How can I give endpoints public IPs, that I can remote to or access (electronic whiteboard) from the Internet using a soho router? Will I need to purchase more than one public IPs or is there something I can do with subnet masking?
View 1 Replieshow I can give endpoints on a SOHO router network Public IPs so I can access an Electronic Whiteboard over the Internet. Do I need to purchase more that one Public IP or is there something I can do with subnet masking?
View 2 Replies View RelatedAt my company, we lease 3 static public IP addresses from 1 ISP. We want to have 3 separate networks that each use one of the IP addresses. Network 1 is the computer network, network 2 is the VOIP network, and network 3 is the security camera network. I am trying to determine the best way to do this. I have come up with 2 solutions in my head, but I'm not sure if they will work or not. I would like to get some input. Solution 1:Solution 1 looks something like this. Fiber box -> Router-> 3 switches. There would be one WAN input on the router, that would have a static route to 3 different LAN ports. For example, address 24.244.208.101 would be assigned to LAN port 1, 24.244.208.102 would be assigned to LAN port 2, and 24.244.208.103 would be assigned to LAN port 3 (by assigned, I mean have a static route to it). Is there some type of router that is capable of doing this? Solution 2:Solution 2 looks something like this. Fiber box -> Switch -> 3 Routers. The ethernet cable would run from the Fiber Box to a switch, and then 3 routers would be plugged into the switch. Each router would have the Static information configured in them. Would both of these methods work? If so, which would be the best way to go?
View 2 Replies View Relatedi want to connect dvr to the internet i need the step to take and process of creating a public LAN Address
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a public IP (static). I have a Gateway machine which is connected through a modem. When I want to add that public IP to the Gateway Device through [URL] site.
View 3 Replies View RelatedMy team were going to purchase the Cisco 801's to build our SoHo. However, they are now EOL.
View 1 Replies View RelatedMy Setup / I've been lurking on here a while, working hard to understand the basic networking concepts and eventually pursue the CISCO certs. I bought a lab and have since managed to setup a four router config (2610XM-DTE, 2621-DTE, 2501-DCE, and a linksys E1000 with routing, DHCP, and NAT turned off to make it a wirelss access point) with three switches (2@2950 and a 2924XL).
So far, I have managed to bring in my public IP using DHCP, and setup PAT. The network is fully functional, I can ping every interface, and reach the web on host PCs from any switchport. I am also able to telnet into the FastEthernet interface IPd with my public address.
My Issue : My concern right now is in feature support. I recently read on here that CISCO does not support UPnP, and due to my limited resources, I am using the only public IP I have to allow remote testing/learning on my lab. The issue is that I also have a PS3 and XBox 360 on this network that is requiring UPnP for certain online games and features.
The only solution I can see to this problem is to return my public IP back to the E1000 router, which is running RIP Version 2 (white papers said version 1, but a debup ip rip showed that updates were being ignored due to illegal version), and then poing my other three routers to it for outside access.
The questions I have in this scenario:
1. Will NAT still function if I use the E1000 and set the interfaces connecting to it as ip nat inside? I'm assuming that PAT is already hardcoded onto the router to allow for multiple connections to public IP space.
2. If my IP is 68.X.X.X, I set the E1000 to an IP of 192.168.1.1 and the FastEthernet it connects to is on my 2621 with an IP of 192.168.1.2, would it be possible to telnet into 192.168.1.2? If I were to forward port 23 out of the E1000 to the 192.168.1.2 address. Will my login and password for line vty 0 4 understand the request if the original telnet was to my public IP?
3. If all of that is just non-sense, is there another work-around that allows me to acheive UPnP through my E1000, while retaining telnet ability to my lab so I can try things in different scenarios or while I'm away from home?
If it's possible, how do you protect/block a unauthorized DHCP SOHO router with NAT form a Cisco 3750?
