Cisco Routers :: RV016 Unable To Get Cable Nor Fiber Services
Feb 9, 2013
We recently moved to a new office and currently have three ISPs(DSL, SAT, 4G) because we are unable to get Cable nor Fiber services. We have anywhere between 7-20 Remote Desktop connections(with lot of file transfers) and 8 VOIP lines. Basically, we need to bind certain services to specific WAN links in order to make everything work somewhat decent because of the limited bandwidth and/or latency of each ISP.
I would like to double check if the bindings are working for the specific services, and it has been difficult to verify if the settings in the RV016 are working. I believe it's not working 100%, and I need a way to check and make sure that my settings are being followed.
What would be the best way to check the current connections to see if the service is being routed via the WAN link specified in my setting? My RV016 is HW ver 3, but not the latest firmware. Purchased about 2 months ago.
View 4 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Apr 12, 2011
Is there any good description how to configure Linksys RV016 for two WANs (cable+DSL)? It looks like switching between those two connections not splitting what is set for WAN1 and what is set for WAN2. I set load balancing as- WAN1 (cable) all HTTP up/donw should go there- WAN2 (DSL) GTalk, IMs, SMTP, POP3, IMAP up/down should go therebut looks like is not working that way. When I will go to speedtest.net and test a connection I always get less amount then connected directly through cable : Also when people try to use any session or IP sensitive web site it doesn't let them to log in because session was expired (based on IP) or IP was changed.
View 11 Replies
View Related
Dec 2, 2011
I just installed a new RV016, and have it up and running currently using just one WAN (cable) on the Internet2 port. Just FYI I do plan to have a second WAN on Internet1 (DSL) once I get this next step working and want that to be the dafault provider, hence the use of Internet2 for this first connection.I already have a WRVS4400N installed that has a whole network on it that will be independant to the new the network and am trying to connect the WRVS4400N to my RV016. It is currently plugged into port 8 of the RV016 and the port is currently set to VLAN2.I know just enough to be a danger to myself here. :-) The RV016 is using the default IP of 192.168.1.1 while the WRVS4400N uses 192.168.10.1.I do know that "Typically, a Cisco RV0xx Series router is used as an access router, with a single LAN subnet. By default, the firewall is pre-configured to deny LAN access if the source IP address is on a different subnet than the router’s LAN IP address. However, you can enable multiple subnets to allow this router to work as an edge device that provides Internet connectivity to different subnets in your LAN."Hence I have added added the 192.168.10.1 subnet with mask 255.255.255.0 (to the RV016) and have tried switching the WRVS4400N from Gateway mode to Router mode. The RV016 can see it but nothing on the WRVS4400N network has any internet access, while computers on RV016 do. I assume this is because of the firewall blocking the traffic.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 27, 2012
We have an RV016 (hardware version 2, firmware version 3.0.2.01) behind a cable modem. Attached to this RV016 is a switch to which our other devices are connected. Among those is another switch, a wireless access point and our VOIP phone system.
The issue with this setup seems to be as follows:
The Mac machines at our office seem to be unable to get internet access reliably. What we have observed is that a connection to the wireless access point is made. Google will load fine, then when performing a search it comes back with either a dns lookup error or just says that the site can't be found. Sometimes sites will load just fine, sometimes they don't. Our Windows or Ubuntu machines in our office hardly ever have that issue, but they do on occasion. Essentially internet is usable on Windows and Ubuntu, but not on a newer Mac. Mainly three Macs are affected that run a newer OS. Two other Macs (older OS) seem to be fine. My coworkers (who have that issue at work) report that at home they do not.
The DNS servers on the router were set to our ISPs addresses. I have since changed them to opendns servers. The issue persists.
When connecting a MacBook directly to the cable modem, everything works fine. Since we are using NAT, I do need to use the router. There are devices attached to it that these users need to be able to get to.
