although cisco sw advisor said that the best IOS for my hardware 6509 Sup720 IOS: (s72033_rp-IPSERVICESK9_WAN-M), Version 12.2(18)SXF16 suits the WiSM; And I tested it already with WiSM version 5.0 but when I've upgraded the WiSM to version 6.0 the service interface from the switch side says:
B5_Noc2_CS1(config)#int gig 4/9 % This interface cannot be modified
as the customer refuse to upgrade the switch IOS & He wants to use the latest ED WiSM sw 6.0;
I have a customer with two WLC 5508's running 7.0.116.0. When I look at the RF Grouping I see both controllers in the 802.11b/g/n section (802.11b>RRM>RF Grouping). However, when I check the 802.11a/n RF Grouping, I only see one controller.Both are in Group Mode = Auto.
I also made sure they had the same NDP settings, and they are both in Transparent mode.
Default 802.11a AP monitoring 802.11a Monitor Mode........................... enable 802.11a Monitor Mode for Mesh AP Backhaul...... disable 802.11a Monitor Channels....................... Country channels 802.11a RRM Neighbor Discover Type............. Transparent 802.11a AP Coverage Interval................... 180 seconds
I have two ASA 5510 in an active-standby cluster, not that I think that the fact that they are clustered will be of any importance here so feel free to think of it as a single 5510. The internet connection is delivered in a single RJ45 connection. To be able to use it with the cluster there is a simple unmanaged switch connected between the ISP and the ASA's. I have two subnets with public addresses, for simplicity lets call them 1.1.1.0/24 and 2.2.2.0/24. Default routers are 1.1.1.1 and 2.2.2.1 respectively.
Can I somehow use both these subnets in the ASA's? Im currently using the first subnet and use PAT to direct traffic to internal servers. But if I want to use adresses from the second subnet wont that mess up the routing, since there is no way I can specify the default router for the second subnet? I have as of yet not tried anything, Im just trying to plan ahead and I cant seem to wrap my head around how this could possibly be done.
The problem is when one of the hosts trys to reach the inside interface of the remote ASA. E.g. Host 1 trying to ping ASA5510 inside interface. Again Host 1 and 2 have the same subnet address of 10.1.1.0/24. I have configured the ASA 5505 to do the the NAT translations.
I have a 48-port 3750G switch (model # WS-C3750G-48TS-S). How do I determine which ports are grouped per ASIC on the 3750G switch? For example, is the grouping ports 1-8 is serviced by ASIC 1, ports 9-16 is serviced by ASIC 2, ports 17-24 is serviced by ASIC 3, etc. If it exists, what is the IOS command to show the mapping of ports to ASIC?
We have a Cisco 2851 router with Advanced Securit IOS version 12.4(13r)T. In the router we have a WIC-1ADSL connected to business DSL with a static IP. We were wondering what our options are regarding adding another WIC-1ADSL card and DSL line and either grouping the two or load balancing to increase our bandwidth. Unfortunately at this time DSL is our only option.
On 45XX catalyst , bandwidth is allocated across six 8-port groups, providing 1 Gbps per port group. Example for the following line card : WS-X4448-GB-SFP
I want to know if there is the same mecanism on 3750X switches. I mean is bandwidth allocated across a group of ports like on 4500 catalyst ?
I need to NAT some subnets to one IP and other subnets to another IP. The range command want work because some of the subnets are out of order.For example subnets 192.168.1.0 - 192.168.7.0 and 192.168.25.0, 192.168.28.0 nat'd to 1.1.1.1. subnet 192.168.26.0-192.168.27.0 nat'd to 1.1.1.2
I dont think my cards are faulty (4 cards in 2 6500 switches),I connect directly to my WISM cards, boot them (insert them), I see it turning on, enabling services, and as soon as the "username:" prompt apears, the Status led turns off and I lose console. [code]
We have Cisco WiSM modules on our 6500 switch. I tried to register a 1142 access point to the WiSM. Is there any difference in the way an AP registers and appears on the WiSM as compared to the Wireless Lan controller?
I could see the AP get an ip from dhcp pool ( configured on the switch ) and Ap was visible on the cdp neighbor of switch.
