Trying to configure netflow on a 3750-X. I'm sort of copying my config from a router but, it seemd that the commandes below don't work.
Is there different set of commands to configure the source and destination.
ip flow-export source Tunnel0
ip flow-export destination 172.20.X.X 9995
Could some one explain what the command . ip route 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.0 . will result in?
View 8 Replies View RelatedI have just bought two Cisco 3750 and stacked them. When in global config mode, The IP Routing Command does not exisit.
See Version below
Cisco IOS Software, C3750E Software (C3750E-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 12.2(55)SE3, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
Technical Support: [URL]
Copyright (c) 1986-2011 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Thu 05-May-11 15:40 by prod_rel_team
Image text-base: 0x00003000, data-base: 0x02800000
What other command can be used to debug packets on a 3750 switch ?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a cisco 3750 swicth which i want to load a new ios to but unfortunately there's no enough space on the flash. This means that i need to backup the cureent (old) ios to my tftp server but the command keeps failing. It always gives 'No such file or directory' error .The free space on the flash is 8mb and my new ios is about 11mb.I also went inside the directory where the old is and inputed the same copy command but to no avail.Below are some of the command failure on the swicth:
[code]....
On 3750 switch with IOS c3750-ipbasek9-mz.122-55.SE4.bin "eigrp stub static redistributed" command will be executable ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedHow the police flow command ( see below) works only in the 6500's platform? Can it apply in 3745 router?
View 2 Replies View RelatedStruggling to find any documentation that states both "ip accounting & netflow" are supported on the new ME3600 switches. I have tried both a 12 and 15 release of software. Netflow produces no data what so ever, ip accounting only produces data (of the global network) when configured on my uplink (running MP-BGP network) unable to get specific data for user networks in seperate VRFs. Is this a case of the commands being there but not being supported?
View 0 Replies View RelatedI met a strange problem after enabling flow-control in 2960s.my enviroment,
- 2 cisco 2960s 24ts-l have been created a stack
- IOS is 12.2(58)se2
- all ports have been enabled flowcontrol receive dersied
via show flowcontrol, I can see each Gigabyte Port have been enabled "flowcontrol receive desired" but, when I do the following tests
- connect equallogic ps4000xv to the port 21, I found the status of port is "input flow-control is off"
- connect one server with Broadcom Gigabyte Network adapter, which has been enable TX ON RX ON, or Auto, the status of the port is still "input flow-control is off"
I guess, the port status should be ""input flow-control is on". Test them with another port, I got the same result. why?
I am really new to Cisco and having a hard time with my Cisco 2800 series.
I have two sites connected with each other Site A and Site B (Using the same Cisco 2800). Now site A can connect to site B on the Cisco and the internal network, but site B can only see the Cisco and not the internal network of site A. So all the traffic is coming in to site B but can't break out of site B. I have tried everything I can think of but again my knowledge of Cisco is not good at all.
I want to see net flow data.I have configured this command on the c6500.but I can to see data only below...How can I configration ip cache flow on the C6500? what is the problem?
int gi4/31
ip add x.x.x.x
ip route-cache flow
c6500# show ip cache flow
Displaying software-switched flow entries on the MSFC in Module 5:
[code].....
I'm receiving multicast traffic (400Mbps) on port 9/38 and sending it out on port gi9/48. I'm trying to achieve that traffic will stay within the card without using the switchfabric,
View 2 Replies View RelatedDoes the Cisco WS-C3560X-24P-S switch supports ip flow export?
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe have a pair of 6509 working in a VSS configuration (IOS 12.2(33)SX5). The 6509s connect to a pair of ASAs (7.2 code) running in an Active/Standby setup. These ASAs in turn connect to routers going to remote sites. I have configured Netflow on the following VLANS,
VLAN 10 - Servers Vlan
VLAN 9 - Transit/ASA VLAN (connects ASAs to 6509s). All traffic originating from any VLAN on the 6509 crosses this VLAN in order to reach remote sites and vice versa
I configured the netflow source VLAN 11 although I am not collecing any netflow from it.Although I have been getting lots of Netflow info, I noticed that netflow for traffic originating from any user VLAN on the 6509s going to any remote site via TRANSIT/ASA VLAN(9) does not get reported, I even tested with 4 GB traffic but no result. Only reverse traffic (i.e. from remote site to user VLAN) is reported as it traverses the Transit VLAN (9).
