Cisco Wireless :: 2504 Management Over Separate Port
Sep 25, 2012
is it possible to Manage the 2504 Controller over a separate Interface. Exmaple: Port 1 is used as controller management interface (untagged) - AP's are connected to the same VLAN Port 1 is used for Guest Traffic (VLAN 3 tagged) Port 2 should be used to manage the WLAN Controller from the internal LAN. (tested with untagged, tagged, same issue)
with this Setup it is possible to ping the Port 2 IP-Address from the internal LAN but if you try to connect to the controller, the Browser shows "Site not reachable".
I also enabled "Management via Wireless" but without success. I also tried to add the "management" VLAN as tagged on the management Interface with the same effect, the controller is not manageable from the internal LAN. On 5508 WLAN Controller i have an similar setup, but with LAG Port enabled. There this works.
The only interface were i can manage the WLAN controller is from the management Interface.
View 1 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Aug 8, 2012
My problem, in a nutshell, is that clients do not get an IP from an external DHCP server when connected to a guest VLAN.
My current setup is:
Native VLAN 1 (192.168.2.x)
2008 DHCP Servers
2504 WLC
[Code].....
The guest WLAN just uses WPA and a PSK and is set to interface vlan101 There rest of the 2504 config is default.
The ports that the WLC and APs are connected to are tagged on the correct VLANs. (is that even necessary for the AP now?)
Ive changed the interface config around a hundred times now with no luck. No matter what a client will not get an IP.
Could this be due to the 2504 and ASA both acting as DHCP relays? Ive tried setting the IP of the DHCP on the dynamic interface to many different things with no luck.
View 10 Replies
View Related
May 10, 2012
We are installing a 2504 with management on VLAN2. The management port is on interface 1 which is attached to a layer 3 3750. From other VLANs in the network we cannot manage the 2504 controller with the web manager. We are running the latest code, 7.2.103.0, since we are using 3600 APs. We have a TAC case open, but spent 3 hrs with them and they can't figure out the problem. TAC did some debugging and saw that the 2504 is ARPing for the address of the PC on the other VLAN instead of sending the packet to its default gateway. How to get success with the management interface on a VLAN and managing the controller from another VLAN?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 29, 2012
It seems like the 4-ports switch in the 2504 can only one port can be used for management VLAN at a time ? I need all 4 ports to be untagged in the managment VLAN.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Nov 5, 2012
I'm trying to separate my management traffic from regular traffic by splitting the management and "outside" interface to separate vlans but I'm hitting a routing issue. Say I have have a management network of 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 running across vlan 1 and I want to use 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 running across vlan 2 for the outside interface to send all the other traffic excluding the management traffic across. Tag both vlans on the external interface, say Eth0/0 Default route of route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.2.1, With this, you can not hit the management interface because there is no route defined for the 192.168.1.0 network. However of course if you try to set one, you'll get the "connected route exists" error. How can I set the default route or gateway of the 192.168.1.0 network on the ASA. Switches just don't complain like the ASA does.
View 8 Replies
View Related
Jan 3, 2012
I am tasked with configuring a 2504 wireless controller. Is it possible to assign an SSID to an interface that has dynamic ap management enabled?
Scenario:
Location1:
1) 10.0.0.0/24
2)192.168.0.0/24 DMZ
Location 2:
1) 10.0.5.0
Both locations are routable using network 1 at each location. However, I need to configure several access points and send them to location 2. These access points will communicate with the controller at location 1 on network 1. Two SSIDs will need to be on network 1 at location 1. The other SSID will be on Network 2 at location 1. This network is not routable.
