I have bridged several w/l Tranzeo's together. I have given each of them an IP address on the same subnet as my gateway and manage the units using that addressOther than for management is the IP address of a bridge used for anything else? I have noticed that I can plug in any gateway address I like and the units are perfectly happy even if the phoney gateway does not exist.
What is the purpose VPN label?As we know, in the MPLS VPN, the following mechanisms:RD - used to distinguish between overlapping routesRT - used to determine the VRF in which to send the route.But why need a VPN label?
I am attempting to set up a proxy on a home network that is used for business purposes. I am not at all a networking person, I know enough to be dangerous. If I follow the steps listed here: URL Will this encrypt the data that is sent to the internet from any computer that connects to my network or just the one I follow the steps on?
I have a remote site that has an AP running in H-REAP mode which connects over our MPLS cloud to a WLC, which has one interface on the "inside" network and one on our DMZ. The remote AP in H-REAP mode currently only runs our Guest SSID, but now I need to established an isolated VLAN.
Two of the hosts on this isolated VLAN, which is need to support some conference room devices, need to run on wireless and communicate with two devices on the same VLAN that are hard-wired to the switch.
Getting the wireless devices to connect remotely is easy enough by setting up an SSID that uses an IP subnet which one of the WLC's interfaces actually connects to...but can I do that for a completely remote IP subnet (i.e. one that the WLC does NOT physically connect to?). I'm not sure and I'm wondering whether that's the purpose of the "Remote LAN" feature...which is a very new feature.
I really need understanding some of the logic behind the default ZBFW settings on my Cisco 881W courtesy of Cisco Configuration Professional. Here are my two questions:
1.) What is the purpose and logic behind consolidating the first class-map (ccp-cls-insp-traffic) in to the second Class-Map (ccp-insp-traffic) as follows?
Code ....
2.) What is the purpose and logic of Policy-Map ccp-inspect is trying to drop traffic from ccp-invalid-src, which is filtering based on ACL 100:
policy-map type inspect ccp-inspectclass type inspect ccp-invalid-src drop logclass type inspect ccp-insp-traffic inspectclass type inspect ccp-protocol-httpclass class-default drop.
I have a Dell R300 server and it does not have a separate DRAC card. When the system POSTs I see it shows something about DRAC and it even gets an IP address. But I can't do anything (ping, web, telnet, etc) with that IP address.So basically what is the point of the basic DRAC without buying the full DRAC card? Just a placeholder?
In setup for old RV042 (V1), when updating / adding Mac addresses, the table is always sorted by IP addresses. But in the new oneRV042 (V3) I have, even with latest firmware 4.2.1.02 the list is random, thereby increasing the chance of user entering DUPLICATE IP addr with diff Mac addr. That will result in conflict.If the firmware sorts the DHCP entries by ip addresses, user would be able to catch duplicate ip errors even if the system does not flag the errors. All Cisco smart engineers can you all get the dhcp entries SORT by ip addresses.
On my 6509-E, all the modules show this: Region F1: INVALID Region F2: INVALID Currently running ROMMON from S (Gold) region
Is this alright? Is the Gold region like a default region where ROMMON is always installed. And are F1 and F2 just storage partitions that are available to hold backup copies of the ROMMON? From what I read, it sounds like I can copy ROMMON images to F1 and F2, either the same version as the Gold region or different versions. Is that correct? Why would I want to copy different ROMMON versions to F1 and F2?
I have always done my port monitoring (SPAN) on Cisco layer 3 switches with no issues. This time I am trying to do this on a Cisco 2901 router:
Cisco IOS Software, C2900 Software (C2900-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 15.1(4)M2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) System image file is "flash0:c2900-universalk9-mz.SPA.151-4.M2.bin
I need to have the source port gig0/0 and destination port gig0/1. There is something about the gig port enumeration (slot/port#) that makes the command rejected. It is self explanatory:
#sh ip int brie Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol Embedded-Service-Engine0/0 unassigned YES NVRAM administratively down down GigabitEthernet0/0 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx YES NVRAM up up GigabitEthernet0/1 unassigned YES NVRAM up up Serial0/0/0:0 unassigned YES unset up up
[code]....
It doesn't matter what slot or port number I use, it is always rejected. The command is rejected for Both destination and source gig interfaces. I tried a wide variety of slot/port numbers. To my best understanding the complete port names are: GigabitEthernet0/0 and GigabitEthernet0/1, so why does it think there has to be another digit after 0/0 or 0/1? Does it have anything to do with the Embedded-Service-Engine0/0 being administratively down?
