Cisco Security :: ASDM 5.2 Command Privilege Level For Vpns
Sep 21, 2011
We have an ADSM (version 5.2(3) ) . In ASA ( version 7.2(3)) we are working with routing, access restriction and configuring IPSEC vpn with integration to our AD. We need to get two diferent profiles: one for networking administrators, who are going to manage routing, acls and have the root for ASA, and the other profile is going to be for the vpn administrators. As I read from the ASDM 6.0 user guide is posible define command privilege level. So do you consider posible to define a particular level for all the command related with ipsec vpn (Create, Modify and Delete) and asociate that particular level with the user for vpn administration.
View 1 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jun 13, 2011
I have cisco ACS 5.2 and external identity source as RSA secure ID.Currently when the RSA user login to AAA Network devices, User id & passcode prompt coming after giving the credential its going to user exec mode.Then after "enable" command again asking for Passcode giving passcode then user able to logged in successfully.
I need RSA users to get direct privlege level15 (privlege mode) ? no need to ask enable password ?
I checked this for local ACS users it is working and loca users getting directly privelege mode access...
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 15, 2013
We have more than 50 devices handling by PI 1.2 (testing) I like to know how to do configuration archiving with user who doesn't have write privilege.
I tried like this.
username john privilege 6 password cisco privilege exec level 6 show running-config
(result) show run --> blank
I tried this user with one of switch in PI 1.2. It did not do configuration backup
username inout password inout username inout privilege 15 autocommand show running-config
(result) once logged in, it automatically showed running-config. However when I tried with PI 1.2 with this user (inout). I couldn't do configuration back.
reference [URL]
create certain user with read-only privilege while PI 1.2 is able to do configuration archiving ?
View 0 Replies
View Related
Apr 29, 2011
I can't seem to enable in ASA with a non-15 privilege level user configured in ACS 4.2 (tacacs).When I enable in IOS device, it enables and "show privilege" shows level 10 as expected. ACS should be configured correctly as it works fine with IOS. User is not set with explicit settings. Group is set with "max enable level" 15 and "shell exec priv level" 15. The enable password is set to the internal ACS PAP password. Works fine in IOS.When I enable in ASA, it fails to enable, and ACS log says "Tacacs+ enable privilege too low". I suspect that ASA tries to enable into level 15 explicitely. If I try to issue "enable 10" command in ASA it says: Enabling to privilege levels is not allowed when configured for AAA authentication. Use 'enable' only. [code]
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 10, 2011
I have a customer with a 861 ISR.I want to block all the privilege 0 users from access the enable command
If i telnet into the device, as a priv=0, enable does not work
If i telnet into the device, as a priv=15, enable does work
If i telnet into the device, as a priv=0, enable does not work
If i telnet into the device, as a priv=15, enable does not work
I have issued the command:privilege exec level 15 enable Should block everyone except 15's from accessing the enable command SSH and TELNET are on the same vty:
line con 0
login authentication local_authen
no modem enable
line aux 0
line vty 0 3
[code]....
Basically TELNET is following the rules ( priv=0 not allowed to access enable ) but SSH is not following the rules ( both priv=15 and priv=0 cannot access the command ) is there a way from blocking somes users from login in completely?
View 9 Replies
View Related
Mar 11, 2013
I´m looking for the best configuration to restrict a user to read-only. The restriction should be configured via CLI not TACACS+.
-Hardware: 3750 (probably not interesting for this question)
-Oldest IOS: 12.2(53)SE1
The user should be allowed to: see the running-configurationtrigger all kinds of show-commandsping and traceroute from the device.The user should not be allowed to: upload/delete/rename files on the flash-memoryget into level 15 (not sure if I can avoid this)all other commands despite those from level 1 and those specified above.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 17, 2007
When ever I create a network object in ASDM 6.0(3) the UI also wants to send the command 'asdm location (network object IP address)' to the device.What is the purpose of 'asdm locaction ....'? Is it telling the ASA-5540 that the IP address is allowed to connect to the device using ASDM?If that is the case why does 'asdm location xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx'get denerated for every network object I create?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 28, 2012
Whether ISE-3315-K9 with ise version: Service Engine: 1.0.4.573 , supports the command level accounting
Bascially , we have integrated Cisco Switches with Cisco ISE for Device Authentication using Radius , we are able get the authentication logs on to the devices , but for any command changes or update done on Cisco devices we are not able to get the command accounting.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 27, 2011
I have ASA 5505 that has two inside security level 100 interfaces and an outside interface.On the inside interface we have corporate domain subnet with DC and 30 hosts. On the inside2 interface I have few servers that runs specific application important for our business needs, and dumb terminals that are connected to them.I have a laptop user that periodically needs access from our corporate vlan1 to one of the servers on inside 2 vlan via remote desktop or some other remote viewer client,so he can view reports etc.I have enabled same-security-traffic intra-interface command and added nat exempt command pointing specific laptop host machine to that specific server.
