I'm trying to make multihoming on cisco 892 router.I Managed to build configuration which works as I wanted but I ran into problem which I can't solve till now.I'm trying to do port forwarding on cisco with 2 working WAN interfaces.
Configuration:
interface FastEthernet8
description ISP_B
ip address 192.168.150.10 255.255.255.0
ip nat outside
[Code]...
I am looking for a simple router recomendation for multihoming dual 100Mbps internet connections with BGP routing. What are the current best practices regarding required resources for the full Internet BGP routing table? We were thinking of specing a 3945 for this application, but is that overkill? The customer has a 2821 that is not in use, I'm thinking this would be too slow for Internet BGP routing combined with the 100Mbps line speed.
View 4 Replies View RelatedCurrently we have a 50mb pipe with our carrier SONIC. We have signed another contract with another provider here in town (Charter) to multihome our Internet connections in an active/active configuration. We have leased our /24 space through our carrier SONIC. ARIN has already approved our org-ID for an ASN and they will be sending us that once the billing portion is finished.
There a few design considerations I was hoping I could get some insight from the community on.. Before I start, the ultimate goal for us to use BOTH Internet connections in an active/active configuration - utilizing both pipes..
Disclaimer: I have gathered this design from a lot of other posts that have somewhat of a similiar topology with ASA-->3750-->router pair-->CPE--internet...
What kind of routes should I get from each carrier? I have been told that partial/partial routes plus a default route form each carrier is the way to go. Also, I've heard mention that full routes from both carriers are preferred. My ASR1001's can support ~500k routes. I know the global table is approximately ~337k routes. My goal is to use both pipes and use the best outbound path per carrier.
We will be leasing our /24 space from SONIC. I plan on running OSPF on the DC-Edge-SW1 in conjunction with iBGP - so I can default originate two equal cost routes back to my ASA. My confusion is when the traffic hits DC-Edge-SW1, there will be default equal-cost iBGP routes to both ASR1001's (DC-Edge-RT1 & DC-Edge-RT2). If the switch does not have the BGP table, it will just load-share across both ASR's. When the traffic hits the ASR's, will they know which carrier has the best path and route accordingly?
Should the iBGP connection between both routers be directly connected ? Or will it suffice through the L3 3750 connection? Also, with the limitations on the routes for the ASR1001 at ~500k. If we end up getting full routes from carriers and create a iBGP neighborship between both routers, will this exceed the route limitations on this platform? On both routes, I will have the network statement 'network 12.231.69.0 mask 255.255.255.0.' This is a leased network from SONIC, and we NAT everything on our ASA to 12.231.69.10. My question is, will this be a problem broadcasting this network from our AS to both carriers AS? Refer to bgp-design.jpg - is it a requirement that I use our leased public subnet 12.231.69.0/24 for the interfaces from ASA5510 -> 3750 -> ASR1001?
I would like to know both Cisco 2901 or 2921 router and Cisco 5505 ASA can build site to site VPN.
1) what is the different to build site to site VPN between router and firewall ?
2) which is the best choice if using in site to site VPN connection ?
hsrp+bgp+site to site vpn on router 2811.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a Cisco 2911 router and a Cisco RV 120W router and i would like to establish a VPN tunnel between theese two. I have defined the settings on the Cisco RV 120W router and i just want the Cisco 2911 to follow those. setting up a connection with Cisco IOS.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI need to configure a site-to-site VPN using a Cisco 881 router on my end and connecting to an ASA5510 on my suppliers end.Our supplier has configured their end and I do not have access to their configuration.
They told us we have to NAT all inside address' to a single address (192.168.89.1) as this is the only one they will let through their firewall/tunnel.I know how to set up the VPN but not too sure how to set up the NAT part.
My sanatized config is attached. The code I am using to NAT my inside network to the single address 192.168.89.1, and send all traffic accross the VPN tunnel as this address is correct? With the router running this config the VPN tunnel does not connect.
