Cisco Switching/Routing :: Expansion Module Required At Existing 6509?

Jan 7, 2013

We have a requirement to build a datacenter within a datacenter for a new project. The existing Core network is 2 x Cisco 6509 in VSS configuration. We would like to connect the new datacenter to the existing Core switch from the new low-end Core switch. This datacenter would have a SAN network and blader chassis.
 
Listing the Cisco Switches requirements and expansion module requirements ?
 
- What expansion module is required at existing 6509 ? Can we have one 10Gibit modules on each switches and crate a port-channel connection from new datacenter core switch ?

- Which model of Switch you recommend for the new Datacenter Core which is only going to have one SAN Enclosure and two blade chassis? Will it be a good option to use 3750E ? If yes do we need any additional modules there ?

- Which aggregation switch should we use for the blade enclosure ?

- Should we have a Cisco Embedded Switch module on the chassis to create trunk with aggregation switch ?

- How the SAN director switch is connecting to the LAN ? should we have any particular module at new Core switch ?

View 0 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Layer 3 Module Required For 5500 Series Switch?

May 16, 2013

We are working with a contractor to upgrade our network, and I heard from them that the 5596/5548 might not need the Layer 3 module for our inter-VLAN routhing.  They have yet to give me an answer.
 
We do have a few static routes on our current layer-3, core switch too. 

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 To 6513 Migration Required

Jan 9, 2012

We currently run 1 Cisco 6509 (CatOS) for our production network. It has multiple vlans which feed distribution switches on each floor in 2 buildings. Essentially each floor is its own vlan. Each floor switch is connected back to the 6509 via fiber connections. We also have several production vlans that our VMware and AIX environments connect to.
 
I would like to phase out the the 6509 and replace it with a new 6513 chassis, sup720's etc. Currently it is sitting next to the 6509 in the rack. I need to limit downtime as much as possible but can get one shutdown window over a weekend. However I dont think it would be enough time to move all of the existing etherconnections etc etc
 
So I am looking to run them both at the same time and slowly migrate over to the 6513 over the next few months.My solution was to use the 6513 (IOS) in L2 mode only for now and trunk it back to the 6509 via 4 1 gig connections in a LACP config.
 
So the 6509 would still be handling all of the L3 routing for now.Once I had moved all of the fiber and ethernet connections over to the 6513, I would use the shutdown weekend to configure the 6513 for L3 and essentially turn off the 6509 at that point.
 
My questions are
     - Is there a better way to do this ?
     - By trunking the 6513 to the 6509 do I need to worry about any loop issues ?
     - I am aware of the oversubscription issue for the port channel and have spread the 4 interfaces over the different groups of asics.

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509-E / IOS Requirements For VSS And ACE Module?

Sep 10, 2012

I have a pair of 6509-E Switches running VS-720 Supervisors. We are planning to add Ace Module onto the 6509-E. Will IP Base Image suffice the requirement? Will Ace Module work with only IP Base Image?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509-E - IOS Support For Module

Mar 4, 2012

I have a switch Cisco WS-C6509-E WS-X6716-10G-3C module ( module for 10 GB) , i have the IOS s72033-ipservicesk9-mz.122-18.SXF9.bin. I want to know if this IOS can support this module or not ? or ,  if i must do a upgrade , is that the  IOS : "s72033-ipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-33.SXH8" work fine  ?

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: To Reload The Module 3 On The 6509 Switch

Jul 31, 2012

Suffered a big outage on the network, the fix was to reload the module 3 on the 6509 switch, we had these errors on the log %CONST_DIAG-SW1_SP-3-HM_PORT_TEST_FAIL: Switch 1 Module 3 TestUnusedPortLoopback Port(s)[24,46] failed. System operation continues.in the end, we reloaded the card and it was all ok. is there anything I can do to check the card / or any deeper logs? would that error cause the card to crash?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 Has Four Module Slots Empty

Apr 1, 2013

I have a cisco 6509 (ws-c6509-e) IOS 12.2.(18)SXF6 with the following modules and submodules: [code] I would like to add another module, I have WS-6816-GBIC or WS-6516-GBIC which one will work with my 6509 ? The 6509 has four module slots empty: 4-7-8-9, Can I add the card in one of these slots ?

