I'd like just notify the missing "no ip name-server" command in sr520 series router. However is possible to enter the command "ip name-server" the only way to delete it is to copy a modified config from tftp or other source to the startup config. This behavior is normal?
View 1 RepliesI´m trying to configure SR520 Cisco router as PPPoE server. The point is, when configuration is done and PPPoE client is directly connected to the interface, SR520 doesn´t respond to incoming PADI. PADI is not shown in PPPoE debugs (debug pppoe events, packets and errors).On the other hand, I get the PADI capturing packets with wireshark (so PADI is being sent) and the same configuration on other router works fine.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI'd like to configure a VPN with two SR520. the first router is a SR520-FE-K9 and it's at office, the second router is a SR520-ADSL-K9 and it's at home.
Each router have a static IP and individually works well. I tried to configure, by CCA, the office router as a server and the home router as a client: at home I can't see the office network and I can't navigate.
Need step by step, using CCA to configure a secure VPN.
I have a SR520 where WAN configured as PPPoE with Dyndns address. I have done all the configuration through the CCA, so far everything is working fine. But now i want to configure SSL VPN, but I have getting an error message : SSL VPN cannot be configured, please configure wan interface using a static IP address. Is there any way that I can configure the ssl vpn through a dyndns address?
View 5 Replies View RelatedHow to install an SSL key + certificate on our SR520 from the CLI. I have found the following document.
[URL]
I basically have the following files that I need to install:
Key file:
domainname.key
Certificates file:
AddTrustExternalCARoot.crt
[Code].....
i have a demroom set up which includes a sr520 as the edge router connecting to the ISP and i have a uc 560 connected to that which is working fine i also have a new business edition 3000 and a 800 series router which im looking to connect to the sr 520 for access to the ISP as the 800 series doesn't have a ADSL line on it .i have given the 800 series routers wan interface a static address of 192.168.75.14 wich is from the address range in the sr520s default vlan and excluded the address from the DHCP pool. now from the ccp express on the 800 s i can ping the wan port of the 800 s and the default vlan/gateway of the sr520 and the wan ip of the sr520 but no further also once i try pinging it from the cmd on windows i cant ping any further that the wan interface on the 800 s .
View 2 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to combine dynamic and static NAT on a SR520. My dynamic NAT is specified with:ip nat inside source list 1 interface Dialer0 overload access-list 1 permit 192.168.0.0 0.0.7.255 In addition to this I want to perform static NAT for a couple of selected internal hosts. I can do this:ip nat inside source static 192.168.1.5 10.85.10.2 which works fine but means that the source address 192.168.1.5 is translated to 10.85.10.2 for all destination IPs. What I want is for the above static translation only to occur for a particular destination subnet.To accomplish this I have tried:
ip nat inside source static 192.168.1.5 10.85.10.2 route-map toOtherSite
route-map toOtherSite permit 10
match ip address 150
access-list 150 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255
But this does not appear to work. Instead it seems to render the host 192.168.1.5 unable to progress through the NAT, whether the destination subnet is 192.168.10.0/24 or not, and I can't work out what I'm doing wrong.
I have configured the sr520 using cca.Basically I have a device connected to the sr 520 via wireless with the ip address 192.168.200.160.
The SR connects to the internet using adsl and pppoe.I configured NAT to the device for a number of ports, however it doesnt work.
how can I completely disable DHCP on SR520-FE?
View 8 Replies View RelatedWe've (an independent school) just bought an SR520 with a view to replacing one of our Draytek 2820s. We need to set up some site-to-site VPN with NAT and the Drayteks won't do it.
I've been trying to configure the SR520 in just the most basic fashion using CCA (3.1) and the CLI but with no success. I can't get a PPP connection with our ISP.
I've tried following the instructions in the software config pdf and also tried replicating the various 'running configs' reported in other posts in this forum to allow connection to a UK ISP, with no success. I don't know how many times I've reset the poor thing to factory defaults.
I have to say that I'm dismayed at how flaky the CCA appears to be. Many of the things I've tried with it simply don't work and often end up in it hanging. Close to useless in my view.
So instead I've tried to use the CLI which seems a lot more solid but is somewhat impenetrable and there's precious little by way of supporting explanation.
