I am looking for a Cisco document that gives me the,IP through-put on 2901, 2911 and 2921 routers with Policy based routing applied.,IOS version 15.1.3TOther processes, EIGRP Stub, VLAN routing, SRST,MGCP gateway (analog and PRI).
View 1 Replies
is there any CEoIP modules (Such as NM-CEM-4TE1) for the 2900/3900 series routers?
View 2 Replies View Relatedwhat is the maximum number of Lan-to-Lan and user vpns supported in the ISR G2 2911 and 2921?
View 5 Replies View Relatedany place I can find how many tunes does the cisco 2900 series made? site to site?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a brand new 2901 and I'm trying to work out what licence features I have. The output of show licence shows I have ipbasek9 feature and datak9 as EvalRightToUse feature. Is BGP included in the base feature? What will happen when the datak9 evaluation period expires?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI need to do password recovery for a 2911 router. But ı can't find any documentation about it. I can be able to login at the first login, unfortunately ı logged out without changing the password. Now I can not log in and I can not open rommon with the ctrl+break key sequence.
View 6 Replies View RelatedI have added 2900 series devices in LMS3.2.1 but same are showing "unknown"device Type in a report generated from common services DC R device List.
Both are snip enabled and responding too. What is the reason behind unknown device type so those are not reflecting in any module.
36.N007010101CRRUNKNOWN37.N007010103CRRCisco 2921 Integrated Services Router38.N007010201ASRUNKNOWN
I know we can use copy & Paste, my questions are:
1. Before that, do I need to wipe out the existing confi on the brand new switch?
2. About using TFTP, how does this new switch connects to the TFTP? Does it mean I have to assign a real IP and put it on our network?
We need to implement VLANs on my company's network. I have 3750 L3 swtich, ive setup 3 vlans for testing. ive setup SVI everything.now how do I connect it to 3com that will also use VLANs. should I set trunk port of cisco and 3com? or no need?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am facing a very big problem with site to site vpn on cisco 2900 ios.i configured the vpn and when i ping from router itself to destination ip with source as lan interface , VPN works, no problem.but when i connect any computer directly to router's lan interface to initiate traffic , it doesnot work at all. and on computer's lan i see yeloow sign.
mtu is 1500, speed is auto (i tried chaging also) , duplex is auto ( i tried changing also) , thoguh firewall on pc should not affect but still i disabled it.since their is no problem with vpn config as vpn comes up when i initiate ping from router itself but i dont know why it is not working from lan.do we need any inspect icmp on this router also ? or any policy modification to pass traffic across the interfac on router is required ?
i was useinf c2900k9-15.0(M4).bin and i upgraded it to 15.3 which is lated to get reed of any bug .lastly , i connected two laptops directly to router's gi0/0, g0/1 interface to ping from one laptop to another but this also did not work.
If there is a router ISRG2 2900 with SEC license and without HSEC license, there is a limit in count of cumulative encrypted VPN tunnels of 225. Which commands can show us a number of current tunnels on the router, so we can see if we are near this limit of 225?
View 4 Replies View RelatedCan Controller 4400 series work with Aironet 3600 series?
View 5 Replies View Relatedwhy I can't use cisco ehwic-3g-hspa-u card in cisco 2800 series and 1841 series router?documentation said that it should work with that devices but when I installed it, it doesn't work even as device i can't see I am using cisco latest ios advance ent. 15.1(4)M4?
View 3 Replies View RelatedWhat's the main technical differences among the 1140 AP series and the 1260 AP series?I know that the 1260 supports external antennas while the 1140 supports internal antennas, but apart from that, is there any other important difference ?
View 10 Replies View RelatedMy Draytek 2710 just dies after 2 years so I was looking for something a little more reliable and noticed the spec of the SRP527W-U.I take it with only one antenna and reading a couple of past discussions, the wireless will only manage n-lite as some people call it i.e. 150Mbps, and not the full 300? Oh, and are the ports still only 100M and not Gig?I know the 547 would tick both these boxes but we are talking twice the price. How does the quality and logevity of the SRP500 series compare to the RV series (which would need an adsl modem) or the Linksys boxes?
View 1 Replies View RelatedDoes AIR-CT2504-25-K9 spupports AIR-LAP1262N-E-K9 Access Point? How can I check this?
View 1 Replies View Relatedi have 3 access-list configured IN | Out on my Border router (MARTIAN) ,i have to look which one block some of the traffic passing through ,for that matter i have enabled the below commands on my ISR 2900: with nothing output.
View 3 Replies View Relatedlatest IOS version is from 18Nov11 and with little amount of traffic it keeps cpu usage sky-high until it starts losing packets (I've tried performance fine tuning according to cisco webpages and saw little difference)
Downgrading isn't an option as 15.2.1 version doesn't implement everything I need...
