I have a cisco 3750v2-48TS connected to a cisco 3750v2-48PS in a stack. The stack ports show up as down/down in the stack.Is there a limitation as to if they can be connected.? I mean can we have a PoE and a non PoE in the stack?
View 1 Replies
Is there a stacking cable that is "bent"?Im using this cable:"CAB-STACK-50CM", "Cisco StackWise 50CM Stacking Cable".But it takes up to much room in the back of the switch, is there such a thing as "bent" stacking cable.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have 3 switches in my 3750 X stack. I am getting the following error in the logs: %PLATFORM_STACKPOWER-4-PRIO_CONFLICT: Switch 1's power stack has conflicting power priorities. Not sure what I should do next. Below is my Stack-power configuration:
Power stack name: Powerstack-1 Stack mode: Power sharing Stack topology: Ring Switch 1: Power budget: 735 Low port priority value: 20 High port priority value: 10 Switch priority value: 2 Port 1 status: Connected Port 2 status: Connected Neighbor on port 1: c464.1308.7900 Neighbor on port 2: e8b7.4827.e680
Switch 3: Power budget: 729 Low port priority value: 22 High port priority value: 13 Switch priority value: 4 Port 1 status: Connected Port 2 status: Connected Neighbor on port 1: 2894.0fd9.9f00 Neighbor on port 2: 2894.0fd8.e200
Switch 2: Power budget: 690 Low port priority value: 21 High port priority value: 12 Switch priority value: 3 Port 1 status: Connected Port 2 status: Connected Neighbor on port 1: 2894.0fd8.e200 Neighbor on port 2: c464.1308.7900
Each switch has its own 715W power supply in it and all check out OK.
A site that i am responsible for has the following equipment installed:
2 x 3750G Switches configured as a stack using Stackwise - Collapsed Core/Distribution Layer
5 x 2960G Switches as Access Layer switches
WAN connections into the Core/Distribution Layer are all Gigabit Ethernet over Fibre.This is a dedicated CCTV Network with 50 Cameras all streaming video into the Core (decoders connected to access switches)Each 2960G has 2 links to the Core/Distribution 3750G Switches, 1 to each switch - Gigabit.I'm running rapid-pvst on all switches, so spanning tree is blocking one of the ports and effectively halving the 2 gig bandwidth. Next year our customer is going to add in a further 50 - 60 cameras.After monitoring the current loading on the ports in use, we have suggested to the customer that the 2 connections to each should be Ether-channeled together. [code]
First interface takes commands no problem, keep getting the message that etherchannel cannot be configured across different switches in a stack when i try to put the second interface commands on.
We currently have as our stack master a 24 port Non-PoE that we want to replace with a 48 port Non-PoE. The 48 port switch at one time was provisioned as switch 3 in the stack (not the master). Correct me if I am wrong, but theoretically all I should need to do to get this working is to shut off the existing master so it re-elects a master and then provision the 48 port switch as the new switch one and make sure switch 1 has a high priority?
Do I need to write erase the switch that is replacing the current master first?
I downloaded all updates packages of the device for the Cisco View and I could not the show the image
View 1 Replies View RelatedI notice that show inventory not showing all members in a 3750-stack after we merged two stacks. Its only showing the master of the new stack, and the previous master of the old stack.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have a stack of five 3750X's connected in a single stack with the stackwise cables. Within this one stack, I created two power stacks, one power stack has 3 switches and the other has two switches. In each of the separate power stacks, one power stack port on a switch shows "shut", so the power stacks are not operating in a full ring. Is there a way to do a "no shut" on those stacks ports that are shut? IOS is 12.2(55)SE1
Here is the configuration -
stack-power stack XXX
stack-power stack YYY
!
stack-power switch 1
stack XXX
stack-power switch 2
[code]...
Our environment consits of 4 cisco SGE2010 switches (stacked). I have implemented STP BPDUGUARD and Portfast on all client ports (suspected a loop). And our uplink to the Server DMZ recieves almost all of it's BPDU packets back(is that normal?) The issues lies where we have random ports dropping out - across all stacks for seconds at a time. We get errors/warning such as,Pinging between the DMZ network appears to be fine. Pinging from the client/switch network show packets being dropped quite frequently.All devices are on VLAN1 (I've have researched this and this could be the cause of the issue)
View 12 Replies View RelatedI have a Cisco 3750G-48PS Running IOS 12.2(40) and was wondering how many physical ports are supported in an LACP Configuration. Is it 4 or 8 ports in a single switch.
If I have a dual 3750 stacked together, and I want to configure (8) port LACP, Can I take (4) ports from each switch in the stack and LACP together.