View 10 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 Shuts Down Module While Running VSL

Oct 21, 2012

How I can shutdown a module when I am running vsl.I can use the following command #hw-module module 2 shutdown.As I have modules in both switch 1 and switch 2 how can I ensure I only shut down module 2 in switch 1.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Cat 6509 - VSS - Minor Error (Sup Module)

Mar 17, 2012

We have a VSS environment with two Cisco 6509-Es. IOS image:s72033-ipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-33.SXI5 when I switch on or reload the  Core switches(VSS), I find a Minor Error in the "Show module switch all" command.I also did a "show diagnostic result switch 1 module 5"Switch 1 Module 5: Supervisor Engine 720 10GE (Active)  SerialNo : SAL1521E035

Overall Diagnostic Result for Switch 1 Module 5 : MINOR ERROR
Diagnostic level at card bootup: complete
Test results: (. = Pass, F = Fail, U = Untested)
45) TestVslLocalLoopback:
Port  1  2  3  4  5
-------------------
U  U  U  .  F
 
This issue temporarily relieves when reseating the X2 module, but reappears after reloading the switch.

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 VSS Implementation As A Service Module Core

Jun 8, 2011

I m planning to implement VSS in core but want some inputs on IOS as i have FWSM as a service module Core :- Ii am running 12.2(33)SXH2a on my Core 6509  and i checkd cisco sites and Fwsm release notes but it states only  I-Train of IOS while mine is H-Train so can I directly upgrade to  I-Train or I was thinking of SXH8b IOS.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 ACE Application Control Engine Module

Oct 4, 2012

We are facing a strange issue, our ACE 20 got failed due to power issue , after RMA once we are installing ACE 20 to 6509 , the status LED is showing ORANGE . The sh module shows it as " Others " ... The IOS is same as it was previously in 6509 .

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 / WS-X6704-10GE Module And Port Status?

Dec 7, 2011

We have two 6509 switches with one WS-X6704-10GE module in each of them. There is an optical cable between the two switches plugged in  WS-X6704-10GE module on both sides. When you shut down the port on one side the other port still stays as up and you need phisycally to unplug the cable to have it down. The same behaviour is seen no matter on which of the two switches you shut down the port, the opposite one always stays as up and only removal of the cable makes it go down.
 
The ports are configured quite simply:
 
interface TenGigabitEthernet1/1
switchport
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-10
no ip address
udld port
 
The IOS version is 12.2(18)SXF8

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 Module Results Show Pass And No Errors In The Logging

Sep 18, 2012

We have a design of two 6509 running in a VSS with dual supervisor each having fthree 10/100/1000mb etherner modules. We have diagnosed a wierd problem that none of the switchports in module 1 and 2 on either switches are having layer2/layer 3 connectivity.
 
Tried everything from changing the cables to changing the end device but no luck with it.
 
Module results show pass and no errors in the logging.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Cat4506 Chassis With Cat2955 - Network Expansion

Mar 1, 2012

Currently I have a Cat4506 chassis with a Sup II+ engine and one WS-X4232-RJ-XX linecard with the WS-U4504-FX-MT daughtercard to provide uplinks to four Cat2955 switches. I chose the Cat2955 because the switches are in an industrial facility and they fit the envrionment very well. Each of them has a multimode fiber uplink.
 
The issue I have now is that I need to add at least 4 more Cat2955 switches to the topology and find that the x4232 is EOL. I can always find a used one somewhere, but is there another currently shipping linecard that will do the trick? I see there is WS-X4248-FE-SFP with the 100BaseX interfaces, but don't really need 48 ports, just 8.
 
Is there another linecard that can downswitch a 1000BASE-X port to 100Base-X, or can I use a 100Base-X SPF in a switch like the WS-X4448-GB-SFP?
 
What are my options, aside from buying another X4232?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 To 6509-E Chassis Upgrade?

