Cisco Wireless :: What Product Replaces A1410 Bridge
Dec 19, 2012
I am looking at replacing an aging pair of 1410 bridges that are linking a three mile span, one building on top of a hill, the other down in the valley. I see the product is now EOL and EOS, so now what?
Looks like we're being pushed in the direction of this product: AIR-XLTC50DA31AK9
I want to PAT my project of WLAN and i attached the document, how I create the Testing Criteria of the said scenarios, PAT document includes WCS 7.0, WLC 5508, MSE 3310, Cisco AP 3502e and ACS 4.2.
I see the WS-SVC-AGM-1-K9 was EOL Jan 2010 ,What is the suggested Product Migration Option? Also if any is using this WS-SVC-AGM-1-K9 I would like some feedback ,Our problem is listed below and we are wondering of the WS-SVC-AGM-1-K9 will work ?
Looking at the best option to detect attempts at cracking our SIP servers. We see connections from scanners on the internet trying to brute force SIP passwords reasonably often, and would like to be alerted to them happening. Essentially we see hundreds of SIP registration attempts or Invites from the same IP, and this is how we know it is dodgy.
we have a Cisco 5540 with ASA5500-SSL-100. We have been trying to load the ASA 5500 SSL VPN Premium user License on the appliance but we could not get a valid Product Authorization Key to use.
I just bought 2 Cisco3750 X Switches, After I open the box, there are too many numbers lables on the switch.
1. Which number is for product registration ? 2. Can any give me the link for product registration ?
BTW, can explain to me what is PAK, is it come with the switch ? Where I can find it ? I can find serial number but I don't know how to use it and connect with PAK.
I see the WS-SVC-AGM-1-K9 was EOL Jan 2010,What is the suggested Product Migration Option? Our problem is listed below and we are wondering of the WS-SVC-AGM-1-K9 will work ?,Looking at the best option to detect attempts at cracking our SIP servers. We see connections from scanners on the internet trying to brute force SIP passwords reasonably often, and would like to be alerted to them happening. Essentially we see hundreds of SIP registration attempts or Invites from the same IP, and this is how we know it is dodgy. If the Anomaly Detector can alert us to this type of traffic, it will be much easier to stop them quickly.
I am pretty new to cisco and the learning community forums is truely one of a kind.Actually, I work on a company which deals the Cisco products, Routers/Firewalls/Switches and stuffs. I am sure you get the picture. What confuses me is the product licensing of ASA5500. To be more specific, we are proposing certain things. And that came with the product pricing sets and all. But I amn't having a clear picture on ASA 5500 Strong Encryption License (3DES/AES). Does that come inbuilt(free) or should there be any pricing behind that!?
my roommate threw out the key code from my n series router, two pcs are currently connected to this network, I would like to add my iphone but need to find the key code on one of these computers..
A few days ago I had to reinstall my notebook and therefore I lost my network settings. I want to reconfigure my Linksys Wap55AG to let it use a new WEP key but I cant find the software to do so ANYWERE on the net.
how can i discover product actual part number from the device through console.I have a bought a cisco ASA5540-AIP20-K9 and i want to check either is the product is shipped us as a right product.And i want to check total BoM requriements from entering the ASA console through any CLI Command.Below My Cisco ASA BoM which i purchased.