I am receiving the following error message on a Cisco 3750 switch stack. Need troubleshooting this error message.
00:03:13: %SW_MATM-4-MACFLAP_NOTIF: Host 00d0.7400.2730 in vlan 600 is flapping between port Gi2/0/3 and port Gi2/0/2
Is possible connect and configuring two cisco wlc in high availability to 3 switches in stack 3750 in difference ports?For example
WLC A (Primary) - SWITCH MASTER
WLC B (Secondary) - SWITCH SLAVE
How can i connect the wlc's in HA to get a redundancy in the stack?
I looking to buy SGE 2010 swith, but I have some question:
1. Can I use 4 SFP ports and stack of two switches at the same time.
2. Is it possible to use for stacking ports other than 24, 48?
3. What is maximum possible number of ports to use for stacking (can I get more than 1Gb thruput).
For protection of any network architecture,use of firewalls (either hardware or software) only at Network ,Transport and Application Layers of TCP/IP stack. Why not at remaining layers?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI would like to find out if the Cisco SFE2000p supports Link-Aggregation in a stack. For instance Unit 1 interface 1 and Unit 2 interface 1 in the same LAG?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have been seeing high CPU on a 3750 stack we use for our phone system. I followed the documentation here:
[URL]
This documentation pointed out that the interrupt was very high and so I started looking at the CPU queues to debug. The icmp queue was dropping TONS of traffic.
The debug was full of these:
ICMP-Q:Dropped Not a candidate: Remote Port Blocked L3If:Vlan248 L2If:GigabitEthernet1/0/17 DI:0xB4, LT:7, Vlan:248 SrcGPN:17, SrcGID:17, ACLLogIdx:0x0, MacDA:001a.a1c4.1cd2, MacSA: 0013.192c.bb80 IP_SA:5.1.1.10
[Code].....
Is it possible to have a WS-C3750G-12S-S and a WS-C3750X-24T-L in the same stack, if so do they need to both be running the same software version/IOS.
View 6 Replies View Relatedi m using a stack in between below mentioned switch but we are facing a problem at 3750E on port is down.
Switch Ports Model SW Version SW Image
------ ----- ----- ---------- ----------
1 28 WS-C3750G-24TS-1U 12.2(50)SE2 C3750-IPBASEK9-M
2 28 WS-C3750G-24TS-1U 12.2(50)SE5 C3750-IPBASE-M
* 3 30 WS-C3750E-24TD 12.2(50)SE2 C3750E-UNIVERSALK9-M
[Code]...
Is there any IOS or any H/W issue???
this occurs when I am checking my email,and it blocks me what can I do?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI an an engineer who inhertited an embedded TCP stack which may be misbehaving. This device serves up web pages and works well in most situations. The embedded server typically sends two 1260 byte packets then receives an ACK for just one packet. Then it sends two more packet and gets one ACK. This soon has the "bytes in flight" up to 60k bytes ahead of the ACKs and then things begin to fall apart. Packets begin to be lost in router(s) and dup ACK's appear. The server responds with a fast recovery but by that time it is somewhat hopeless and the connection "collapses". I have studied RFC 2581 and believe the stack is in compliance.How should the stack behave during a new connection? Should it wait for an ACK before sending the next packet? Any other RFC's or docs that I should look at?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI am trying to use Ciscoworks LMS3.2 with RME 4.3.1. to upgrade many, many Cat3750x stacks we have laying around. The problem I am having is that Ciscoworks downloads the new image to the Stack’s master switch only and not to all switches. When I reload the stack after the download, any switch could become the master. I already set up the priority to always have the same master, but the process is unreliable and more than once I ended up with another switch as a master. In any case if the master is not the switch with the new image, the stack will keep the old image as their running image and the switch with the newer image has problems joining the stack (after a while it downgrades and become stable)I know how to do it manually, but I was hoping Ciscoworks would be able to do this for me. It would make my life much easier.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe have a current 3-stack 3750 ( 48-P,48-TS & 3750v2-48PS ) running fine. There is a plan to introduce a fourth stack member ( 3750X-48P ) into this stack.as per cisco documentation, it suggests to use 3750X as master for a mixed stack. In this case, we will need to upgrade current other 3 stack switches to a latest version.,Can we do a no-downtime ios upgrade on the existing 3-switch stack?, when this upgrade is done, is there any way to have the new ios pushed down to all three stack members at the same time or do we need to each member upgrade seperately?, for adding the fourth member, is it acceptable if master is ruuning ver eg. 12.2(55) and all rest of the members run ver 12.2(53) ? will this create any issues and will stacking be successful.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have 4 switches of 3750. I need toupgrade all the switches, but I can't to disconnect the stack cable.How I can to upgrade the version without to disconnect the stack cable?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI was thinking of upgrading the IOS of a number of c3750 stack (roughtly about 50-100 stacks around the country)...I would like to know is this feasible?
