Cisco :: Unable To Get 6509 IOS Via Add To Repository Job
May 16, 2012
This is a new install of LMS 4.2 evaluation. I have a current install of LMS 3.2 which is working. When I run an Add job for our core 6509 in Software Repository using cisco.com on the 3.2 LMS it works normally. When I attempt the same job in LMS 4.2 for the same device the device is not selectable in the left hand window and it has a message that says (This operation requires Containment data in Inventory. Either this is unavailable) Or (Add Image from CCO not supported). Also and probably related is that LMS 4.2 cannot complete an inventory update on the 6509s that we have and does not say why the inventory job collection failed. So far as I can tell the other devices inventory and offer IOS updates correctly. I ran a job to get all device package updates before I ran any of the jobs. The devices all pass credential checks except for HTTP, which is not activated on the devices.
I have a case for an LMS 4.0 running in a Live environement (With devices already discovered and organized into seperate groups), where the Device Credential and repository DCR is showing suddenly as empty and only i can see the groups listed, but without any devices in them (Through Inventory > Device Administration > Add/Import/Manage Devices).After a restart of the whole LMS server a few weeks ago, the problem was fixed and the devices appeared again, but now the same issue re-appeared.
I have just installed LMS 4.1 on a Win2008serverR2. Getting started and discovery are OK. Then I tried to configure all parameters under the Admin Menu. I have a problem with SWIM : the "repository" directory does not exist ! I also tried to import an IOS file into the repository : no way.
We are unable to login at Cisco 6509 switch, due to username and password not working. We have tried to recover the password as per Cisco document, but that is also not working. This switch is our Primary Switch in our network.
I have issue to access one of the wism on 6509 switch however other wism is ok both wism on switch are up and functional how to enable remote access on wism.
We have ACE module intergrated in cisco 6509 switch. We have performance issue for specific url while accessing through ACE, but it works normal when works with direct url.The users are getting error at middle of works , " applications are unable to get data ". We have configured http-cookie sticky like below, [code]
We are using two rserver in serverfarm and enabled port-80 services.
I have a vlan defined in FWSM for server farm there is a one server with two IP addresses and teaming has done on it how ever from FWSM i am able to ping both IP addresses but from core 6509 switch i am only able to ping one ip address. from FWSM show ARP command displays the same virtual mac addresses against both IPS of the same server.
I have a 6509-E chassis that was prevoius in a VSS configuration. Due to some VSL failures I had to cobvert it to a standalone chassis but would like to bring it back to a virtual system.
Whenever I try to convert it by using the command "switch convert mode virtual" I get the msg %Please configure local switch number first". After doing so by entering the CLI cmd "switch set switch_num 1 local" I still get the same message.
On a Catalyst 6509 switch I have configured wccp protocol in order to redirect the Http traffic to a Bluecoat SG8100. It was working fine until a new L3 interface implementation.Thereafter I was unable to redirect the http traffic due to an error reported from the Cat6509: [code] After some checks I supposed that the problem should be the UDP 2048 port connection between the Switch and the Bluecoat while the switch L3 port and the bluecoat are on the same Lan. A deep analysis found that the WCCP protocol seems to be as follow:
-Proxy address 10.64.28.240 to Switch Port 10.64.28.250 Here I Am -Switch Port 10.64.28.250 to Proxy address 10.64.28.240 I See You -Switch Port 10.66.0.251 to Proxy address 10.64.28.240 UDP 2048 packet (dropped by firewall)
It's strange to me that the first dialog is correctly handled by the correct Cat6509 interface while the UDP packets are flowing from another Vlan interface not configured with the WCCP and apparently not involved on the protocol.Last of all the WCCP is now disabled and unusable?
I currently have a couple of 6509 chassis (router/switches) with the following hardware blades:
x3 48 ports x1 NAM x2 Sup720 Running 12.2(18)SXF3
I am keeping the four Sup720 modules and have purchased new versions of the others blades including two new 6509-E chassis?Can I take my stand-by Sup720 out of the production machine and insert it into the new chassis?
