Two Vlans (ID1 and 100)are on a Cat 4500, which connects to an ASA, interface DMZ. On 4500, there is default route point to the ASA DMZ interface Issue, server on vlan 100 cannot ping a server on Vlan 1, vice verse. When I enable the realtime log, it gives me a “Translation creation failed” message, please see the attached files.
View 1 Replies
After adding a NAT rule on Friday morning, I'm now getting a bunch of "portmap translation creation failed" messages from my ASA5520. (It's currently running 8.4(3).) The failure errors appear to have nothing to do with the change that was made. [code] I have very similar rules in place for other vendors to access other machines. The only difference between this new one and those old ones is the use of the objects in the rule instead of the direct IP addresses. This is also the first one that invovles a range instead of a specific address or network. [code]
View 4 Replies View Related See the error below on my ASA5510.
305006 200.200.0.34 53 portmap translation creation failed for udp src inside:192.168.1.4/1047 dst outside:200.200.0.34/53
The first two computers work normally( IP 2 and 3) , but the third computer gets ip does not work on the Internet.
We have a PIX with 3 interfaces. Inside, Outside,DMZ.
On my DMZ we have some clients that come in and remotely connect back to there office via MSPPTP. I setup the ASA with this to get rid of the error message: regular translation creation failed for protocol 47 src
policy-map global-policy
inspection_default
inspect pptp
Now when the dmz client tries to connect back to there PPTP server I get the following error.
172.31.10.204 0 24.172.85.162 37624 Teardown dynamic GRE translation from dmz:172.31.10.204/0 to outside:24.172.85.162/37624 duration 0:01:30
172.31.10.204 1069 173.188.74.155 1723 Deny TCP (no connection) from 172.31.10.204/1069 to 173.188.74.155/1723 flags PSH ACK on interface dmz
172.31.10.204 173.188.74.155 63767 Teardown GRE connection 8393958 from dmz:172.31.10.204 to outside:173.188.74.155/63767 duration 0:01:08 bytes [ code]...
We have an ASA 5540 with 8.2(5)
Last three days in early afternoon we start getting these errors in the log and webpages either won't load or pages only half load.
3|Mar 22 2013|13:22:24|305006|184.73.105.115|443|||portmap translation creation failed for tcp src inside:10.10.176.114/58217 dst outside:184.73.105.115/443
3|Mar 22 2013|13:22:24|305006|54.243.129.71|80|||portmap translation creation failed for tcp src inside:10.35.54.37/1517 dst outside:54.243.129.71/80
[Code].....
I'm connected to my remote access vpn and am getting the below error, wierd thing i only get this error for ICMP, i can browse data on our network retrieve files etc, but pings fail for some reason
NAT-T is enabled
NAT rules are in place
ICMP is not blocked as can ping elsewhere
Where to being looking as to why only ICMP fails?
I have site-to-site VPN and IPsec VPN installed on ASA 5505. VPNs work OK except few stranges:I can't ping 192.168.17.104 from remote ip 192.168.17.138 - 305006 192.168.17.138 regular translation creation failed for icmp src OLD-Private:192.168.17.104 dst OLD-Private:192.168.17.138 (type 0, code 0) in the same time I able to ping 192.168.17.104 from my network 192.168.10.0 and can ping from ASA No firewall at 192.168.17.104?How to fix it?
There is my config:
ASA Version 8.2(2)
!hostname ASA5505domain-name domainenable password password encryptedpasswd password encryptednames!interface Vlan1 description INTERNET mac-address 0000.0000.0001 nameif WAN security-level 0 ip address a.a.a.a 255.255.255.248 standby a1.a1.a1.a1 ospf cost 10!interface Vlan2 description OLD-PRIVATE mac-address 0000.0000.0102 nameif OLD-Private security-level 100 ip address 192.168.17.2 255.255.255.0 standby 192.168.17.3 ospf cost 10!interface Vlan6 description MANAGEMENT mac-address 0000.0000.0106 nameif Management security-level 100 ip address 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.0 standby 192.168.1.3 ospf cost 10!interface Vlan100 description LAN Failover Interface!interface Ethernet0/0!interface Ethernet0/1 shutdown!interface Ethernet0/2 shutdown!interface Ethernet0/3 shutdown!interface Ethernet0/4 shutdown!interface
[code]....