Nov 21, 2011

I currently have a couple of 6509 chassis (router/switches) with the following hardware blades:

     x3     48 ports
     x1     NAM
     x2     Sup720
     Running 12.2(18)SXF3
 
I am keeping the four Sup720 modules and have purchased new versions of the others blades including two new 6509-E chassis?Can I take my stand-by Sup720 out of the production machine and insert it into the new chassis?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Upgrade Of 6509 To 6509-E Chassis

Nov 21, 2011

I currently have a couple of 6509 chassis (router/switches) with the following hardware blades:

x3     48 ports
x1     NAM
x2     Sup720

Running 12.2(18)SXF3.I am keeping the four Sup720 modules and have purchased new versions of the others blades including two new 6509-E chassis. Can I take my stand-by Sup720 out of the production machine and insert it into the new chassis?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Infrastructure :: Wastefulness 3845 Fan Module Required

May 3, 2011

We had a fan fail on our 3845 edge router. No big deal; the other two fans kept the temperature easily within spec, and the module is a two minute hot swap. I opened a ticket, they sent me a replacement. Simple. (In fact, the router install docs note that the fans are essentially a "consumable" part, and will fail within a few years, depending on how hot and dusty your environment is.)
 
The fan module is actually the whole face plate of the router, blue plastic with a steel backing, status LEDs, and the three fans.That is all fine. But, Cisco won't take the failed part back for refurbishment, which in this case would be simply to replace the fans!
 
The replacement part came with the standard Cisco return packaging: a sticker with an RMA #, a "manual" paper UPS label, and instructions to use their on-line tool [URL]. But, when I entered the RMA number, I got a pop-up saying it was invalid, and I should call Cisco Asset Recovery, whose 800 number is also on the sticker.
 
They told me that this part is not returnable; that the RMA is only to ID the shipment so they can confirm I got it. They told me to just throw it out. They would not provide a printable return shipping label.
 
I'd feel bad throwing out even the substantial cardboard and foam packaging of this part, let alone the assembled unit!
 
Hasn't Cisco heard that there is a general industry movement to cut down on electronic waste? With the removal of six screws, I could swap the failed fan out of this assembly and replace only the fan. I'm glad Cisco didn't ask me to do that level of repair, but I certainly think they should -- I'd assumed that the replacement unit I'd received was a return "refurbished" with new fans.It seems a complete waste to just chuck out this whole thing.
 
Heck, even the tiny power supply bricks for the Aeronet APs have a little "no trash" sticker on them, with a link to [URL]. Why do they just dispose of router faceplace assemblies when the only issue is a fan that was expected to fail in the first place?

Attached photo shows the 3845 front piece, which is the fan assembly, and the package the replacement came in, which could be used to return this part, and then be reused. For comparison, the little black thing in front is an Aeronet 1131 power module, which has a Cisco Recycles sticker.

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Adding N5K To Existing Core

Mar 3, 2013

I need your input on how to appropriately introduce an N5K with Jumbo enanbled to a prexisting Core Network (Stack of Cisco 3750G Switches) without making any major alteration on the Core configs (everything is happy). The idea is to move two High I/O servers to the N5K during a transitional phase. I already have a fair understanding of what Jumbo-Frames are and what it does. Keep Jumbo-Frames within the N5K ONLY.

Conditions:
 
- Traffic is Data traffic, not storage/iSCSI
- The servers host our ERP applications and MySQL that is accessed heavily by users
- N5K to C3750G connectivity is a Port-Channel consisting of 4x1GB ports
- The servers are to remain on VLAN 2 (Data VLAN)
- The Core Switch is L3 and the boundaries reside here

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: ISR 891 - Initiate Existing VPN Tunnel

Dec 4, 2012

I have configured a site to site VPN tunnel using my Cisco ISR 891 router. The tunnel connects between my network 10.88.10.0 to the remote network 10.210.65.0. When I ping the remote nnetwork my VPN tunnel comes up and all is well.
 
I have recently connected a second network to my 10.88.... network. The new local network is 192.168.0.0. I have now managed to get the two local networks pinging each other. I can also carry out RDP sessions between systems on both networks. Hence I am happy that both networks are communicating.
 