I have an issue with 2 site to site VPN tunnels from a RV042G router. The issue is for both VPN tunnels is that in the logs, it is showing that when the RV042G router is trying to establish the tunnel, it is getting a response from the remote gateway internal address and not the Public address of the remote gateways. On the remote gateways I have other site to site VPN's terminating fine and the tunnels are passing traffic. I only have an issue with the RV042. On the VPN Tunnel page it shows for both tunnels waiting for connection. This is an output from the log of the RV042G
Dec 17 15:19:48 2012VPN Log(g2gips0) #2174: sending encrypted notification INVALID_ID_INFORMATION to 203.43.XX.XXX:500 Dec 17 15:19:48 2012VPN Log(g2gips0) #2174: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Receive Main Mode 6th packet Dec 17 15:19:48 2012VPN Log(g2gips0) #2174: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Receive Main Mode 6th packet Dec 17 15:19:48 2012VPN Log(g2gips0) #2174: Peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: '126.0.21.52' Dec 17 15:19:48 2012VPN Log(g2gips0) #2174: we require peer to have ID '203.43.XX.XXX', but peer declares '126.0.21.52' Dec 17 15:19:48 2012VPN Log(g2gips0) #2174: we require peer to have ID '203.43.XX.XXX', but peer declares '126.0.21.52' Dec 17 15:19:48 2012VPN Log(g2gips0) #2174: sending encrypted notification INVALID_ID_INFORMATION to 203.43.XX.XXX:500 Dec 17 15:39:50 2012VPN Log(g2gips1) #2192: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Receive Main Mode 6th packet Dec 17 15:39:50 2012VPN Log(g2gips1) #2192: Peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: '10.1.202.65' Dec 17 15:39:50 2012VPN Log(g2gips1) #2192: we require peer to have ID '203.47.XXX.XX', but peer declares '10.1.202.65' Dec 17 15:39:50 2012VPN Log(g2gips1) #2192: we require peer to have ID '203.47.XXX.XX', but peer declares '10.1.202.65' Dec 17 15:39:50 2012VPN Log(g2gips1) #2192: sending encrypted notification INVALID_ID_INFORMATION to 203.47.XXX.XX:500
VPN tunnel terminating on 203.43.XX.XXX is a Checkpoint firewall running R70 software version?VPN tunnel terminating on 203.47.XXX.XX is a Cisco ASA 5510 running ASA 8.2.4 software?As stated above, I have other VPN tunnels working fine. This RV042 is a replacement router as the original router suffered a power surge.
Just now my boss asked me to prepare to set up site-to-site VPN on Cisco 881 Integrated Services router to ASA 5505 router which is now running at the HQ side. I am now learning pdf file from Cisco which mention how to setup site-to-site VPN between Cisco 1812 IOS router and ASA 5505 router by using ASDM V6.1 and SDM V2.5. Can't find the paper for that Cisco 881 device.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI am trying to create a site to site VPN using a cisco 2901 and Linksys router.I have the VPN configured and connected and I can ping gateway to gateway. However, from the Cisco I can't ping any of the devices beyond the gateway.Example, from the cisco I can ping 192.168.5.254 (gateway IP address) source gig 0/1 and it works great.
However if I ping from the cisco 192.168.5.50 (end user PC) source gig 0/1 it doesn't work.I have created a client VPN and that works perfectly.Below is my config.
crypto isakmp policy 1
encr 3des
authentication pre-share
group 2
!
crypto isakmp policy 2
[code]....
I have Cisco 877 routers, with ethernet (LAN) and ADSL (external) interfaces. The ADSL interface gets dynamic IP. Is Site to Site VPN with Dynamic IP and Internet Browsing Possible on the Same Router.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI'm setting up a site-to-site VPN between two offices, Site A uses a Cisco RV110W VPN Router with a static WAN IP and local IP 192.168.1.0/24 while Site B I have set up with a Belkin N300 VPN router which also has a Static WAN IP and the local IP is set to 192.168.2.0/24
I'm able to ping from Site B (192.168.2.xxx) to Site A, however I can't communicate from Site A back to Site B.how I could go about troubleshooting this? I've been scouring the internet for 3 days trying to get to the bottom of this with no luck.
I have recently bought two CISCO routers RV220W for our main and brach office mainly for VPN tunneling. I didnt know they are routers only not modems. so I have set it up using BT 2wire Router as modem only.
I have successfuly setup the routers and manage to establish the VPN tunneling between two routers. AS bt doesnt give static WAN IP address so I have used Dyndns which works fine. although I have 5 static ip address which cannot be used for WAN unless i cahnge to one IP address even then BT tech said it will not work.
when I created the tunnel i could ping both servers with their IP only not with the names. I can ping them fine locally. I could also see the network from branch office to main office but not from main office to branch office. today when I restarted the server I cannot ping both server i mean vice versa but VPN tunnel is established. now I cannot see the network from branch office to main office as well.