My operations manager says "Could you go on-site and configure a new clients new internet connection?" I make the arrangements and go on-site. As I'm working with the providers tech he says "Do you have a sub-interface confgured for a dot1q VLAN id of 1057?", I say "What?". Anyway my firewall is not capable of dot1q VLAN, so he says "Do you have a Cisco router that can provide the trunking?", I say "Yes, I tink so but not with me". The question is can I use an SR520 between my firewall and the provider demarc to route the VLAN he is talking about? My initial discovery says yes but I am not quite sure of the details on how to achieve this on the SR520.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to configure a zone-based firewall on an SR520 and am confused about the 'not' criterion. The 'zone-design-guide' says (my stress): Class- maps define the traffic that the firewall selects for policy application. Layer 4 class-maps sort the traffic based on these criteria listed here. These criteria are specified using the match.where my intention is to let only LAN hosts with IPs in the range 192.168.1.1 to 192.168.1.7 out through the firewall. There may be an easier way of doing this which I'd be pleased to hear about. But, even if there is, I'd also be interested to know what I'm doing wrong in the above.
View 0 Replies View Relatedi am wanting to open up snmp on a pix 501 6.3 version. I am planning on doing it with the following configuration: [code]
I noticed you cannot specify RO on the snmp-server command with the older pix. I don't want this configuration to open up any write access to the pix. Is there a way to specify only read only for snmp
I am wondering if it has its own DHCP router and if theres a command to enable it?Also Random side question. it hands out ip addresses to other devices (the 2950 im using infront of a router) but when I hook up another switch to this switch it doesnt initialize the port or try to connect? why.
View 1 Replies View RelatedIf you have a headsite with multiple EZVPN clients (PIX 501 & 515) connected in a star configuration can you have one remote site connect to another remote site using the intra-interface command and modifying the encryption domain on the EZVPN Server?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI came across an interesting issue and thought I would see if anyone else has encountered it before contacting TAC.I have two Cisco Catalyst WS-4510R-E switches with a single Supervisor V module in each chassis. Both Sup cards are now running 12.2(54) SG1; ipbasek9 firmware; yes, I plan to move both switches to 15 code but that's another story. Anyways, prior to the upgrade the one switch was running 12.2 (33) code; I suspect the code was never upgraded; running ipbase non - K9 code. The other switch was running 12.2(44) with K9 prior to upgrade to 12.2(54).
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have two Cisco Catalyst WS-4510R-E switches with a single Supervisor V module in each chassis. Both Sup cards are now running 12.2(54) SG1; ipbasek9 firmware; yes, I plan to move both switches to 15 code but that's another story. Anyways, prior to the upgrade the one switch was running 12.2 (33) code; I suspect the code was never upgraded; running ipbase non - K9 code. The other switch was running 12.2(44) with K9 prior to upgrade to 12.2(54). With the background set, one switch reports the following:SwitchA (config)#r?radius-server redundancy regexp represourc rmon route-map router.
View 4 Replies View RelatedWe have a catalyst 2950 switch running:
IOS (tm) C2950 Software (C2950-I6K2L2Q4-M), Version 12.1(22)EA6, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
This release doesnt have the snmp-server enable traps errdisable command.
Where to look on the cisco site for the next available release for me that would have this command in place?
12 users, 3 servers, 5 smartphones/tables on the WiFi (existing AP), future VPN server (maybe 5 simultaneous inbound VPN connections at the most with at least one client using a Mac), Cisco Gigabit small business switch.Internet access, VPN connectivity, and firewall (reporting, close/open ports for custom applications as needed)I was originally going to select an ASA5505-50 user device for the above client. The device is highly regarded on the Internet, offers a command line interface, priced right for the budget and should perform all duties required by the client.However, the addition of the RV180W to the Cisco product line has me questioning my choice.
1)Does the RV180W offer a command-line interface?
2)Is the RV180W limited in the number of users it can support without having to purchase additional user licenses?
3)How are firmware/software upgrades handled with the RV180W?
4)What will the client be giving up if they choose the RV180W vs. the ASA5505?