I used the Fastethernet Port 8 on my ISR 891 to physically connect to the new 192.168 network and then entered the appropraite 'Static Routes' on the 192.168 exisiting router(Netgear Router). Hence certain traffic arriving at the netgear will now be forwarded to Port FE8 on the cisco ISR 891.. See FE8 Port config at the bottom of this post. I have used tracert to ensure that the traffic does arrive at Port FE8,(192.168.0.235).
 
I cannot seem to ping any device on the remote 10.210.65.0 network from the 192.168 network. However, as stated above I can sucessfully ping the same remote device from the local 10.88 network. I must be missing something that allows the 192.168 traffic to use the existing VPN tunnel. I have added the following command to the IpSec rules for the VPN tunnel using the Cisco Configuration Professionla tool.
Permit 192.168.0.0/0.0.0.255 10.210.0.0/0.0.255.255 ip

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Add N2K To Existing N5K - Can't Ping Devices

Mar 5, 2012

I have several cabinets with top-of-rack N2K's attached to N5K's via FEX's.  9 cabinets with 2 switches each. 
 
Recently I added 3 more cabinets to the mix, for a total of 12 cabinets with 2 switches each.
 
I can get into the new switches and see the FEX's and configure ports, etc. but no device I attach to the 'new' N2K's is pingable over the network.  I can take the same device, same cable, and attach it to a legacy N2K talking to the same N5K's, and it immediately joins and is pingable over the network

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 7600 SIP-400 MIB Required

Apr 14, 2010

I have Cisco 7609 router and we have observed that router is rebooted due to the following error ;SLOT 3: Apr 13 16:06:26.621: %CARDMGR-2-ESF_DEV_ERROR: An error has occurred on Egress ESF Engine: Control Store Parity Error SLOT 3: Apr 13,Slot -3 we have SIP-400 card. We would like to know if there is any MIB which can monitir such reboots.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Add A New 3750x To Existing Stack Of 3750

Aug 2, 2012

I've a situation where I need to add a new 3750x to a existing stack of 3750. [code] When I tried to stack them together, I get a version mismatch error. Is this because of the difference in SW Image?  What are my options next ? My ultimate goal is to make the new switch stack correctly with the exisitng switches.

View 11 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Understanding Existing Setup With Two 3750s

Jan 10, 2013

We've recently inherited a platform with little handover and also minimal networking experience.We're going 100 miles an hour in learning, but I'm a bit confused with the idea of a L2 switch with no IP assignments to ports, so using VLANs, and a L3 switch with IP assignments. And the combination of both.We have 2 Cisco 3750 switches, along with a whole host of other hardware, so we're starting at this "gateway" to start breaking things down.

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: N7K No Drop In Service To Existing VLAN

Aug 8, 2012

When you use the command switchport trunk allowed vlan add [vlan-id]There should be no drop in service to the existing VLANs, correct?  I am trunking from a 7K to a 2960S via 2G PoCh.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Adding Two 2960S To Existing Stack

Oct 1, 2012

I need to add two additional 2960S switches to my stack. I saw a diagram that showed how a 4 switch stack can be connected, but I couldn't find much detail on adding a switch to an existing stack (besides master election). The output below shows how the existing stack is connected and its state
 
SW#sh switch detail
Switch/Stack Mac Address : 0011.2222.3333
H/W   Current

[Code]..... 
 
I will need to break one of the stack rings between SW1 and SW2 in order to connect the new switches. Does it really matter which ring I break to connect the additional switches? Does one ring act as primary? If so, I'd rather not break that ring so this process is transparent as possible. Also, is there any benefit to disabling the stack port vs just disconnecting the cable?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 7600 Setting Up Network To Existing One

Sep 29, 2012

I am a soon to be network admin and have never set up a network to an existing network. Steps you need to add a new location to a company's network. For example if they are using 8 Building with 7600 Routers and 6500 and you need another building and they are using MPLS or Private Network, or Internet.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: How To Add Four 3750 Switches Into Existing Stack

Sep 22, 2012

I have 3 3750  staking switch with the following configuration:

                                            H/W   Current
Switch#  Role   Mac Address     Priority Version  State
----------------------------------------------------------
1       Member 442b.0350.9400     1      1       Ready              
2       Member 442b.0357.8780     2      1       Ready              
3       Master 442b.036f.a800        3      1       Ready              
 
The new switch is installed to be wired to the master switch. the swtich 3 (* 3 Master Ready 442b.036f.a800)my question is: if you disconnect the wiring from the master stack to connect to the new switch, it is possible that the new switch change the current configuration of stacking.
 