Both sites running windows server 2008 standard. main office server has 6 NIC cards two wwith public and three with private ip addresses, its also runing Terminal server, exchange, file etc. the branch office has two NIC card one with private and one with public ip. Intially I could establish the VPN tunnel as the network range was same on both sites so I changed one in th e10.0.0.0 range other in 192.168.1.0 range and VPN tunnel was established straightaway.
As soon as the VPN tunnel was created I manage to creat an external trust without any problems and both servers are added in each other forward zones as name servers.
in the main office the fues went off and I had to re-start the router and now the VPN tunnel is not establishing, mainly the error is ISAKMP-SA Expired I will paste the log of both routers below
1. How to Clear Old or Existing Security Associations (Tunnels) on RV220W
2. how to fix the problem where I can ping the server with their IP as well as domain names ?
3. how to set it up so that both sides can see the network resources as well as access it ?
4. how to set it up so if the staff in branch office wants to log on the domain in main office he can simply do it as he does it in his office.
how to configure a site to site tunnel using IKEv2 between our offices using an ASA 5515-X and a Cisco 3925 router running IOS 15.2 Connecting ASA to ASA and ASA to Router via IKEv1 works fine. Want to take advantage of the improvements in IKEv2 but I'm having difficulty with the ikev2 setup on the router. Here is the pertinent ASA side config--
ASA IP: 5.5.5.5
Router IP: 10.10.10.10
crypto ipsec ikev2 ipsec-proposal AES256
protocol esp encryption aes-256
protocol esp integrity sha-1
[Code].....
I was traying to make a site to site VPN between a cisco 1800 router and cisco asa 5510. But it was impossible to get it. [code]
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a requirement to create a site to site vpn tunnel on ASA 5510 from a remote site to my HO, ihave already other site-to-site tunnels are up and running on the ASA.The issue is my remote site has got the network address which falls in one of the subnet used in HO(192.168.10.0/24).My requirement is only My remote site need to accees couple of my servers in HO which is in 192.168.200.0/24 subnet.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a new WRVS4400N configured with a site to site VPN to connect to my office. At the office, we're running a Cisco PIX 515E. I have successfully established an IKE preshared key and the tunnel is listed as Up. I can successfully connect through the VPN tunnel into the office network through the tunnel and all seems good. After some period of time, the tunnel apparently goes into a bad state. Access to the office network is no longer available. When looking at the VPN status screen, the Linksys indicates that the tunnel is up. However, I cannot ping any resources on the office lan. If I disconnect and connect the site to site VPN tunnel, it connects and comes back up successfully. It seems like there is some sort of timeout taking place here. I am running the 1.1.03 firmware.
View 7 Replies View Relatedhow to configure a site-to-site VPN between RV042 router and 1941 router?
View 0 Replies View RelatedI'm setting up site to site VPN on a RV110W router. The administrator guide site to site instructions don't match the options on the router.The first step tells you to click on VPN then Basic VPN Setup. The router under the VPN option only has three choices, (1) VPN Clients, (2) Certificate Management and (3) VPN Passthrough. I have upgraded to the latest firmware 1.0.0.9.
View 4 Replies View Relatedwhat is going on message" MM_NO_STATE ". i'm not clear about this for documents they said that MM_NO_STATE-The Internet Security Association and Key Management Protocol (ISAKMP) SA has been created but nothing else has happened yet."but i still don't know that is the main problem? Note: i used Cisco router 2821 and Cisco router 1841 ( and configure VPN site to site)
View 4 Replies View RelatedI'm looking to configure a DMVPN spoke with a Site to Site VPN Connection to a different destination than the DMVPN. I'm using a Cisco 2800 router. When I add the crytpo map to the outside interface for the Site to Site VPN. The DMVPN drops. Is there something I could be missing? The Tunnel interface for the DMVPN has the shared optioin applied to the tunnel protect ipsec profile.
View 6 Replies View RelatedI have a remote office with a dual WAN router (2911) in front of an ASA (5510). Our main office currently has an ipsec site to site vpn to that remote office ASA. The router has two ISPs. ISP-A is the wan link used for the site to site and has provided us with a /28 public address space which we use on the ASA outside interface for the site to site. Now we are in the process of getting a second ISP which will also provide a /28 or /29 public address space. I would like to use that second ISP for backing up the site to site in case ISP-A link goes down. I think I have the IP SLA config worked out. My question involves NAT. On the router I would like to configure a static nat that only takes place if ISP-A goes down. In other words, if everything is working fine, then the router does not nat the ASA outside address, but if the ISP-A link goes down, then the router will NAT the ASA outside address to one of ISP-B provided public addresses.
View 6 Replies View RelatedI have two Cisco ASA routers and I have a site to site vpn set up between the two. The VPN link works but Site A can't ping anything on Site B. Site B can ping Site A. Site B can ping other pcs on it's own network. Site A has been in place for a while and has other site to site VPNs that work fine, so I think the problem is with Site B. Here is the config for Site B:
Result of the command: "show running-config"
: Saved
:
ASA Version 8.4(4)1
!
hostname SaskASA
enable password POgOWyKyb0jgJ1Hm encrypted
passwd 2KFQnbNIdI.2KYOU encrypted
names
[code]....
I have an offsite employee at an apartment complex where she uses the leasing offices internet connection. I have an ASA 5505 but I don't know how to make this work behind the leasing offices router and other network equipment. Is there any way to have her connect back to our corporate network using site to site vpn without touching the leasing office devices? She needs VoIP and corporate server access.
View 3 Replies View Relatedis this possible to configure ipsec site to site vpn with redundancy using 2 cisco router 881?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI try configure VPN site to site, with ASA 5520 and Ruter 891.The topology is LAN-->ASA 5520-->INTERNET<--ROUTER 891<--LAN.
The configuration of the VPN site to site on ASA5502 is UP, but in Router 891, I dont understand the commands. url...
I have created a VPN site to site tunnel between Pix and Router. I have pix in my control but router is under Client control. I have done everthing I need to do but I am getting errors.
When I run sh isakmp sa , I get .
Total : 1
Embryonic : 0
dst src state pending created
x.x.x.x x.x.x.x QM_IDLE 0 0
When I run sh ipsec sa , I get...
local ident (addr/mask/prot/port): (10.0.0.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
remote ident (addr/mask/prot/port): (x.x.x.x/255.255.255.255/0/0)
current_peer: x.x.x.x:0
PERMIT, flags={origin_is_acl,}
#pkts encaps: 0, #pkts encrypt: 0, #pkts digest 0
[code].....
I have a HQ with two branches, the HQ contains one 3900 ISR router with two WAN connections, the two branche sites each one contains one 2900 ISR wth two WAN connections for each router.
i need to establish a site to site vpn with GRE between the HQ and the two branches, so is it possible to
1-for HQ: i need to configure site to site VPN to the branches using the both WAN connections on the HQ Router like if one site to site vpn is down the other one will be on and works as High Availabilty.
2- same for the branch offices i want use both wan connections with HA in site to site vpn to the HQ.
3-using GRE for routing after configuring IPSEC VPN.
I am trying to set up a Site to Site between two RV042 with static IP at both routers.at the log at site 1 i get: packet from XX.XXX.XX.167:5: initial Main Mode message received on 10.2.32.1:500 but no connection has been authorized with policy=PSK.At site 2 i get: packet from xxx.xxx.xxx.146:500: initial Main Mode message received on 192.168.1.1:500 but no connection has been authorized with policy=PSK.I have tuned off the firewall and added a Port forwarding to the router ip and port 500.Tried with different autentication methods, but get the same message.
View 1 Replies View RelatedOn my 2911 router, can I have both an Easy VPN server, and a site-to-site VPN? Also, with an Easy VPN, is it possible to specify another internet (outside) IP address in my assigned range as the address remote users use . . . rather than the specific IP address assigned to the interface?
View 3 Replies View RelatedWe have ordered a pair of Cisco ASA5520 (ASA5520-BUN-K9).Now there is a requirement to terminate site-to-site VPN from remote site. Do we need VPN plus licence for this and how much it cost?
View 1 Replies View RelatedThe scenario where a Site to Site VPN tunnel has been established between Site A and Site B. Lan on Site A can ping Lan on Site B. My problem is a Printer behind Site B needs to be accessed by using the WAN IP address of Site A. Also i could not ping the remote lan or printer from the router.
Below are my configure on the Cisco 877 in site A.
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 5425 bytes
!
! Last configuration change at 15:09:21 PCTime Fri Jun 15 2012 by admin01
!
version 12.4
no service pad
[code]....
cisco products and am struggling getting a VPN going between an ASA 5505 and 5510. I have a VPN created (using the VPN wizward on both) and it shows the VPN is up, but I can't ping the remote site (from either side).
View 11 Replies View Related