Cisco WAN :: To Connect Cisco 1800 And HWIC-2T
Dec 27, 2012
I have the CISCO 1800 and I have there the HWIC-2T. I have two questions.First is an easy one. I want to replace the HWIC-2T with HWIC-4T but the CISCO 1800 guide and the HWIC-4T guide says that they dont fit together but I inserted the HWIC-4T in to the CISCO 1800 it recognized him with all the 4 Smart Serial ports that it hase. The question is, how can I check if the CISCO 1800 supports the HWIC-4T?Second question is how can I configure one of the Smart Serials in the HWIC-2T/4T to comunicate with the X.25 Protocol? What I have now is at one end CISCO 1800 and at the other end CISCO 2800 and they are comunicating with each other throught one of the Smart Serials they have. I want to connect to each one of then an old pc that comunicate only with X.25 and I want this two computers to comunicate with each other throught those two routers.
View 2 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jul 13, 2011
I have recently bought two 1800 cisco routers and have tried to connect them over wan serial link, but I am having problems when trying to access resources on the other side. I am a newbie to cisco and I wonder if the problem is with the configuration or the new routers or the serial link between the sites. Below is the show-running config results I have done on both routers; I can ping the serial interfaces from both sides and remotely, but I can't ping hosts or FE from other side.
View 8 Replies
View Related
Nov 13, 2012
i have 2 routers 2821 with wic-2t serical card and 1921 with hwic-2t serial card.can i connect between those two serials card with serial cross cable ?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 2, 2011
How Can I connect two router with one HWIC-4ESW card , I have Problem with this because when I tried to do , I received the message I can´t configure IP address on L2. The idea is to connect two routers with /30.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 30, 2011
we bought the Cisco 1921 ISR with the HWIC-1GE-SFP to get a router that would be able to connect via fiber to our switches. I called Cisco and their reps recommended this router/HWIC pair to me.
I have got the basic configuration out of the way and I have discovered my router with CCP, now I would like to know how I can configure this HWIC. I have the SFP(GLC-SX-MM= ) installed correctly and it is connected to our test switch via an LC/LC cable, but when I do 'show ip interface" all ports are down except the one my workstation connects directly to the router with (gigabit0/1).
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jun 12, 2013
What is the difference between HWIC-1ADSL-M and HWIC-1ADSL without the "-M"?Can either of the above ADSL cards be used in Cisco 3845 router? We are using HWIC-1ADSL-M in our Cisco 3845 routers everywhere?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 19, 2012
Cisco 1800 router SNR at 3db
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 23, 2011
My boss want me to configure a cisco router 1800 series to an IP VPN, but I don't know how to configure a router with an IP VPN...
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 14, 2011
Imagine organization has about 300 partners. Currently data center has 100 Cisco 1800 routers to accept P2P connections for each partner.
Now organization proposal is:
- Use MPLS and use an extranet network. Advertise a certain unique route to each partner..
- Grant unique VPN ID for each partner and VRF Lite at the data center. Then bring each partner with separate tagged VLAN to the data center via MPLS.
Can VRF Lite scale to more than 300+ partners OK?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 28, 2012
I have an existing 1800 router that is using NAT and VPN to HQ. I now have a new ISP provider and so now i need to chane the Fastethernet1 IP address. I know how to do that but what else do I need to change to make everything continue to work?
View 10 Replies
View Related
Jan 25, 2011
How can I use a 1800 router as a firewall. I want also the router be able to make VPN.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 15, 2012
I have a client that has 6 public IP addresses. He needs to use 3 of them. One for workstations which is currently working fine. It is using the default gateway IP. One for a email/web server which has a statis NAT and is also working fine. But we need an additional NAT but it is for 3 servers that all need to go out as the smae public IP. I am not sure and been unsuccessful getting those to go out as the same IP. I either cannot get them to exit the same IP or it breaks the workstation NAT.
Workstations would be 10.0.0.100 - 200 going oput the FE1 interface or I think x.x.94.122
Email would be 10.0.0.5 going out the statis NAT of x.x.94.123
I then need 10.0.0.2 - 4 to go out x.x.94.124
I removed some ACLs and IP info for security. Attached is the current config.
interface FastEthernet0
description $ETH-WAN$$FW_OUTSIDE$
ip address x.x.4.240 255.255.255.0
[Code]....
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 28, 2011
I don't know much about routers, but lately I've been playing around with router configuration and getting better but I am kind of stuck now.
The scenario is this.
I have 3 ip net from the ISP:
178.249.51.0/255.255.255.248 Gateway 178.249.51.1
178.249.51.8/255.255.255.248 Gateway 178.249.51.9
178.249.51.16/255.255.255.248 Gateway 178.249.51.17
[Code]....
I am also wondering - when we get more public IP net from the ISP, is this the correct way to do it?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Sep 24, 2012
My team already bought one 1800 Series router. And they setted some passwor.