-Can I just add the new switch with clean configuration without changing the current configuration ?
-How is assigned the stack number? i need the new switch be with the GI4 / x?. I can I manually by assigning ports?
-If I want to the new 3750 member witch lower prioridad, can I change priority before adding to stack?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 10Ge Interface Can Be Set Down To 1Ge If Required

Nov 17, 2011

How to confirm if a 10Ge interface can be set down to 1Ge if required ?

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 4510E License Required For BGP?

May 3, 2012

I have a 2 X 4510E switch with dual sup-7E running as the core switches of my company. we would like to enable BGP on these switches, according to cisco released datasheet IPBase license does NOT support BGP. When i typed question mark, BGP commands did show up. I just wonder does BGP really works on this image/license or we need to upgrade to ent license?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Required Power For WS-SVC-NAM3-6G-K9?

Oct 1, 2012

What is required power in Watts for this card in Catalyst 6500? Or the "show power" ouput with this card included?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3560G Upgrade Required

Feb 20, 2013

I have a  WS-C3560G-24TS-S running  12.2(50)SE5 with IPBASE. I have been told that the functionality i seek (multicasting) is only available in the IPSERVICES version of the software. I was reading up on upgrading and saw that i needed to do a show license and get the UID and Serial number and get a license that is tied to my box. But the show license command doesnt work wtih my box. i then found something that said that the 3560's were special in that way. Im not sure how to get this box upgraded. I have a different 3560 running the IPSERVICES elsewhere in my organization. Can i take the IOS Version and  update my switch to that?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco LAN :: 6509-e Best Way To Swap Out Supervisor Module

Mar 28, 2012

We have a 6509-e (WS-C6509-E V04) with (4) (WS-X6148-GE-TX) 48 port modules and a supervisor 32 (WS-SUP32-GE-3B).We purchased a supervisor 720 (WS-SUP720-3B) and (2) (WS-6708-10G-3C) 8 port fiber modules and (1) WS-X6748-GE-TX)48 port module to add to the switch. My question is what is the best way to swap out the supervisor module? Can the SUP720 be added as a standby module so that the config can be transferred? Probably a long shot. Is there anything in this swap that I should be concerned with? The other three modules should be pretty straight forward.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 6509 - Catalysts Does Not Support Module

Jul 31, 2012

we have two 6509 catalyst. we bought two new SFM-capable 16 port 1000mb GBIC/WS-X6516A-GBIC module. but our catalysts doesnt support them. we don't know the reason. we tried on another 6500 series catalyst they worked.
 
here are the outputs from our 6509:
 
Core-SW-1#sh module
Mod Ports Card Type                              Model              Serial No.
--- ----- -------------------------------------- ------------------ -----------
  1    0  1-subslot SPA Interface Processor-600  7600-SIP-600       JAE14090958
  2   48  CEF720 48 port 10/100/1000mb Ethernet  WS-X6748-GE-TX     SAL1413DX2B
  3   16  CEF720 16 port 10GE                    WS-X6716-10GE      SAL1414EL2Q
  4    1  Application Control Engine Module      ACE20-MOD-K9       SAD1408036Z
  5    5  Supervisor Engine 720 10GE (Active)    VS-S720-10G        SAL1414ERDT
  6    5  Supervisor Engine 720 10GE (RPR-Warm)  VS-S720-10G        SAL1414ERE3
  7   16  CEF720 16 port 10GE                    WS-X6716-10GE      SAL1414ER93
  8   16  SFM-capable 16 port 1000mb GBIC        WS-X6516A-GBIC     SAL1326SVBS(code)

View 7 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved