I have a 6509 that has dual SUP32's.Just want to make sure and give a reason(if there is one). Slot 6 always becomes the active hot on a full reboot. Meaning from no power to the whole switch to powered on. What is the election process for Supervisors?
View 5 Replies i have one of my switch modules that shows PwrDown when i issue the command show mod.
Mod Ports Card Type Model Serial No.
--- ----- -------------------------------------- ------------------ -----------
1 9 Supervisor Engine 32 8GE (Active) WS-SUP32-GE-3B SAD09120263
2 48 48 port 10/100/1000mb EtherModule WS-X6148-GE-TX SAL1029VWZ5
[Code]....
i tried disabling the diagnostic monitor for the module, did a power enable module command and then reset it but it still fails. this is the third blade that i am replacing in a few weeks and i still get the same error. i am persuded that it is not a hardware since it is the third blade in a matter of weeks. after the module reset, i receive this error % module 3 is operationally off (FRU-power failed)
could an ios upgrade solve this issue? are there any ios related bugs?
We have a cisco catalyst 6509 with Supervisor Engine . After power outage, the switch always start in Rommon mode. Configuration register is 0X2102, we want to it always start in normal mode. What should i do?
View 3 Replies View RelatedThe power supply on 6509 NEB A is not working with me . I have installed only one power supply on the box WS-CAC-3000W
It is showing me that "Input OK , Output fail " from the LCD
I tried with another WS-CAC-3000W , another power source but still same problem .
I am trying to find a way using CLI that I can identify the amperage being used by a 6509 chassis. I have looked through all of the sh power and sh env commands and seem to only find the power being used on the DC side (since the output referemces 42V). Ddint know if there was something I was overlooking. To each things from the AC side will take getting an electrician in which is what I was hoping not to have to do.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have a 6509 box with the following modules:
View 4 Replies View RelatedWe had power failure catalyst 6509 and after the device boot up ssh does not work any more below is error messages
line con 0
access-class 90 out
logging synchronous
[Code]....
My DIR-825 stays on even when I flick the power switch, for as long as I don't disconnect the externally powered Belkin USB hub from it. Some lights do come off, Internet light turns orange, but it stays on. If I disconnect the hub before trying to shut down the router, it turns off instantly.
I feel slightly worried by this because as far as I am aware, a USB client device shouldn't be feeding power to the host. On the other hand, the host shouldn't be accepting power from the client either.
Also, sometimes after days since last reboot, the USB light on the router is not on despite connected devices, and they may or may not appear in Shareport.
I am trying to use a Tekradius Windows2008 server to aaa authenticate switch admin logins. The Radius server and 6509 loop0 are in a management VRF "netman". I can happily ping to and from the Server and loopback0 interface without issue. I have also tested the radius server account using RadiusNT on a workstation. I get an accept reply with the following variables..
shell:priv-lvl=15
NAS-Prompt
Here are the relevant parts of my config as far as I can see..
aaa new-model
aaa group server radius SRADIUS
server-private 192.168.1.101 auth-port 1812 acct-port 1813 key cisco
ip vrf forwarding netman
ip radius source-interface Loopback0
!
aaa authentication login default group SRADIUS local
[code]...
Im having a strange problem on a 6509 switch. I am trying to use a Tekradius Windows2008 server to aaa authenticate switch admin logins. The Radius server and 6509 loop0 are in a management VRF "netman". I can happily ping to and from the Server and loopback0 interface without issue. I have also tested the radius server account using RadiusNT on a workstation. [code]
View 8 Replies View RelatedI have a 6509 running catOS that i had to do some routing changes on this weekend. I guess i forgot to set the default route so now I can't login or ping from outside the local subnet and because of acl restrictions on the vty lines can't login from a device within the local subnet. I can login to the sup module so i'm trying to figure out if there is way to get to the switch from the sup like you would access the sup from the switch by inputting the command session 15 or session 16, is there a way to do the reverse to get to the switch from the sup?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have number of 6500 switches and we are in the process of getting support contract renewed now when i buy support for my 6500 series switches i have to inform main module serial numbers (Only this one). or do i also have to inform about sub module serial numbers to my support vendor?
View 1 Replies View RelatedSuffered a big outage on the network, the fix was to reload the module 3 on the 6509 switch, we had these errors on the log %CONST_DIAG-SW1_SP-3-HM_PORT_TEST_FAIL: Switch 1 Module 3 TestUnusedPortLoopback Port(s)[24,46] failed. System operation continues.in the end, we reloaded the card and it was all ok. is there anything I can do to check the card / or any deeper logs? would that error cause the card to crash?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a 6509-E chassis that was prevoius in a VSS configuration. Due to some VSL failures I had to cobvert it to a standalone chassis but would like to bring it back to a virtual system.
Whenever I try to convert it by using the command "switch convert mode virtual" I get the msg %Please configure local switch number first". After doing so by entering the CLI cmd "switch set switch_num 1 local" I still get the same message.
in my 6509 switch while i checked is showing some thing like this RDCCI65F0#sh environment
environmental alarms:
no alarms
backplane:
operating clock count: 2
[Code].....
