. I can ping from within the switch all around and i can ping from within the woodlawn router all around but cannot ping host to host.
I have Cisco Catalyst 2901 switch with Sup engine which have CatOS installed. I want to know that can I install Cisco IOS in this switch.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have 1941, 2901 ISR routers. I will use 3G backup when primary link (metro ethernet / G.SHDSL) goes down. Do I have to use Data License (SL-19-DATA-K9 / SL-29-DATA-K9) in order to switch back to 3G when primary link is not reachable) ?
View 7 Replies View RelatedThe core switch is a 6506 and one of the modules is the 48port POE module. The 6506 resides in the main building and we need to interconnect two other annexes to the main building via fibre. is it possible to have just 2 sfp ports on the 48 port module or how to connect the fibre cable to the switch?
Also, if the existent network is made up of Cat5e cables would it be of anyuse to use Cat6 cables for uplink for the switches on each segment to the core switch. I feel basically the Cat5e would nullify the speed of the Cat6 or am i wrong and this would make uplink speed faster.
This is an easy question for all the architechs and designers out there. I have a stack of 3508-XL switches and one of them failed. we have 2 spares but hese are more than 10 years old and have reaced EoL.What is the equivalent switch of a 3508-xl replacement today?
View 11 Replies View RelatedI was checking some things on my Cisco 4500 and spot checking some of the ports. Using CNA it says it is at 10. The web browser to the switch says Full-duplex, 1000Mb/s, link type is auto, media type is 10/100/1000-TX on port 6i/18 The CNA says, so what would cause the difference?
View 3 Replies View RelatedWe are using CISCO 4507R-E switch as our core/distribution switch. Out of the 7 available slots, 3 are currently being used. Descriptions is as follows:
Slot 1: 6 Port Fiber Line Card
Slot 2: 6 Port Fiber Line Card
Slot 3: Supervisor Engine
Slot 4: Empty
Slot 5: 48 Port Copper Line Card
Slot 6: Empty
Slot 7: Empty
We want to add extra 10 Gbps fiber links (approximately 12) using slot 6 and 7.
In one location we have a HP 2510-48 port switch which we need to connect to a Cisco 3560 switch. The problem I have is that we have issues connecting fibre to the HP switch, so I have decided to attached a CAT 5 to Fibre convertor at this end and another to the cisco switch.
My question you can not connect a HP switch to a Cisco switch, is this true or do I just need to confirgure something on the ports.
Is it possible to cascade a (fiber) Dell switch to Nexus5000 as shown above ?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI just installed a 10 port Cisco SG300-10MP in my office, 9 of the ports are already in use. Connected to it are
PC
Laptop
Notebook
WIFI AP
B&W laser printer
Color inkjet printer
IP camera
Squeezebox SB3
Cat5e connection to basement HP 1810G-24 switch All of these devices are connected via a single Cat5e cable that was installed when the house was built. I had to re-terminate both ends of it when I moved in because the existing terminations were done very poorly. I have no idea how or where the cable is routed, nor what the quality of this Cat5e cable is. It did pass a test using my cable tester.
This single Cat5e is connected to my main HP switch in the basement equipment rack. Both of these switches have mini-GBIC ports that can utilize SFP transceivers and fiber. I priced out 2 MGBSX1 compatible modules along with a 30M multimode fiber patch 'cable' online at under $150. Although it would require at least a couple hours of work (including digging around in the attic and crawl space and drilling some holes), but running the fiber to the basement is very doable.
My question to my far more experienced forum members is if the performance gains would be worth the effort?My server is in the basement, and despite having an Intel GB NIC in my PC I am seeing read speeds of ~23MBs and writes of ~49MBs to/from my it. My server has teamed GB NICs (802.3ad LACP Layer 2) connected to trunked (LACP) ports on my HP switch.
I'd like to use an SG200 swicth to allocate bandwidth on a 100 Mbps fiber Internet uplink.I will have 5 routers (each supporting a separate network) connected to the SG200, and I'd like to give each network 20 Mbps. QOS configuration, best CIR and CBS settings for this.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI had a strange issue yesterday when onsite installing a new access switch.Port capacity full on a two switch stack of 3750 x48 PS switches (WS-C3750- 48PS-E)- New 2960 x48 PS - WS-C2960S-48FPS-L racked, with the plan of using it just as an edge switch via SFP Stacking cable.Setup the two connecting ports with simple initial config: - switchport mode trunk- no encapsulation option on the 2960, default dot1q- dot1q set on 3750 port- no shut on both sides.Connected the SFP Stacking cable but it didnt work:- %PHY-4-SFP_NOT_SUPPORTED: The SFP in Gi1/0/1 is not supported
This is ok as I had a backup:- Next step tried using 2 x Short Haul SFP SX GBIC's with LC - LC OFNP 50/125 fibre patch lead - no joy- Extra backup of 2 x Long Haul SFP LX GBIC's with the same fibre patch - no joy- Checked the fibre and it was not a cross over so transmit and receive going down the same side, switchedand still would not come up.- Used Fibre as a straight through and still the same.In all cases there was no indication of any life in the connection.It is pointing to a faulty fibre patch lead but I know it has worked in the past. Could it be something to do with the config or device incompatibility? Or any setting I need to activate?