View 10 Replies
View Related
Apr 7, 2011
Is there any good description how to configure Linksys RV016 for two WANs (cable+DSL)? It looks like switching between those two connections not splitting what is set for WAN1 and what is set for WAN2
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 3, 2012
I have had fiber optics for phone, TV, and internet (30/30 speed). They upped the price 80%! I would like to keep my internet on fiber optics but drop TV and phone to cable which is cheaper. Can I have both systems simultaneously? Also, we have a Sony L-series TV/Computer. IT's a TV and computer in one. Can we have both fiber optics and cable attach to it at the same time?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 7, 2011
When i try to launch topology services in LMS 4.0 i get prompted to install a java plugin. When i install this it tells me to restart the browser but nothing is changed, it asks me if i want to install the java plugin again.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Feb 12, 2013
An external company is going to deploy multiple fiber links on my campus.Link distances vary from 120 to 400 meters.I already have the switches in production with spare SFP gigabit ports on the locations.The backbone is gigabit, so I asked them to use GLC-LH-SMD SFP modules.So, they just called me and according to them, the minimum distance for MMF links with that SFP module is 550 meters. I checked Cisco's website and it says "up to 550m"?
View 6 Replies
View Related
May 14, 2012
The core switch is a 6506 and one of the modules is the 48port POE module. The 6506 resides in the main building and we need to interconnect two other annexes to the main building via fibre. is it possible to have just 2 sfp ports on the 48 port module or how to connect the fibre cable to the switch?
Also, if the existent network is made up of Cat5e cables would it be of anyuse to use Cat6 cables for uplink for the switches on each segment to the core switch. I feel basically the Cat5e would nullify the speed of the Cat6 or am i wrong and this would make uplink speed faster.
View 10 Replies
View Related
Apr 2, 2013
I have X3000 home gateway and very happy with this device. Use it now as ADSL modem/wifi router. Everything works fine but there is something I do not understand about this device.It has 4 LAN ports and a Cable port. Suppose, I am upgraing from a copper service to fibre. Fibre providers comes and installs their fibre box which is kind of a "modem" for fibre technology. how do I connect fibre box to X3000? Do I use Cable port or a LAN port?
As far as I understand the 4 LAN ports work as switch ports (work at OSI level 2, provide access strictly within same subnet, all devices connected to these ports share the same default gateway), and Cable port gets a different IP address via DHCP or another protocol from the fibre box, or directly from ISP (if we have PPPoE or IPoE service as an example). And there would be no point in plugging WAN link into a LAN port as X3000 would not be able to communicate to the gateway on the other end of the cable.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 2, 2012
i am unable to see WS-C3750E-24TD-SD OID in common services of lms version 4.0.1Is this supported in this version ? and in order to get the support of this device
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 12, 2012
I have a WS-X6816-10G-2T module with X2-10GB-SR modules. I will be getting a SMF hand off and the length of the termination is around 100 meters. (I will be getting another hand off for Inter-DC link for which I have X2-10GB-LR module). The question is can I connect this SMF hand off (short length) on the SR module?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 14, 2011
I want to "stack" a couple 300 series gigabit switches with fiber using a pair of MGBSX1 GBICs and a single LC to LC patch cable.Is there a minimum supported patch cable length in this configuration?
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 25, 2013
I need to connect 4 Floor Building with 4 Cisco 2960 - 48 ports switch each other and it needs to be through a fiber. So all PCs connected to each switch would reach the LAN/WAN from the other switch. (attached is the image here with)
I see that the 2960 has 2 SFP ports each port of each switch should connect each other or how?
My simple question is:
1. What cable / patch code I have to use = Single-mode or Multimode? ( distance for each switch will not more then 25 mts)
2. Do I have to use SFP or SFP+ module?
3. What kind of SFP/SFP+ module I have to use = Single-mode or Multimode?
4. What kind of connector should patch code have = LC / SC or ?
5. How to connect each switch with redundancy like ...each switch should be interconnected with each other or I have to choose Cisco 3750G which has more then 2 SFP ports (option#1 & opetion#2 = attached here with) =
Best practice for connecting cisco switches over fiber.
View 10 Replies
View Related
Feb 7, 2011
We have a 6509 Sup2 at our ISP edge with fiber connection to ISP. I am planning on replacing the 6509 either with 7206VXR-GE2 or ASR 1002.
How do I find out what GBIC is installed on my Sup2 right now where Fiber cable is connected?What GBIC/SFP will be compatible for this on 7206VXR or ASR1002?If I use SFP do I need to change the cable connector?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jan 24, 2012
I have 4 workstation at 4 different power substations. Each substation have switches. All substations is link with fiber optic cable throw switches. Each substation has 100 relay (IED) with different IP address it connect with substation switches. The IP address of substation is[CODE]
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 2, 2012
If I am not able to start remote desktop services on windows 7 machine, will machine can be accessible by RDP?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 23, 2012
I have a problem connecting a PC in a TwinGig Convertors (GLC-LH-SM). I want to connect a PC with a fiber cable on the supervisor WS-X45-SUP6L-E of my Switch 4500E.