I am having an issue with a specific server that is not reachable from other sub nets. Every other device on the same sub net as the server is reachable via the other sub nets. This server is special because it's NAT'd to an external IP address and has several site-to-site VPN's set up. The firewall is a Cisco ASA 5510.
This is the error I see on the ASA syslog when I try to ping the server from another sub net: 3 Dec 05 2012 10:58:49 10.0.15.101 regular translation creation failed for icmp src inside:10.0.20.8 dst inside:10.0.15.101 (type 0, code 0)
The problem server is on sub net 10.0.20.0/24 and the server IP address is 10.0.20.8. Every device on the 10.0.20.0/24 sub net can hit the server, but devices on other sub nets cannot. For instance, a device on 10.0.15.0/24 cannot reach 10.0.20.8, but can reach other devices on 10.0.20.0/24.
I have cisco switch model WS-C3750G-12S-D. It is in transparent mode. I am getting below error message when tried to create new vlan.
Proposed configuration exceeds the limit of 1005 VLANs that can be supported on this platform. Reduce the number of VLANs proposed to be within this limit.
After deleting few unnecessary vlans, it allowed me to create.
3750#sh vtp statusVTP Version : running VTP1 (VTP2 capable)Configuration Revision : 0Maximum VLANs supported locally : 1005Number of existing VLANs : 959VTP Operating Mode : TransparentVTP Domain Name : VTP Pruning Mode : DisabledVTP V2 Mode : DisabledVTP Traps Generation : DisabledMD5 digest : 0xBC 0xA7 0xEC 0xDE 0x36 0x6C 0x61 0xB4 Configuration last modified by 97.193.17.172 at 0-0-00 00:00:00
I confused with terms 'maximum supported vlans' and 'maximum locally supported vlans'. If switch is supporting vlans 1-4094 means it should also allow to create locally. Otherwise how they will pass through the switch trunks without local creation.
Whenever I try to goto a webpage within any browser,despite me being connected to my network(though 1 received packet to every 20 or so sent packet ratio) it tells me that DNS lookup failed. I had a similar issue on my other pc that I use more often,though connecting through WIFI momentarily resolved the issue,before I returning to wired,where everything has been fine. My other pc however has no wifi adapter. So ive been stuck.
View 12 Replies View RelatedThis is a WS-C4510R+E with a Sup 7-E running 03.02.02.SG enterprise.
I increased SNMP timeout to 10 seconds to no avail.
canon pixma MX 715 network set up failed X P home edition
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am unable to connect to the internet on my desktop computer. The error message I receive is" Download failed(12007) The sever name or address could not be resolved" I am running windows 7. Hooked up to att uverse. My laptop is working as you can see by sending this message. I have been trying to fix this problem for the last 2 days to no avail. I uninstalled norton hoping it was a firewall problem. On the local area connection it shows IPV4 connedtivety: No Network access.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have just gone through hours of tech support with my ISP and still cannot seem to get online. Problem is the same as recent posts by jerguy1928, with message "DNS lookup failed...." coming up in Google Chrome. Both IE and FF just say cannot connect.Running Windows 7 on laptop. I have tried alt DNS settings (Google and others), all the CMD suggestions, disabling firewalls etc, etc! Other computer in house connects just fine.Ping works fine. Really, there appears to be no reason to not be able to connect - since I am actually connected!
View 13 Replies View RelatedUpon checking the logs, I'm seeing a lot of these messages:
*emWeb: Oct 25 14:11:01.345: #LOG-3-Q_IND: spam_lrad.c:10136 Validation of STAT_PAYLOAD failed - AP 00:3a:98:09:4e:d0
Always the same MAC address, which I assume is a Cisco AP trying to join. The output interpreter/message decoder isn't much useful. 5508 Controller running ver 7.3.101.0.
I need to implement a DMZ in my office. Before talking about the configuration , i would like to know best practises of implementing DMZ.My questions are,is traffic from inside to DMZ is permit by default?,What about DMZ to Inside traffic ?,Is it necessary to do a NAT from inside to DMZ with the same IP as of inside,What is the use of " static (inside,dmz) 192.168.1.0 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 ? is it a no nat statement?,Is it necessary to permit traffic from DMZ to inside?,Suppose i have a web server in DMZ, for inside host whether it will take path through ASA or path through internet?
View 17 Replies View RelatedI have a stack of Catalyst 3750E switches.
