Are there any routers out there that allow for traffic logging? I'm not just looking for URLs, but I want to capture the actual traffic (filtering down of course for specific key words, etc...)
View 1 RepliesI configured ASA5520 and RV042 for site-to-site IPSec VPN tunnel.Tunnel get connected, but no ping, no traffic between both end network.
Network:
=======
192.168.113.0/24----------192.168.113.6 -ASA--------public, static IP address------Cisco 2821--------Internet
192.168.10.0/24-----------192.168.10.1 -RV042-----public, static IP address------Cisco 2821--------Internet
ASA5520 config:
----------------------
name 192.168.10.0 VPN
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
nameif NET
security-level 100
ip address 192.168.113.6 255.255.255.0
[code]....
I have upgraded to the new RV042G to take advantage of the gigabit Ethernet speeds and to prepare for when our ISP upgrades our bandwidth. I currently use the RV042 with Protect Link enabled to filter out various categories from our network traffic. I noticed that this feature is not included with the RV042G.
Is this something Cisco will decide to add back in later? In the meantime, how to block content on the network? The basic URL and keyword filter will not meet our needs, since it is much easier to let a service such as Trend Micro manage what is blocked in the categories they offer.
I configured my RV120W (Firmware:1.0.2.6) to count the traffic on my network. I set the monthly limit to 99999 and did not change anything else.So after a few hours, the traffic counter shows 2048 MB for outgoing traffic. This is impossible, because the DSL-connection is too limited in upload to cause this huge outgoing traffic in 6-8 hours. When I reset the counter at night, the next morning the device shows 2048MB again (even if there was no traffic at all, just some clients syncing time with NTP). I did already reset the device to factory defaults and reconfigured everything from scratch.
View 0 Replies View RelatedIs it possible to redirect all web traffic to a Symantec web filtering address on a particular listening port. I had a look at the Srp527w Router and can't find where this could be done.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe are an A/V integrator and AMX shop and provide our clients with support through the use of VPN tunnels from our RV042 router to their mostly RVS4000 routers.Support is provided through access of remote site equipment using VNC, Telnet, FTP, etc. from multiple PC's at our main office.Netbios is not turned on, but the remote sites have the ability to access equipment on our local LAN should they know our private IP address range.Is there any way to limit the acces from the remote sites back to our LAN while maintaining our access to the equipment on their LAN?I know that one can limt the IP address range on on end of the VPN, but I would like to limit the ability of remote sites to gain "any" access to our LAN. If there's any way to just prevent all traffic from an IP address range on the remote site, that would also do.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have rv180w (firmware 1.0.1.9) and 1 Gbit/s internet.When i turn on WAN Traffic meter, WAN speed down to 100mbit/s.I didn't find any suggestions in official documentation.Is this a bug or undocumented feature?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to setup a VPN between an RV042 V3 and an RV082 V2 router. They get connected but no traffic gets through the tunnel. I tried with and without firewall,DPD, Keepalive, forward secrecy but nothing worked. What should I do? I don't want to throw out the V2 routers. V3 to V3 connects fine.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe connected to locations to the RV042 by setting up 2 Gateway - to - Gateway VPNs - both locations can communicate with the RV042 and devices within the local LAN of the RV042 - however at the moment it is not possible to send traffic from 1st VPN Location to the 2nd VPN location
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a RV016 with an internal address of 192.168.1.1. Also on the 192.168.1.0 network is a gateway server that the rest of my clients sit behind. The clients are on a 172.16.3.0/24 network. All of the gateway server does is forward the packets. It does not NAT. There is a static route to 172.16.3.0 on the RV016.
So my question is how do I get traffic from 172.16.3.0 to route through the RV016? Computers on the sub net can ping the RV016 and get a reply so I know the gateway server is forwarding the packets between the two sub nets just fine and that the static route on the RV016 works. Any traffic that tries to go beyond the RV016 never makes it. It just disappears at the RV016. I have checked all of the ACLs and they should let all internal traffic through.
i am using RV042 router, i have configured DMZ in this, DMZ is not passing the traffic, i am able to ping the DMZ ip from the server. but the server is not getting the Internet.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have an issue with some traffic routing:
Machine A | Machine B (Win 2008 R2) | Machine C
Start: 192.168.5.9 > 192.168.5.5 (NIC 1) - 10.14.137.130 (NIC 2) > 10.14.137.128So the question is how do i get traffic from Machine A to Machine C. I've tried various 'Route ADD' cmds but no luck so far. So was hoping someone out there could shed some light for me?Machine B is a AD/DNS and can talk to the entire 10.14.137.x range but has no forwarders set up in DNS. And does not act as a AD/DNS server for the 10.14.137.x range. It fills these roles only for the 192.1668.5.x range.