View 32 Replies
View Related
Sep 12, 2011
I have made a seperate VRF for management.But have a strange problem with a Cisco 3750 and a Cisco 3550.When I added these to the VRF, I can not reach them on tools like Network Assistant and web interface.Telnet works, no problems there.And there is no ACLs on the device restricting this.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jan 16, 2013
My fiance recently signed up for the Screen-wise Panel for Google research. Basically they monitor your TV usage and your internet usage. As part of the program they installed a Cisco WIFI router. I've got no issue with them logging the sites visited etc but I'm a little worried about them possible collecting private information (banking / work related stuff) that I don't want going out there. According to what I've read what's supposed to happen is they replace your router with the new Cisco router.The "technician" who came in and installed the router was actually a builder and not an IT technician and rather than replace our router he connected the Cisco router into port 4 of our router... I wasn't in at the time.
What I was looking to do is separate Port 4 of my router into a separate VLAN that can access the internet, but not access anything on ports 1-3, or the wireless. However, I want to be able to see everything on port 4 from the other side (in other words I want to see "into" the port 4 VLAN, but don't want them to see out). I also wanted DHCP to assign IP addresses correctly depending on where you were plugged in. In this example the first VLAN (your current router ip address) is going to be on 192.168.1.1, and the second VLAN (the new on we create on port 4) is going to be on 192.168.2.1.This is exactly what I'm looking to do, I could then connect the kids machines / tablets / ipods to the Cisco router and have the main machine and my work laptop on the main router... but I don't have a clue how to do it. </quote> Is this something that I am able to do with the Netgear router I own and is it hard to set up?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 29, 2012
Is it possible to use a 2504 wifi controller to manage compatible AP's across different subnets ?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 5, 2012
Is it mandatory to connect Cisco WLC 2504 to a Gigabit port ?? can we connect it to a fasternet port (100 mbps) ?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 30, 2012
I have an all gigE 3560. I don't use the management FE0 port on the back. I was thinking to use that for a 100Mbps WAN connection.
Seems to work just fine when I plugged in an test. But I am not routing across that link yet as I still need to setup the far end.
Is there any reason this would not work? I would like to not burn a gig port if the max throughput of the circuit is 100Mbps.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 2, 2012
I have got ASA 5520. How to use the management port as a normal port on ASA. What are the basic reqirements for that.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 3, 2012
I'm having an issue with the 5508 management port .. I can't seem to ping it from the switch connected to it .. ( the Show cdp command shows that the two can see each other .. but no ping is possible ! [code]
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 28, 2012
I created a wlan just for our wireless IP phones.I assigned an interface I created which in turn was set to a specific port on company 2504 WLC. Connecting switchport is set to trunk. Right now I can't ping the voice wlan interface.
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 6, 2013
I have 2 x 5508 Wireless Controllers, 1 mgmt port on each as standard. I noticied something different between these controllers running the same code.I can bound a physical port to the mgmt interface on one controller but not the other (both interfaces are untagged)see below, this config appears on one controller but not the other? Is this something to do with the initial setup? How can I add Phyiscal information to the other controller mgmt interface, I cannot delete the mgmt interface. Physical InformationPort Number Backup Port Active Port Enable Dynamic AP Management?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 25, 2013
Region : Malaysia
Model : TD-W8968
Hardware Version : V1
Firmware Version : 0.6.0 1.1 v0005.0 Build 120926 Rel.27100n
ISP : TM
The Remote Management Port is not working correctly. For whatever port I set, it will uses port 80 to access.
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 17, 2011
I've read some conflicting things on the new 2504 WLC's. Some things indicate all 4 ports are fully useable, while others indicate perhaps only 1 or 2. I think I've read in product documentation that it support a max of two ap-manager interfaces. Does, for sure, all 4 ports are useable? I'm thinking of the following configuration:
Port 1: management interface and first ap-manager interface
Port 2: second ap-manager interface
Port 3: first dynamic/client interface
Port 4: second dynamic/client interface
I'm planning on deploying my ap's in h-reap mode with a max of 25 ap's per 2504. Since I'm using h-reap, bandwidth shouldn't be much of an issue so I'm also considering trimming it down to using just two physical ports as follows so I can take up fewer gig switchports which are scarce at many of my locations:
Port 1: management interface and first ap-manager interface
Port 2: first and second dynamic/client interface
I've always deployed 4400's and 5508's with LAG so I haven't had to think about this much until now.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Apr 24, 2012
I have a question about 2504 deployment.Two WLC's , one will be acting as primary controller, second as secondary controller.