I can configure two APs as a bridge with one as an AP with RMW enabled, and the other in WGB mode. I have three VLAN, each configured on both APs with their own SSID. Each switch (cisco switches) port is in trucking with only the three vlan allowed. The APs are associating with each other but not passing VLAN traffic.
I have an old metal-walled mobile home that I plan on converting to a combination shop and man-cave; it's about 200 feet from my home's computer room, where I have a Netgear WNDR3400 wireless-n router. The only place in the trailer where I can "see" my home network is the kitchen window, and I thought about putting a Wi-Fi repeater there to extend the home network into the trailer. But I have read that using a repeater will cut the network's Wi-Fi throughput in half -- which would not please my wife and daughters back at the house. Is there a simple, relatively inexpensive way to extend the network to the trailer without slowing everything down? Eventually I may have Charter install a separate cable hookup there, which would allow a separate high-speed Internet connection too. For now, I just want to "share" Wi-Fi to the trailer.
For a while now i have been making netowrk bridges to connect my laptop's wireless router to my ethernet port, and every now and then i delete the bridge and make it again. for some reason, a couple of days ago, while trying to make a bridge my laptop said "an unexpected error occured while trying to configure the network bridge"
I have two Cisco 1300's acting as bridges only. I have created an infrastructure ssid on VLAN 2 and assigned this to the radio. I am carrying multiple VLANs between the bridges (using subinterfaces on the fastethernet and radio ports).I have enabled WPA-PSK, but how do I check that this is being used between the bridges? Also - I have a switch connected at each end of the bridge. When I make VTP changes, the remote switch does not pick these up - is this because VTP goes over VLAN1 regardless of the Native VLAN (2 in my case)? Do I have to carry VLAN1 over the bridge to get VTP working, or is there an alternative solution?
Two facilites are connected via wireless bridge(AIR-BR1410A-E-K9).we wanted to add wireless bridge at each facility to increase the bandwidth.So we will have two wireless bridge at each facility connected wirelessly. and we wanted to achieve it by doing some kind of etherchannel in the switches at each location.
I have two 1310 bridges...one set as root and the other as non-root.For some reason they keep losing connection. When I reboot the non-root bridge, link is established.Both bridges have an antenna connected with the right connector and they have the setting antenna transmit right antenna receive right
logs from root bridge Nov 29 13:52:53.311: %DOT11-4-MAXRETRIES: Packet to client XXXX.XXXX.XXXX reached max retries, removing the clientNov 29 13:52:53.311: %DOT11-6-DISASSOC: Interface Dot11Radio0, Deauthenticating Station XXXX.XXXX.XXXX Reason: Previous authentication no longer validNov 29 13:52:53.568: %DOT11-6-ASSOC: Interface Dot11Radio0, Station Test XXX.XXXX.XXXX Reassociated KEY_MGMT[WPAv2 PSK]Nov 29 13:55:16.260: %DOT11-4-MAXRETRIES: Packet to client XXXX.XXXX.XXXX reached max retries, removing the clientNov 29 13:55:16.260: %DOT11-6-DISASSOC: Interface Dot11Radio0, Deauthenticating Station XXXX.XXXX.XXXX Reason: Previous authentication no longer validNov 29 13:55:16.550: %DOT11-4-MAXRETRIES: Packet to client XXXX.XXXX.XXXX reached max retries, removing the clientNov 29 13:55:16.550: Client XXXX.XXXX.XXXX failed: reached maximum retries
logs from non-root Nov 29 2010 13:52:55: %DOT11-4-UPLINK_DOWN: Interface Dot11Radio0, parent lost: Received deauthenticate (2) not validNov 29 2010 13:52:55: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to down The signal strength is around -84dBm Cisco IOS Software on both bridges is: C1310 Software (C1310-K9W7-M), Version 12.4(10b)JA1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
I bought this wireless router about a year+ ago, and it's just great. It's attached to the cable modem "downstairs" and right now it supports 2 smartphones wirelessly plus an ancient wired cable to an "upstairs" home office.
I'd like to improve overall performance with a wireless bridge to a gigabit hub in the upstairs office. I'd also like to add a second wireless bridge so I can stream movies to a box that would be attached to my TV, which does not have built-in wireless access.
Trendnet seems to have some interesting wireless bridges, but in the past I had a Trendnet wireless router with really, reallly bad software.
Two facilities are connected via wireless bridge(AIR-BR1410A-E-K9).we wanted to add wireless bridge at each facility to increase the bandwidth.So we will have two wireless bridge at each facility connected wirelessly.and we wanted to achieve it by doing some kind of etherchannel in the switches at each location..