The default configuration mode is X2. As I want to deploy Gigabit interfaces (that is, use TwinGig Convertors), then I configured the associated port-group:
Switch(config)#hw-module module 1 port-group 2 select gigabitethernet
*Feb 24 06:18:37.125: Port Te1/2: TwinGig Converter inserted: vendor: CISCO
Switch(config)#do sh int status mod 1
Port Name Status Vlan Duplex Speed Type
[code]....
I noted that the Swicth set up automatically 'switchport mode trunk', so i put the command 'swicthport mode access' because i want to connect only a PC. But the status is the same, I can not achieve connectivity. i just want to know how connect a PC in the interface GigabitEthernet1/4 of the supervisor engine of my Switch.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 30, 2011
correct settings > Configuration of WAG54G2 on etisalat adsl fiber optic
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 27, 2013
I would like to ask if what is the replacement for RV016? Is there any on the ISR G2 that can be set as a mulit-WAN router? Meaning can handle for more than two WAN connections.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 22, 2010
I have a rv016 that's been in 24x7 operation since I bought it a few years back. It is out of warranty. It is connected to three cable modems on WANs 1-3. Behind it are a bunch of PCs getting IPs via DHCP. There is a gateway to gateway vpn tunnel setup on wan3 to a rv082 at another site. There is a forwarding entry for http to an internal http server. Everything else is pretty much default.
The router is primarily used to aggregate bandwidth for uploading large numbers of photos. The systems behind the router initiate the uploads and the router automatically load balances the outgoing bandwidth.
This was all working fine until just recently. The ISP is Knology who is upgrading each of the 8m/768k cable modems to 25m/5m. They are also moving from DOCSIS 1 to DOCSIS 3. They are currently in the middle of this upgrade and have upgraded the modems to DOCSIS 3 as well as the speeds to 12m/2m. The problem is that the rv016 Network Service Detection, which is set to "Default Gateway" indicates that the modems fail randomly. Usually only one will be failed, but up to two will fail the Network Service Detection simultaneously.
Knology insists that there is nothing wrong with their modems. I have removed a modem from the rv016 when Network Service Detection indicates it is in a failed state and connected it directly to a computer. It will work, but it has a different IP address and default gateway. As soon as I connect it back to the rv016, it works there too, but on the original IP address and gateway. I've only tried this test this twice so far, so it is a bit inconclusive.
Speed tests behind the rv016 are the same as directly connected to one of the cable modems. The router works normally as it has for years. Nothing else is acting funny.
So my question is, is the rv016 failing or is the ISP having problems?
View 17 Replies
View Related
Jul 22, 2012
Problems on RV016 the firmware, Firmware Version : v4.2.1.02 (Jan 18 2012 14:10:55) on port PPPoE mode. It makes the dial, but not Web browsing correctly. The solution was to return the old version of firmware.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 22, 2011
I am trying to upgrade my RV016 from 3.0.2.01-tm to 4.0.4.02. I have not received any messages and the log has nothing. I have left the computer and switch for 2 hours and it never seems to end. (serial no. DF0006200812).
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 26, 2011
I have 100 mbps fiber connection. I bought 320N today I bought 320N and here is the problem:
We have a switch in the building. I am getting connection via CAT5. So I choosed "Use as WAN Port" from Ethernet settings. There is not much you can do here. I just used PPPoE and connected internet without any problem. The problem is I am only getting 32mbps. When I connect CAT5 cable directly to my computer I am getting 92mbps.
Maybe WAG320N is not establishing a full duplex connection.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Dec 28, 2011
Is it possible to have this setup on RV016?