The RV042G manual said to use this site for support so here goes. After owning and operating the RV082 for many years, I recently upgraded to the RV042G V01. Overall the RV042G hardware appears to function pretty good. The RV042G has faster throughput, but it is slightly slower in command/ control response and boot than the RV082. I have now owned the RV042G about two days and have found a number of issues. Specifically, emailing logs doesn't work.
- Emailing logs does not work. RV042G does not appear to handle any type of connection authentication, it does not have a place for the senders user name or password. I have tried SMTP servers that require no authentication and ones that do, none of them work. RV082 worked fine with the Time Warner Cable (TWC) SMTP server, RV042G does not. Additionally, there is NO output in the logs to show a failure. So TWO bugs here. I have checked settings to ensure no blocking rules, have rebooted, and even did a factory default with no luck and absolutely no mention in the logs anywhere of failure to send.Email is my primary issue, I've also identified a number of other issues as well and included them here to avoid multiple posts. These are:
- Port 0 apparently responds to interrogation and shows CLOSED (not STEALTH per grc.com). This was NOT the case for the RV082 and is a potential security vulnerability as it cannot be redirected.
- Port 1 is CLOSED and apparently responds to interrogation. This was NOT the case for the RV082. Normally I would be good on the RV082. I could redirect any OPEN or CLOSED ports to the bit bucket (192.168.1.254 for instance). BUT, the RV042G Port Forwarding is NOT sending things to the bit bucket and instead decides to OVERRIDE the forwarding and respond to queries. So there are TWO bugs here. This is a potential security vulnerability.
- The ALL Logs tab shows nothing, but sub tabs do until AFTER you hit the clear button, then it works as expected. This happens every time you open the logs. Another poster identified this problem so this is confirmation of that issue. Also, once the dialog box for the log has closed, it will not open again until leaving the page and returning.
- Authentication failures will show up in the System Log but not in the Access Log?
- HTTPS html interface works fine in Firefox. However, turn it off and use just HTTP and there is a problem. Can't see the forms and buttons, can only see the background image. This isn't as much of a problem as I can just use HTTPS, however, with the RV082 when HTTPS was activated it would open the remote management portal regardless of whether the button was clicked or not. So really a non-issue but a bug none the less.
- RV082 could send 500 log events, RV042 can only send 100. Again, not a bug but a reduction in capability over the older RV082.One last thing, your hardware version control numbers and firmware download page are confusing for the RV042G V01. Found this when I checked if there was a newer version of the firmware than what the RV042G shipped with. "Cisco RV042G Dual Gigabit WAN VPN Router"
"Firmware Release 4.2.1.02 - RV042, RV082, RV016 firmware 4.2.1.02-tm (V3 hardware required)". The problem is that you reset the hardware version in the RV042G (V01). Just seems probable that someone will download the firmware for the RV042 V01 and try to put it on the RV042G V01. I like the RV042G overall and will wait for updates for these issues (email logs would be nice sooner rather than later as this is an advertised feature). The RV082 was a great router for a long time ONCE most of the bugs were fixed, hoping the RV042G will be the same.
I remember there is one command which can tell you which memory slot has how much big memory in Cisco 2800 or 3800. But at this moment, I just couldn't recall this command. I checked "show diag" but didn't see any information about memory.
View 9 Replies View RelatedI am currently setting up a 2800 Series router, and prefer a username/password type authentication rather than a single enable password. To do this, I did:
Router(config)# username <myuser> privilege 15 secret 0 <mypassword>
Router(config)# username2 <myuser> privilege 15 secret 0 <mypassword>
Router(config)# aaa new-model
Router(config)# aaa authentication login default local
This basically does what I want - when I connect to the router through console, it immediately asks me for a username and password. The thing is - as soon as I provide the right credentials, it takes me to USER EXEC mode (the default command mode). Is it possible to change that so that after entering the credentials, I go right into privileged exec mode?
Bonus question: As it is now, I just have no enable password, so when I login with my credentials, I issue "enable" to enter privileged exec mode without it prompting for an additional password. Is it safe to do it this way - having no enable password but requiring a username and password for login?
I'm trying to get several VPN tunnels up. It seems that only 1 map can be assigned to the WAN interface (fa4). Is this true or is there an 'extended' map like ACLs?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI an aware the SR520 is no longer made, But we use the VPN Remote aspect of it (For site to site UC540 installs), is there anything else that has the same VPN functionality, and what would i be looking for in regards to terms for the client to be on the router itself?
