Cisco Switching/Routing :: Additional RJ45 Port Required On 1941 ISR
Nov 16, 2012
One of branch locations has a Cisco 1941 Router . The port details are as follows
-Gi0/0 - ISP line
-Gi0/1 - Inside Network ( To a 2960 Switch)
Now they have procurred another line from ISP through which MPLS based VPN to the Main location is configured. What are the options I have , to terminate it on the Router ? As all the On board LAN ports are filled I guess I wont be able to do anything with the current setup .Are Switching modules available ? What is the Embedded-Service-Engine0/0 port that I see on #sh ip int b output ?
I have Cisco 800 series (888w) with BRI-ISDN port. Is there any way to change the usage of ISDN port to normal RJ45 port?I want to use this SOHO router to sharing connection.
We have recently purchased 2 x 4900M switches with the following configuration:
2 x X2-10GB-SR installed in port te1/1, 1/2 (optical)
1 x 20 x 1GB RJ45 installed in the top left of chasis ge2/1 - 2/20
1 x WS-X4908-10G-RJ45 8 port 1/2 card in the top right of chassis te3/1 - 3/8
We have te1/1 connecting the 2 switches, and various vlan's and connections on the 1GB RJ45's with no problems.
However, we have a number of 10Gbps BaseT connections te3/1 - te3/5 which are causing us issues. On a reload of the switch or removal / re-install of the cable it can take anywhere up to an hour for the port to become active again. So when we reload the switch, we may get a connection come up after say 3 mins, but the port next to it may not come up for 15-60 min. The cabling is all the same (CAT6 and has been tested/verified) and all connections go to Broadcom 10Gb cards in Dell 820 servers running vmware. We have the following set on the ports:
switchport mode access spanning-tree portfast
No speed or duplex can be set on these ports - these options are not available in the config.
Once a link is finally established, it will hold the link solid with no problems, but this is a problem for us, we can't have a reboot take an undetermined amount of time for the link to come back.
I have a Cisco 1941 K9 Router. I want to add POE functionaltiy to it. Specifically I want a 4 port EHWIC POE switch to power a couple of AP's.
This is what I understand I need; Upgrade/replace the internal power supply with PWR-1941-POE power supply, This is supplied with a fan replacement also (not yet purchased).buy 1 x EHWIC-4ESG (4 port switch)buy 1 x ILPM-4 (inline daughter card / power supply board) I think the real question here is the 4 port switch... there are two types available one is EHWIC-4ESG=the other is EHWIC-4ESG-P=
Is there any difference between these two switch modules? or are they the same and the more expensive "P" version is simply supplied with the ILPM-4 daughter card for POE?
I have recieved via courier today 1 x EHWIC-4ESG, and found a ILPM-4 on ebay for a good price. WIll this provide POE through the switch EHWIC-4ESG?
I Have a Cisco 1941 router which had its GE0/1 port burnt out and we have since plugged in a module with 4 fast ethernet ports. I need to reconfigure the router such that at least one of the Fast ethernet ports can server the purpose of the GE0/1. GE0/0 connects to our Service provider and GE0/1 connected to the inside network.Currently, while connected to one of the ethernet ports, i can telnet into the router on the address 192.168.29.1. when i'm on the router, i can ping our remote site, network address 192.168.24.0 with no problem, but when i use the command "Ping 192.168.24.0 source 192.168.29.1" there is no response.
I have a cisco 1941 router. Stock standard vanilla hardware, no extras. Standard universal image. Data and Security not enabled.I would like to add a 4 gigabit port POE switch (EHWIC) module to the router..The 4 port POE switch module will be used to power and connect 2 x Areonet AP's for my home. I'm replacing a Apple Airport Extreeme and Express setup. I'll possibly later use the two remaining POE ports for security cameras.My question is, what extra hardware and or IOS version do I need for the POE swtich module to function on the 1941? [URL] I think this is the model I want EHWIC-4ESG-P #4 port 10/100/1000 Enhanced High-Speed WAN Interface Gigabit Ethernet switch with Power over Ethernet?
My questions is can a 4 port PoE switch module (EHWIC-4ESG-P) and a 8 port switch module (EHWIC-D-8ESG) be used at the same time in a Cisco 1941 router?
Here's my problem. I'm going to be using Cisco 1941 routers at a bunch of remote sites. All of these sites have 2 comm paths out. Some of them have 2 IP/VHF radios and some have 1 IP/VHF radio and a copper link using Patton ethernet extenders. From the VHF radios the data hit our MPLS network back to our HQ and the sites with copper go directly back to our HQ. Everything ends up at a Cisco 4948 switch. The problem I'm having is that I want the routers at the remote site to use one ethernet port (G0/0) as the primary and the other (G0/1) as the backup interface. I've tried the backup interface command but the problem is that depending on where an outage occurs the ethernet link to either the radio or Patton stays up so it never switches over. We're using OSPF as our routing protocol and I'm sure there's something that can be done with it but I'm not sure what.