I have configured cisco 6509 to do nating and its not working. Static nat is perfectly working fine below is the config.
View 6 Replies View RelatedI have one CISCO 6509 Switch in my store. I tired to login in that switch but couldnt.. Once it's booted it's asking me: rd: . Find the attachment. I recover the password by changing confreg value but that also failed.
View 8 Replies View RelatedHow a 6509 pair handles the loss of the other vss switch, and what happens when the other comes back on ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am doing a deployment of a cat 6509
Any checklists that they fill in pre deployment, ie card failover tests etc ?
recently a Cisco 3560E switch went down due to a power surge. the switch is getting power but i am only seeing the below message continously. it is keep on rebooting. i try to reset to factory settings/ safe boot nothing worked. is there any way i can bring the switch up or it is hardware failure.Using driver version 1 for media type 2Base ethernet MAC Address: 00:23:33:af:1b:00Xmodem file system is available.The password-recovery mechanism is enabled.Using driver version 1 for media type 2Base ethernet MAC Address: 00:23:33:af:1b:00Xmodem file system is available.The password-recovery mechanism is enabled.
View 5 Replies View Relatedwe need to relocate our core switch 6500 with sup 720 to another bldg
what is the command to gracefully shut it down I mean power off
I was told one can just switch off the power
We have Communication Media Module (WS-SVC-CMM) mounted on 6513 switch. It went down twice and we brought it up by applying "power enable module".
View 4 Replies View RelatedCan a Cisco SG300-10P switch power a Cisco SG200-08 switch over POE? Or an SG200-08P power an SG200-08 via POE? I have an area where I'd like to put a small switch, but would like to avoid having to have electrical power run to it. Or will the SG300 and SG200 POE switches only power endpoint devices such as cameras and IP phones?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have an issue with a 3560 in my network, after sometimes it fails to give out power to some ip phones,while others are not affected and below is the message i get
"Power given, but Power Controller does not report Power Good"
output of sh power inline and sh env all : everything seems to be ok on the switch
#sh power inline
Available:450.0(w) Used:48.0(w) Remaining:402.0(w)
Interface Admin Oper Power Device Class Max
(Watts)
--------- ------ ---------- ------- ------------------- ----- ----
Gi0/1 auto off 0.0 n/a n/a 15.4
Gi0/2 auto off 0.0 n/a n/a 15.4
Gi0/3 auto off 0.0 n/a n/a 15.4
[code].....
It's solved by a reboot of the switch, i could have suspected a power environnment issue but it's the only equipement disturbing in the network.
If I dual connect my access switch to my 6509s running vss, what will happen, will spanning tree still block one of the ports if I don't set up an etherchannel?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI was trying to uplink a switch today on a 1500m run of SMF. I have a 6509 core switch with a 16 port GBIC module. On that end I have a WS-G5486-LX with a 3m SC to LC patch cable.On the other end I have a 3750G with a GLC-LH-SM SFP. I have checked my fiber path and it seems good, (by sight, did not have an OTDR avialable).I can't get the link up at all. Tried swapping Tx Rx at one end, Tried different transceivers. Tried different patch cables. Nothing worked. At about the mid-point of my fiber run the cable passes through another network closet with a core switch for a separate network. If I break my fiber path there and try to connect in either direction it works. The only differences are the length of the fiber run and that the core switch on the other network has a CLC-LX-SM SFP.Is it the distance? Or is there some issue connecting a GLC-LH-SM to a WS-G5486-LX?
View 7 Replies View RelatedI have upgraded my C3560-PS-S switch to the latest IOS version 12(2)55-SE4 and it is not providing PoE anymore? It used to work before this upgrade? I searched Cisco bugtrack and there is bug defined for this IOS/Switch.
