I am trying to set up a static VTI IPsec VPN between a SR520 and a RV110w. This works fine between the 520 and an 861, but the RV110 complains about the "permit ip any any" default policy of the VTI. (Same thing happens with the 861 and rv110) How to put a policy in place that would be used in negotiating the tunnel that the 110 would accept?
Attached the lines out of the 110's log and the VTI setup.
I am having a tough time getting my VPN client to reach any devices on my office network. I have a Cisco SR520 configured with IPSec to terminate Cisco VPN client sessions. The client is able to connect successfully. I get a username/password challenge, and then I get assigned a pool IP address on the client computer. So the VPN connection looks good at that point but I cannot reach any devices in the office network.
Config below:
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 8066 bytes
!
! Last configuration change at 06:14:35 PDT Wed Apr 13 2011 by admin
! NVRAM config last updated at 06:17:11 PDT Wed Apr 13 2011 by admin
!
version 12.4
[code]......
I've created an IPSEC VPN site-to-site from a SR520 (remote office) to a Nortel Contivity(home office)...all works really well on the VPN front as I can communicate effectively over the tunnel. However, this setup will be deployed at a few smaller sites and I'd like to setup a split tunnel so that Internet bound traffic goes straight to the Internet while traffic bound for our home office goes over the IPSEC Tunnel.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to combine dynamic and static NAT on a SR520. My dynamic NAT is specified with:ip nat inside source list 1 interface Dialer0 overload access-list 1 permit 192.168.0.0 0.0.7.255 In addition to this I want to perform static NAT for a couple of selected internal hosts. I can do this:ip nat inside source static 192.168.1.5 10.85.10.2 which works fine but means that the source address 192.168.1.5 is translated to 10.85.10.2 for all destination IPs. What I want is for the above static translation only to occur for a particular destination subnet.To accomplish this I have tried:
ip nat inside source static 192.168.1.5 10.85.10.2 route-map toOtherSite
route-map toOtherSite permit 10
match ip address 150
access-list 150 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255
But this does not appear to work. Instead it seems to render the host 192.168.1.5 unable to progress through the NAT, whether the destination subnet is 192.168.10.0/24 or not, and I can't work out what I'm doing wrong.
I make a vpn site-to-site IPSEC tunnel between 2 RV110W the above ,you will find the configuration
Site1
Site 2
always the same message
I have a VPN working between two locations using WRV210s at each end. Now I'm looking to replace one 210 with a new RV110W. Can I get the two to work together? The config is quite different.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI am trying to connect my RV110W from my home office to our office IPSec router. I have a dynamic IP address and am using DDNS, therefore the RV110W local endpoint needs to be configured with my FQDN, not the IP address as this will change.
On page 100 the manual states
Step 4 -
• Local WAN (Internet) IP Address—Enter the public IP address or domain name of the local endpoint (Cisco RV110W).
This option is not available in my router - I am running firmware 1.2.0.9
I am using a Cisco RV110W (Firmware 1.2.09) in a branch and I would like to create a VPN Tunnel to another site that has a Cisco RV042 (firmware v4.2.1.02)
What would be the correct Configuration? the current configuration I am using is
in the RV042 i am using
Check Enable
Local Group Setup
Local Security Gateway Type : IP Only
IP Address : RV042 Pulbic IP address
[Code].....
I have an 881W with configuration posted below along with IOS version. The site has a local Exchange server and also a LAN-to-LAN IPSec. Exchange's internal IP is statically NAT'd. Problem is that when that when a static NAT for Exchange is in place, Exchage is not accessible thru tunnel. Scenarios is as below:
Exchange's internal IP: 10.50.80.21Exchange's NAT'd IP: 65.X.X.216IPSec interesting traffic: Local - 10.50.80.0/24, remote - 198.168.189.0/24Static NAT for Exchange in place: Excahgne server can be accessed over Internet. We can RDP in to the
[Code].....
configuring some static NAT entries on a remote site 887 router which also has a IPSec tunnel configured back to our main office.
I have been asked to configure some mobile phone "boost" boxes, which will take a mobile phone and send the traffic over the Internet - this is required because of the poor signal at the branch. These boxes connect via Ethernet to the local network and need a direct connection to the Internet and also certain UDP and TCP ports opening up.
There is only one local subnet on site and the ACL for the crypto map dictates that all traffic from this network to our head office go over the tunnel. What I wanted to do was create another vlan, give this a different subnet. Assign these mobile boost boxes DHCP reservations (there is no interface to them so they cannot be configured) and then allow them to break out to the Internet locally rather than send the traffic back to our head office and have to open up ports on our main ASA firewall.