ASA5540-AIP20-K9ASA 5540 Appliance w/ AIP-SSM-20, SW, HA, 4GE+1FE, 3DES/AES1CAB-ACUAC Power Cord (UK), C13, BS 1363, 2.5m1SF-ASA-8.3-K8ASA 5500 Series Software v8.31SF-ASA-AIP-7.0-K9ASA 5500 Series AIP Sofware 7.0 for Security Service Modules1ASA-VPN-CLNT-K9Cisco VPN Client Software (Windows, Solaris, Linux, Mac)1Included: ASA5540-VPN-PRASA 5540 VPN Premium 5000 IPsec User License (7.0 Only)1Included: ASA5500-ENCR-K9ASA 5500 Strong Encryption License (3DES/AES)1Included: ASA-AIP-20-INC-K9ASA 5500 AIP Security Services Module-20 included w/ bundles1Included: ASA-180W-PWR-ACASA 180W AC Power Supply1Included: ASA-ANYCONN-CSD-K9ASA 5500 AnyConnect Client + Cisco Security Desktop Software1CON-SU1-AS4A20K9IPS SVC, AR NBD ASA5540 w AIP-SSM-20,4GE + 1FE,3DES/AES1
i am placing a formal request to Cisco and to the firmware development team to create a new-and-improved firmware release for the WET200 wireless Ethernet bridge, a product that is still being produced, shipped, and sold. I purchased the product about one-and-a-half years ago and have enjoyed its performance. There have been, however, some flaws with the device, namely the following:While configured to use WPA2-based security, DHCP-related traffic is not passed from a router/gateway's DHCP Server to connected devices on the WET200. Current firmware release notes indicate this was a known issue and was, supposedly, fixed; however, due to the level of problems customers are reporting, it appears this may have only been resolved, if at all, with security configurations of WPA, WEP, or OPEN. It has not been fixed for customers using WPA2-based security.When I originally purchased the WET200 and configured it to use WPA2-based security, while it, initially, did have a few problems connecting to my router/gateway, it, eventually, did connect and stayed connected for, approximately, one year. However, in September of 2009, it suddenly lost connectivity with my router/gateway and has not been able to establish a connection since, even after reinstalling the latest firmware revision and after several soft and hard resets of the device. I tested the WET200 with another router/gateway, only to experience the same issue. Other devices are connecting to my router/gateway, but, not the WET200. The last firmware update for the WET200 was dated back in July of 2008. Currently, it is January 2010 and since these issues have been known for quite some time, it is unacceptable that the firmware for this device has not been updated in such a long time, especially when there are known issues with the WET200's firmware. Such lack of support is forcing me and my clients to stop using these Cisco-based products and purchase competing hardware, something I would prefer not to do; however, without better support, I and my clients do not have a choice. Expecting me and my clients to use an inferior form of security on the WET200, such as WEP and/or WPA, until a firmware update is issued is unacceptable, especially when that update has not been released in over one-and-a-half years. Such lack of support is especially unforgettable when my clients and I are looking to purchase new networking equipment. In the past, I would not have hesitated to purchase a Cisco-based product; now, with this experience in mind, I am finding it very difficult to recommend to a client that he or she should invest their organization's finances into Cisco-branded equipment. Proper, professional, timely, support of your hardware is expected of your customers, especially if you wish them to remain loyal customers. I have noticed that other similar devices, albeit, higher-end devices, have had their firmware updated, more recently, compared to the WET200. I assumed this meant that the firmware development team was updating all firmware on such devices. So far, I have been disappointed in the lack of firmware updates for the WET200. While I understand the possible desire to update the higher-end products, first, as a professional whose job is to research, recommend, purchase, install,configure, secure, and maintain both the enterprise-level and small business-level devices, I highly encourage Cisco not to overlook their small business products when the firmware development team is updating firmware for any Cisco products. Deficiency in the support of one strata of Cisco-based products is reflective upon the support of any Cisco-based product and is not easily forgiven by Cisco customers, such as myself, when new and additional hardware needs to be purchased.
WET546 successfully authenticates and looks pretty healthy on controller (see below) , however neither of computers plugged to WET546 was unable to obtain ip address from dhcp server , nor working with static ip. I was under impression what it might be related to some default policies on WLC2100. Logs (warning) on WLC2100 looks clean.
I need to figure out a network setup for my house between modem connected to one wireless bridge connected to another wireless router connected to wired router.The reason why I decided to make this evil setup is due to insufficient range between my wireless router and desktop pc upstairs. However, in the room next to it I have a very good wireless signal and a possibility to bridge it to wired network installed in my house. But in order to do it I guess I need to bridge that wireless signal via wireless router or bridge to wired network. [code]
I have 2 routers and would like to create a wireless bridge/repeater between them so i can extend my wifi range. Is it possible to do this? and How would I do it.
I have a laptop with a wireless adapter. I have a desktop without a wireless adapter. Both of these pc's have windows 7. I have the laptop and desktop connected by an ethernet cord, and the laptop has a wireless connection to the router. In Network Connections under the control panel, I used the Bridge Connections option to bridge the pc's together.At my friend's place, this is usually the end of this process as my desktop will have internet access and run fine. At my own place, however, the desktop will not have any internet until I set a static IP for it. Also at my place, games on the desktop tend to run with a lot of lag due to the internet.
