Service policy output command is not supporting on Vlan interface of Cisco 2900 Router.I am having one HWic 4ESW Card and configured VLAN interface. But Service policy output command is not supporting.Same config is supporting in the Cisco 2800 Router.
View 13 RepliesNeeding to bridge from my wic interface to an ethernet interface on a 2900 series router so that I can pass through the ip address given to the WIC, to my ASA so that I don't have to give my ASA a private range address. (Just like a service provider might do when bringing a T1 with managed router in to my prem)
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am facing a very big problem with site to site vpn on cisco 2900 ios.
I configured the vpn and when i ping from router itself to destination ip with source as lan interface , VPN works, no problem.
but when i connect any computer directly to router's lan interface to initiate traffic , it doesnot work at all. and on computer's lan i see yeloow sign.
mtu is 1500, speed is auto (I tried changing also) , duplex is auto ( i tried changing also) , through firewall on pc should not affect but still i disabled it.
since their is no problem with vpn config as vpn comes up when i initiate ping from router itself but i dont know why it is not working from lan.
do we need any inspect icmp on this router also ? or any policy modification to pass traffic across the interfac on router is required ?
I was useinf c2900k9-15.0(M4).bin and i upgraded it to 15.3 which is lated to get reed of any bug .
I connected two laptops directly to router's gi0/0, g0/1 interface to ping from one laptop to another but this also did not work.
I have a requirement where 3 Branch locations of an organization is connected to their hub location via MPLS.They have an internet connection only at HUB as shown in the diagram (Attached)Now all spoke locations should access internet via hub.At spoke locations is there a way that I can have Cisco 2900 router and dedicate only 30% of the WAN bandwidth for internet browsing traffic.Remaining 70% should be used for accessing applications at hub.
For example if i have 5 Mbps Mpls port at spoke I want to dedicate only 1 Mbps for internet browsing traffic remaining should be dedicated for accessing the application at hub.How can we acheive this? Can it be done by using PBR and rate limiting?
The only option that I have under the IOS that's installed on a 2900 series router is track. I don't have a version that supports SLA. The interface is connected to a switch that the ISP gave, and all of the tests that I've done refuse to make the circuit go down. If I were to lose the circuit, the interface won't show to be down unless the switch were to go down.
Is there any way with track to see that the provider's circuit went down on a switch? I was going to set up sla to ping the ISP's address, but I can't do that unless I upgrade the OS. These are a pair of routers running hsrp at a remote datacenter. Is sla the only way that I'm going to be able to accomplish this? I have tried track with different options in gns and all of them keep the CE's interface up and doesn't show it down. Watching a route in the table isn't feasible because I wouldn't want it to fail over because another site is having problems. Tracking the route doesn't work for connected routes either because the route itself doesn't leave the table as long as the interface is up.
we have connected gig interface Ethernet on Cisco 2900 series router to mpls link connected to our corporate network ,the issue here is our router interface speed and duplex settings are set to auto negotiation.The interface is negotiating speed and duplex at 10 and half where the provider side interface is hard coded to 100 and full duplex.when we tried to hard code the settings on our router to match the provider the interface never come up.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have a frustrating issue with a dynamic VPN head end running IOS 15.2 on 2900's. I have existing keyrings, and isakmp profiles (both main and agressive) running. When I add in a new peer, by adding in a keyring prechared statement and a match identity in the isakmp profile, phase 1 biulds but phase 2 only gets right to the end and the Cisco side resets the connection because it did not get back a response to it's Phase 2 proposal.I have tried a number of soft clear commands to remedy this (I do have 16 other production tunnels I do not want to take down) and no avail. This is very consistent. We had this happen last week in the same manner, and the TAC finally said I must reboot the system. So I removed the cmap from the interface, and reapplied it (using notepad to do it all at once). All the tunnels dropped, and after a few manual restarts on the far end for thos etunnels that are tempermental, all tunnels came back up, including my new add.I have a pair of 3900's running 15.1 code in the US that terminate the same tunnels, and I can add and remove PEERS all day long without resetting anything. Could there be a more polite way of resetting what ever it is that removing the CMAP does to allow my new peer to get the full treatment here?
crypto pki token default removal timeout 0
crypto keyring Site-to-Site
pre-shared-key address a.a.a.a key lkdshjfhjkdsfkjfsjkddedswdes
pre-shared-key address b.b.b.b key lkdshjfhjkdsfkjfsjkddedswdes
[Code] .....
I just negate this and re-add and new peers start working.