View 16 Replies View RelatedI want to setup an home network with a wireless router and use multiple switches for wired connections through out my home. I currently have an Airport extreme hooked up to a cable modem and a leviton gateway hooked up to the Airport. The 2 computers connected to the Leviton are on a windows 7 homegroup and share fine, but won't share or discover any wireless device connected to Airport. My main goal is to have a wireless/wired network with all computers sharing information with each other. I want 2-3 wired switches/gateways with a min of 2 devices connected to each, connected to my wireless router whiich is connected to cable modem.
View 3 Replies View Relatedhow to connect two subnets with two switches and one router using router sim software?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am relatively new to Cisco CLI and on the diagram that I am attaching I want the 2008 server to do DHCP for everything behind E0 on the Soho 91. I have tried multiple configs and I seem to get close but never quite get it. I am thinking that adding a DHCP helper on E0 will work but I am not sure.
This is my current show run:
clock timezone akst -9
clock summer-time akdt recurring
no aaa new-model
[Code] ....
I have a Catalyst 2960 switch (2960-8TC-L) and running Software version 12.2(53)SE1.I mange to configure SSH to the switch and add addition user as well.Now I need to configure this switch password less log in with public key SSH authentication.
I configured several Linux servers and Workstations for the public key SSH authentication.So far I could not figure out how to do this in CISCO switch. Following link {URL} how to do this.But ip ssh pub key- chain command never work showed invalid command.
I have an ADSL connection which I would like to have my Cisco Soho 97 ADSL router configured to dialup and forward to port 8080.
My network is 192.168.1.0/24
Router is 192.168.1.1
Server is 192.168.1.4 - Default gateway is 192.168.1.1
I am able to connect using the script below and get a public ip address but i cant get it to connect to the internet?what command to use for port forwarding to 8080?
hostname Router
!
!
ip subnet-zero
ip name-server 212.23.8.1
ip name-server 212.23.3.1
ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.1.1
[code]...
How the ACL Ports/Protocols which must be opened (in- and outbound) to enable a communication between a CISCO Office extend AP and a 5508 WCS.
View 3 Replies View RelatedHow to setup 3 SG300-52 (in L2 mode) as per this diagram:Port 1 on all switches should be able to talk to each other and access the blob at the right.The ports 25 on the other hand should only be able to talk among themselves in their own private vlan. They are to carry sensitive traffic. So I created 3 vlans, vlan 78 for ports gi1, gi51 and vlan 10 for port25,49,50 and a dummy vlan: 666 with the intent of segratating vlan 10 from vlan 78. My attempts so far have failed. ports gi49-50 are configured as trunk ports and gi1,gi51 as access ports as the following cli output (excerpts of the startup config):
vlan database
vlan 10,78,666
exit
interface vlan 1
ip address 172.16.10.11 255.255.255.0
[code]....
Ports gi1 can talk to each other and access the blob but ports 25 refuse to talk to each other. But as soon as I remove the access links to the blob they can! Obviously, at that point port gi1 lose access.Is such a topology feasable or even advisable?
Trying to ssh from our QNAP to our switches and copy the running-config.These tests are on an SG-300. When ready well be doing the same thing on all of our 2960's. So maybe the SG300 is the problem.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am having a problem reaching a soho linksys e1000 router through a second hop cisco 2900 router.Here is a brief topology of the network: I am using OSPF area 100 for all networks except for
192.168.2.0 on R1 to E1000 which is RIPv2
R1 directly connects to R2 with a point-to-point serial on network 192.168.12.0 /30 with ip 192.168.1.13
R1 directly connects to a a switchport using network 192.168.2.0 /24 with ip 192.168.1.75
R3 directly connects to a switchport using network 192.168.1.128.0 /25 with ip 192.168.1.129
R3 directly connects to a different cisco router using ethernet on network 192.168.1.0 with ip 192.168.1.1
E1000 directly connects to a switchport using network 192.168.2.0 /24 with ip 192.168.2.1
The switch has a vlan ip on 192.168.1.128 /25?I can ping from R1 to E1000?I can ping from R3 to R1 192.168.2.75? I can't ping from R3 to E1000 192.168.2.1?show ip route on R2 indicates that network 192.168.2.0 is reachable via the serial connection on 192.168.1.12?I have redistributed rip to ospf area 100 and OSPF to RIP on R1?I am wondering why R1 can reach E1000 on network 192.168.2.0, and why R3 can reach R1s 192.168.2.0 newtork, but R3 can't reach the E1000.There is an R2 router than can reach R1 and also cannot reach E1000, but I assume it's for the same reasons R3 can't, so I've omitted the remainder of that topology for this question.