- My friend has a cheap $30 ASUS router, i don't know the exact model of it atm
I have a room cut off from the wired network by concrete walls (there are windows and it's a very short distance). There is a device in that room with a wired network adapter than needs access to the network. We'd like to use a pair of WAP4410N devices to get that room on our wired network over a simple "wireless bridge."
Would the following work?
Connect one WAP4410N normally with WPA2 Personal encryption and connect it to our wired network. Enable repeating of its signal.Set up the "remote" WAP4410N in the "cut off" room. Give it the same SSID and Encryption settings. Enable "Wireless Client Repeater" mode and uncheck the box labeled "Allow wireless station to associate". . . then use its RJ45 network port to connect to the wired device in the room. My biggest concern is the part in bold. Will the network port on the "remote" repeater function like that? So that any devices (or a switch) plugged into it will then be "forwarded along the bridge" to the main/local AP and then onto our network?
I have two Cisco Aironet 1252 that I want to configure as a point-2-point bridge. Now I want to know if this configuration supports the 802.11n protocol.
Can you use a Cisco 3600 to do a P2P bridge? Using the MAP's ethernet port to connect to a remote LAN? On that remote LAN can you have lightweight APs that connect to a controller on the RAP side?
I am trying to setup a wireless link between two locations, and be able to pass VLANs through the Wireless link.Currently I have two 1310 bridges.I followed the information at url..., but it is only passing VLAN 1 across the link. I cannot figure what the problem is.Both Bridges are running c1310-k9w7-mx.123-8.JEA3. [code]
Is it possible to make a bridge using a 1242 and a 1310? I have been able to get them to associate together and it appears it will function as a bridge. I have the 12(4) 253 JA IOS for both devices. I would like to use the g antenna on the 1242 for the bridge and the a antenna for wireless clients. The configuration on the web management appears to support bridge root and non root for both devices.
Someone already do a bridge configuration with 1524 AP? I read Cisco documentation, and is not very clear regarding configuration on switch side.I will do a Bridge in trunking mode, so i want to know what is the VLAN i need to set as native vlan on the switch trunk port.Do i need to set the management vlan as native VLAN?
My current setup is an AP1262n located ~400 feet from my WAP321. I would like to take the wireless signal coming from the AP1262n and rebroadcast it using a WAP321. configuration setting on these two devices.
I need to bridge from our office to our shop that is around 800 feet away. Here are the Details
I need the 2.4 ghz antenna for client access (Iphones are not compatiable with 802.11a) The locations are 800 feet away but are line of sight. I need to use the 5ghz antenna for the bridge i have 2 aironet 1242ag's I have 2 2.4 ghz AIR-ANT3213 antennas (planned for client access) I have 2 2.4 ghz AIR-ANT2506 (maybe useless for this)
My problem is that the range of all the listed 5 ghz antennas. None that i can find will bridge 54mb over the 5ghz radio for greater than 170ft
The closest that i can find is AIR-ANT5195. If i put these on both sides and it is outdoors line of sight, will the best i can hope for is functioning and 6mb
I am trying to configure an RV180W to act as a wireless bridge to our guest wireless network (Cisco 4404 WLC, 1130AG access points, WPA2 personal). I was told in a Cisco support chat that this configuration was possible, now that I have the RV180W it doesn't seem that it is.
I've configured the RV180W as a WDS Bridge with the ssid name, WPA2 key, and MAC of an AP hosting the guest wireless but it still doesn't seem to connect. I have a feeling I would need another WDS device for this to work, and that it will not connect to just any wireless network.
I'm looking to bring up a wireless bridge between 2 WET200.I've set in Wireless -> Basic Settings and Wireless -> Security the same parameters in both devices, but it fails.
I purchased quite a few of these APs as they listed the ability to function in WPA2-PSK mode, but on initial configuration I see that this may only apply to standard AP mode? Is there any way to configure WPA2-PSK on an AP541 to AP541 bridge? Unfortunately, this is a must have for our client. If not, what would allow for this with an external antenna port?