I have the below configurations done on a 2900 router. [code]I would like to know, if the IP address assigned to dialer1 interface "20.1.2.133" would be listed in "show arp" ?, as it failed to list on our router and I want to know if this is an expected behavior ?
Secondly, does self ping 20.1.2.133 (dialer interface IP) work ? [code]
Cisco 1900 , 2900 and 3900 have Interface Slots and Service Module Slots , My question is which type of card is support this slot.
View 6 Replies View RelatedI understand the vlans on the catalyst side of the house on 2900 to 6500 Catalyst switches.
This 7010 running nx-os 5.1(3) I did not setup, but have to manage it. Hasn't really been a proble till now.
My nexus 7010 has a Layer 2 only vlan 11. It is "Active" but the interface is "shutdown". Yet, it is passing traffic across the directly connected ports on the nexus 7010 and to other switches in my network. Vlan 11 is being set out via VTP to all my switches and things are running fine.
I need to create another L2 only Vlan. I can't seem to find any docs that indicate that a Layer2 vlan Interface on nx-os should be in "shutdown" mode as part of the setup. I do see in the docs where it has to be set "Active" as part of the process.
Is this the correct way to seutp a L2 only vlan on nex-os? Leave the interface in "shutdown" but make it "Active"?
Mystery Vlan 4 and 6
The mystery deepens. I have other L2 vlans ,Vlan4&6 that are NOT defined as "Interface Vlan4" in the nexus config, yet it is applied to GigE ports on the nexus and these Vlans 4/6is also being sent out VTP to all switches. Even weirder is that these vlans have names associated with the numbers. These are valid Vlans that were configured on the old 6509 before the Nexus was installed.
I have checked all switches, NONE are running in Server mode for VTP, all are in CLIENT. The nexus 7010 is the only device running in VTP Server mode.
If there is a router ISRG2 2900 with SEC license and without HSEC license, there is a limit in count of cumulative encrypted VPN tunnels of 225. Which commands can show us a number of current tunnels on the router, so we can see if we are near this limit of 225?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have a 10Mbps connection link which I will like to reduce to 5Mbps on a 6509 switch as indicated in the config below. [code] After applying the service policy on the vlan interface, i got this "match vlan is not supported for this interface". I actually tried the rate limit command but I cant see the effect using the speedtest.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI recently upgraded my 5520 to 9.0.1 IOS. Today I tried to apply a capture to my inside interface referencing a simple ACL and I get this error.
ERROR: Capture doesn't support access-list <capin> containing mixed policies
I also created a capture for the outside interface with a similar ACL and it worked just fine. I can't seem to find anything on the web that gives me a clue to resolving the error above.
Used to access the FTP server using "My computer" as some reason we cannot use the IE explorer to direct access...However, under the Windows 8 enviornment, it just prompt out "No Such Interface Supported" and cannot direct open the file... but only can copy/copy to folder etc...
View 1 Replies View Relatedmy office is looking in ordering a HWIC-1FE to supply our cisco 1841 router with a second ISP connection. i wanted to find out if this card support load balancing and fail over? not sure if fail over is the right terminology so ill explain, i need it so that if one ISP connection goes down (as it does often) it fails over to the second ISP.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have 1x Cisco 6509 with Sup2 and MSFC2 and it is running on IOS (c6k222-jk9sv-mz.122-17d.SXB11). I have following policy map :
Policy Map VOIP
Class IP PHONE
priority percent 75
and the following command on each interface: service-policy output VOIP those configuration are working fine on SUP2 with MSFC2 but last week I tried to upgrade the SUP2 to SUP32 on the switch and upgrade the IOS to the latest version (s3223-adventerprisek9-mz.122-33.SXJ4) but when I try to put service-policy output VOIP on each physical interface I am getting the following error:
"Priority command is not supported in output direction for this interface" and when I try to add service-policy output VOIP on a V LAN interface I am getting following error:
MQC features are not supported in output direction for this interface. Will I need to change something after upgrading to SUP32..
I am looking for a Cisco document that gives me the,IP through-put on 2901, 2911 and 2921 routers with Policy based routing applied.,IOS version 15.1.3TOther processes, EIGRP Stub, VLAN routing, SRST,MGCP gateway (analog and PRI).
View 1 Replies View Relatedi have 3 access-list configured IN | Out on my Border router (MARTIAN) ,i have to look which one block some of the traffic passing through ,for that matter i have enabled the below commands on my ISR 2900: with nothing output.
