I have a C7200 router which does not support full feature CBWFQ. There are no option to configure following commands:
class-map match-any voice
match protocol rtp
match ip dscp ef
[Code].....
Router ios for c3600, c7200, c2600 that support ikev2? (command crypto ikev2 )
View 5 Replies View RelatedCBWFQ kicks in when the interface becomes congested and there is no available space in the queue but I need to find a solution to the scenario below:Im using a Gigabit interface on the 3945 Router that connects to the ISP. The ISP limits bandwidth to 60Mb so I need to make sure when I reach the limit of the 60Mb the router starts using the BW percentages defined in the policy-map using classes. any kind of traffic go out as it wants but as soon as the 60Mb limit is reached, the priorities defined by the traffic classes will kick in just as if the interface ran out of queues (as CBWFQ usually works).
View 7 Replies View Relatedwe have some strange problem on our c7200 IOS 12.2(31) with an e BGP peer. the eBGP session begins as usual and without any problem, all prefixes (Full BGP table) are announced to the neighbor, of course during this time the CPU goes high up to 80%. Then the both peers are in sync and traffic run as usual, but after some minutes the CPU goes again up to 80% and the debug on the neighbor side shows that it gets again the BGP updates for all BGP prefixes from our 7200 with "rejected - duplicated" comments for every received prefix, it means that it gets the updates for prefixes which are already exists in BGP table.
And it happens every 3-5 minutes. Truly said I can't explain why our 7200 always tries to send the Full bgp table again and again. The work-around was to configure the peer with "soft inbound", it's OK and we'd like to use it anyway , but from my opinion BGP shouldn't send Full BGP table very 5 minutes without "soft inbound" as well.
Does the nexus 7010 support virtual switching yet? All of the posts I have found from about a year ago say that it is going to be supported, but there were no dates listed. I heard the same thing from Cisco a while back, but haven't followed up with it.If it is supported finally are there any configuration guides available for it?
View 7 Replies View RelatedDoes Catalyst 3550 switch support inter vlan routing ?
View 12 Replies View RelatedCan nexus 5010 supports inter v lan routing , as there is no core switch and router available in current network.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have lots of PPPoE users that get Virtual Access interfaces created upon login based on a virtual template. I need to traffic shape them. I know how to get it to work on an individual basis, because the policing within a service policy works fine. As soon as i change it to shaping it leaves things wide open.I really dont care how it gets done, I just need to be able to specify a speed to be traffic shaped and apply that to a virtual template. I need to limit speeds on the download and upload, i understand that the upload i will use the policing, but the download i need it to smooth out the flow and be traffic shaped, not policed.
Here is my Policies and classes:
***
policy-map CHILD class class-default bandwidth 1650policy-map PARENT class class-default shape average 1650000 service-policy CHILD****
Here is my Virtual Template:
****
interface Virtual-Template8 description pppoe-auth-FTTH ip unnumbered FastEthernet0/0 ip access-group subs-in-FTTH in ip mtu 1493 timeout absolute 6120 0 peer default ip address pool FTTH-POOL ppp authentication pap pppoe-auth ppp authorization pppoe-auth ppp timeout idle 84600 service-policy output PARENT
[code]....
The results i am getting is unrestrcited throughput, i am seeing about 40mb of throughput when the target is to limit to 1.65MB. As you can see from the output the PARENT class is seeing 279116 packets, but the shaper only saw 59. In all the examples i see on the internet these two numbers should be the same. Why is the shaper not acting on all the traffic crossing that class/policy?
Hardware/IOS:
Cisco IOS Software, 7200 Software (C7200-IK9SU2-M), Version 12.4(12), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
Does the Model "WS-C2960-24PC-L" Supports IP Routing or not?
View 9 Replies View RelatedI have a 50 Mbps metro ethernet connection between our main office, and our collocation site, where we store web servers, DR equipment and VPN access gateways. I have two Cisco 3845 ISR's connected to the metro E circuit. The interfaces on each router are configured as 100/full as requested by my ISP. We are connected via ethernet to a fiber media converter.