Is GET VPN be a better choice than DMVPN in order to support VoIP, Video over IP, Advanced QoS and Multicast? I think it should be the better choice based on what is described as the benefits and how it works but I just want an expert opinion.
Can separate groups be created using the same key serves? I need to protect two functionally separate WAN segments that terminate on the same DC core routers. However I want the separate WAN segments to have different encryption policies. Is this possible?
It is stated in the deployment guide for GET VPN that "Network Address Translation (NAT) is not supported by GETVPN. NAT must be performed before encryption or after decryption when GET is used." However the NAT capability is required on all the routers.
The 2900 series routers has embedded hardware encryption but according to the router perfomance guide, with a mix of traffic such as NAT, QoS and IPSec VPN they are unable to provide 100 mbps of throughput. Does the new ISM VPN modules would allow the routers to achieve 100 mbps of throughput with the services mentioned above?
I have not done much with business routers, but we have a 1700 series with a WAN WIC-1ENET card with a RJ45 connection. We had a T1 line and will be moving to ehternet. We are going to be moving to a 20MB line, and i just wanted to make sure I have the right connections before installing. We also have a T1 line in another loaton and would be moving to this same 2811 router there as well.We would also like to copy over the configuration from 1700 series router to the 2811 router. Would it be easier to do it by hyper-terminal? Also if we keep the 1700 routers are they capable of using layer-3?
View 2 Replies View Relatedprovide my some (official) info regarding the MBTF for the C2900 and C3900 routers (2911 and 3945)? This info is currently not part of the data sheets.
View 0 Replies View RelatedI want to know if the Cisco 2900 series can do UC without having to buy any other hardware.I read through the 2900 series datasheet, and i can understand it does.But will want to clarify if i do not need any other hardware except the Unified Communications License for Cisco 2901-295.Does this mean all i need to activate UC is buying this license?My organisation wants to do UC, especially Voice and Wireless.It requires APs, IP Phones(both wired and wireless).To achieve this on a 2900 series, is all i need just the UC license to work, and then my IP Phones both wired and wireless once plugged to the switch connected to the 2900 series starts working?Or do i still need to buy another hardware for the Unified communication Manager Express ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am having two sites, at one site the ISP is terminated on 2900 Router and at one site ISP is terminated on 3500 L3 Switch. Now need to configure the IP SLA on this. In the current setup I am having two 2900 routers at one location and 3500 L3 switches which by point to point link.
View 1 Replies View RelatedService policy output command is not supporting on Vlan interface of Cisco 2900 Router.I am having one HWic 4ESW Card and configured VLAN interface. But Service policy output command is not supporting.Same config is supporting in the Cisco 2800 Router.
View 13 Replies View RelatedWe will be getting a circuit from the same ISP at two of our sites and will be doing eBGP. Couple of notes. 1. We are fully aware of the risks associated with depending on a single ISP and have mitigated them as much as possible with the ISP. 2. We will be getting assistance on the eBGP setup from the ISP, so I’m not as concerned with that config at this point.
Site Summary
Site A:Cisco 2900 Series (RtrA) connected to single Ethernet based ISP circuit (ISP-1-A)eBGP will run between RtrA and ISP-1-A, default routes from provider onlyLayer 2 Switch (SwA) connected to LAN of RtrA and uplinks to SwB
Site B:Cisco 2900 Series (RtrB) connected to single Ethernet based ISP circuit (ISP-1-B)eBGP will run between RtrB and ISP-1-B, default routes from provider onlyLayer 2 Switch (SwB) connected to LAN of RtrB and uplinks to SwA
I need advise on the LAN side redundancy. Our goal is redundancy; load balancing is not a concern (If load balancing ever becomes a concern I will look at GLBP). We have several devices on the LAN side of the routers that can only use a single gateway. Given that I’ve surmised I need to use HSRP in some way for LAN gateway redundancy.
1. HSRP with Object Tracking, No IGP.HSRP handles LAN gateway failover if a router dies. Object tracking ensures LAN gateway failover if an interface fails or if an interface is up, but there is an upstream traffic issue. ie. track the physical WAN interface and use an IP SLA icmp to track a specific upstream IP incase of an upstream traffic issue.
2. HSRP with OSPFHSRP handles LAN gateway failover if a router dies. OSPF redistributes eBGP default routes to RtrA and RtrB so that each router should have a route to the ISP even if they loose their local ISP circuit. i.e if ISP-1-A on Router A goes down, Router A knows to send traffic out ISP-1-B via RtrB. In other words, traffic enters RtrA LAN, but exits on RtrB WAN.
3. HSRP with iBGP HSRP handles LAN gateway failover if a router dies. I have no experience with BGP, but assuming this would work similar to the OSPF solution above except for the required iBGP config and possible route reflectors?