There will be two firewalls with High Availability between them. Ok, if primary controller will go down, we would need to wait about 2minutes, and AP's would join secondary controller.
But if there is a problem with firewall? Etc. FW 1 goes down. Is it possible with WLC 2504 to use it's second port as backup port ? And use the same IP address between them?
Because if we configure the second port with different IP address, we would need to wait about 2minutes, because AP's is in "rejoining" mode )(To use second port as backup, but have the same IP address on it ( like put these two interfaces into the same "vlan") , because this would be really great, if one Firewall goes down, we would still will be using the same wireless controller.)
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 13, 2012
I saw that the management port for the ASR 1006 has limited routing functionality according to the documentation. I know it "may" not be best practice but can I use this as a routed interface for the WAN port to our Internet or will this not work?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 7, 2011
I have interfaces defined on the 5505:
interface Ethernet0/0
switchport access vlan 2
interface Ethernet0/1
[Code].....
I only need one interface to connect to a single host on the inside (VLAN1) and then connect E0 to a DSL.
Is it possible (are what are the commands required) to take one of the other interfaces and create a Management port on the local office LAN?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 29, 2011
I just purchased 2 SF-300 48 port units for 2 customers. I want to be able to remotely manage them over the Internet with my browser. BUT, customer sites already use port 80 for web servers. So, how do I configure this switch to use some other port than 80?
I called support, and much to my surprise he said it cannot be changed. How bizarre that a device with many hundreds of configuration settings does not have one of the most basic settings...
At one customer site I can configure port forwarding and translation to get around this problem, but the other site's router does not offer port translation..
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 14, 2012
I'm using a 2504 controller. I dont have WCS.My questions are about the best way to configure a Rogue Detector AP.
In my lab environment I setup the WLC with 2 APs. One AP was in local mode, and I put the other in Rogue Detector mode.The Rogue Detector AP was connected to a trunk port on my switch. But the AP needed to get its IP address from the DHCP server running on the WLC. So I set the native vlan of the trunk port to be the vlan on which the WLC management interface resides. If the trunk port was not configured with a native vlan, the AP couldn't get an address through DHCP, nor could the AP communicate with the WLC. This makes sense because untagged traffic on the trunk port will be delivered to the native vlan. So I take it that the AP doesn't know how to tag frames.Everything looked like it was working ok.
So I connected an autonomous AP (to be used as the rogue), and associated a wireless client to it. Sure enough it showed up on the WLC as a rogue AP, but it didn't say that it was connected on the wire. From the rogue client I was able to successfully ping the management interface of the WLC.
But the WLC never actually reported the rogue AP as being connected to the wired network.So my questions are:
1. What is the correct configuration for the trunk port? Should it not be configured with a native vlan? If not, then I'm assuming the rogue detector AP will have to have a static IP address defined, and it would have to be told which vlan it's supposed to use to communicate with the WLC.