View 3 Replies View Relatedlatest IOS version is from 18Nov11 and with little amount of traffic it keeps cpu usage sky-high until it starts losing packets (I've tried performance fine tuning according to cisco webpages and saw little difference)
Downgrading isn't an option as 15.2.1 version doesn't implement everything I need...
Is GET VPN be a better choice than DMVPN in order to support VoIP, Video over IP, Advanced QoS and Multicast? I think it should be the better choice based on what is described as the benefits and how it works but I just want an expert opinion.
Can separate groups be created using the same key serves? I need to protect two functionally separate WAN segments that terminate on the same DC core routers. However I want the separate WAN segments to have different encryption policies. Is this possible?
It is stated in the deployment guide for GET VPN that "Network Address Translation (NAT) is not supported by GETVPN. NAT must be performed before encryption or after decryption when GET is used." However the NAT capability is required on all the routers.
The 2900 series routers has embedded hardware encryption but according to the router perfomance guide, with a mix of traffic such as NAT, QoS and IPSec VPN they are unable to provide 100 mbps of throughput. Does the new ISM VPN modules would allow the routers to achieve 100 mbps of throughput with the services mentioned above?
provide my some (official) info regarding the MBTF for the C2900 and C3900 routers (2911 and 3945)? This info is currently not part of the data sheets.
View 0 Replies View RelatedI want to know if the Cisco 2900 series can do UC without having to buy any other hardware.I read through the 2900 series datasheet, and i can understand it does.But will want to clarify if i do not need any other hardware except the Unified Communications License for Cisco 2901-295.Does this mean all i need to activate UC is buying this license?My organisation wants to do UC, especially Voice and Wireless.It requires APs, IP Phones(both wired and wireless).To achieve this on a 2900 series, is all i need just the UC license to work, and then my IP Phones both wired and wireless once plugged to the switch connected to the 2900 series starts working?Or do i still need to buy another hardware for the Unified communication Manager Express ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am having two sites, at one site the ISP is terminated on 2900 Router and at one site ISP is terminated on 3500 L3 Switch. Now need to configure the IP SLA on this. In the current setup I am having two 2900 routers at one location and 3500 L3 switches which by point to point link.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe will be getting a circuit from the same ISP at two of our sites and will be doing eBGP. Couple of notes. 1. We are fully aware of the risks associated with depending on a single ISP and have mitigated them as much as possible with the ISP. 2. We will be getting assistance on the eBGP setup from the ISP, so I’m not as concerned with that config at this point.
Site Summary
Site A:Cisco 2900 Series (RtrA) connected to single Ethernet based ISP circuit (ISP-1-A)eBGP will run between RtrA and ISP-1-A, default routes from provider onlyLayer 2 Switch (SwA) connected to LAN of RtrA and uplinks to SwB
Site B:Cisco 2900 Series (RtrB) connected to single Ethernet based ISP circuit (ISP-1-B)eBGP will run between RtrB and ISP-1-B, default routes from provider onlyLayer 2 Switch (SwB) connected to LAN of RtrB and uplinks to SwA
I need advise on the LAN side redundancy. Our goal is redundancy; load balancing is not a concern (If load balancing ever becomes a concern I will look at GLBP). We have several devices on the LAN side of the routers that can only use a single gateway. Given that I’ve surmised I need to use HSRP in some way for LAN gateway redundancy.
1. HSRP with Object Tracking, No IGP.HSRP handles LAN gateway failover if a router dies. Object tracking ensures LAN gateway failover if an interface fails or if an interface is up, but there is an upstream traffic issue. ie. track the physical WAN interface and use an IP SLA icmp to track a specific upstream IP incase of an upstream traffic issue.
2. HSRP with OSPFHSRP handles LAN gateway failover if a router dies. OSPF redistributes eBGP default routes to RtrA and RtrB so that each router should have a route to the ISP even if they loose their local ISP circuit. i.e if ISP-1-A on Router A goes down, Router A knows to send traffic out ISP-1-B via RtrB. In other words, traffic enters RtrA LAN, but exits on RtrB WAN.
3. HSRP with iBGP HSRP handles LAN gateway failover if a router dies. I have no experience with BGP, but assuming this would work similar to the OSPF solution above except for the required iBGP config and possible route reflectors?
I have a 2900 ISR that my VPN clients connect to using IPSEC over UDP. I am having periodic problems, especially with clients connecting through DSL, where they connect and immediately drop. Sometimes this is resolved by users updating their home router firmware. I'd like to issue a new client PCF file using IPSEC over TCP to see if that resolves the problems.