Now my main concern is regarding security. This user carries his laptop home, browses the web, puts USB memory, and you can imagine how this machine is susceptible to all kind of malicious software. Inside2 vlan is very important and until now it has been a very secure environment.This is no longer the case since all traffic between this inside sec level 100 vlan host and corresponding inside2 sec level 100 server is now allowed because of the enabled same level interface traffic and nat exemption rule. Do I have another solution that would allow communication based on just a tcp port number for this host? Something like port forwarding from outside to inside Vlan interface?
View 10 Replies
View Related
Sep 21, 2012
I have 2 dmz interfaces(dmz1 and dmz2) with security level 50. I am able to ping the hosts on dmz2 from dmz1. I am running a service on a dmz2 host on port 82 but i am not able to access that service from dmz1. Also, i have an inside interface at security lever 99 which is able to access that service.
Also, i have defined the following command to allow same security level communication.
same-security-traffic permit inter-interface
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 10, 2011
On a Cisco ASA 5520. I have 2 interfaces that are the same security level. I need hosts on 1 of these interfaces to be able to get to a specific IP and port on the other but I DON'T want to blanket enable 'same-security-traffic permit inter-interface" I have added an ACL inbound on the interface allowing the desired traffic and inbound on the other for return traffic and it simply doesn't work.
interface GigabitEthernet0/3.175
vlan 175
nameif Test175
security-level 30
ip address 172.30.175.1 255.255.255.0
[code]....
View 13 Replies
View Related
Feb 3, 2011
We have an ASA5520 firewall, IOS 8.0(4), running in routed mode with an operational Cisco 2821 router to ASA-5520 L2L IPsec VPN.:All Internet searches explain how to enable a L2L IPsec VPN from the LOWER security-level interface to a HIGHER security-level interface- and this is how our setup is configured and it is operational and working fine.:We now have a need to setup another L2L IPsec VPN tunnel on the same firewall BUT this time traffic will be arriving on the HIGHER security-level interface destination is to a LOWER security-level interface.:Is it possible to enable a L2L IPsec VPN tunnel between a HIGHER security-level interface to a LOWER security-level interface?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Mar 27, 2013
I have issue with traffic passing between same security level interfaces. I want to control traffic between same security level interfaces with ACL. Even no restriction, traffic does not go through. [code]
I tried to access server from THREE network to web server at FOUR network I have no response. In sh xlate output it shows "PAT Global 10.124.104.254 (28889) Local 10.124.103.1(2922) " I am not sure what else should I do. I add both same-security-level commands and it is the same.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jan 28, 2013
Quote from the RV180 manual; 'By default, all access from the insecure WAN side is blocked from accessing the secure LAN, except in response to requests from the LAN or DMZ.'
Does this mean a general access-rule for the firewall blocking all inbound (WAN --> LAN) data is not required?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 16, 2012
I'm trying to implement some best practices for ASA running on Software Release 8.2 and had a question about the default security-level behavior. Let's say I have 3 interfaces...
-inside (security-level 100)
-dmz (security-level 50)
-outside (security-level 0)
I have an ACL on the inside interface allowing http access to anywhere. Because of the ACL, the implicit higher to lower security level access is nullified. Correct?
I do NOT have any ACL on the dmz interface applied. So, would the servers in the dmz be allowed outbound access to the Internet due to the default higher to lower security level behavior?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 22, 2013
I'm an ASDM 6.4 command line novice & I'm looking for the command to delete an unused vpn key, e.g. 'key1'.Or if there's a GUI method?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 25, 2011
I'm facing a problem with two vlans. Each vlan has internet access by NAT.
In each vlan there is at least one server, who should be accessible from the other vlan and vice versa.
The function "same-security-traffic permit inter-interface" doesn't work, because NAT control is in place - so an expert.
Some experts told me it's not possible to route back out the same interface, and also not route back out the seperate subinterfaces as well.
View 12 Replies
View Related
Sep 3, 2008
Before running firmware asa722-k8.bin and asdm-522.bin ASDM "asdm location" config lines were created when we created a network object. After the upgrade to asa722-k8.bin and asdm-522.bin this dissapeared.We recently upgraded to asa724-k8.bin and asdm-524.bin which brought those config lines back.So if "asdm location" is needed, if not can we make sure those lines wont pollute the config file?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 14, 2012
I have ASA 5585 with SSP20. I want to enable same security level subinterfaces (routed mode) to communicate with each other.