2. Assuming there is a rogue client associated with the rogue AP, how long should it reasonably take before it is determined that the rogue AP is connected to the wired network? I know this depends on if the rogue client is actually generating traffic, but in my lab environment I had the rogue client pinging the management interface of the WLC and still wasn't being picked up as an on-the-wire rogue.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 6, 2011
i am currently trying to use LMS 3.2 Compliance management to verify and alter our access port configurations for 802.1x. Below is our current configuration
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 4, 2013
Is it possible to use the mgmt port when in rommon mode? I use the Mgmt port when IOS is loaded and it works fine. I reboot the router, issue a break to put it in rommon and have set some variables but my Mgmt port never has link and I cannot ping it from the network. In rommon mode it looks like this:
PS1=rommon ! >
MCP_STARTUP_TRACEFLAGS=00000000:00000000
BOOT=bootflash:asr1000rp1-adventerprisek9.03.07.03.S.152-4.S3.bin,1;
IP_ADDRESS=10.71.50.101
IP_SUBNET_MASK=255.255.255.0
DEFAULT_GATEWAY=10.71.50.3
BSI=0
RANDOM_NUM=1133006948
RET_2_RTS=13:38:27 EDT Wed Jun 5 2013
RET_2_RCALTS=1370453907
?=0
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 3, 2012
How does the IP address is assigned on management port of WS4507 R, syntax.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 17, 2012
It's a problem about access ASA5500 Firewall mangement port. The customer request access ASA5500 by entering the default IP address https://192.168.1.1 to monitor data tracffic in Windows 7. But after entering the default IP in IE, no any page appear.
But that way can access ASA5500 magement port successfully in Windows XP. What the different between Windows 7 and Windows XP? Is there any way or any patch can access ASA5500 manemeng port in Windows 7?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 1, 2012
Is there some kind of trick to getting the fastethernet 0 management port to come up? My adjacent switch is up/up, but fe0 is down/down. I dont' see how this could be possible. I am getting all my info remotely, but I am pretty sure it's wired up correctly.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 11, 2013
I have a brand new RV042 v3 that I just updated to the latest firmware (v4.2.1.02) and have stumbled across an anomaly... I can only access the router from the WAN port using port 80. I happen to have it set to port 8080, but that doesn't work; I have to use standard port 80.
I have two other RV042 units running older firmware and they work as expected and follow the port that is filled in. This one has me puzzled and wondering if this is a bug in the firmware.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 17, 2013
I've got a client with a Management Port set up for Out-of-Band management. Here's the configuration of the interface and some relevant static routes:
interface Management0/0
description MGT
speed 100
duplex full
nameif Mgt
[code]...
The route through Mgt interface is required as my client accesses the device from a subnet that isn't local to M0/0.Unfortunately, now any traffic originating from outside and destined to 10.48.0.0/16 is choosing the Mgt interface. I had thought that the 'management-only' keyword prevents this from happening (traffic traversing between interfaces).
There is a broad scope of /16 addresses on the 'inside' so just swapping destinations won't work (the client wants to avoid a routing table with 50+ static entries, understandably)My temporary solution was to do this:
route inside 10.0.0.0 255.128.0.0 10.38.103.1
route inside 10.128.0.0 255.128.0.0 10.38.103.1
route Mgt 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 10.38.100.254
If 'management-only' doesn't prevent traffic from using the Mgt interface, what is the point of the command?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 27, 2010
I have a cisco 6509 configured with a cisco NAM module. I have reset the config of the NAM module by the config clear command. Since this moment I can't no more ping the NAM module via the management port: OK via the 127.0.0.91 address and log in ok via the ios cli session command. [code] I have already tried to reboot the module via the ios cli hw module command and nothing better.
View 12 Replies
View Related
Aug 13, 2011
recently got a RV220W and liking all the configuration options.
Although I cannot find where to change the listening port for management? I want it to listen on port 81 instead of 80.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Nov 11, 2010
What is the point of it? It is not a remote console. If i reboot the switch i cannot get back to the out of band management port unless the switch is fully running. Is this only for security purposees? so all telnet/ssh is from an Out of band network?
View 15 Replies
View Related
Apr 7, 2011
We recently reset a 4400 controller in a school. Although all access points associated, clients could not get the Internet. On investigating we suddenly lost connection to the web interface. We tried hyperterminal connections to reset, but found that the managament interface had the ports "unconfigured". We finally reset the configuration, and when we tried to start from scratch it now does not allow a port designation. It asks for 1 or 0 but says both are invalid when entered.
View 2 Replies
View Related