I have a requirement to connect two 3750 switch with 10G speed between two sites with 150km distance. We will lay-out our own fiber (48 core) between two sites. I just want to consult the following:
1. Could i use two core switch 6500 with single mode fiber as a transport equipment?
2. Or i need to use SDH equipment because of the distance concern? If so do i need a repeater?Could i use Cisco Metro Core ONS, which one?
3. Any other option to achieve this requirement?
i run a web server out of my home hosting a website that can get several hundred people visiting simultaneously. im currently attempting to upgrade my DD-WRT flashed WRT54G V2 router with a cisco rv120w in order to sustain more simultaneous connections (existing router locks up after a few hundred). due to the amount of spam i get on my forum, particularly from IPs originating from asia pacific networks, i block all access from those IPs utilizing the IP address and CIDR. the rv120w has starting IP and ending IP to apply a rule to, but id like to block using my existing addresses from asia pacific networks with their applicable CIDR.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe typically use the 2602 series AP in lightweight mode, however I have a scenario where we are going to be installing one with the stand-alone software. I understand that we will not be able to utilze certain features that you get with the WLC such as RRM, rogue detection, and clean air.
We do want to utilze both the 2.4GHZ and 5GHZ bands. In order to do this with the 2602 stand-alone AP, will we have to configure 2 separate SSID's? I really do not want to do this to if I do not have to to minimize confusion for clients.
I had an interesting issue utilizing a monitoring software for our routers and switches. The monitoring tool indicated a few switches were down, however was unable to ping or telnet into them from the computer I had the software installed on.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI want to configure 5585x Active/Standby with 2 nexus switches utilizing VPC technology. New ASA 8.4 supports etherchannel so I want to plugin 2 cables from ASA1 to sw1 and sw2 and 2 cables from ASA2 to sw1 and sw2? Is this a valid design? how would I configure that? Any design document on that?
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe have the Linksys E4200v2 router. We have two servers on our network that we want to access remotely (from outside). We have two Static IPs from our ISP. We currently utilize one of those IPs to access one of the servers-no problem. How can we utilize the second IP to access the second server?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI am trying to connect a SF200-48 switch via Mini-GBIC MGBLX1 fibre module to a Cisco 3750 switch with a GLC-SX-MM fibre module installed both running a 1000 Mbps. When connected together they do not enable. Are there compatibility restrictions or is it that the Mini-GBIC modules cannot be used to uplink to a LAN?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI notice that my Cisco switches have 2 fiber GBIC ports on them each and while i have been around networking for quite some time i have never dug that much into fiber. So after some quick googlefu i learned that there is lots of different types and compatibility problems.
The 2 switches i would like to connect are a WS-C3550-12T and a WS-C3550-48-EM.From what i have read these are 1000-base-fx?
What ISO do I need to purchase to get Cisco IOS Firewall on a Cisco 2901 - is it just IP Base or do I need one of the Security IOSs?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a 1-Port 3rd Gen Multiflex Trunk Voice/WAN Int. Card - T1/E1 in a 2901 that I want to configure for data only (T1 connection to the Internet)I don't see any options in the IOS for using this thing as a serial interface (data), only options for configuring PRI/ISDN.
View 5 Replies View RelatedThe license has been installed onto the router. Here is the relevant out from the show license all:
License Store: Primary License StorageStoreIndex: 0 Feature: ipbasek9 Version: 1.0 License Type: Permanent License State: Active, In Use License Count: Non-Counted License Priority: MediumStoreIndex: 1 Feature: WAAS_Express Version: 1.0 License Type: Permanent License State: Active, Not in Use License Count: Non-Counted License Priority: Medium
WAAS license as it says that this is not in use, WAAS under the interface is not possible.
I am trying to come up with a config for implementing QoS over a 512 kbps WAN link that will traverse voice and data traffic for now. I am using a Cisco 2901 router with 15.1(3)T IOS on it. my config is below
class-map match-any DATA-PRIORITY match protocol citrix match protocol sshclass-map match-any VOICE-CONTROL match protocol skinny match protocol mgcp match protocol h323class-map match-any VOICE match protocol rtp audio class-map match-any ANY match any [ code]...