I have a 1941 that I am going to deploy with a HWIC-D-9ESW switch module (I only need 3 switch ports but need the PoE). I am going to hang a 1262 autonomous AP off one of the ports but I need to configure MAC address port-security so that only that AP can pass traffic. I know the switch modules are 'almost' exactly like a switch for commands but I can't seem to enable or configure any port-security settings. Is port-security no available on the switch modules?
I have a strange issue that I am having an issue figuring out. I am trying to login to the 1941 router through the console port. When I enter the username and password, which I just set, it fails. I am able to login under a different login but when I try to enter the enable mode the enable password doesn't work, which I just set as well. I can login with the TACACS+ login from a SSH session. Here is the line config:
Okey so the issue here is that my computer just looses its connection after ive downloaded somewhat or something.especially when im downloading from you know what So.when i try to go on my Chrome, explorer, firefox WHATEVER it says Additional logon information may be required.so i click on that annotation and it just brings me to the home page of my main browser google home page with ofcourse no internet what so ever.. im using Wireless and wired (best connection) for the wired i use it through a cisco but neither works.it works fine on laptop and my iPhone 4.
Can you configure a Cisco 1941 to use an 8 port EHWic module and the 2 onboard GE ports in a single LAN?
I've discovered you can't have the on GE ports associated with a VLan, and I'm when I've previously researched for a solution, bridging was mentioned but I cannot seem to get it to work (or completely understand it)The reason I would like to use all 10 ports on for the LAN is becuase I have 10 devices I need to connect to the 1941?
A product I could have used a number of times is a expanded version of the C3KX-NM-1G device module. To include 2 or maybe 4 more SFP ports. From the layout behind the faceplate there is plenty of space which additional circuit boards could be placed, (which is used in the 2 port 10GB version). I don't need the 12 port fiber switch that Cisco has, because I need a few RJ45 connection at that location, which I would then have to buy additional Fiber to coper Gbics for a few connections where the switch is at. The reason I need something like this is I have a few locations which I get a main feed from the City fiber, then it gets sent out to a number of local buildings on my fiber. Maybe another option is to take the 12port switch, and have an option for 6 rj45 and 6 sfp connections.
Any limitation on building an etherchannel on the abovementioned linecard, when bundling more than one port on the same card? The 4506 is using a 6L-E supervisor engine 12.2(54)SG1.
If it's done on a 6500 with a WS-X6148-GE-TX linecard it effectivley can only reach 1gb throughput.
I have an 871w set up to add wireless connectivity to an existing network. When adding a client to the physical interfaces to test VLAN internet connectivity, however, a DHCP address is assigned but internet traffic on the terminal never reaches the network nor does the network recognize the IP the terminal shows as being 'connected'. Also, pings sourced from the VLAN do reach destinations. I've attached my config file, I think it's a routing issue of some kind.
10.26.99.0 is the existing network. 10.26.99.1 is an existing 871w router set as the DHCP server for that network and 10.26.99.10 is a Windows Server 2003 DNS box. VLAN 2 and DHCP pool alpha were control sets for trialing DNS settings.
I have cat4500 with subject module. There is strange behaviour over module installed in 3rd slot only, some ports are connected, UP & working fine. But If I am connecting new ports over same module, are not coming UP.Duplex/speed settings already checked & are fine. If i connect same machine to any other module, it perfectly comes up & operation is fine.
I have a Cisco Catalyst 2960 with IOS Release12.2(53)SE (because of a contract I can not update it) -> the release notes for this version describe the following:
When auto-QoS is enabled on the switch, priority queuing is not enabled. Instead, the switch uses shaped round robin (SRR) as the queuing mechanism. The auto-QoS feature is designed on each platform based on the feature set and hardware limitations, and the queuing mechanism supported on each platform might be different. There is no workaround. (CSCee22591)
My config is as follows:
interface FastEthernet0/1 switchport access vlan 200 switchport mode access srr-queue bandwidth share 10 10 60 20 priority-queue out mls qos trust dscp auto qos voip trust no cdp enable network-policy 1 spanning-tree portfastMy question now is:When the priority queue is not enabled with auto-qos because of the software bug is it nevertheless enabled with the additional priority-queue out command?
I currently have Cisco 3750G which is currently live and active and fully populated and only have remote access.
I have an additional same switch which I would like to stack. My initial plans were to have 2 GIbit etherchannels, but I came across the option to Stacks both switch with each other.
When I do a show switch on the live switch its set as a Member: [code]
I would like to add the new switch to the stack without losing the config for the switch which is live. I understand that the highest priority of the switches becomes the Master but as the live switch is Priority 1, would chancing this affect the switches config, or would it lose connection at all?