However, i could not locate the new AP on the WiSM module. Do i need to add MAC address to the WiSM as same as WLC.
I have a facility, where all the access points almost 250 of them are connected to two WisM's (One in each core switch ) . They are running in 6.0.199 firmware . These two WisM's are managed by WCS , which is running 6.0.188.
As i need to add more access points and to make fully redundant , 5500 controller was ordered and it has with firmware 7.0 installed. Couple of queries related with it .
1. Can 5500 be added in the WLC group, so that existing Access Points can be configured to use primary controller as 5500 and secondary / tertiary controller as WISM ?
2. Will 5500 be able to be detected by WCS , as the version of 5500 is 7.0 and WCS version is 6.0.188 ?
3. As WCS was already deployed and live, is it possible to upgrade, if the client has support contract like SUSA ?
WiSM WLAN Service Module WS-SVC-WISM-1-K9 in 6509e running VSS IOs s72033-ipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-33.SXI2a.bin having trouble to get the IP from service-vlan DHCP.The pertinent config is as follows.
! vlan 300 name WiSM_Service_Vlan !interface Vlan300 description *** WiSM Service-Vlan ip address 192.168.200.1 255.255.255.0
[code]....
The service IP is supposed to have been populated with an address from the dhcp pool. I am also unable to connect to it by doing a session switch 1 slot 4 processor 1. I get the following upon attempting to do so:
HO2NET0001##session switch 1 slot 4 proc 1
The default escape character is Ctrl-^, then x. You can also type 'exit' at the remote prompt to end the session Trying 0.0.0.0 ...
I am getting an alarm on WCS where a one controller is down, unreachable from WCS, while the other one is reachable on the same WiSM module. Upon investigation, Status of controller is shown as "Oper-Up" for all controllers on Supervisory engine. Hardware platform is Cisco 6509-E.
WLAN Slot Controller Service IP Management IP SW Version Status ----+-----------+----------------+----------------+-----------+--------------- 2 1 192.167.10.11 172.19.47.65 6.0.196.0 Oper-Up 2 2 192.167.10.12 172.19.47.66 6.0.196.0 Oper-Up
However, I can not ping the managment interface of the down controller while the other controller management interface is pingable. All these interfaces are in the same VLAN.
ping 172.19.47.65 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 172.19.47.65, timeout is 2 seconds: ..... Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
Problem is fixed when I reboot the problematic Controller. However, this problem re-appears after some time. I am not able to figure out why controller is not able to ping its default-gateway which is an SVI interface on Supervisory card on the same chassis, and showing status UP/UP. Is it a software bug or backplane fault or any other reason ?
We have a WISM in a 6509. The 6509 lost power (the UPS failed) and upon reboot the WISM isn't allowing AP's to connect. The WISM is blade 4. Upon consoling in, I get this error message for all 8 ports: 42w6d: %EC-SP-5-CANNOT_BUNDLE2: Gi4/1 is not compatible with Po407 and will be suspended (trunk mode of Gi4/1 is dynamic, Po407 is trunk)
I have a WiSM installed in WS-6504E, vesion 6.0.182. It can't function normally after upgrading to version7.0.220.When it was unstable, I found three strange condition 1. A lot of log looks like this*osapiReaper: Mar 10 14:53:39.282: %OSAPI-3-FILE_OPEN_FAILED: osapi_file.c:370 Failed to open the file : /proc/1059/stat.(erno 24)*osapiReaper: Mar 10 14:53:39.282: %OSAPI-3-TASK_GETTIME_FAILED: osapi_task.c:3431 Failed to retrieve statistics (/proc/<pid>/stats) for task 'fmcHsTask'2. Internal Temperature was showed "sensor failed"3. CPU User load is Zero?
The Samsung SCH-i569 Wi-Fi can't work at the LAP1131G with WiSM. It can associate to AP and get the ip address but about one minutes ago it had deauthentication and the phone's Wi-Fi status will show scanning. The phone can work at the Autonoumous mode or other 3rd party Fat AP.