I have a point to point link of 9.27 km using 1410 bridges and AIR-ANT58G28SDA-N antennas as per the documentation that would be an easy to deploy link and it should work at 54 Mbps, eventhough it drops the link, it's so slow and the power measurments indicate -70 dbm (aprox) right under the antenna which is at 9 m height.
This is not the first time I have troubles with 1410 bridges, the other two times I had to change them for 1310 bridges. I wonder if it has to do with some configuration tunning like, external antena gain, link distance or anything else? By the wat this is ocurring in México don't know if that might be worth of taking into consideration in order to deploy a 1410 link.
Since upgrading to the WAG160N, my 2 sound bridges dont want to play properly. They see the network and ask for the password, which i key in, but they dont get any DNS/IP addresses.
I have a setup where - I have a cisco stack (4X SGE2010 Switches) trunking over to a 3COM switch. Both switches believe to be the "ROOT" of the network. Note The 3COM is running RSTP as opposed to the Cisco Stack which is running normal STP. To my understanding of STP - Essentially STP is not functioning! Both switches believe to be the "ROOT" so they don't shut ports down. (We are currently having major issues with ports going up and down for seconds at a time on both switches)
I have 2 campuses. I have my 5508 wireless controller working beautifully on my main campus using LDAP. (YAY!!) Now for my problem. My remote campus has 1310 bridges. I was able to successfully upgrade one of them to work with the controller, however, I can't get the other two bridges to talk to the one that I upgraded and I can't get them to upgrade, it indicates that they need to be the root. I have several small buildings on that remote campus, than need that remote bridging in order to be able to have network access.
Is it possible to configure two 1300 series bridges at one location, each handling a bridge link to another location to BOTH backup and load balance for each other should one of them fail?
I have got two 878 integrated services routers and I need to configure them as transparent bridges in order to connect 2 remote sites over ATM.
As I'm testing the topology, I configured two switches (representing the sites) at each end with a VTP domain. VTP works while the switches are connected directly with eachother, but it won't work with the bridges in the middle. [code]
I have two 1310 bridges. one configured as root and the other as non-root. Authentication Settings: Open with EAP and Network EAP with no addition. Set up: when non-root bridge tries to associate with root bridge, root bridge checks with radius server if it's ok to associate with the non-root bridge.
I can see communication with the radius server (I'm using FreeRadius) and the radius server even sends a SUCCESS back to the root bridge. However I'm seeing this error on the non-root bridge: DOT1X_SHIM-3-PLUMB_KEY_ERR: Unable to plumb keys - Eap key struct is NULL and the bridges do not authenticate.
Okay so I have been using my E4200 router and WET610N bridges for a while now without any issues really until yesterday when I updated the firmware on the 4200 now none of my WET610N's (I have 2) can connect via wireless at all. At first I thought it was a a wireless issue but I have other devices that connect up just fine via wireless.I've made no changes to the router or the bridges before the firmware update.
If I hook the bridge directly to the router I can access it and configure it, but looking at the "Status" page, I see the bridge try and connect wirelessly but is quickly disconnected. Range isn't an issue as in my testing the bridge was 2 feet from the router.I've update the bridges to the latest firmware and have verified a 100 times that the settings on both my router and the bridges are set correctly (when the bridges are hooked up via network card).
i two 5550 firewall set up for redundance purpose . in failover we define two different ip add one for primary and one for secondary .interface Ethernet0/0 nameif outside security-level 0 ip address xxxx.0.0.0.1 255.255.255.0 standby xxxx.0.0.2!interface Ethernet1/0 nameif inside security-level 100 ip address 10.0.0.12 255.255.255.0 standby 10.0.0.11.default gateway for host will be 10.0.0.12 (primary fw address) however in case of failover , the secondary fw will be up with ip address that was assigned for primary .in this case the secondary ip add 10.0.0.11 is actually nerver used? similarly do i need to have two public ip address for outside (one for primary and one for secondary ) ? or in case if primary fails the secondary comes onlie and take the ip of primary fw . hence i only need to purchase just one ip address.
I have 2 Media Bridges, a Trendnet TEW-640MB and TrendNet TEW-680MB. Both are set as a Static IP on the devices 192.168.1.150 and 192.168.1.151. In the DHCP table for my E4200 I don't see those. I have no problem accessing them typing in those IP addresses but wondering why they don't show up in the table.Actually looking at it more closely, the devices hooked up that are active seem to show up.So I see the following below. And where is list LAN but no name those seem to be devices connected to the media bridges.