I have put below command at global level but somehow it is not happening.
hostname(config)# same-security-traffic permit inter-interface
Do I also need to check for NATing or some other things apart from above command?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 15, 2013
I am trying to configure site to site vpn between Cisco ASA and Cisco router 3825, I need to establish the vpn connection with an interface that has security level of 90.I followed the procedure shown in the following link: URL.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jan 23, 2012
Verifying the operation of the ASA when configured with Global access rules. Does the global rule overide the interface security levels? According to the ASA order of operations, the interface specific rule get's processed first and then the global rules, but It does not say anything about interface security levels. Observing an ASA in production that has global rules configured I see that an interface with a security level of 50 that has no rules applied to it, passing traffic to the outside interface (security level 0) drops the traffic. Syslog shows that it hits the global access rule implicit deny. Does the implicit permit any to any less secure interface not apply?
View 7 Replies
View Related
Feb 17, 2013
I have been monitoring the alarm summary but have been off couple days and i see one of my controllers is down. Getting critical level security and message is port is down on the controller, condition link down. The other issue is config difference found between NCS and Contoller, I tried getting them to sync together but still getting the same message.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 27, 2011
Is there a way to view changes made in ASDM before hitting apply button?
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 26, 2011
I've tried 3 different machines including a server.
Basically when I try to access my ASA 5510 with the ASDM software the software never loads. So I have tried to access it through the management port https://192.168.1.2 and installed the software. The software starts up, I enter the password and it connects and loads to 100% but doesn't go beyond that point. I then try the java applet, and it as well loads up to 100% and says "Please wait, the main is coming up."
I have http server enabled, and asdm image is pointed correctly
As I said, I've tried this on two Windows XP machines and a machine running Server 2008.
I can connect through CLI all day and all night, but I'd rather (read feel much safer) configuring it through ASDM.
Here is some system version info
Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance Software Version 7.0(8)
Device Manager Version 5.0(8)
Compiled on Sat 31-May-08 23:48 by builders
System image file is "disk0:/asa708-k8.bin"
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 6, 2011
When I run the Upgrade software from Cisoc.com Wizard in ASDM i get this error:
You are not authorized to download encrypted software. Please register your self for this service.
CRYPTO_REQUEST_URL
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 23, 2012
I have gone through the docs in creating a static NAT. I have gone into firewall/NAT Rules and set the internal / external entries, set access rules for the various services. However, I am unable to make a connection remotely. Somewhere along the line, I must be missing a command or something.
ASA ver: 8.4(4)
ASDM ver: 6.4(9)
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 24, 2012
I have an ASA 5510 running ASDM 6.4(9) and Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance Software Version 8.4(4)1.I am trying to configure for the first time and I am accessing the ASA via its Management Interface.I am successfully able to connect to the device and get to the Cisco ASDM 6.4(9) page.When I try to run the startup wizard, a couple of prompts displays up to the point where the java applet runs and aks me to enter my IP, username and password.As it is a new system, password and username is blank so I enter and I get a message saying "loading software from cache" which later changes to "software Update completed" and then nothing happens.I am running MacOSX 10.7 Lion, Java version 1.6.0_33.I did try and run this on a Windows system and i was able to load the interface.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 6, 2011
Attached is what i have done for command authorization for privilege level user 2
View 27 Replies
View Related
Feb 20, 2012
Can we set ips 4260 into factory default settings with a single command?
View 0 Replies
View Related
Oct 26, 2011
Im trying to follow along documentation i see via train single videos and some online resources. I am trying to enable port security.I have a Catalyst 3546 XL when i type in "rtr1# switchport ?""port-security" is not only of the options to choose from. I have already set this as an access port.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Apr 26, 2011
nat global entry not showing up in ASDM but it does via CLI see blow, it's a policy NAT.
nat (inside) 5 access-list inside_nat_outbound_4
global (outside) 5 ************-OUTSIDE netmask 255.0.0.0
Global 5 doesnt show in ASDM 6.1 (5) the globals only go up to 3
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 4, 2011
I have created internal user on internal identiy store --> users with password & enable password , Similarly i have enabled max privilige level 15 under policy elements , authorisation & permission ,Device administration , shell profile .But i am unable to login into device using enable password , I am finding following error on my logg report
Failuire reason : 13029 Requested privilige level is too high .
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 11, 2012
I am experiencing a problem that when I telnet a router ip.It prompts for username and password.After entering username and password the router enter into exec mode with > prompt.But when trying to enter in privilege exec mode by typing en or enable it gives error:
"Translating "en" %unknown command or computer name.or unable to find computer address".
This problem started on removing easy vpn configuration which include aaa new model configurations. The router is in production environment and have remote and console access.
View 11 Replies
View Related