I have an issue with routing public IPs on the RV042G. I have been able to route the IP's in a couple of different ways, but there is always a nagging problem.
I have a PPPoE Business Class account with 5 routable public IP's. I would like to route the IPs and manage the private network using the RV042G.
Here is what I have tried and the problem that arose: 1) I used 1:1 NAT and the servers responded with no issue. This would be a workable config however I use Kerberos for single sign-on for my clients. To use this security protocol and bind the clients to the server, I must use a public IP on the server machines. In this scenario however, everything else worked fine. 2) I then tried using the DMZ and putting the servers on the DMZ port with a public IP entered in the network config of the machine. That even worked fine and I was excited until I noticed that the servers were reporting the public IP assigned to the DMZ port as their IP when they sent mail. I then ran a test and that is the case. The servers - each with a public IP - are reporting the IP of the DMZ port. I can't have that because the mail servers need to announce a correct IP so the reverse lookup will match. Once again, a little gnat gets in the soup.
I connect to the internet using a laptop and pick up a wireless signal from a Belkin router.The router receives its signal from a WOW dsl modem. If i plug my computer directly into the modem my public ip(the one i can view online) is completely different than it is when i have it plugged into the router.My modem ip has a 4 day lease period and then it renews. What im wondering is how this affects the public ip associated with my router. Does the independent public ip of my router act like a static ip? In the command prompt the router states that its internal ip expires in 2038.What does the routers internal ip address (192.168.?.?) have to do with the public ip address associated with the router? Or how is the public ip address of the router(not the modem ip) determined?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI just moved into an apartment where the internet is being provided to me via wifi (open). The landlord doesn't have a private network, he is with me. What I'm was curious about is if it is possible for me to use a second router to create a secured network for all my devices? My thought would look like this: ISP>Landlords Router>wireless>MyRouter. I know you can have private and public wifi but the two routers have to be connected. I haven't talked to him about the fact that he needs to secure his router mainly because we never cross paths.
View 6 Replies View RelatedI've a problem with Cisco RV082. I want to connect to my public IP from local IP. But it seems it's been block by the firewall.I've added a firewall rules to allow ANY connection from LAN to outside world. But has no effect.
LAN IP : 192.168.1.5.Public IP (which is assigned to LAN IP 192.168.1.5 by One-to-One NAT) : 118.xxx.xxx.xxx
I am configuring this new router for a client. I am running into an issue that I cannot get working. They use 5 public IP addresses. Currently the wan port on the router is .66 and I have all the ports forwarded to the correct internal IPs. This works fine. However I need to forward parts from other public IPs (ex: .67) to internal IPs. So far I have been able to accomplish this via the One to One NAT feature. It allows me to forward ONE port from a public IP to a private IP. However I need to forward 3 or 4 ports per public IP to a single internal address. Does this router not support that functionality?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI've finally set up our RV220W to serve our office network, using the following environment:The WAN is set to a public IP (static configuration), while the internal network consists of two VLANs.VLAN 1 is connected to the cabled network and one wireless SSID, where DHCP is served by our Windows SBS server (192.168.15.x), and this VLAN is used only for our own office. VLAN 2 is connected to a second wireless SSID, where DHCP is served by the RV220W itself (192.168.17.x), and this VLAN is used for guests and visitors to our office.
