Cisco VPN :: ASA5520 / L2L VPN Security Level Higher To Lower?
Feb 3, 2011
We have an ASA5520 firewall, IOS 8.0(4), running in routed mode with an operational Cisco 2821 router to ASA-5520 L2L IPsec VPN.:All Internet searches explain how to enable a L2L IPsec VPN from the LOWER security-level interface to a HIGHER security-level interface- and this is how our setup is configured and it is operational and working fine.:We now have a need to setup another L2L IPsec VPN tunnel on the same firewall BUT this time traffic will be arriving on the HIGHER security-level interface destination is to a LOWER security-level interface.:Is it possible to enable a L2L IPsec VPN tunnel between a HIGHER security-level interface to a LOWER security-level interface?
View 5 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Oct 1, 2012
I have read that nat control is no longer exist in this version,However, I am trying to permit traffic from lower security interface to higher interface security,Is it need to be Natted ?
When I try to route, i have never succeeded, but when I put a nat, I can access and the traffic go through Do I miss anything on the nat control statement ?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jun 27, 2011
I have ASA 5505 that has two inside security level 100 interfaces and an outside interface.On the inside interface we have corporate domain subnet with DC and 30 hosts. On the inside2 interface I have few servers that runs specific application important for our business needs, and dumb terminals that are connected to them.I have a laptop user that periodically needs access from our corporate vlan1 to one of the servers on inside 2 vlan via remote desktop or some other remote viewer client,so he can view reports etc.I have enabled same-security-traffic intra-interface command and added nat exempt command pointing specific laptop host machine to that specific server.
Now my main concern is regarding security. This user carries his laptop home, browses the web, puts USB memory, and you can imagine how this machine is susceptible to all kind of malicious software. Inside2 vlan is very important and until now it has been a very secure environment.This is no longer the case since all traffic between this inside sec level 100 vlan host and corresponding inside2 sec level 100 server is now allowed because of the enabled same level interface traffic and nat exemption rule. Do I have another solution that would allow communication based on just a tcp port number for this host? Something like port forwarding from outside to inside Vlan interface?
View 10 Replies
View Related
Sep 21, 2012
I have 2 dmz interfaces(dmz1 and dmz2) with security level 50. I am able to ping the hosts on dmz2 from dmz1. I am running a service on a dmz2 host on port 82 but i am not able to access that service from dmz1. Also, i have an inside interface at security lever 99 which is able to access that service.
Also, i have defined the following command to allow same security level communication.
same-security-traffic permit inter-interface
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 10, 2011
On a Cisco ASA 5520. I have 2 interfaces that are the same security level. I need hosts on 1 of these interfaces to be able to get to a specific IP and port on the other but I DON'T want to blanket enable 'same-security-traffic permit inter-interface" I have added an ACL inbound on the interface allowing the desired traffic and inbound on the other for return traffic and it simply doesn't work.
interface GigabitEthernet0/3.175
vlan 175
nameif Test175
security-level 30
ip address 172.30.175.1 255.255.255.0
[code]....
View 13 Replies
View Related
Mar 27, 2013
I have issue with traffic passing between same security level interfaces. I want to control traffic between same security level interfaces with ACL. Even no restriction, traffic does not go through. [code]
I tried to access server from THREE network to web server at FOUR network I have no response. In sh xlate output it shows "PAT Global 10.124.104.254 (28889) Local 10.124.103.1(2922) " I am not sure what else should I do. I add both same-security-level commands and it is the same.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jan 28, 2013
Quote from the RV180 manual; 'By default, all access from the insecure WAN side is blocked from accessing the secure LAN, except in response to requests from the LAN or DMZ.'
Does this mean a general access-rule for the firewall blocking all inbound (WAN --> LAN) data is not required?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 16, 2012
I'm trying to implement some best practices for ASA running on Software Release 8.2 and had a question about the default security-level behavior. Let's say I have 3 interfaces...
-inside (security-level 100)
-dmz (security-level 50)
-outside (security-level 0)
I have an ACL on the inside interface allowing http access to anywhere. Because of the ACL, the implicit higher to lower security level access is nullified. Correct?