IOS image :c3750e-ipbasek9-mz.122-55.SE3.bin
I have been seeing multiple occurance of the below message in the switch logs.
"Failed to send hrpc non blocking message"
I could not find a relevant reference for this message in the Cisco.com.
I need to create a DMZ zone in my network. One server need to be put in DMZ. I have a PIX 515E 6.3.3. It has free port to create DMZ.
1) Put a new switch for DMZ zone
2) Connect it to the DMZ port
3) Create a NAT for inside to DMZ with same IP as inside
4) Create ACL for permiting traffic to DMZ and apply it to outside interface
5) Create ACl for permitting traffic from DMZ to inside
6) Routing for DMZ in PIX
I have a pair of 3750E-24PD-S stacked together, it seems after stacked together the stacked switch always flood the console screen with these messages which are not true: [code] Switch-2 is the stack member, Switch-1 is the stack master. The RPS fan failed refers to RPS2300 or the internal power supply of 3750E? Even when I turned on the RPS2300 the stacked switch still display the messages. Also I have two RPS2300 serving stack master and stack member respectively both RPS2300 were switched off why the messages only refer to Switch-2 and not Switch-1? [code]
View 1 Replies View RelatedOn the ASA running the 8.4.4.1 code in transparent mode. Can I create sub interfaces in different vlans and attach them to different BVI groups?
switch---trunk---ASA---Trunk---switch
Gig0/1.1 vlan 100 bridge-gr1 Gig0/2.1 vlan 101 bridge-gr1
Gig0/1.2 vlan 200 bridge-gr2 Gig0/2.2 vlan 201 bridge-gr2
I am trying to use the built in feature of Cisco ASA 5510 smart call home feature with the purpose of automatic backup creation by email. I found the configuration [URL]. I already configured the said instructions but when I send a test email it says it cannot contact the email server. Below is the error that I am getting from our ASA. I am new to firewall.
OGI-MNL-ASA-FW0# call-home test profile ASA_Config_Backup
INFO: Sending test message to fcaccam@example.com...
ERROR: Connecting to SMTP server xxx.xx.xxx.xx failed: CONNECT_FAILED(33)
ERROR: Failed: CONNECT_FAILED(33)
I am going with ASA 5520, know how many NAT translation is possible.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to migrate from olda PIX to newest ASA 8.4.1. Everything seems to be good except the static NAT. [code]
The inside interface uses implicit rule. ( permit any less secure network )
Although te above config the ASA logs the following.
TCP access denied by ACL from 94.94.94.94/2003 to outside:86.101.228.221/80
The 86.101.228.221 our public Internet IP whic are used as outside IP also.
I have some issues with Twin PAT on ASA (8.4.2), there is sth I dont udnerstand FTP server is on the inside and client is in outside.
I did sth like this
object network NATED-11
host 20.20.20.11
object network REAL-2
host 10.200.200.2
object service SRV-FTP
service tcp destination eq ftp
nat (outside,inside) source static any any destination static NATED-11 REAL-2 service SRV-FTP SRV-FTP so teoretically there should be a problem in NAT cause there is a second channel for data etc. BUT according to docs "For applications that require application inspection for secondary channels (for example, FTP and VoIP),the ASA automatically translates the secondary ports."
The problem is that it doesn't work at all and got the syslogs
Debug on ASA shows
ASA5510(config)# nat: untranslation - outside:20.20.20.11/21 to inside:10.200.200.2/21
nat: untranslation - outside:20.20.20.11/21 to inside:10.200.200.2/21
nat: untranslation - outside:20.20.20.11/21 to inside:10.200.200.2/21
nat: translation - outside:20.20.20.252/37924 failed - port is not found in xlate(0-0)
[code]....
To make it work I need to modify the nat rule to sth like this (translate source of client to inside inteface of ASA) nat (outside,inside) 1 source static any interface destination static NATED-11 REAL-2 service SRV-FTP SRV-FTP / why its not working in the first place? aaa I forgot to mention that both modes of FTP were tested (passive and active)
I have a server in a DMZ of my 8.4 ASA with nat:
object network FTP-SERVER
host 192.168.1.102
nat (dmz,outside) static interface tcp ftp ftp
And that's working well. However, I now need to translate the source address of connections from the outside to the FTP server as well. The aim is that the source address of packets when they reach the FTP server is an address on the DMZ subnet (as the default route for the FTP server now needs to be something else, not the ASA) as well as this outside-dmz NAT. I thought overloading the DMZ interface of the ASA? Or another IP in that range?