I have a f9k1113 V1 or AC 1200 wireless router. I opened RDP - remote desktop to my home pc. Everytime i try to connect from the internet to my home pc the router reboots. I never get connected. It seems when the router sees that type of traffic it reboots.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a Belkin G router F5D7230-4 (firmware version 8.01.07) and am trying to view stats on what is using our connection.We have a very low capacity, rural wireless broadband that our ISP tells us is maxed out all the time, even when we don't appear to be using any devices, so I'd like to view the traffic on our DHCP client list to see which device is using an excessive amount of bandwith and put a limit on its access.I don't see a statistics tab on the setup page, is there another place to look or does Belkin have an external program to do this?
View 1 Replies View Relatedi want to set WRVS4400N Route all traffic through, it function as same as sonicwall Route All.
View 1 Replies View Relatedwe've buyed a WRVS4400N to create a IPSEC VPN tunnel to our client in order to access some applications.
After a while trying to configure the router, we have archieved it and the VPN tunnel is up. We can see the tunnel up from here and from client's side as well.
Our client supposendly have created the tunnel in order to access a list of specific IPs in the range 10.113.x.x, but if we try to access this IPs via telnet whe cannot obtain any response.
Making a tracert, we obtain...
C:UsersHuexxx>tracert 10.113.56.177
Traza a 10.113.56.177 sobre caminos de 30 saltos como máximo.
1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.0.1
2 * * * Tiempo de espera agotado para esta solicitud.
3 * * ^C
... and therefor the client doesn't receive any packet at its firewall.
I've tried to establish a static route for 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 to their remote gateway, but I'm unable to add any entry to static routing list... The router tries to do something, but afterall I cannot see the new entry...
What can I do to route the traffic through the tunnel?
We have a managed service provider voip network that requires us to use our own router for the data network. We wanted to use the RV042 for it's easy vpn setup. After installing it worked great for about 10 min. then the WAN port stopped passing traffic. 3 min. later it started working again. We tested the RV042 on a different network and it works fine. We tested an older Pix on the managed network and that works fine. But the RV042 will not work on the managed service provider voip network. The service provider says that on their end it shows our WAN port going up and down.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm having some problems blocking IP blocks. I have several blocks of IP's that I want blocked.I want to block 77.0.0.0/8 from communicating with a server on my lan.So I make a rule in the RV042 to deny all traffic from 77.0.0.0 to 77.255.255.255, source wan1, destination lan, my server's ip,As soon as I move that rule above the traffic forwarding rules I have created, no traffic moves in or out via the wan interface. It seems to just cut off all traffic.
View 2 Replies View RelatedJust picked up a ISA550 and have been playing around with it a bit but seem to be having some trouble. I have two LAN subnets in my small business with approx 10 hosts per subnet. I'd like to use the ISA550 to route between them (and to the internet) but can't seem to figure out how. Is it just as simple as creating two VLANS? Can the ISA550 route VLAN traffic?With my old RV042G, I had the option to setup multiple subnets inside the setup menu but I don't see any such area with the 550.
View 2 Replies View RelatedCE IP - 172.18.10.10 /30PE IP - 172.18.10.9/30 I had configured some floating static route on the PE towards CE .The routes were installed correctly till PE - CE link was UP as next hop IP was showing as connected .Now the link has been removed and I am receiving a supernet of 172.16.0.0/12 from PE2 via MPBGP. Although the 1st static route for 10.10.0.0 is showing in routing table, the other 2 ( 172.17.0.0 & 172.24.0.0 ) donot show. I believe that as both the routes and next hop fall under the supernet , the static route is not installing. But I don't know why is this behaviour. I tried to remove the distance 250 from both the routes , but still the static route does not install. I tried this on GNS3 but got the same results .
View 14 Replies View RelatedJust setup two RV220Ws with a IPsec VPN connection. All working well. However, I have a question regarding how to force ALL traffic from a VLAN to go thru the VPN.IPsec from site A (EU) to site B (USA) working good. On Site A I have a dedicated VLAN that needs to have ALL traffic (internet included) be sent thru the VPN tunnel. The main purpose of this is to have internet presence as if in the USA. This is necessary to access some sites available only in USA specially for the kids -their web sites will not display content because they're not in the USA at the moment. How do I accomplish this? I tried to setup a Static Route for the VLAN but you cannot setup a 0.0.0.0 destination route.
View 2 Replies View RelatedReplaced an older RV042 that had damage from lightning. The new RV042 is V03 with firmware 4.0.0.7. This router supports 7 branch offices using site-to-site VPN to other RV042 routers. After connecting the new RV042 at the main office, three of the branch offices had very slow response over the VPN tunnel. I disabled the firewall on the new RV042 and the problem resolved. The three branches with the problem have Windows 7 systems and the other 4 have Windows XP. I confirmed that the Windows firewall was disabled on the Windows 7 systems.I did try leaving the firewall enabled and disabling SPI, but that didn't work. Have to have firewall disabled to resolve the problem. I would not expect the firewall on the main office RV042 to affect VPN tunnel traffic, but apparently it does. Do we need specific access rules to fix the issue. It works fine with firewall disbaled, but I'd be more comfortable with it enabled.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI've installed a rv042G, disabled dhcp, opened port 3389 (wan to lan), one port formwarding rule to terminal server.