I do NOT have any ACL on the dmz interface applied. So, would the servers in the dmz be allowed outbound access to the Internet due to the default higher to lower security level behavior?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 21, 2011
We have an ADSM (version 5.2(3) ) . In ASA ( version 7.2(3)) we are working with routing, access restriction and configuring IPSEC vpn with integration to our AD. We need to get two diferent profiles: one for networking administrators, who are going to manage routing, acls and have the root for ASA, and the other profile is going to be for the vpn administrators. As I read from the ASDM 6.0 user guide is posible define command privilege level. So do you consider posible to define a particular level for all the command related with ipsec vpn (Create, Modify and Delete) and asociate that particular level with the user for vpn administration.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 25, 2011
I'm facing a problem with two vlans. Each vlan has internet access by NAT.
In each vlan there is at least one server, who should be accessible from the other vlan and vice versa.
The function "same-security-traffic permit inter-interface" doesn't work, because NAT control is in place - so an expert.
Some experts told me it's not possible to route back out the same interface, and also not route back out the seperate subinterfaces as well.
View 12 Replies
View Related
Jul 14, 2012
I have ASA 5585 with SSP20. I want to enable same security level subinterfaces (routed mode) to communicate with each other.
I have put below command at global level but somehow it is not happening.
hostname(config)# same-security-traffic permit inter-interface
Do I also need to check for NATing or some other things apart from above command?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 15, 2013
I am trying to configure site to site vpn between Cisco ASA and Cisco router 3825, I need to establish the vpn connection with an interface that has security level of 90.I followed the procedure shown in the following link: URL.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jan 23, 2012
Verifying the operation of the ASA when configured with Global access rules. Does the global rule overide the interface security levels? According to the ASA order of operations, the interface specific rule get's processed first and then the global rules, but It does not say anything about interface security levels. Observing an ASA in production that has global rules configured I see that an interface with a security level of 50 that has no rules applied to it, passing traffic to the outside interface (security level 0) drops the traffic. Syslog shows that it hits the global access rule implicit deny. Does the implicit permit any to any less secure interface not apply?
View 7 Replies
View Related
Feb 17, 2013
I have been monitoring the alarm summary but have been off couple days and i see one of my controllers is down. Getting critical level security and message is port is down on the controller, condition link down. The other issue is config difference found between NCS and Contoller, I tried getting them to sync together but still getting the same message.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 21, 2012
i hav asa5520 i copying configuration from PIX to ASA5520 (7.2) everything working fine bt problem is that after sometime my DMZ interface losing connectivity ...
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 26, 2013
I have an ASA 5520 K8 with a smartnet contract, how can I proceed to get K9 software so that I will be able to use 3DES/AES encryption key.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 15, 2007
I want to put the asa5520 to the factory default please let me know how to do that. how to remove the configuration file from it.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Aug 4, 2011
i need replace a Fortigate 310B with Cisco products, that is, all Web Filtering, IPS/IDS, AV, so, the question is, what we can use to replace?First, we can use Cisco ASA 5520 right? with CSC Module, so, this for Anti-X, but for IPS? is better router with IPS on IOS? or IPS Sensor? or other Cisco ASA with IPS Module?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 14, 2013
A simple question - I have ASA 5520s and was wondering what license is required to create multiple (more than default 2) security contexts.
The ASA already have ASA 5520 VPN Plus license.
Software Version 8.4(1)
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 8, 2011
I have installed CSC-SSM-10 on cisco ASA 5520.I am facing two problems
1 : When I send traffic from ASA to SSM module then internet connection becomes slow and sometimes internet session disconnected.
2. When I try to manual update then following erros shows please see attachment .
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jun 1, 2011
I have an ASA5520 in location A with an ISP connection and a matching ASA5520 in location B with a separate ISP connection. We have fiber connecting the two locations and vlans passing back and forth so I will be able to configure the failover via a vlan as well as extend the ISP's to each location via vlans. The Active/Active configuration with the multiple security contexts does not seem to be an issue but how is a redundant ISP configured in this mode?We want to have context A using the ASA in location A with ISP1 as the primary and failing over to ISP 2 in locaiton B We also want to have context B using the ASA in location B with ISP 2 as the primary and failing over to ISP1 in location A Would route tracking provide the desired result? Is there a better option?