My CiscoWork NMS is connected with a low bandwidth (2Mbps) management link. I was thinking if I upgrade via CW2k, then RME will take "ages" to push the IOS to the stack, right? Is this feasbile for 100+ stack of switches?
Can I create lag betwen stack unit to increase speed between units ?? stack connection is only 1Gbit on ports 24/48 if posible lag link must be in trunk mode ?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI will be installing a new ASA 5510 firewall on our SIP vlan to separate our voice traffic from the rest of the traffic. I'm trying to decide whether or not I should go with an active/active setup or an active/standby. Any insight on the best way to set this up? This install is going in from scratch, and I am going to be connecting to a 3750 switch stack. Should I pair up a link from each switch to each 5510 using etherchannels? Should I use 8.3 or 8.4? Most of the docs I've been able to find say it depends on this, that, or the other.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have 3750 stack with 4 switches.I am trying to make change some port to new VLAN, but switch 2 & 3 new change never works, the ports stick with old VLAN. Other two switches works as I expected on new changed VLAN.Tried to reboot, no progress.
#Show VLAN command confirmed the VLAN changes are made.
#show switch detail
Current
Switch# Role Mac Address Priority State
--------------------------------------------------------
1 Member 0019.e752.xxxx 1 Ready
2 Member 0015.f9bf.xxxx 1 Ready
[code]......
I am building a few 3750 stacks, I want to be able to poll/monitor each individual switch in the stack but as it only has 1 ip associated with the stack how can I do this. I am polling the uplink interfaces but as I only have uplinks on the top and bottom switch I am blind to a switch going down in the middle of the stack.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have 3 SLM248G4S switches in a stack (SW1, SW2, and SW3), and want to pull one out and configure it as a stand alone.
If I just disconnect the stacking ports from SW3 and reconnect the bottom stack port from SW2 to the top one of SW1, the two switches continue to function together fine, but SW3 still seems to think it's part of the stack (still shows #3 on the LED screen) and doesn't work at all. I cannot even telnet into SW3.
I just inherited a network which has 7 switches (3750s) as a Stack. In there, there are 5 SVI (switch virtual interfaces) and in each of these VLANs, HSRP is configured.
Question:Is HSRP really needed in a Stack configuration?If so, what are the benefits?Can I simply clean-up the config and remove HSRP?
I have 2 3750x switches connected via a pair of stackwise cables, but I keep seeing error messages about the stack&switch ports going up and down,Performance wise, it seems to work, but I'd like to eliminate this message... Sometimes it will go hours without bouncing, sometimes it does it a few times a minute....
*Mar 4 12:56:57.903: %STACKMGR-4-STACK_LINK_CHANGE: Stack Port 2 Switch 1 has changed to state DOWN
*Mar 4 13:16:48.070: %STACKMGR-4-STACK_LINK_CHANGE: Stack Port 1 Switch 2 has changed to state UP
*Mar 4 13:16:49.093: %STACKMGR-4-STACK_LINK_CHANGE: Stack Port 1 Switch 2 has changed to state DOWN
*Mar 4 13:38:55.802: %STACKMGR-4-STACK_LINK_CHANGE: Stack Port 2 Switch 1 has changed to state UP
*Mar 4 13:38:56.809: %STACKMGR-4-STACK_LINK_CHANGE: Stack Port 2 Switch 1 has changed to state DOWN
[code]...
I have to setup my first flex stack and wanted to make sure I do it right. I have the physical aspect of the stack down. From what I gathered I have to setup the master switch as the highest priority and then provision the other two switches. But I have configs on the other two switches, do I have to delete them? And do I have to setup individual ips for the two slave switches, because from what I saw the master switch is the only one with an ip address? The master switch is a poe 2960S-48LPS and the two other switches are 2960G-48TD
View 5 Replies View RelatedWe'd had 5 switches in the stack and everything was ok. but then we connected a new 6th switch so I can see periodical short loosing packets. It happened on many hosts connected to these stack at different time. Cpu load is ok and no any errors in logs. Any others debugs?
(From my host)
ping -t 10.8.8.xx
[...]
Reply from 10.8.8.xx: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=127
Request timeout
Request timeout
Reply from 10.8.8.xx: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=127
[code]....