[URL]
So I went ahead and created a separate vlan and DHCP reservation and then also followed the guidelines outlined above about using a route-map to stop the traffic being sent down the tunnel and then configured static NAT statements for each of the four ports these boost boxes need to work. I configure the ip nat inside/outside on the relevant ports (vlan 3 for inside, dialer 1 for outside) The configuration can be seen below for the NAT part;
! Denies vpn interesting traffic but permits all otherip access-list extended NAT-Trafficdeny ip 172.19.191.0 0.0.0.255 172.16.0.0 0.3.255.255deny ip 172.19.191.0 0.0.0.255 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255deny ip 172.19.191.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.128.0
[Code].....
I have a 5510 that i have configured for L2TP over IPSEC, not using AnyConnect. The first, and most prevelant being, VPN clients are unable to ping/access any of the hosts that are assigned a static NAT from the inside interface to the outside interface. I was able to circumvent this by adding another static NAT to the public interface for the incoming clients, but this caused intermittent connectivity issues with inside hosts. The second issue involves DNS. I have configured two DNS servers, both of which reside on the internal network and are in the split_tunnel ACL for VPN clients, but no clients are using this DNS. What is the workaround for using split tunneling AND internal DNS servers, if any?
i've had two different CCNA's look at this numerous times to no avail. A ping from a VPN client to any internal host works fine, unless it is one that is NAT'd. You can see in the config where i added the extra STATIC NAT to try and fix the issue. And this works perfectly across the tunnel but only intermittenly from the internal 10.1.4.x network. [code]
I want to assign static IPs to users that login to IPSec VPN using Group Authentication in ASA 8.2. The authentication through a Windows RADIUS server. Right now, they are connecting just fine and pulling an IP from the pool I have configured in the IPSec policy.
What would the best way to assign static IPs through VPN?
I'm having problems configuring an IPSEC VPN between an SRP521 with a dynamic IP and a ASA5505 with a static IP. Static to Static is fine between these devices and I can configure that without problems. Dynamic to Static however.
View 1 Replies View Relatedi measured with Iperf over two Cisco 1811 router, that bandwidth speed is higher then is used IPsec+GRE tunnel between two routers, than just using a static routes.Bandwidth over GRE in average is about 91389Kbit/sec Over static routes is about 88474Kbit/sec.
View 1 Replies View RelatedIs it possible to have a site-to-site IPSEC tunnel between 2 identical RV110W routers?I basically want one of them to initiate a secure tunnel with the second so that computers from one router subnet see the computers from the other router subnet.
View 3 Replies View Relatedthe RV110W IPSEC site-to-site tunnel, are there necessary 2 x public IPs for it to work, or only 1 public IP is enough? [code]If it works with 1 public ip, the "CLIENT" RV110W configuration should be straightforward (in Advanced VPN SetupRemote Endpoint i fill in the dyndns address?), but how do i setup "HOST" RV110W?
View 2 Replies View RelatedIs it possible to re-route our Site 2 Site VPN over our Static Route (T1) if the WAN fails?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to get several VPN tunnels up. It seems that only 1 map can be assigned to the WAN interface (fa4). Is this true or is there an 'extended' map like ACLs?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI an aware the SR520 is no longer made, But we use the VPN Remote aspect of it (For site to site UC540 installs), is there anything else that has the same VPN functionality, and what would i be looking for in regards to terms for the client to be on the router itself?
View 0 Replies View RelatedHaving problems configuring an SR520 to support SSL VPN with Active Directory authentication. I set up the domain and a user in the SR520. and get the login prompt remotely but when attempting to login using the active directory account i get a login error. I can login fine using local authentication.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI just received a new SR520-FE router and am having a hard time getting it configured right. AS of now it is in my lab in a simulated "customer environment". I can ping what's behind it, what's in front of it. But I can't get outside access. I know it's probably something small so I am hoping another pair of eyes might be able to see what I don't. Here is the running-config. It's the factory setup minimally adjusted.
SR520 Base Config - MFG 1.0
User Access Verification
Username: ciscoPassword: SR520#show runBuilding configuration...
Current configuration : 6177 bytes!version 12.4no service padservice timestamps debug datetime msecservice timestamps log datetime msecno service password-encryption!hostname SR520!boot-start-markerboot-end-marker!logging message-counter syslogenable secret 5 $1$m/V3$CM6/dHniD1KgHsPZV6jV70!no aaa new-model!crypto pki trustpoint TP-self-signed-
[code]....