Trying to translate telnet for switches to the outside ip address at some random ports.
172.16.200.2:23 -> 10.199.199.2:2300
172.16.200.3:23 -> 10.199.199.2:2301
172.16.200.4:23 -> 10.199.199.2:2302
etc....
ASA 5510 running 8.4(3):
interface Ethernet0/0
nameif outside
security-level 0
ip address 10.199.199.2 255.255.255.248
interface Ethernet0/1.200
vlan 200
nameif inside
security-level 100
ip address 172.16.200.254 255.255.255.0
[code]....
I can not access the switch at 10.199.199.2:2301 . What am I doing wrong? Or should cleaning toilets be something I really should look at! Now if i run this NAT statment:
object network Switch_TN
nat (inside,outside) static 10.199.199.3 service tcp telnet 2301
I am able to access the switch at 10.199.199.3:2301
I have a server on the inside of my network (with a internet Routable IP). It has been requested to me that people from the internet access port 80, and that is translated at the firewall to port 7080. I have set up a temp Access rule to allow access to 7080 from the outside and it is accessable. I am not sure what I am doing wrong, but I am tion from 80 not able to get the translato 7080 to work.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have ASA 5510 and public FTP server from my local network to external IP address, with static nat translation. All works, but I need request to ftp come from internal ASA interface (need use gateway different ASA). How configured ASA for forwarding request?
View 4 Replies View Relatedi wounder why i'm getting such log message whenever i'm trying to reach my remote site: No translation group found for tcp src outside XXXX dst dmz ZZZZ, i have a Cisco PIX515E firewall and that message is captured there, the traffic is going through a VPN tunnel (the VPN are up on both ends)
View 2 Replies View RelatedRecently upgraded to an Asa 5512x from a pix 515e. I have an Ipswitch secure MoveIT server on the dmz1 interface that needs to be accessed from both the inside and outside interfaces. I have setup a static nat from the outside to the dmz1 and it works, I can also connect from the inside interface. Now I need the MoveIT server to access the DNS server and email server on the inside interface so it can send notifications. On the pix I just created a static from the inside to the dmz1 using its own IP address - static (inside,dmz1) 192.168.1.7 192.168.1.7 net mask 255.255.255.255. I would then add the access-list to allow. How would I set this up with the Asa 8.6 commands?
View 5 Replies View RelatedError message
305005: No translation group found for udp src c_dmz:10.0.176.120/51910 dst inside:195.244.192.16/53
305005: No translation group found for udp src c_dmz:10.0.176.120/51910 dst inside:195.244.192.166/53
[Code]....
I thought it needed a nat (c_dmz) command but I got the following error message
PIX(config)# nat (c_dmz) 0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0 nat 0 0.0.0.0 will be identity translated for outbound WARNING: Binding inside nat statement to outermost interface. WARNING: Keyword "outside" is probably missing.
I am trying to correctly configure our ASA 5520 and our Mitel Border Gateway in our DMZ. In the documentation for the Mitel border gateway it wants me to set up 2 external IP's on my ASA one to allow 443 traffice into the MBG, and another for 443 traffic that needs to be forwarded to port 4443 for the MGB in the DMZ. My problem is I don't know how to do this. the MBG only has one IP, and I need to have 2 different URL's mapped to two different external IP's both externally using port 443, and one of them forwarding to 4443 on the DMZ interface.
View 10 Replies View RelatedIs it possible to perform static Nat's through an internal network?I have a ASA 5510 with a public outside interface (let’s call it 68.68.68.1), and I have an inside private IP address (192.168.1.2/24). The inside IP address leads to a 4900m with that interface being configured with a 192.168.1.1 (no switching). On the 4900 M I have several VLANs one of them is an internal DMZ of sorts. (192.168.2.0/24). Within this DMZ network are several Web servers which need to be associated a public IP address (68.68.68.x).
Every time I configure a static Nat to associating a public IP address with an internal IP address within the DMZ, packet Tracer on the ASA informs me that the packet gets dropped at the static Nat and I cannot figure out why this is so.Safe it to say my question still stands is it possible to Nat (68.68.68.222 to and 92.168.2.60) given the configuration above, and how would I go about configuring in such the manner above so that I acn apply static nat through the 192.168.1.0 network to reach the 192.168.2.0 network.