On a regular basis, we need to use a mobile device to access a test page from a development server on VLAN 1, and the router is configured to redirect connections on a specific port on the public IP to our development server.For VLAN 1, I solved this by overriding DNS for the hostname of this test page to use the local IP for the development server.However, for VLAN 2, there is no way to access this test page.
Is there any way I can configure the router to either redirect these connections, or override the internal DNS so the test page on the development server can be reached also from VLAN 2 (the guest/visitor network)?
I'm planning to set up a network with two routers and one cable connection. One router will be for public wifi at my business and the other will be for my Point of sale system and private use. I think I have it figured out but want to double check the set up. Someone tell me if this isn't correct or if there's a better way of doing it.Cable modem --> connect via ethernet to Router #1 WAN port. Router #1 Lan port 1: connect via ethernet to router #2 WAN. Now, router 1 and 2 will have two different subnets; 192.168.1.x and 192.168.2.x respectively. Router #2 is the one that I should use for my private network and for the POS system since it can't be accessed by users from router #1 correct? I have DD-WRT installed on both routers but I plan on putting Tomato firmware for router #1 to limit bandwidth for public wifi and keep DD-WRT installed for router #2.
View 1 Replies View RelatedIf there are any small business routers that offer one-to-one NAT? I have several public IP addresses assigned to me by CenturyLink. I have two servers that provide email and web hosting for two different domains. I want to put the client machines on one VLAN (VLAN Z) and assign it a public IP address (to keep server traffic separate). I want to put each server on its own VLAN (VLANs X & Y) and assign each server its own public IP address. I need the router to be able to provide a firewall and port forwarding for each VLAN. I also need to be able to route traffic between VLANs so the clients on VLAN Z can access their email and the websites on VLANs X and Y. I also need to be able to route DNS traffic between VLANs so each server can provide name resolution for their respective domains.
So, is this possible with a small business router or do I need to look at something different? I'm fairly certain this configuration is not possible with my current Cisco RVS4000. What it boils down to is I need a router that is capable of having multiple public IP addresses on the same interface and to forward those public addresses to private VLAN subnets. This would be one-to-one NAT if I understand it correctly..
I have a n150 and it only allows private ip addresses for the lan setup. Is there anyway to assign a public address? I need to have the DHCP use a public range and I can't do that unless I can set the router to a public ip.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI recently "upgraded" to Uverse from DSL. While the speed boost is nice, UVerse comes with a 2wire residential gateway. Unfortunately you can't disable the DHCP functionality in the 2wire router, nor can you disable the router functionality completely and just run it as a modem, which has pretty much made it impossible to integrate into my network.So the partial solution anyway is to keep using the rv082 (yey!) behind the 2wire, assign a public static IP to the rv082 WAN1 i/f, disable the firewall in the 2wire for the rv082, and up and running again.The problem I'm facing now is that I had 3 devices on the LAN that were published using individual public static IPs. With good-ol'-DSL, I could use the one-to-one-NAT feature in the rv082, block any unwanted traffic in the firewall, and everything works. Unfortunately with the configuration options in the 2wire, I can only assign a single public IP address to any one device hooked up to it, in this case the rv082 WAN1 port.i have the one-to-one-NAT configured sequentially on the WAN and LAN side on the rv082 with nothing else hooked up to the 2wire. For example, one-to-one-NAT configuration in the rv082:
WAN range: 66.77.88.91 to 66.77..88.93
LAN range: 192.168.0.2 to 192.168.0.4
The 2wire is allocating the first public static IP in the range to the rv082 (i.e. 66.77.88.91). This works 100% reliably for this address - however because I can only assign a single address in the 2wire interface the other devices are no longer accessible externally. Curiously it kind of partially works, but not reliably. I can briefly connect to one of the other addresses (say xx.92), but then connectivity is lost to the others.Someone suggested I try using the Dual-WAN feature to get at least two addresses assigned to the rv082. Seemed like a good idea in theory, i.e. because the 2 WAN ports have different MAC addresses, the 2wire should see two different devices and allow me effectively to assign two public IPs to the rv082, e.g. 66.77.88.91 to WAN1 and 66.77.88.92 to WAN2. Of course failover mode won't work here, because only one is connected at a time. However the load-balancing mode did seem like it may work, but something is going on that I don't understand. Internal connectivity is working fine and I can access the internet, but for some reason the 2wire is getting really confused and constantly re-assigning IP addresses to the rv082. I don't know if this is because the host name is the same for both WAN1 and WAN2 ports, or there is something in how the rv082 does the load balancing.