Now 48 hours later, when i try to login to the router, (https), I'm automatticaly redirect to the https site of the NAS (iomega ix-200).
The nas is connected to a cisco sg100-24, which is connected to lan 1 on the router.
I have now the sa`s stablished between SRP527w and cisco 857, but If i ping from a host of Cisco side to a host of SRP side I get only rx traffic on the tunnel, the stats keep tx at 0 and ping is not answered.My tunnel is to send some voice call into IPSEC tunnel keeping DSCP bits, It comunicate SRP voice vlan with Cisco lan.
I have on SRP 2 vlans:
1 Vlan for data on ports 1,2 and 4
1 voice vlan on ports 1,2,3,4.
I connect a netbook to port 3 and I can connect to internet but I cant reach by ping the other side of the tunnel?Maybe traffic from voice vlan is being natted with data vlan ip address?I need all traffic must go into the tunnel without being natted, on cisco side I have a policy to avoid nat but don know if SRP have any problem about it too.All gateways are ok ?
Beta Firmware: 1.0.2.3
Web server log showing the issue:
2013-03-08 05:39:21 192.168.1.102 POST /somewebpage/somefile.htm - 80 - 192.168.1.1 - 404 0 0 6098 410 457
ISSUE: 100% of the traffic forwarded through the router is taking on the IP address of the router when it arrives at the web server. In this case, 192.168.1.1
My email server and FTP servers are having fits due to the anti-hammering issue that this creates.
I simply got the run around and they told me to call level 2 support and did not provide me with a contact number. For some reason, he refused to escalate the call. They simply told me to contact someone from a previous issue in which they gave me the beta firmware to download and I spent a lot of time on the phone to get that far. I do NOT want to speak with the same person who addressed my last issue.
I have an RV042 router and I'm looking to monitor the total upstream and downstream traffic from within the router.
I know there is tons of software that I can put on a network computer to monitor traffic, but is there any software that I can put on the router itself that will monitor the traffic from within the router?
I found this guide in order to send all traffic from RV042 branch office to the RV082 in the central office: [URL]
But that guide is for v2 hardware. I tried and did not work, so I wonder if there is newer info for v3 hardware (firmware v4.2)
I have a RV042 in a brach office connected via working VPN Tunnel to a RV082 central office. I want to route all traffic from the brach office to the RV082 in the central office.
I require a system that will support 3 VLANs, the VLANs are purely for containment of broadcast traffic and needs to support inter-VLAN communication between client devices. Would the following configuration work:
Port based VLAN on the SRP527W with each port connected to layer 2 switches serving each VLAN.
DHCP server on the SRP527W assigning IP addresses for each of the V LANS in different ranges. (eg 10.10.1.xx, 10.10.2.xx, 10.10.3.xx). Would there be any benefit upgrading the Router to a SRP547W?
I have following issue with RV220W - the router seems to be dropping parts of traffic coming through it. The unit is brand new, the firewall is turned off, there are about 20 computers and 15 VOIP phones connected to it via Zyxel GS1910-48; all IPs are set to static DHCP records, in the last 3 hours the router rebooted about 3 times, then I turned on the log in. The router is producing insane number of warnings, as you may see from the log attached. I found this thread [URL] but no answer regarding this issue.
Wed May 15 13:03:10 2013(GMT) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] cvm_ipfwd_cache_flow: Failed to allocate flow info buffer
Wed May 15 13:03:10 2013(GMT) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] WARNING:cvmx_ptr_to_phys() passed a NULL pointer
Wed May 15 13:03:10 2013(GMT) [rv220w][Kernel][KERNEL] cvm_ipfwd_cache_flow: Failed to allocate flow info buffer
[Code]....
I run a AirPort Extreme router. I have my F9K1106 range extender set up and working. works awesome. I get home from work the next day and the range extender seems to fall asleep , it won't pass any traffic. I power cycle it and its back up and running. this happens everyday no fail for a week now.
View 1 Replies View RelatedISP environment with 3 Cisco 7200 BRAS ( NPE-G2 ) , we need to load balance traffic between two of them so the load balancer will accept traffic from backhauling link and distribute traffic the upper two BRAS , can we achieve this using spare 7200 we have or is there any software solution can do this .
another question , Cisco 7200 VXR ( NPE-G2 ) , does it support concurrent calls or sessions from more than 16000 subscriber ?
Initially we had a rv110w in place and had problems with the port forwarding stopping a few times a day so we replaced with with a RV180W. Now port forwarding appears to be staying up, however I have a new problem. We host a web page, for some reason when an internal user points the url to the web page it resolves to the web interface of the Router and not the expected web page. If you are outside of the network it resolves to the correct web page. I am not sure why this is happening as it didn't happen with the RV110W or the PIX before that.
View 2 Replies View RelatedWhen WAN traffic meter is enable on RV180 router maximum throughput drops to 40Mbps from ~120Mbps.Enabling WAN traffic meter is needed to get SNMP data from WAN port.
View 1 Replies View Related