I have a 2900 ISR that my VPN clients connect to using IPSEC over UDP. I am having periodic problems, especially with clients connecting through DSL, where they connect and immediately drop. Sometimes this is resolved by users updating their home router firmware. I'd like to issue a new client PCF file using IPSEC over TCP to see if that resolves the problems.
Can I have both running at once, and what do I need to add to the 2900 to enable this connectivty without breaking the existing clients? If the test is successful, I will migrate all users to the new configuration. This ISR is also used to support L2L connectivity for a handful of sites.
I try to setup a basic GTS shaping on a cisco ISR G2 2900
Cisco IOS Software, C2900 Software (C2900-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 15.2(4)M3, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
Cisco CISCO2901/K9 (revision 1.0) with 1957856K/40960K bytes of memory.
ipbase ipbasek9 Permanent ipbasek9
the policy-map was applied to a svi interface (vlan interface)
And my problem is the shape isn't effective, in my attempt the max bw is 20Mb and I have gigabit interface
I know this kind of setup is classic and I see it working on older ios version 12.x
config:
interface VlanX
ip address X X
no ip redirects
[code].....
We are in the process of switching to a new internet provider in our office and have run into some problems. Our old setup was with AT&T, where they provided a managed router which linked to our internal switch and also provided NAT to the internal IP of our email server.Our new setup right now is just the internet coming in through a cable connected to a switch, we were told we needed to provide our own router. Someone donated a Cisco 2900.What should our proper set-up be? Should the internet come in directly to the router and then to our switch, or should it go to the switch they provided, then the router, and then our switch?Also, there seems to be some confusion about whether or not we need anything else to get the internet to work. There are slots for network cards in the router. Does it come with at least one built in we can use, or do we need to provide one?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI've problem with IP SLA probes between two different routers.2900 (c2900-universalk9_npe-mz.SPA.151-4.M4.bin) here is set "ip sla responder" only and 2800 (c2800nm-advipservicesk9-mz.124-24.T2.bin) here is set two type of tests "udp-jitter" and "icmp-jitter" - temporary, used to check for availability of 2900 router.As a result, I've what udp-jitter doesn't work at the same time icmp-jitter test is OK.Here are the settings of IP SLA tests
ip sla 281
icmp-jitter 172.25.28.1 source-ip 192.168.28.6 num-packets 100
tos 128
frequency 120
ip sla schedule 281 life forever start-time after 00:05:45
[code]...
I have bought DRAM MEM-2900-2Gb for 2921, and received the following error...
Validation failed for DIMM0
*****System halted*****
%SPD info: DIMM0: Invalid DIMM type (only UDIMMs are supported)
I am looking to setup for BGP with the following conditions:
Client has two 2900 routers, each connecting to a seperate ISP
Client has a Sonic Firewall with a link to each router
Client owns their own /24 block of public IPs and has their own AS Number.
Client has a public /24 and /25 from the corresponding ISPs
Client has supplied the following routing rules they would like to use:
-Anything from their own public subnet should advertize via the two ISP's with best path selection
-Anything from the respective ISP public subnets should use only their link (The ISP's are not auth'd to advertize the other's network)
The two routers are directly connected to eachother and each has a link going to the Sonicwall.
I have DSL 8Mbps DL and 768kbps UL The setup look like this:Internet -> Modem -> Cisco Router -> Firewall -> Switch Core - > Multiple switches like sfe2000p? CiscoRouter: i use port gig0/1 for PPPoE and i use port gig0/2 for LAN static Router port gig0/2 with 122.54.144.153/29 connected directly to Firewall port13 with 122.54.144.154/29 ?i want 122.54.144.153/29 will my default gateway ? include no limit bandwidth,filter etc at router, Firewall will be DHCP Server and control the bandwidth, filtering etc and the client computer should get 8Mbps
Mode: Routing
Encapsulation: PPPoE
Username: xx
Password: xx
Service Name: ISP name
[code]....
I have this small network comprising of around 40 users complaining about the poor speed. And they have 2900 WAN router having 10M service. The interesting thing is that they are using proxy server for all the communication.I am very new to the server side of thing-and wanted to confirm if the proxy server is packed full to its capacity for serving to clients' requests making it slow or its something to do on the network like WAN link being overloaded or showing errors.I did "sh interface g0/1" (WAN interface) and to me it looks there is not much load as the tx and rxload values are fairly ok. (as shown below). Moreover the output drops is 7341. I am still guessing if thats not too bad??
The other thing I did was to test the "sh ip nat transalations" which is all coming from the PRoxy server and was wondering if that is the place of bottleneck. Currently there were showing around 570 entries. Below are the output from there as well. Also, I was keen to know what is the "----" indicates in some of th output? [code]