View 0 Replies View RelatedHaving problems configuring an SR520 to support SSL VPN with Active Directory authentication. I set up the domain and a user in the SR520. and get the login prompt remotely but when attempting to login using the active directory account i get a login error. I can login fine using local authentication.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI just received a new SR520-FE router and am having a hard time getting it configured right. AS of now it is in my lab in a simulated "customer environment". I can ping what's behind it, what's in front of it. But I can't get outside access. I know it's probably something small so I am hoping another pair of eyes might be able to see what I don't. Here is the running-config. It's the factory setup minimally adjusted.
SR520 Base Config - MFG 1.0
User Access Verification
Username: ciscoPassword: SR520#show runBuilding configuration...
Current configuration : 6177 bytes!version 12.4no service padservice timestamps debug datetime msecservice timestamps log datetime msecno service password-encryption!hostname SR520!boot-start-markerboot-end-marker!logging message-counter syslogenable secret 5 $1$m/V3$CM6/dHniD1KgHsPZV6jV70!no aaa new-model!crypto pki trustpoint TP-self-signed-
[code]....
I am having an issue get an EZVPN working between a 2811 server and a SR520 client. The symptoms are the SR520 makes multiple connection attempts to the 2811. It appears that sometimes these connections are successful and the SR520 is assigned an IP address but then the tunnel will be dropped and a new session will be started. I've attached scrubed configs for both the 2811 and the SR520. One other note, when connecting to the 2811 with a software VPN client, there are no problems, so I think the problem is with the SR520. On the other hand, the SR520 wasn't having any problems until we switched our VPN server from a UC520 to the 2811.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have cisco sr520 adsl router i have everything set up and it is ok. Internet work but i can not open some web pages In DNS is not problem NAT work fine. When i try some simple adsl gateway the problem websites work correctly. I think the problem is on sr520 router.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI am trying to set up a static VTI IPsec VPN between a SR520 and a RV110w. This works fine between the 520 and an 861, but the RV110 complains about the "permit ip any any" default policy of the VTI. (Same thing happens with the 861 and rv110) How to put a policy in place that would be used in negotiating the tunnel that the 110 would accept?
Attached the lines out of the 110's log and the VTI setup.
I am having a tough time getting my VPN client to reach any devices on my office network. I have a Cisco SR520 configured with IPSec to terminate Cisco VPN client sessions. The client is able to connect successfully. I get a username/password challenge, and then I get assigned a pool IP address on the client computer. So the VPN connection looks good at that point but I cannot reach any devices in the office network.
Config below:
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 8066 bytes
!
! Last configuration change at 06:14:35 PDT Wed Apr 13 2011 by admin
! NVRAM config last updated at 06:17:11 PDT Wed Apr 13 2011 by admin
!
version 12.4
[code]......
setting up a link between a Head Office UC540 and a remote SR520 which I want to use a PC and an IP Phone from. This remote site is the first of several.I've found several examples of site to site IPsec VPNs, but none with references to voice and data VLANs, do I need to worry about this or will the phone just work.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI've created an IPSEC VPN site-to-site from a SR520 (remote office) to a Nortel Contivity(home office)...all works really well on the VPN front as I can communicate effectively over the tunnel. However, this setup will be deployed at a few smaller sites and I'd like to setup a split tunnel so that Internet bound traffic goes straight to the Internet while traffic bound for our home office goes over the IPSEC Tunnel.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a SR520 just deployed at a remote site with Internet Access.
Working Environment:
Remote sites have SR520 with IPSEC VPN back to HQ and netflow v.5 works through the VPN back to our PRTG server.
Non-Working:
I cannot get Netflow data to our PRTG with this first SR520 implemented with Zone Base Security. I am not able to get my netflow traffic out. VPN is up and running. Internet is a dialer0 interface. I have a Kron job that does the copy run to tftp backup daily to the same PRTG server and it works fine.
Both my source interface and address on the TFTP command and the netflow commands are the same interfaces (VLAN75) and IP. The Destination ip is the same too (through the VPN tunnel).
Snipped:
flow exporter prtg
destination x.x.x.x
source Vlan75
[Code]....