Also when I plug in the new switch and it reboot how do I ensure it becomes the slave without rebooting the live switch?The cables on the switch do they have to go to port1 on the live switch and port 1 on the new switch or can they be port 1 and port 2?
I need a L2 switch with dual AC power supply and RJ45 uplink The optin I got was WS-C3560X-48T-L + C3KX-PWR-350WAC , but the problem is with uplink . There is no RJ45 1G uplink , there is only option for SFP uplink The another option was WS-C2960G-48TC-L , but there is no dual AC power supply option a good model ( Dual AC power supply , RJ 45 uplink ports (Gig) , with 48 port 100/1000 UTP)
I've got a 3560-X that passes POST according to console, but there are issues nonetheless...USB console doesn't work. RJ45 works just fine. No status lights turn on at any point (e.g. syst, xps...). 10g network module is installed with a 10g LRM SFP. All lights on the module are amber. However, it passes according to POST. Switch passes traffic, obeys config, etc. Link lights on RJ45 ports work fine. This was brand new out of the box. Thinking about trying IOS reload..
I use one cisco 6506-e switch with modules (including two sup720-3B,one 6148-GE-TX,one 6724-SFP), and Thomson ViSE EM1000 encoder connect to 6148-GE-TX module with its two Gigibit RJ45 ports,Video picture can appear,but it isn't active.If connect to 6724-SFP module with GLC-T transceiver,It is OK. configure speed 1000 on the 6148 interface? configure full-duplex on the 6148 interface?
I have been making effort to solve frequent input errors of module interface(WS-X4548-GB-RJ45) in our Backbone Switch(Cat4506).Let me show you show interface information.Rx-No-pkt-buff value is increased continuously even though traffic rate of interfaces is lower than 20Mbps.We have two Backbone Switch which is operated by HA via HSRP.What bring buffer shortage to our network ? [code]
Based on what i am reading on the Catalyst 3850 datasheet, the controller functionality comes by default if i have a IP Base of IP Services license on the switch. Is this correct or do i need additional license to enable the controller functionality?What capabilities does below license provide ?
LIC-CT3850-UPG (Primary upgrade license SKU for Cisco 3850 wireless controller)
Is it possible to use my atom mini itx with pci + pci nic card and creating a firewall? No possible problems between using the motherboard port and a pci port? I'd like to fool around with smoothwall or another firewall software.
I have a 1941 router configured for Policy based routing with two ISPs.Two static default routes configured to point the gateways of respoective ISPs with same metric.But the problem is, packets are going throug the one ISP only while doing traceroute.
N/W connectivity:
ISP1-----> <----------------------> LAN1 | Router | ISP-------> <----------------------> LAN 2
Below is my configuration :
Current configuration : 5958 bytes ! ! Last configuration change at 05:18:56 UTC Mon Jun 25 2012 ! version 15.0 service timestamps debug datetime msec service timestamps log datetime msec no service password-encryption
I have this Cisco 1941 router with two Ethernet ports g0/0 and g0/1. The g0/0 is connected to office LAN with internet access. As my office LAN is DHCP, it will assigned a IP address for g0/0 since this g0/0 is configured as "ip address dhcp". Now my question is that i have a group of 5 pcs, namely PC1, PC2, PC3, PC4 and PC5 that is connected to the switch and one of the ports of this switch is connected to g0/1 of Cisco 1941. Is it possible that let say PC2 and PC3 (both DHCP enabled) could access the internet access from g0/0 and at the same time, the office LAN assigned IP address for PC2 and PC3 automatically?
Office Lan with internet access (DHCP) (Default gateway 10.0.0.1) | | g0/0 (DHCP enable) (DHCP assigned IP address 10.0.0.138) Cisco router 1941 g0/1 | | HP Switch | PC1 PC2 PC3 PC4 PC5
Is this operation possible? if possible, how to configure inside the router 1941 to achieve this objective?
I have just set up my Cisco 1941 router to my cable internet connection. I have access to everything, but I cant login successfully into Cisco CP.
I set up a new user with level 15 privileges and a secret password. I go to login via webbrowser and I put in my credentials, but I get rejected. I have tested the username and password via the CLI, and it works fine, I just cant seam to login to Cisco CP.
the IP next hop 10.84.23.254 is cascaded on my customer LAN . At nominal time the router advertsed the route in BGP
pjnb1376#sh ip bgp nei 57.213.169.169 ad Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path *> 10.84.22.0/23 10.84.23.254 0 32768 i
When the lan interface of the router goes down , the router still advertise the route !!! Even if the IP next hop 10.84.23.254 is not reacheable anymore ....
The box is a Cisco 1941 using 1900-universalk9-mz.SPA.151-4.M1