Switch(config-if)#do show power inline Available:370.0(w) Used:0.0(w) Remaining:370.0(w)
Interface Admin Oper Power Device Class Max
(Watts)
--------- ------ ---------- ------- ------------------- ----- ----
Fa0/1 auto off 0.0 n/a n/a 15.4
Fa0/2 auto off 0.0 n/a n/a 15.4
Fa0/3 auto off 0.0 n/a n/a 15.4
Fa0/4 auto off 0.0 n/a n/a 15.4
Fa0/5 auto off 0.0 n/a n/a 15.4
Fa0/6 auto off 0.0 n/a n/a 15.4
Fa0/7 auto off 0.0 n/a n/a 15.4
Fa0/8 auto off 0.0 n/a n/a 15.4
Fa0/9 auto off 0.0 n/a n/a 15.4
Fa0/10 auto off 0.0 n/a n/a 15.4
Fa0/11 auto off 0.0 n/a n/a 15.4
Fa0/12 auto off 0.0 n/a n/a 15.4
Fa0/13 auto off 0.0 n/a n/a 15.4
Fa0/14 auto off 0.0 n/a n/a 15.4
Fa0/15 auto off 0.0 n/a n/a 15.4
Fa0/16 auto off 0.0 n/a n/a 15.4
Fa0/17 auto off 0.0 n/a n/a 15.4
Fa0/18 auto off 0.0 n/a n/a 15.4
Fa0/19 auto off 0.0 n/a n/a 15.4
Fa0/20 auto off 0.0 n/a n/a 15.4
Fa0/21 auto off 0.0 n/a n/a 15.4
Fa0/22 auto off 0.0 n/a n/a 15.4
Fa0/23 auto off 0.0 n/a n/a 15.4
Fa0/24 auto off 0.0 n/a n/a 15.4
We have one switch 4510R which could have total 300 cisco GE color phone connected. That means 300x15.4=4620W. Considering the 89% effiency for the PoE line cards, that means each line card needs 5191W input power from chasis power supply. Based on the 6000W power supply specs, only up to 4800W is allocated for PoE purpose. But we need 5191W from power supply which redundant mode can't offer. We don't want to go with combined mode. So should we add external power shelf to add more power?Another question will be how much power we need from utility or UPS. For example, the efficency of cisco power supply is 75% and we use two 6000W power supplies in redudant mode. Then we need 8000W. The voltage is 220V. Then the AMP we need is 36.4A from UPS or utility power.
View 2 Replies View Relatedpower supply problem...?Switch cisco WS-C3750-24P is showing "Unavail" from sh env all.Switch3750#sh env all FAN is OK,TEMPERATURE is OK,SW PID,Serial# Status Sys Pwr PoE Pwr Watts,Does it means that power supply 1 was removed? failed?,Do you know about another command to see more details?
View 3 Replies View RelatedWe have 9 x 3750x switches with 5-nonPOE and 5-POE. There is a limitation with 4 POE per stack with Stack Power.
Can we combine all 9 to one stack since there are only 4 POE?
Or, is the 4-switch limitation applied regardless if they are mixed with POE and non-POE?
I would like to check if it may be possible to hot-upgrade/swap the 4506E power supplies? Based on the configuration guide; I have summarized the steps as follows:
1. Switch has 2 existing power supplies to be upgraded
2. Remove right side/bay 2 power supply and install new power supply
3. At this point; the new power supply will be in err-disabled due to different power supplies on the switch
4. Remove the left side power supply and install new power supply
For item 4; during the removal of the old power supply in bay 1/left side and installation of the new power supply; I am wondering if the switch would lose power even though the new power supply is installed in bay 2?
The following discussion is based on cisco cat 6500 switches with two power supplies: p1 and p2. . Both power supplies are running in combined mode .Each power supplies is rated with 500 watts max( I just picked 500 watts for simplicity)Combined mode In combined mode, each power supply provides approximately 83% of its capacity to the chassis. This allows for greater utilization of the power supplies and potentially increased PoE densities
1) Let say our specific 6500 switch's configuration requires 1000 watts. We have two power supplies p1 and p2 ,each with rated power of 500 watts. Both power supplies must operate in combined mode. Will power supplies be able to meet the total load power requirement of 1000 watts?
Here is my understanding :The maximum power delivered by each power supplies is 83 percent of its rated power, assuming power supplies are running in combined mode.
So Maximum power delivered by power supplies
= 83% of p1+ 83% of p2
= 83% of 500 + 83% of 500
= 415 +415
=830 watts
Thus the required load of 1000 watts can not be met by our power supplies in combined mode.
2 )Suppose our switch's switch configuration needs 500 watts. Again our power supplies each rated with 500 watts, are configured for combined mode. How much power is being delivered by each power supply? Is it 83 percent of the total load i.e 500 watts?
I have 4 switches in a 3750-X stack.Here is the output from the stack why are the switches out of order and I'm not able to bring up switch 1 port 1.
switch 4 port 2 shows not connect it is I've checked the cables.
Power stack name: Powerstack-4
Stack mode: Power sharing
Switch 1:
Power budget: 695
Low port priority value: 22
High port priority value: 13
Switch priority value: 4
Port 1 status: Shut
Port 2 status: Connected
Neighbor on port 1: 0000.0000.0000
Neighbor on port 2: c471.fe84.e100
Switch 2:
Power budget: 713
Low port priority value: 21
High port priority value: 12
Switch priority value: 3
Port 1 status: Connected
Port 2 status: Connected
Neighbor on port 1: c471.fe85.3000
Neighbor on port 2: c471.fe80.2800
Switch 4:
Power budget: 697
Low port priority value: 19
High port priority value: 10
Switch priority value: 1
Port 1 status: Connected
Port 2 status: Not connected
Neighbor on port 1: c471.fe80.2800
Neighbor on port 2: 0000.0000.0000
Switch 3:
Power budget: 710
Low port priority value: 20
High port priority value: 11
Switch priority value: 2
Port 1 status: Connected
Port 2 status: Connected
Neighbor on port 1: c471.fe84.e100
Neighbor on port 2: c471.fe7f.eb00s