I read somewhere that egress netflow is not supported in 6500, but isnt traffic originating from a user vlan to a remote site via the transit VLAN (9) considered ingress with respect to the transit VLAN (9)? I would like to know whether bidirectional Netflow is supported on 6500 VLANS. I have mimimum control on routers beyond the ASAs, and since these ASAs run 7.2 code netflow is not supported, and Monitoring this Transit Vlan gives me extremely useful info.
I do get netflow biderectional traffic from the Server Vlan 10, but I think it is correlated by the netflow collector from vlans 9 and 10. [code]
How to configure traffic flow between computers inside VLANs and a routed port? Here is the setup details:
1. Switch 3750-X
2. VLAN 100 - ( SVI IP address 192.168.100.1 /24)
3. VLAN 200 - ( SVI IP address 192.168.200.1 /24)
4. routed port gi1/0/48 (IP address 192.168.150.1 /24). Note: this port is directly connected to a firewall ASA 5520 port IP 192.168.150.100 /24
Ip routing is enabled on the switch and inter vlan traffic is flowing ok. I can ping the routed port gi1/0/48 from any computer connected in the VLAN 100 or 200. For example computer with IP 192.168.100.25 can ping the routed port 192.168.150.1. Switch can ping firewall port 192.168.150.100 and the 'sh ip route' command shows the network 192.168.150.0 /24 as directly connected network.
any computer in the two VLANs CANNOT ping firewall ASA port 192.168.150.100 Is it because inter VLAN routing does not work with a routed port on L3 switch? I looked up fallback bridging, but it is meant for non IP traffic.The goal is I am trying to set the ASA port as an internet gateway for VLANs.
Do I need the Universal image to perform stftp on a 3750 or 3750-X?
View 8 Replies View RelatedThe last few days I've been exploring options in getting rid of some old routers accross a wan connections. I have a cat 3560 to play with and I thought I would try and use the no switchport command test out routing with switch. I've got some type of route issue and I tried a few things which I thought would fix the issue but had no effect. I'll post the config and a few commands so you can see what the basic setup is.
Here we can see in the arp that it knows about both 10.7.1.2 (PC unable to ping 10.3.3.254) as well as 10.3.3.254 (ASA).I tried adding in a ip route of 10.7.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.3.3.110 as well as 10.3.3.254. Neither produced the results I wanted allowing 10.7.1.2 (PC) to ping the ASA (10.3.3.254). [code]
We have two catalyst 3560 switches running c3560-ipbasek9-mz.122-58.SE2.bin They are connected using etherchannel using gi 0/21 - 24 interfaces.
on 3560-1 switch, there isn't any ip-default gateway or ip route configured. It only have 1 interface vlan configured.
on 3560-2 switch, there is ip default gateway configured along with 1 interface vlan.
What i dont understand here is that, i can reach out to other subnets from 3560-1 switch in which the routing is not enabled?
I used to "ip routing" command in order to enable inter-vlan routing, for example with 3750 cisco. I have a 6503 cisco with SUP720 MSFC3. I was able to create some vlans but I can not configure inter-vlan routing.
sw#conf t
Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.
swsur(config)#ip routing
[Code]....
Where is the "ip routing" command in Cisco switch 6500 series?
is the ip routing enable by default accoridng to the: [URL]
I'm looking at adding a Cisco 3750-X switch running c3750e-universalk9-mz.122-55.SE1 (IP base license) into a stack of 3750-G switches running c3750-ipbasek9-mz.122-55.SE1.bin Given that the version and feature sets are the same I don't forsee any compatibility issues. Would there be any reason why a universal image wouldn't stack correctly with other switches running the single .bin file?