Setting up a multi floor WLAN using a 6500 WISM Controller. Each floor has an AP group with the floor WAPs assigned. Each floor has a VLAN and the WLC has an interface configured. Each floor has a WLAN configured with the same SSID and the only change is the interface on the WLAN per floor.DHCP is remote on AD servers and each floor as a scope configured.Each floor works fine - we can get connected and get assigned to correct IP address. The issue we had with this setup was moving between floors. When we move up a floor the client loses connection to the inital floor (coverage - as expected). if we disconnect and reconnect it connects to the new floor SSID and gets an IP from DHCP.When looking into this - I then created an interface group and added all the floor interfaces into the group. I then applied the interface group to each floor WLAN and did soem testing - it worked as expected. I could now move between floors.The issue with this is though. When I was testing I already had an IP address assigned from DHCP - before I changed to interface groups. The issue is that the intial DHCP assignment no longer works and we cant connect to the WLAN anymore,
I am looking to install 2 1552I outdoor AP's. I can't find what the minimum code version is on the WISM controller that supports this AP.I am running 7.0.98.0 on the WISM. Where can I find this information?
I have a customer buys 12 x WISM and build up a mobility, when I add the final WLC to mobility, it prompts that there mobility group has reached the max of mobility member, but the total member is 23, according the configuration guide, it should be allow to 24 member, do I hit some bug? My using version is 7.0.98.0.
I have been having some issues trying to stand up an older WiSM that has been incorrectly configured by my predecesssor and has a bad Mgt IP so I am unable to telnet or SSH into it, nor can I console or session into it.
What I would like to do is to change the Mgt address for the WiSM controllers (1 and 2) by way of the Sup (not sure that is possible) because as it stands they are set to 169.254.1.1 and are unreachable even when directly consoled into them.
Core-A#sh wism status
Service Vlan : 52, Service IP Subnet : 10.104.52.2/255.255.255.0 WLAN Slot Controller Service IP Management IP SW Version Status ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 1 10.104.52.3 169.254.1.1 4.0.217.0 Oper-Up 3 2 10.104.52.4 169.254.1.1 4.0.217.0 Oper-Up
Core-B#sh wism status
Service Vlan : 52, Service IP Subnet : 10.104.52.1/255.255.255.0 WLAN Slot Controller Service IP Management IP SW Version Status ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 1 10.104.52.50 10.104.30.254 7.0.116.0 Oper-Up 3 2 10.104.52.51 10.104.30.250 7.0.116.0 Oper-Up
I hope to get this WiSM setup on Core A and get it configured like I have my Core B and then run them in a dual failover design with load balancing between the two.
The problem is WiSM module not coming in OPER-UP status , it’s in Started-Keepalive status.I did run debug wism events on cat6509 and seeing below logs:
[code]...
It’s receiving garp request from controller and assign ip to controller but then keepalive time expired and it’s put the controller in started-keeplaive status.
web authentication when using Android devices. I've been testing it and it seems to be caused by certificates (as it has been said in others discussions). With https disabled in the WLC (Wism 6.0.196.0), the portal authentications loads, but no with https. In addition, another issue I've detected is the DNS resolution of my controller by 1.1.1.1 when redirection takes place. With https enabled, DNS resolution and redirection works fine, so I don't think DNS server misconfiguration is the cause of the problem.I've only been able to see the portal with https disabled and entering manually 1.1.1.1/login.html
we have two offices in same city at different location however we are planning to bring both the office at same location.Now lets say site A has controller 5508 configured with 24 AP's with 10.10.10.x subnet for internal SSID and Site B which is shifting to Site A campus has different subnet ( 10.10.20.x ) for same SSID.Site B has no controller since they had connection with H-reap and they were using different subnet for internal SSID ( 10.10.20.x ) .....Now i need to add their AP's in Site A controller which will be extended wireless LAN however we would like to keep same subnet ( 10.10.20.x ) what Site B has for wireless clients which is really confusing me ....I have already client subnet for site A with 10.10.10.x /24 subnet and nearly 200 users are already using this wireless client subnet.... How do i add their ( Site B ) subnet / 10.10.20.x with same SSID configured which is globally only one SSID ?
limitations :I can not create new SSID for site B since same will be broadcasting even in Site A AP's ?Is this possible to map one more subnet of site B to existing SSID with already different subnet ( 10.10.10.x ) ?