THE ISSUE IS : when i add in the service-policy output WAN- QOS- POLICY command , i get the error " insufficient bandwidth 256kbps for bandwidth guarantee (180)". if i take out the " bandwidth 512 " command out then i get no issues adding the above command on interface g0/1
I have a Cisco ASA and a 2901 Cisco Router connected via site-to-site VPN. The ASA can ping over the VPN to computers behind the router, but the router can not always ping to computers in the ASA network. When i ping from a computer in the IOS router's 10.100.36.0 network the requests times out most the time; although every few minutes, i will get about 10 pings back, then stops working again.
I uploaded their two configurations.
The ASAs public IP is 20.20.20.5 and local (inside) network of 10.101.36.0/24
The IOS routers public IP is 20.20.20.10
There are many internal networks, but 10.100.36.0/24 is the one with issues.
I try to make a gre tunnel with 2 cisco routers 2901, ping responds between tunnel ip's ends, but I don't have pings from the pc's inside the networks. [code]
View 7 Replies View RelatedHow do I disable fragmentation on a 2901 router? I want it to simply drop packets oversized packets.In my lab, I am trying to test various MTU issues. I'm trying to use a 2901 router to simulate the WAN equipment that my WAN provider would deploy in production. In production i'm expecting the WAN to only support an MTU of 1320 with no fragmentation at all.
View 2 Replies View RelatedPhysical devices are a Cisco 2901 (CISCO2901/K9) with GE0/0 configured as 192.168.1.1
Connected through a D-Link DGS-1210-24 configured as 192.168.1.202
Running on a domain with an HP domain server as 192.168.1.2
The 2901 was an EHWIC (VA-DSL-A oPoTS) on EHWIC 0/0/0
GE 0/0 on the 2901 is physically connected to the DGS-1210 which is physically connected to the server.
VDSL 0/0/0 is physically connected to the DSL jack.
So far the configuration reports all is connected, and I can ping the gateway of our ISP (using CLI or Cisco CP); however the server reports no internet connection and no workstations can access the 'net.
Once connected; I'd also like to allow ports through for use on the network (25, 80, 110, 443, 987, 1723) - but not sure on how to do that just yet!
Our IP is 202.27.19x.19x
Our Gateway is 202.27.217.5
[Code] ......
I have recently bought cisco 2901 in order to replace it with our 1811W that we have at the moment.When I try to set a failover / backup with rtr; it seems like the function is not valid.Once I select rtr and set the object #, the reachability command is not available.Does that mean this function is not a part from the license package I have?
View 6 Replies View RelatedI have inherited a setup for a custom application and would like to know if this is the only way this could be set up. How would you do it?The application uses dedicated T1 links to our vendors. There is a Cisco 2901 router in the middle providing the connections. Traffic to specific vendor's IP's are routed to their prospective connections. I have attached a network diagram and a config for the 2901. The way my predecessor(s) set this up, each different vendor uses a different private IP address for the internal links. This seems odd to me. Shouldn't there be a way to have only one subnet on the inside and have the links NAT depending on which route it takes? The servers have persistent routes built in them to send vendor traffic to the associated IP on the router. E.g., traffic to Vendor 1 is routed to 192.168.50.1, the 2901's IP address for the Vendor 1 network. That traffic is then NAT'd to an IP address associated with Vendor 1's link and the 2901 then routes the traffic to the Vendor's end of the link.
I would think that I should be able to revamp this so that internally we're only using one subnet and the traffic could NAT at the link associated with the Vendor. I recently had to add the 3rd vendor connection, and wound up having to duplicate what was done for the other two in order to get it working quickly. I didn't have the time to wrap my head around the best way to revamp the whole thing.
I recently obtained a 2901 router running 15.2(2)T to replace my old 877 which was running 15.1(4)M1. The 2901 is humming along quite nicely but I have had difficulty configuring one feature which was working fine on the 877. The router needs to be a PPTP client to a hosted VPN service. On the 877, I had it configured like this: [code] I then had a dialer interface to actually set up the connection, and some PBR to control what went over the VPN. All well and good, and it worked fine. But on the 2901, when I try to configure the same thing, there is no such command as "protocol pptp" -- the only option is protocol l2tp.Was PPTP support deprecated somwhere between 15.1 and 15.2, or does the 2901 itself not support it for some reason? Obviously I understand that l2tp is superior to pptp, but at the moment this is my only option.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have one router 1841 in which i configured PBR for internet traffic from LAN. I hv two ISPs few server are configured for ISP1 and few for ISP2.I planned to shift my existing setup at 2901 G2 router. when I am configuring the same config on this router so traffic is passing through only from one ISP not from other, if I troubleshoot so I see that the interface which is connected with ISP2 is not getting any input/output packet.
Config is here:
==========
interface FastEthernet0/0
description ****** ISP2 ******
ip address 203.xx.xx.110 255.255.255.248
[Code].......
I try to make a gre tunnel with 2 cisco routers 2901, ping responds between tunnel ip's ends, but I don't have pings from the pc's inside the networks.
[code]....