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 24, 2012
I am on BrightHouse cable internet and running a Netgear WGT624 v3 wireless router and WPA-PSK + WPA2-PSK. Computer1 is the only computer on the network at present and is connected via CAT5 cable. No wireless computers here are turned on.If I enable wireless radio, my SpeedTest (www.speedtest.net) is consistently 2- to 3 Megs slower than when wireless is turned off. I have run this comparison over a dozen times spread out over about a 14 hour period.
View 8 Replies
View Related
Dec 11, 2012
My router got turned off for aroud 2 hours, now my speeds have dropped by around 40-50% according to speed test.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 20, 2013
Is it possible to lower the power draw on the Aironet 1552e AP (AIR-CAP1552E-N-K9) so it will run on a standard PoE device (IEEE 802.3af). The spec sheet for the AP says you need to either use the Cisco PoE injector (AIR-PWRINJ1500-2=).Is there possibly a firmware upgrade/downgrade or some sort of command I can use?The APs being used are running LWAPP and require a controller.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 20, 2013
i'd like to know if there's a routed switch lower than 3750x? also 2960s? but have equal functionality like switchport mode access, trunking, spanning-tree, etherchannel, etc.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 30, 2012
I have a 1.25 mbps download and .2 upload speed. I have a netgear n600 router and have wireless and cannot change to wired. I have around a 120 ping all most always. My current speed is the best in my area too. Is there any kind of equipment that will give me a lower ping for online gaming? Is there any router settings for this?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 30, 2011
I just recently purchased a Linksys WAG320N and replaced a setup with Linksys AM200 modem and a good ole Linksys WRT54GL. Problem is that after the switch i immediately got around 100 KB lower transfer speeds no matter what source i use or kind of transfer i perform. If i earlier got for example 860KB/sec i now only gets 760KB/sec.I´ve set the modem/router up pretty much using the default values, are there any settings i could change to get a more efficient use of my bandwidth? I am using the provided network cable that came with the WAG320N, but i have also tested with other cat 5 cables. The file transfers are taking place using cable attached devices only.
View 9 Replies
View Related
Apr 15, 2011
I am using a linksys E3000 router, and a linksys AE1000 adapter with XP system, for some reason adapter always has to reconnect, disconnect, reconnect. and even with good connection, it only has a maximum speed 144MBPS. How to reset the adapter or the router so it won't get disconnect so often and maximize the speed.
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 31, 2011
Our firewall expert has gone off on long term illness leave and I am trying to pick up the pieces :-(
We have an ASA 5520 (local office) talking to another ASA (remote office) via a VPN Tunnel.
My 1st problem is that I cannot ping from my inside network (local) to the outside interface of my remote ASA.
My 2nd is that I have debug enabled on my rules but am not logging anything.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 24, 2011
I recently built a new computer, this computer is running Windows 7 (64 bit), playing games such as World of Warcraft I get from 250-350 ms Latency, on my old Windows XP built hooked to the same router gets about 80ms stable.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 6, 2011
We have 10M internet link and the router is 2620 we want to change it to a higher up......which one would be the best one?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 1, 2012
ASA code 8.3 and higher uses NAT objects and totally changes the NAT rule config. I am new to FWSM .... but was wondering if this comparable ? I am lookinig at upgrading FWSM 3.1(16) to a higher 4.1 version .... but have a feeling this could be a huge task if NAT config changes as with the ASA's
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 13, 2011
I am setting up a remote site to provide a backup internet circuit for outbound traffic. Everything is working from the main site by redistributing a static route and using default-information originate within BGP to my MPLS provider.Now on the remote site I setup a static route with an AD of 250 which is higher than the AD of 20 we are getting from the main site over the MPLS network. When the route come up BGP uses the default route from the main site and everything works fine. When I clear the BGP routes at the main site the backup site installs the static route with a higher AD. The problem is when the BGP route comes back up the static route is not getting removed. From looking at some other posts it seems that the redistributed local route is still preferred by BGP. They mentioned setting the weight to 0 in a route map which I tried but I am not getting the results of removing the static route and using the BGP route.Remote site router config: router bgp 65011. [code]
View 24 Replies
View Related