- Is there any tricks to getting the Dual-WAN to work in the way needed to essentially have two simultaneous internet connections?
- Would it be possible to buy a 2nd rv082 and have it on the same LAN? How would I configure this?
- Is there an alternative Cisco router that may work better with what I'm trying to do?
my Networks contain three devices (BPX, DVR, PC) need to fixed IP, do you router supports the Cisco SRP547W Static Public ip.
View 1 Replies View RelatedThe client has a Cisco RVS4000. There are 3 Internet devices need to be accessed from the outside and will use one public IP for one device. I don't see any options to setup on Cisco RVS4000 to do 3 NATs. If Cisco RVS4000 doesn't work in this situation, which router will do?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a client that just got a second public IP (x.x.x.252) for a new program. I've setup that second IP on their UC540 on the public-facing port and it's accessible all day long from the outside, no problem. The problem comes in where users from within the LAN can't see the new public IP at all; however, they CAN get to the original public IP x.x.x.250. I've looked at the rules every which way and can't see anything that either 1) only allows LAN traffic to get to the original public IP, or 2) a NAT rule that only allows the same thing.
[Disclaimer: I just inherited this client and their setup, so other than me adding the IP and opening ports to it, I didn't program it.]
Here is the port configuration:
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
description $FW_OUTSIDE$
ip address 63.234.195.252 255.255.255.248 secondary
ip address 63.234.195.250 255.255.255.248
ip access-group 106 in
no ip redirects
no ip (code )
I can't figure out why .250 is internally-accessible, but .252 isn't. .252 is in the routing table as a directly-connected address, but I also added ip route 63.234.195.252 255.255.255.255 FastEthernet0/0 to the routing table and it still won't go. Everything is controlled by the UC540: The internal servers do not run DNS or DHCP or even a domain. There are no NAT outside rules.
What I'm trying to do seems pretty basic, but I cannot get it working on the RV180?I have 5 Fixed IPs. Using Access Rules I have configured a few inbound rules with specified WAN Destination addresses and these are correctly port forwarding these inbound ports on the specified Public IP addresses. Perfect!
However, for outbound, I need to do the equivalent for one public IP for outgoing SMTP so that our mail servers public facing address is not the standard WAN address and therefore will not fail a reverse DNS lookup. At the moment I have emails bouncing all over the place and panic has set in. I thought the SNAT option was the soltuion, but that just seems to break traffic flow completely on the specified port. I had this working no problem on my old Netgear, but I had to replace it due to throughput limitations.
I have a customer that has an RSV4000 Router. The customer has also purchased a block of 5 usable public IP addresses. I need to be able to assign these public IP addresses to printers either by configuring a static IP on each printer directly or thru IP mapping or some other method. Does the RSV4000 support using multiple public IP addresses and if so what configuration is needed in the router for the printers to be seen by the outside world.
View 2 Replies View Relatedi have a router connected to my ISP which can get me 2 different IP's at all times (the router gets one IP).Now i want to get my computer to have a different ip as my router has (seen from outside my home network) - i want my computer that accesses the internet through my router to have a different IP as my router. I know that if my computer gets it's IP from my router's subnet, then it will (seen from outside) always have the same IP as my router. So the question is how do i get around this ? Do i just have to change my PC's DNS / gateway settings to match my router's ? The PC is connected to my router via wifi. Or would forwarding some ports on my router work ?
View 3 Replies View Related