Right now i am not able to login. I know the cisco password recovery method to reset the password.
Instead of password recovery method i want to try with total factory default setting.
is there is any method to do factory default without login
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jun 9, 2013
load balancing and automatic failover between two isp
View 13 Replies
View Related
Sep 3, 2012
What commands do I need to enter to correctly authenticate with my DSL PPPOE provider? I need to have the ID and Password entered into the router.
View 19 Replies
View Related
Aug 29, 2012
I have a cisco 1801 router that is not prompting for enable password.After loging into router thru telnet it puts direct into privelege mode without promting for enable password.Here is the configuration:
User Access Verification
Username: adminPassword:xxxxx#sh runBuilding configuration...
Current configuration : 2132 bytes!version 12.4service timestamps debug datetime msecservice timestamps log datetime msecservice password-encryption!hostname xxxxxx!boot-start-markerboot-end-marker!enable password 7 022F0A5D0208063555692B!no aaa new-model!!dot11 syslog!!ip cefno ip dhcp use vrf connectedip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.0.1 192.168.0.10!ip dhcp pool LAN import all network 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 default-router 192.168.0.1!!!multilink bundle-name authenticated!!username admin privilege 15 password 7 112017031E1C02181Dusername user privilege 3 password 7 091D1C5A100B111B05051033!!archivelog config hidekeys!!!!!interface ATM0no ip addressno atm ilmi-keepalivepvc xxxxx
[code].....
View 7 Replies
View Related
Oct 18, 2011
I'm troubleshooting an issue with a new site-to-site vpn setup between 1800 series routers. The tunnel is up but not encrypting traffic on one router, when IP CEF is disabled traffic is encrypted and decrypted!
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 24, 2011
I am trying not to run before i can walk,.. so first thing I'm trying to do is ping out to a DNS server in the internet: 212.135.1.36 from my internal network.
- If I put a default gateway on my router, and set to 172.16.32.254 (Firewall Vlan100 interface) and ping,.. it works fine from my router.
- If put a default gateway on my switch below the router as 172.16.32.252 (VLAN100 interface of the router) and ping from the switch it doesnt work.
I assume its getting to the switch as I can ping the 172.16.32.252 from the switch so the router is dropping the packets... my question is why!?
Once this bit works,.. the intention is to route any external bound traffic that comes from VLAN100 to 172.16.32.254, external bound traffice from VLAN200 to 172.16.64.254 etc etc
[Code] .....
View 5 Replies
View Related
Feb 21, 2011
We are going to purchase a Device , thte sites and also VPN server for remote access ( EzVPN), Should we use ASA or should we use Cisco 1800 series router with security software. The main purpose of this device is to terminate all VPN connections ( Site-to-site) and remote access.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 12, 2011
I have the following network connected and configured to a single Cisco 1800 router.
VLAN 2 (10.1.20.0/24)
|
int vlan2, ip address 10.1.20.1
|
Cisco 1800 ----- int fa0, public ip address ---- Internet
|
int vlan3, ip address 10.1.30.1
|
VLAN 3 (10.1.30.0/24)
VLAN 2 is server vlan with a webserver.
VLAN 3 is clients.
NAT configuration:
VLAN 2 and VLAN 3 is using NAT to access the internet, and both is configured as inside interfaces.fa0 is configured as outside interface. Now I don't know if this is about NAT, but I've tried several things without luck.
Problem:
A client in VLAN 3 tries to access a domain on the webserver in VLAN 2.It starts by sending a DNS query to a DNS server located at the ISP, and gets the ip address for the domain, which is of course a public ip address. Then nothing happens because the client tries to access the domain on the webserver using the public ip address, and the webserver have a local ip address 10.1.20.20 which is on the local LAN (VLAN 2).
I've tried NAT because I have to change the destination ip address, but I can't seem to get it right.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 3, 2012
I ahve a requirement to configure static crypto for 1800 site and I need to configure on two sepaarte interfacs at spoke site which means I need to configure 1800*2 = 3600 peers at central site. The challenge I have is due to load balancing , the traffic dynamic crypto can not be used since traffic may be initiated from Dc on other link which may get dropped incase not encrypted.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jun 27, 2012
Site A, site B, site C, site D is connected using leased line each other. We are using Cisco 1800, 2800 and 2900. Each site also have Internet connection using ADSL connected to firewall, we are using pix 501 and ASA 5510.My question is, can i use the existing ADSL line to be use as a backup line if the leased line is down on any of the site??
And i want it to trigger itself, once the leased line is down, the firewall UP the backup line? something like that..
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jul 29, 2010
I will have this one router. Its f0/0 will be for the Internet connection with bandwidth of 30Mbps. Its f0/1 will be connected to a switch for internal networks. This link will be separated to 3 VLANs for 3 internal networks. I'm wondering if there is a way to gurantee 10Mbps for each VLAN but allow use up to 30Mbps when another two VLANs are not using any Internet bandwidth? I only worry about download bandwidth from internet.The 3 internal networks will all have public IPs and they belong to their own subnets. There won't be NAT/PAT.