WAN1: VOIP traffic (either by port or IP) + failover for WAN 2 WAN2: all other traffic + failover for WAN1 WAN3: failover for WAN1 & WAN2 with connection on demand
View 0 Replies
View Related
Jul 16, 2012
I have hardware version 2 and firmware 3.0.2.01 (latest firmware available for this hardware version I believe) and I cannot get it to email me logs. I have entered my outlook address and our SMTP server.The log says that it's failing each time it attempts. I have scoured the internet and I cannot find a solution that will work for me. I have found some talk of adjusting an MTU setting which is supposed to be located under the firewall / general tab.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 22, 2012
this router (RV016v3, Firmware: v4.1.1.01-sp (Dec 6 2011 20:03:18)) in regards to it not properly directing UDP packets out of the right WAN, as per the settings stored in Protocol Binding section of [System Management, Multi-WAN].I use the section to direct all traffic from desktop computers (192.168.5.100 ~ 192.168.5.199) through WAN4, and all VoIP related traffic (192.168.5.200 ~ 192.168.5.239) through WAN2(PPPoE).Everything seems to be working well except for some of the UDP traffic from 192.168.5.200 which is seen in the log going out of WAN4 instead of WAN2.I have even created a new entry for [UDP/5060~5060]->192.168.5.200~192.168.5.200(0.0.0.0~255.255.255.255)WAN2, and placed it at the very top of the list.Here are a few lines that I've observed in the log: (Refreshed the registration of two SIP Trunks configured in our PBX)
Feb 23 18:11:47 2012 Connection Accepted UDP 192.168.5.200:5060->184.72.227.214:5060 on eth4
Feb 23 18:11:46 2012 Connection Accepted UDP 192.168.5.200:5060->50.56.59.168:5060 on ppp2
Feb 23 18:11:46 2012 Connection Accepted UDP 192.168.5.200:5060->184.72.227.214:5060 on eth4
Feb 23 18:11:46 2012 Connection Accepted UDP 192.168.5.200:5060->50.56.59.168:5060 on ppp2
There are no static routes configured, so i'm baffled by what could cause some of the UDP packets to go through the wrong WAN.All TCP Traffic from 192.168.5.200 is seen going though WAN2 as it should.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 3, 2010
Would one of the 'Cisco RV016' work with a switch? I'm planning on running our work network using this device to load balance between 3 WAN connections and would like to keep the upstairs and downstairs computer users separated via a switch.Will the switch affect the load balancing or will the router still be able to detect each individual user and balance the load as seen necessary?
View 7 Replies
View Related
Oct 19, 2011
We are deploying a new batch of RV016 with the latest firmware (4.0.4.02). We are using 3 WAN ports for internet access (WAN1, WAN2, WAN3)The WAN ports connects to Cicso 800 series adsl modem with DHCP.The RV016 WAN1 port setting regularly resets to 0.0.0.0 despite that the modem dhcp is still up and running. A cold boot, resets all the configuration and WAN1 port start working againg a new ip.
All three WAN ports are set to automatically obtain ip from the modems.We have tried several modems, and even swap WAN ports, but the error is persistant to WAN1 only.
WAN2 and WAN3 are up and running without any errors. This error is persistant with WAN1 only.We have also configured a manual ip on WAN1, and after a few hours of operation on all 3 ports, traffic on WAN1 comes to a halt.We have the same error on 3 units we received last week.All there modem are configure on different subnets.It does not seems to be a configuration error with the modem as they work perfectly well with the WAN2, WAN3 ports.We also tested a RV016 out of the box using the wizard setup, without any extra setting/configuration, and we got the same error after a few hours of operation.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 10, 2013
I am trying to upgrade my RV016 hardware version 1, Firmware version 1.3.2 to firmware version 2.0.0. but can't find the file. Locating RV016_2.0.0? I am trying to upgrade to version 3.0.0.1
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jan 14, 2013
I know this is a small business appliance I got my ccna certification with the hope of practice my CLI skills with a cisco device however I read in cisco docs the small business routers doesn´t support talnet neiter ssh I mean CLI, is thta true ?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 31, 2011
I have two LANs 192.168.0.* and 192.168.1.* (main)
I'd like to facilitate port forwarding on the sub-LAN - is there a way to configure the device to do so? The "main" LANs fowarding works just fine, however I have specific ports that need to go to the sub-LAN.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 15, 2011
I have a RV016 with an internal address of 192.168.1.1. Also on the 192.168.1.0 network is a gateway server that the rest of my clients sit behind. The clients are on a 172.16.3.0/24 network. All of the gateway server does is forward the packets. It does not NAT. There is a static route to 172.16.3.0 on the RV016.
So my question is how do I get traffic from 172.16.3.0 to route through the RV016? Computers on the sub net can ping the RV016 and get a reply so I know the gateway server is forwarding the packets between the two sub nets just fine and that the static route on the RV016 works. Any traffic that tries to go beyond the RV016 never makes it. It just disappears at the RV016. I have checked all of the ACLs and they should let all internal traffic through.
View 3 Replies
View Related