I have a SR520 where WAN configured as PPPoE with Dyndns address. I have done all the configuration through the CCA, so far everything is working fine. But now i want to configure SSL VPN, but I have getting an error message : SSL VPN cannot be configured, please configure wan interface using a static IP address. Is there any way that I can configure the ssl vpn through a dyndns address?
View 5 Replies View RelatedHow to install an SSL key + certificate on our SR520 from the CLI. I have found the following document.
[URL]
I basically have the following files that I need to install:
Key file:
domainname.key
Certificates file:
AddTrustExternalCARoot.crt
[Code].....
I am having an issue get an EZVPN working between a 2811 server and a SR520 client. The symptoms are the SR520 makes multiple connection attempts to the 2811. It appears that sometimes these connections are successful and the SR520 is assigned an IP address but then the tunnel will be dropped and a new session will be started. I've attached scrubed configs for both the 2811 and the SR520. One other note, when connecting to the 2811 with a software VPN client, there are no problems, so I think the problem is with the SR520. On the other hand, the SR520 wasn't having any problems until we switched our VPN server from a UC520 to the 2811.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have cisco sr520 adsl router i have everything set up and it is ok. Internet work but i can not open some web pages In DNS is not problem NAT work fine. When i try some simple adsl gateway the problem websites work correctly. I think the problem is on sr520 router.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI´m trying to configure SR520 Cisco router as PPPoE server. The point is, when configuration is done and PPPoE client is directly connected to the interface, SR520 doesn´t respond to incoming PADI. PADI is not shown in PPPoE debugs (debug pppoe events, packets and errors).On the other hand, I get the PADI capturing packets with wireshark (so PADI is being sent) and the same configuration on other router works fine.
View 2 Replies View Relatedi have a demroom set up which includes a sr520 as the edge router connecting to the ISP and i have a uc 560 connected to that which is working fine i also have a new business edition 3000 and a 800 series router which im looking to connect to the sr 520 for access to the ISP as the 800 series doesn't have a ADSL line on it .i have given the 800 series routers wan interface a static address of 192.168.75.14 wich is from the address range in the sr520s default vlan and excluded the address from the DHCP pool. now from the ccp express on the 800 s i can ping the wan port of the 800 s and the default vlan/gateway of the sr520 and the wan ip of the sr520 but no further also once i try pinging it from the cmd on windows i cant ping any further that the wan interface on the 800 s .
View 2 Replies View RelatedI'd like just notify the missing "no ip name-server" command in sr520 series router. However is possible to enter the command "ip name-server" the only way to delete it is to copy a modified config from tftp or other source to the startup config. This behavior is normal?
View 1 Replies View Relatedsetting up a link between a Head Office UC540 and a remote SR520 which I want to use a PC and an IP Phone from. This remote site is the first of several.I've found several examples of site to site IPsec VPNs, but none with references to voice and data VLANs, do I need to worry about this or will the phone just work.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI'd like to configure a VPN with two SR520. the first router is a SR520-FE-K9 and it's at office, the second router is a SR520-ADSL-K9 and it's at home.
Each router have a static IP and individually works well. I tried to configure, by CCA, the office router as a server and the home router as a client: at home I can't see the office network and I can't navigate.
Need step by step, using CCA to configure a secure VPN.
I have a SR520 just deployed at a remote site with Internet Access.
Working Environment:
Remote sites have SR520 with IPSEC VPN back to HQ and netflow v.5 works through the VPN back to our PRTG server.
Non-Working:
I cannot get Netflow data to our PRTG with this first SR520 implemented with Zone Base Security. I am not able to get my netflow traffic out. VPN is up and running. Internet is a dialer0 interface. I have a Kron job that does the copy run to tftp backup daily to the same PRTG server and it works fine.
Both my source interface and address on the TFTP command and the netflow commands are the same interfaces (VLAN75) and IP. The Destination ip is the same too (through the VPN tunnel).
Snipped:
flow exporter prtg
destination x.x.x.x
source Vlan75
[Code]....
I have installed an SR520 with wireless for a client. They have asked if there is an easy way for them to monitor who is connected to the wireless at any given point in time. They are not capable of using the IOS command line.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have configured the sr520 using cca.Basically I have a device connected to the sr 520 via wireless with the ip address 192.168.200.160.
The SR connects to the internet using adsl and pppoe.I configured NAT to the device for a number of ports, however it doesnt work.