View 9 Replies View RelatedWhat is the command to shutdown a cisco 1841 (say, to add a module)? I know how to reload / reboot, but does not seem to find any command with an obvious name.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a 6509 witch a sup vs-Sup2T, and I´m very confuse for to configure QoS. is diferent in the old supervisor..What is the command similar to map cos to DSCP.. look
This is a configuration in a sw 4507
qos map dscp 56 to tx-queue 1
qos map cos 1 to dscp 10
qos map cos 2 to dscp 18
qos map cos 3 to dscp 26
qos map cos 4 to dscp 34
qos map cos 5 to dscp 46
qos
In 6509 with sup2T and version 15.0.SY2 Im no sure.. I see two command
platform qos map cos-mutation testmap 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3
and
table-map cos-discard-class-map 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I created new VDCs. Since I have done so, there is not switchport command under the interface configuration.
The interesting this is that it is available on the admin VDC, but not the new VDC I created. I cannot create a peer VPC Peer link between my 2 Nexus switches. I did allocate ports to the new VDC and I did verify the enabled feature are the same.
why the switchport command is not available?
Cisco IOS 12.4 Basic check to see if the command "ip nat pool" is available?We have 12.2 basic and I know it is in the 12.4 Advanced and 15.1 Basic versions (too large of a jump in version for management). Our budget is very limited so I am hoping that 12.4 Basic has this command.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have 3560g with 15.0(2)SE2 version. I try to give different default gateways for different interfaces.I've already changed the sdm, run "ip routing" and made interest interfaces in "no switchport" with ip addresses.
my route-map is "
route-map ABC permit 10
set ip next-hop 192.168.77.3"
and it is applied on the interface with "ip policy route-map ABC" but when I try to apply it says "%PLATFORM_PBR-3-UNSUPPORTED_RMAP: Route-map ABC not supported for Policy-Based Routing" everything is fine if I change from "set ip default next-hop" to "set ip next-hop" but it is not I need in the guide of the version it is said this statement is not in unsupported list of route-map commands.[URL]
I am using cisco packet tracer to configure the hsrp on 3560 (c3560-advipservicesk9-mz.122-37.SE1.bin) but the standby ip Command is not available on the interface the problem in that IOS or in config
View 1 Replies View RelatedI was working on adding a Cisco 6513 to TACACS but ran into trouble. While I work on the issue offline (recreate and test another switch), I wanted to place this switch on radius temporarily.
For some reason i cant undo/delete the AAA commands in order to point to my radius server. Below was done via console: [code]
I disabled my telemetry port on the Cisco 6513 as a precaution. The IOS im using is "s72033-advipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-33.SXI5.bin".how to remove the AAA authentication statement. Hope its not intrusive cause i have a customer on the box.
Are any of the following commands supported on Nexus 5K switches when deployed with L3 card:
ip helper addressip forward-protocolip directed-broadcast
Is there a command to find your optical tx/rx power (dBm) on a 3845? On a 3750 you can do a show int transceiver; looking for a comparable command for ISRs.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am trying to use the following commands on the switch but it is not supported:
ip route-cache flow
ip flow-export destination
Attached is the output for show version and show module commands from the switch.
I just needed more insite into the function of the ip tcp adjust-mss command which can be used to adjust the MSS value in the tcp syn packet which passes that interface. But here is a question which I had. Consider that i have two sets of systems in my LAN one with an MTU value of 1300 ( MSS 1260 ) and with a MTU of 1500 ( MSS -1460 ). If I go ahead and put an ip tcp adjust-mss 1456 (for reducing the packet size from 1500 to 1496) on the WAN . Does the command only lower the MSS for the set of systems which have 1460 or will it also increase the MSS in the tcp syn packets send by systems with MSS of 1260 ( which can potentially break some communication ).
View 1 Replies View RelatedIs there a command to globally invoke rw or ro feature of SNMP on a 356024P switch?
View 2 Replies View Related