View 18 Replies
View Related
Mar 20, 2013
I have been given a task, where I need to create a failover setup from a 1800 Cisco router to a LAN network 2 hobs away (see topology).The reason I have been given this task is because the wireless links are not so realiably, but necessary.I'm thinking of doing this failover task with IP SLA on the routers fiber 1 and fiber 2 link, so when/if one off the links goes down, it instantly chooses the other link.I have also been thinking about implementing STP instead, and replace the router with a switch, but i'm not sure exactly how to implement it. Unfortunately I'm not able to test anything, as we are still waiting for the fiber lines, but I want to be prepared as much as possible.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Aug 28, 2012
I have a Cisco 1800 ISR router running IOS 12.4(22)T5.Clientless SSL VN is configured and working, and has three bookmarks.When logged into Clientless SSL VPN and displaying the portal page in IE-8, the bookmarks are visible and functioning as expected.When logged into Cleintless SSL VPN and displaying the portal page in FireFox-14 or Chrome-21, the bookmarks are not visible.The window for the bookmarks is displayed, but the content (file tree) is not.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 4, 2013
Leased line is between dammam to dubai and the dammam office is getting internet from dubai.The ip address of Dammam office is class A (Public IP) x.x.x.x and for dubai it is y.y.y.y which we are using as proxy for accessing internet.I purchase the local DSL direct line connection through cable from Local Provider and this ip address range is 192.168.1.0 - 192.168.1.254.Is it possible to use the DSL line as failover, so if one line goes down the user should remove proxy and can use local internet.The router which is using is cisco 1800.
I believe that failover is possible, 100%, but would like to know how I can do it and requesting for sharing more inputs about failover in this case.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 20, 2012
We have an MPLS network to a half dozen remote sites. At our main location we have a 2800 series router. In the routers config are the following lines for QOS. When I go to the routers on the other end of the MPLS, none of them are configured with these same policies. Would these not be in the running config of the 1800 series routers, or is this not setup correct and this should be removed?
View 13 Replies
View Related
Dec 22, 2010
I have configured PBR on my 1800 series router, it is working perfect. Now I am changing my router from 1800 to 2901 router with the same config, so the PBR stop working and I am not getting hits in the second WAN interface. [code]
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 12, 2013
We have 6 WAN routers connected through ISP MPLS cloud , we need to implement GET VPN between these WAN routers.We have 2 Key servers (1800 routers) , and the WAN routers will act as Group Members (6 GMs)
The attached configuration files are for working configuration for typical GETVPN (crypto map applied on WAN interface)
In Key server configuration , the crypto isakmp command is using the WAN interface IP address of each WAN router (172.16.x.x) , and since that the KS routers are connected to local backbone (VSS) , they should be able to reach 172.16.X.X , and therefore the subnet 172.16.X.X is advertised to the local network (check GM configuration file under eigrp - redist connected )
This is what our customer want to avoid ! they do not want 172.16.X.X to be advertised to the local network .I know It is possible in GETVPN configuration to configure ,the crypto isakmp command to use loopback address's of the WAN routers instead of the WAN IP , but in this case the crypto map must be applied to the loopback address , and this requires all traffic to be encrypted and decrypted to go through the loopback interfaces on all WAN routers .
i was wondering what is the best solution for this case , I though to use the below config on the GM's
View 14 Replies
View Related
Feb 24, 2011
Currently I have a 4510-48g HP3COM switch as a core switch for my 4 VLAN network (which I hope to send back cause it doesn't do what I wanted it to do... PBR, which is what I need to route specific VLAN's to specific interfaces on the sonicwall,.. cause sonicwall dont understand trunk or spanning tree,. meh!) This may not happen so I've dug out an old CISCO 1800 sdsl router that has 1 FE0 port and 8 other ports, FE 1-8.
The first thing I need to do is get everything to talk to each other. So I plugged the switch into it via its configured trunk port, and configured 4 sub interfaces on the router 1800 and all seemed happy as larry and working. The problem I have is I dont seem to be able to create sub interfaces on the other ports!?
[Code]...
View 6 Replies
View Related
Mar 1, 2012
I have aaa new model configured on a number of isr's(1800, 1900, 2900, 3800 etc). When i have aaa configured, the telnet logins use that authentication and not the password in the line vty portion. Is this by design. would disabling aaa enable both telnet and aaa authentications, essentially making it a dual login.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 19, 2012
I have an 1800 isr that is running with port forwarding only. It is running a series of ip nat inside source static address port address port commands. It does not have an access list bound to the outside interface. This is working fine, but i am wondering if this is a security concern?
View 1 Replies
View Related