Can I have both running at once, and what do I need to add to the 2900 to enable this connectivty without breaking the existing clients? If the test is successful, I will migrate all users to the new configuration. This ISR is also used to support L2L connectivity for a handful of sites.
I try to setup a basic GTS shaping on a cisco ISR G2 2900
Cisco IOS Software, C2900 Software (C2900-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 15.2(4)M3, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
Cisco CISCO2901/K9 (revision 1.0) with 1957856K/40960K bytes of memory.
ipbase ipbasek9 Permanent ipbasek9
the policy-map was applied to a svi interface (vlan interface)
And my problem is the shape isn't effective, in my attempt the max bw is 20Mb and I have gigabit interface
I know this kind of setup is classic and I see it working on older ios version 12.x
config:
interface VlanX
ip address X X
no ip redirects
[code].....
We are in the process of switching to a new internet provider in our office and have run into some problems. Our old setup was with AT&T, where they provided a managed router which linked to our internal switch and also provided NAT to the internal IP of our email server.Our new setup right now is just the internet coming in through a cable connected to a switch, we were told we needed to provide our own router. Someone donated a Cisco 2900.What should our proper set-up be? Should the internet come in directly to the router and then to our switch, or should it go to the switch they provided, then the router, and then our switch?Also, there seems to be some confusion about whether or not we need anything else to get the internet to work. There are slots for network cards in the router. Does it come with at least one built in we can use, or do we need to provide one?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI've problem with IP SLA probes between two different routers.2900 (c2900-universalk9_npe-mz.SPA.151-4.M4.bin) here is set "ip sla responder" only and 2800 (c2800nm-advipservicesk9-mz.124-24.T2.bin) here is set two type of tests "udp-jitter" and "icmp-jitter" - temporary, used to check for availability of 2900 router.As a result, I've what udp-jitter doesn't work at the same time icmp-jitter test is OK.Here are the settings of IP SLA tests
ip sla 281
icmp-jitter 172.25.28.1 source-ip 192.168.28.6 num-packets 100
tos 128
frequency 120
ip sla schedule 281 life forever start-time after 00:05:45
[code]...
I have bought DRAM MEM-2900-2Gb for 2921, and received the following error...
Validation failed for DIMM0
*****System halted*****
%SPD info: DIMM0: Invalid DIMM type (only UDIMMs are supported)
I am looking to setup for BGP with the following conditions:
Client has two 2900 routers, each connecting to a seperate ISP
Client has a Sonic Firewall with a link to each router
Client owns their own /24 block of public IPs and has their own AS Number.
Client has a public /24 and /25 from the corresponding ISPs
Client has supplied the following routing rules they would like to use:
-Anything from their own public subnet should advertize via the two ISP's with best path selection
-Anything from the respective ISP public subnets should use only their link (The ISP's are not auth'd to advertize the other's network)
The two routers are directly connected to eachother and each has a link going to the Sonicwall.
I have DSL 8Mbps DL and 768kbps UL The setup look like this:Internet -> Modem -> Cisco Router -> Firewall -> Switch Core - > Multiple switches like sfe2000p? CiscoRouter: i use port gig0/1 for PPPoE and i use port gig0/2 for LAN static Router port gig0/2 with 122.54.144.153/29 connected directly to Firewall port13 with 122.54.144.154/29 ?i want 122.54.144.153/29 will my default gateway ? include no limit bandwidth,filter etc at router, Firewall will be DHCP Server and control the bandwidth, filtering etc and the client computer should get 8Mbps
Mode: Routing
Encapsulation: PPPoE
Username: xx
Password: xx
Service Name: ISP name
[code]....
I have this small network comprising of around 40 users complaining about the poor speed. And they have 2900 WAN router having 10M service. The interesting thing is that they are using proxy server for all the communication.I am very new to the server side of thing-and wanted to confirm if the proxy server is packed full to its capacity for serving to clients' requests making it slow or its something to do on the network like WAN link being overloaded or showing errors.I did "sh interface g0/1" (WAN interface) and to me it looks there is not much load as the tx and rxload values are fairly ok. (as shown below). Moreover the output drops is 7341. I am still guessing if thats not too bad??
The other thing I did was to test the "sh ip nat transalations" which is all coming from the PRoxy server and was wondering if that is the place of bottleneck. Currently there were showing around 570 entries. Below are the output from there as well. Also, I was keen to know what is the "----" indicates in some of th output? [code]
I want to configurate Cisco SSL AnyConnect VPN on cisco router 2900 series.when i install this license on router after that can i configurate ssl anyconnect vpn? Must I be first enable EULA then install this license?
View 0 Replies View Related