I currently have a couple of 6509 chassis (router/switches) with the following hardware blades:
x3 48 ports x1 NAM x2 Sup720
Running 12.2(18)SXF3.I am keeping the four Sup720 modules and have purchased new versions of the others blades including two new 6509-E chassis. Can I take my stand-by Sup720 out of the production machine and insert it into the new chassis?
I got an invalid input message when I typed "ip routing". Is this the expected result? Does the 6509-E with Sup 720 and FWSM support "ip routing" command?
Version: 12.2(18)SXF5. FWSM version: 3.1(4)
I have some routing problems between the switch and the fwsm.
switch(config)#ip routing ^ % Invalid input detected at '^' marker.
I have searched the internet until my battery died. How to fix dribbles. If not, why have a counter for them. I have a 4506 one fiber hop away from a 6509 and I am getting dribbles
What i m achiving by VSS the same i use to achieve before with 2 redundant core switches, By flowing half vlan's from 1 switch and other half by another core and specifying HSRP priority according to spaning-tree vlan flow, either of them goes other core takesover
I am trying to change SNMPv2 community string on 6509 remotely, without using expect script. I tried EEM applet (we cannot use TCL scripts), but it does not work. EEM command "action 10 info snmp oid 1.3.6.1.2.1.1.4 get-type exact" is supposed to store the result into an environment variable. It does not. Or at least not in the one that is documented. Is it a bug? We have IOS 12.2(17r)SX5. To get EEM version i ran "sh event manager version" and got "eem: (v240_throttle) 2.21.32". Does it mean i have EEM version 2.21?
One of the pur client want to use Cisco 6509 as core Router. STM Module they want to install in it and used as Core Routing through it. Is it ok with core network ?
I have a second link being installed this week to a second ISP. Each ISP has tunnels that terminate on there routers for various services. Right now on the 6509 I have a static default route which sends all traffic to ISP one. Once I get the second link installed I would only like to send specific traffic to ISP1 and everything else to ISP2 unless the link is down. Would policy routing on the 6509 fit my needs?I would like to send 172.20.0.0 / 24 and 10.25.0.0 to isp one and everything else to ISP2.
If two (one 6509A 9/26 with server A located in A end, 6509B with serverB located in B End) which is connected via a 1G link. If there is serverA send 700M file to server B via a 1G link. If I configured below command to 6509A 9/26, can I limit the bandwidth of server on bothincoming and outgoing to 500M?
class-map match-all FROM-SERVERmatch access-group name FROM-SERVER!policy-map FROM-SERVERclass FROM-SERVERpolice 500000000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop!interface GigabitEthernet9/26service-policy in FROM-SERVER
Is it possible to tunnel IPSec through a 6509 with an FWSM installed without the packets being interferred with?My question arises because myself and a colleague were attempting to form an IPSec tunnel in just this environment last week and no amount of resetting policies, key phrases etc would allow the tunnel to come up. The 2821 was complaining about Phase 2 not matching but the policies were definitely matching and configured the same on both ends. If there shouldn't be an issue with the 6509 and the FWSM then I will post configs from both ends. The 6509 is configured to all all ports through for the two IP addresses for now and is performing a one-to-one NAT for the PIX that is behind it.
I have recently connected a 10 Gig connection from the local telco between two sites on 6509's. These two sites also have a 1 Gig links between them. When I connected the 10 Gig link I expected the 10 gig link to be the preferred route, but after looking at the routes I noticed that both links have the same EIGRP path cost. Also the minimum BW for both links is 1000000Kb or 1Gb. Why?
I would like more information of performance to 7600 router with the SP-720, how many sessions full bgp routing it supports? I have 4 links 1 GB and a throughput of 900 MB.
I am trying to setup Netflow to identify a problem I am having with a video conferencing system. Here are the commands that I have entered into the 6509 I am working on. I have checked this against another 6509 I have and these match. Not able to get netflow to show up on the solarwinds server. I have configured it to accept the netflow source coming from the 6509 I am working on.
ip flow-export version 9 ip flow-export destination 1.1.1.1 2055 ip flow-export sourc vlan 254