As I understand, CBFWQ will not kick in until congestion occurs on an interface. I also understand that the bandwidth command on an interface is to provide bandwidth related information to upper level protocols (like EIGRP, etc).
My question is that since the interface where I have CBWFQ configured on is at 100 Mbps, but my circuit is at 50Mbps, how can I get my routers to kick CBWFQ in when traffic demand exceeds 50Mbps+? Does the bandwidth command on the interface control that as well?
I have problems to configure CBWFQ on a ethernet sub-interface on a Cisco Router ASR 1001. Then I applied the policy in the physical interface but it should be is in the sub-interface. How can I configure CBWFQ on sub-interface in ASR 1001. (version 3.02).
Error Messages:
CBWFQ: Not supported on subinterfaces and efps
This the final output:
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0
description Conexion WAN
bandwidth 153600
no ip address
load-interval 30
no negotiation auto
[code]....
i have 7206VXR with trunk interface toward customers, now i'm trying to configure CBWFQ on one of the sub-interfaces for specific customer,while trying to apply parent policy which includes child policy i'm getting the following message:Must remove traffic-shape configuration first.
here is the configured policy:
ip access-list extended ACL_TEST_SRV
permit ip any host 192.168.10.1
permit ip host 192.168.10.1 any
!
class-map CM_TEST_SRV
match access-group name ACL_TEST_SRV
[code]....
I am preparing configuration (currently in lab) for Per-Tunnel QoS in DMVPN on ASR 1002F for one of our customers, and I came across one issue. According to restrictions for this feature, I cannot apply per-tunnel QoS in conjunction with interface based QoS. This means, I can provide shaping with hierarchical CBWFQ for each spoke, but I cannot guarantee anything on physical interface! What if there are services in native MPLS? I am also unable give reservations for BGP which is used on PE-CE link! How about monitoring spoke PE-CE links natively? I can only apply policy-map with class-default on physical interface. When I add anything related to queuing for that class (or any other non-default class) I get the message:
R1(config- pmap)class routing
R1(config- pmap-c)#bandwidth 16
service-policy with queuing features on sessions is not allowed in conjunction with interface based
[Code] ........
Coincidentally when i tried to configure router 877 as an adsl router i found that a vlan configuration is included. my question is what is the benefit of using vlans in router ??? i studied that we use it in switches for the purpose of network enhancment from broadcasts and netwrok segmentation. why we use vlans in routers ?
View 9 Replies View RelatedDoes the 4500 support VSS (Virtual Switching System) ? On the official product overview page it says: 1.6 Terabits capacity with Virtual Switching System (hardware-ready)What means Hardware ready ? Does it mean that it supports VSS in the same manner as the 6500 ? The reason I'm asking this question is that I didn't find any info on the Internet about this. We would like to upgrade our network by interconnecting the 2 sites with Layer 2 redundant links (Layer 2 extension), but I'd like to use the both links in a load-balancing manner, which can be a real pain in the *** with STP. The choice is between 4500 and 3750 stackable core switches. The 6500s are very expensive.
View 6 Replies View RelatedDoes this Router Support SIP Forwarding?
View 1 Replies View Relatedwhen the VSS will be supported on Catalyst Supervisor Engine 7-E or 7-LE and on Catalyst 4500-X?And does VSS will require Enterprise license ? or the IP base will be enaugh?
View 7 Replies View Related I have a 3560G switch with c3560-advipservicesk9-mz.122-46.SE and 2 routers. The switch has vlans defined. I want to route all traffic on vlan 25 out of one of the routers exclusively. Here is what I have attempted:
-Set the SDM template to routing & reload
-Define an access-list for the v lan traffic
-Define the route-map
-Apply the route-map to the vlan interface
When I attempt the last step I receive the following syslog error:
%PLATFORM_PBR-3-UNSUPPORTED_RMAP: Route-map RM_IMDGuest not supported for Policy-Based Routing
Also, the route-map is removed from the vlan interface after this error is thrown. Im 99% confident that PBR is supported on this switch (am I wrong?). Here is the relevant show output:...
access-list 125 permit ip 192.168.25.0 0.0.0.255 any
route-map RM_IMDGuest permit 10
match ip address 125
set ip next-hop 192.168.5.3
[code]....
We purchased ME 3400 switch and trying to implement it. But its quite surprising in the ME3400 configuration guide that the switch does not support VTP. When I checked in Feature navigator under feature "VTP" i could see ME3400 supports VTP. But when i get into CLI of ME3400, i am not getting any option of configuring VTP. I could see in some sites VMPS is supported in ME3400.
I would like to confirm the following:
1. Does VTP support present in ME3400 or not? If not, what would be the reason that it is not included in ME3400.
2. If not what is the alternative.
Network is already running VTP of around 30 switches.
Its required that all ports on nexus 7k should be user configurable as either 1G/10G/FcoE. Which module do i need in this case ?
View 0 Replies View RelatedDoes the Catalyst 3560 support GRE ?
I know that Catalyst 3750X support GRE ,but Catalyst 3750X cannot work in hardware it.
Does the Catalyst 3560 cannot work in hardware too?
Does Cisco SG200-50 50 port gigabit smart switch have support for SNMP ? I have updated the firmware and still can not find any option for snmp.Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI would like to ask you that switch WS-C3750x-24S-S can support with GLBP?i have IOS version : S375xvk9t-12258SE.
View 2 Replies View RelatedIf i look at the Feature Navigator , it says that IP Base Supports OSPF and EIGRP. But if i look at the Cisco Link it contradicts the Cisco Feature Navigator.
[URL]
if I have 6509-E with VSS-SUP720-10G and want to run OSPF and BGP on the Switch. What is the IOS i require? WIll IP Base Suffice or i need to take Advance or Enterprise Image.
We will deploy several 4507 with 2xsup7 as a L2 access switches for our office.Does LAN_Base IOS version support SSO or we need purchase IP_Base IOS (L3)?
View 1 Replies View RelatedIf the 3560 or 3750 "X" series support GRE.I am pretty certain the older 3750-E does not support GRE (both in hardware and software)Was hoping the new super duper X series do. If not, it could get expensive
View 5 Replies View Relatedi have some ME-3600x. some of version 12.2 and one of version 15.5. te last one hast same config as all other. but if i check for rstp it sends.i know abount global config commands:
-spanning-tree mode rapid-pvst
-spanning-tree extend system-id
but there is no spanning-tree support. this causes many more problems. so it is important to solve spanning tee at first.is it possible without downgrading this device?
I have a 3750 running 12.2(55) and when I configure BGP I only get the standard AS number choice of 1-65535, but my provider is supplying a 4-byte AS number which is six digits and it gets rejected at the prompt on the 3750. Does that mean no support on 3750
View 1 Replies View RelatedWhen using dynamic configuration tools, if I choose 2960 (not 2960s), I have the option to choose RPS2300 as redundant power, but when I choose 2960s, I cannot choose RPS2300. However, in a document describe both 2960 and 2960s, it said that RPS2300 can be used. Does RPS2300 support 2960S?
View 1 Replies View RelatedThe switch ws-c3524-XL with c3500xl-c3h2s-mz.120-5.WC17.bin not support the command dot1x?
I ask that because i´m unable to write this command: aaa authentication dot1x default group radius
And enable 802.1X authentication on the interface with this command: dot1x port-control auto
I am looking for a router to route between VLANs on a Cisco Small Business 300 Series 10-port Gigabit Managed Switch.The router needs to support 802.1Q and also have Gigabit ports.I have been looking at the Cisco small business RV series of routers but most of these seem like Wireless routers and I don't know if these will act as proper routers.I already have a Cisco SRP547 and this does not seem to have proper 802.1Q support.
View 12 Replies View Relatedthis module WS-X4748-RJ45-E able to support 802.1x?
View 1 Replies View Related[URL]The Cisco 2811 does not support the HWIC-4T1/E1 module. But, I installed HWIC-4T1/E1 on the 2811 running 124-24.T2.
View 3 Replies View Related